Re: [LinuxBIOS] Intel refactoring and microcode updates

2008-01-11 Thread Uwe Hermann
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 04:34:39AM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote: On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 09:34:28PM -0500, Corey Osgood wrote: How many different cores could you put in even the most popular socket, three? LGA775 currently has 19 (and may have more I don't know about). Using some rough

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Intel refactoring and microcode updates

2008-01-11 Thread Uwe Hermann
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 09:36:20PM -0500, Corey Osgood wrote: Both patches Signed-off-by: Corey Osgood [EMAIL PROTECTED] I checked that this doesn't break abuild, so far so good. On which hardware has this been tested so far? I'm reluctant to commit this without some broader testing on actual

Re: [LinuxBIOS] m57sli : debugging the flashrom problem when booting with LB

2008-01-11 Thread Florentin Demetrescu
Okay I will check this with my oscilloscope.. The most difficult would be to identify the LPC signals on the IT8716 chip, given that the package really installed onto the board doesn't match the publically available datasheet.. But with some effort this can be done.. I hope to be able to give some

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] v3: add a check for a termination member

2008-01-11 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080111 03:07]: Hopefully that's the worst case. Still horrible if we use 1 MByte ROMs - 5 seconds for reading the whole ROM is unacceptable. We will have to bear with that if we plan to check the rom checksum at some point. This feature should

Re: [LinuxBIOS] LinuxBIOSv3 Config files

2008-01-11 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* Myles Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080111 05:00]: On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 12:18:14PM -0700, Jordan Crouse wrote: it really should be a feature that kconfig offers. It's make defconfig in Linux. Make defconfig ignores your .config file. What I wanted was something similar to make

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Intel refactoring and microcode updates

2008-01-11 Thread joe
Quoting Corey Osgood [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: On 11.01.2008 02:33, Corey Osgood wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting Corey Osgood [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Do you mean the microcode files? If so, the microcode update looks like this: Header Update Revision Date

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Intel refactoring and microcode updates

2008-01-11 Thread Peter Stuge
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 09:42:00AM -0500, Corey Osgood wrote: Peter Stuge wrote: I think we need to make it configurable. I don't like that. With a factory bios, you expect the correct microcode update for your CPU to be present, no matter what CPU you put in a socket. (Actually no, not

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Intel refactoring and microcode updates

2008-01-11 Thread Corey Osgood
Peter Stuge wrote: On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 09:34:28PM -0500, Corey Osgood wrote: How many different cores could you put in even the most popular socket, three? LGA775 currently has 19 (and may have more I don't know about). Using some rough math, I get a rounded-down size of 186KB

Re: [LinuxBIOS] LinuxBIOSv3 Config files

2008-01-11 Thread Uwe Hermann
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:48:36PM +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote: * Myles Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080111 05:00]: On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 12:18:14PM -0700, Jordan Crouse wrote: it really should be a feature that kconfig offers. It's make defconfig in Linux. Make defconfig

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Intel refactoring and microcode updates

2008-01-11 Thread Uwe Hermann
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 03:54:18PM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote: On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 09:42:00AM -0500, Corey Osgood wrote: Peter Stuge wrote: I think we need to make it configurable. I don't like that. With a factory bios, you expect the correct microcode update for your CPU to be

Re: [LinuxBIOS] LinuxBIOSv3 Config files

2008-01-11 Thread ron minnich
On Jan 11, 2008 7:31 AM, Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you want yes for all unspecified options: make oldconfig /usr/bin/yes Now, Uwe, we just came full circle. I said something like that a few messages ago and Jordan yelled at me :-) ron -- linuxbios mailing list

Re: [LinuxBIOS] LinuxBIOSv3 Config files

2008-01-11 Thread Ed Swierk
On 1/11/08, Peter Stuge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Linux make help does not seem to have a target that combines oldconfig and defconfig in the desired way. :\ FWIW, Red Hat patches the kernel to achieve this: # This patch adds a make nonint_oldconfig which is non-interactive and # also gives a

Re: [LinuxBIOS] LinuxBIOSv3 Config files

2008-01-11 Thread Jordan Crouse
On 11/01/08 08:40 -0800, Ed Swierk wrote: On 1/11/08, Peter Stuge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Linux make help does not seem to have a target that combines oldconfig and defconfig in the desired way. :\ FWIW, Red Hat patches the kernel to achieve this: # This patch adds a make

Re: [LinuxBIOS] LinuxBIOSv3 Config files

2008-01-11 Thread Uwe Hermann
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 07:59:17AM -0800, ron minnich wrote: On Jan 11, 2008 7:31 AM, Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you want yes for all unspecified options: make oldconfig /usr/bin/yes Now, Uwe, we just came full circle. I said something like that a few messages ago and

Re: [LinuxBIOS] LinuxBIOSv3 Config files

2008-01-11 Thread Stefan Reinauer
Peter Stuge wrote: On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 07:59:17AM -0800, ron minnich wrote: If you want yes for all unspecified options: make oldconfig /usr/bin/yes Now, Uwe, we just came full circle. I said something like that a few messages ago and Jordan yelled at me :-) So will

[LinuxBIOS] r90 - in buildrom-devel: . config/platforms packages/linuxbios packages/linuxbios/conf.v3

2008-01-11 Thread svn
Author: jcrouse Date: 2008-01-11 18:38:23 +0100 (Fri, 11 Jan 2008) New Revision: 90 Modified: buildrom-devel/Config.in buildrom-devel/Makefile buildrom-devel/config/platforms/Config.in buildrom-devel/config/platforms/alix1c.conf buildrom-devel/config/platforms/db800.conf

[LinuxBIOS] r90 - in buildrom-devel: . config/platforms packages/linuxbios packages/linuxbios/conf.v3

2008-01-11 Thread svn
Author: jcrouse Date: 2008-01-11 18:38:23 +0100 (Fri, 11 Jan 2008) New Revision: 90 Modified: buildrom-devel/Config.in buildrom-devel/Makefile buildrom-devel/config/platforms/Config.in buildrom-devel/config/platforms/alix1c.conf buildrom-devel/config/platforms/db800.conf

Re: [LinuxBIOS] PATCH: lx car that returns from disable_car

2008-01-11 Thread Marc Jones
ron minnich wrote: Marc, here are the register dumps. As a reminder, we seem to have no memory above 1M. It looks like stage2 has problems. The MSRs are not setup beyond what stage1 did to allow stage2 to run. Specificly, geodelx_pci_domain_phase2() is not running. Can you send your

Re: [LinuxBIOS] r3046 - trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/targets

2008-01-11 Thread Corey Osgood
Myles Watson wrote: Author: jcrouse Date: 2008-01-11 19:23:47 +0100 (Fri, 11 Jan 2008) New Revision: 3046 Modified: trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/targets/buildtarget Log: Add the ability to extend CFLAGS as needed for several new distros Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [LinuxBIOS] AMD SimNOW question

2008-01-11 Thread ron minnich
In the TARGET file, you can put something like this: option ROM_SIZE=1024*1024 that gets you 1M ron -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios

[LinuxBIOS] r92 - buildrom-devel/packages/linuxbios

2008-01-11 Thread svn
Author: jcrouse Date: 2008-01-11 20:17:38 +0100 (Fri, 11 Jan 2008) New Revision: 92 Removed: buildrom-devel/packages/linuxbios/CL2.5.patch Log: Remove a OLPC refugee that I must have missed. Trivial. Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Deleted:

[LinuxBIOS] r3046 build service

2008-01-11 Thread LinuxBIOS information
Dear LinuxBIOS readers! This is the automated build check service of LinuxBIOS. The developer jcrouse checked in revision 3046 to the LinuxBIOS source repository and caused the following changes: Change Log: Add the ability to extend CFLAGS as needed for several new distros Signed-off-by:

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Patch file for ld/fedora 8 issue as promised...

2008-01-11 Thread Marc Karasek
Is this patch good to go as is? Or should I pull out the id.lds section for now? /* Marc Karasek MTS Sun Microsystems mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ph:770.360.6415 */ Myles Watson wrote: On Jan 8, 2008 3:41 PM, Marc Karasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So

Re: [LinuxBIOS] AMD SimNOW question

2008-01-11 Thread Marc Karasek
I have managed to cobble together a build structure that tries to build. It gets to the point of building the linuxbios image and it chokes because the image is to large for the romsize. Can someone shed some light on what Config.lb should be set to to get this to compile. The payload

Re: [LinuxBIOS] LinuxBIOSv3 Config files

2008-01-11 Thread Peter Stuge
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 07:59:17AM -0800, ron minnich wrote: If you want yes for all unspecified options: make oldconfig /usr/bin/yes Now, Uwe, we just came full circle. I said something like that a few messages ago and Jordan yelled at me :-) So will oldconfig read from stdin also for

Re: [LinuxBIOS] r90 - in buildrom-devel: . config/platformspackages/linuxbios packages/linuxbios/conf.v3

2008-01-11 Thread Myles Watson
AHHH!! That completely slipped my mind. I'm so sorry. No problem. It happens. Myles -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios

Re: [LinuxBIOS] r90 - in buildrom-devel: . config/platformspackages/linuxbios packages/linuxbios/conf.v3

2008-01-11 Thread Jordan Crouse
On 11/01/08 11:24 -0700, Myles Watson wrote: Signed-off-by: Myles Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Jordan Crouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] The rest is in r91. AHHH!! That completely slipped my mind. I'm so sorry. Jordan -- Jordan Crouse Systems Software Development Engineer Advanced

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Expand linuxbiosv3 support

2008-01-11 Thread Jordan Crouse
On 08/01/08 14:20 -0700, Myles Watson wrote: This patch is Jordan's buildrom patch with a few additions, so I'm including his original message: [BUILDROM] Expand linuxbiosv3 support Add more generic support for LinuxBIOSv3 - add specialized package for v3, and add support for using LAR to

Re: [LinuxBIOS] r90 - in buildrom-devel: . config/platformspackages/linuxbios packages/linuxbios/conf.v3

2008-01-11 Thread Myles Watson
Signed-off-by: Myles Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Jordan Crouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] The rest is in r91. Thanks, Myles -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios

[LinuxBIOS] r3046 - trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/targets

2008-01-11 Thread svn
Author: jcrouse Date: 2008-01-11 19:23:47 +0100 (Fri, 11 Jan 2008) New Revision: 3046 Modified: trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/targets/buildtarget Log: Add the ability to extend CFLAGS as needed for several new distros Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Peter Stuge [EMAIL

[LinuxBIOS] r91 - in buildrom-devel: . packages packages/linuxbios packages/linuxbiosv3 packages/linuxbiosv3/conf packages/roms

2008-01-11 Thread svn
Author: myles Date: 2008-01-11 19:22:53 +0100 (Fri, 11 Jan 2008) New Revision: 91 Added: buildrom-devel/packages/linuxbiosv3/ buildrom-devel/packages/linuxbiosv3/conf/ buildrom-devel/packages/linuxbiosv3/conf/qemu-i386-defconfig buildrom-devel/packages/linuxbiosv3/linuxbiosv3.mk

[LinuxBIOS] r91 - in buildrom-devel: . packages packages/linuxbios packages/linuxbiosv3 packages/linuxbiosv3/conf packages/roms

2008-01-11 Thread svn
Author: myles Date: 2008-01-11 19:22:53 +0100 (Fri, 11 Jan 2008) New Revision: 91 Added: buildrom-devel/packages/linuxbiosv3/ buildrom-devel/packages/linuxbiosv3/conf/ buildrom-devel/packages/linuxbiosv3/conf/qemu-i386-defconfig buildrom-devel/packages/linuxbiosv3/linuxbiosv3.mk

Re: [LinuxBIOS] LinuxBIOSv3 Config files

2008-01-11 Thread Peter Stuge
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 06:13:31PM +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote: So will oldconfig read from stdin also for options specified in .config ? If so, this is still no the winner. nope. oldconfig only asks options not available in .config Then this should work: while :;do echo;done|make oldconfig

[LinuxBIOS] r94 - buildrom-devel/packages/linuxbios

2008-01-11 Thread svn
Author: ward Date: 2008-01-11 21:46:46 +0100 (Fri, 11 Jan 2008) New Revision: 94 Modified: buildrom-devel/packages/linuxbios/norwich-linuxbios.mk Log: This spurious echo sneaked in in r90 but breaks the build for the norwich board. This is a trivial patch. Signed-off-by: Ward Vandewege

[LinuxBIOS] r94 - buildrom-devel/packages/linuxbios

2008-01-11 Thread svn
Author: ward Date: 2008-01-11 21:46:46 +0100 (Fri, 11 Jan 2008) New Revision: 94 Modified: buildrom-devel/packages/linuxbios/norwich-linuxbios.mk Log: This spurious echo sneaked in in r90 but breaks the build for the norwich board. This is a trivial patch. Signed-off-by: Ward Vandewege

Re: [LinuxBIOS] r3021 build service

2008-01-11 Thread Myles Watson
Here's my attempt at fixing abuild for serengeti_cheetah_fam10. It's pretty trivial, since I'm just using the ROM_IMAGE_SIZE in Config.lb and putting it in Config-abuild.lb. When I reduce this size (past what it is in Config-abuild.lb), it gives me the same overlap error in my system that abuild

Re: [LinuxBIOS] INIT detected.

2008-01-11 Thread Marc Jones
Steve Isaacs wrote: Is this message normal or does it indicate a problem that needs to be corrected? INIT detected from {APICID = 00 NODEID = 00 COREID = 00} --- Issuing SOFT_RESET... Looking at the code this is emitted in model_fxx/init_cpus.c when cpu_init_detectedx is

[LinuxBIOS] r92 - buildrom-devel/packages/linuxbios

2008-01-11 Thread svn
Author: jcrouse Date: 2008-01-11 20:17:38 +0100 (Fri, 11 Jan 2008) New Revision: 92 Removed: buildrom-devel/packages/linuxbios/CL2.5.patch Log: Remove a OLPC refugee that I must have missed. Trivial. Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Deleted:

[LinuxBIOS] r93 - buildrom-devel/packages/busybox/conf

2008-01-11 Thread svn
Author: myles Date: 2008-01-11 21:02:53 +0100 (Fri, 11 Jan 2008) New Revision: 93 Added: buildrom-devel/packages/busybox/conf/defconfig-serengeti_cheetah-x86_64 Log: Sorry I missed this file in an earlier commit. Signed-off-by: Myles Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Myles Watson [EMAIL

Re: [LinuxBIOS] r3046 - trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/targets

2008-01-11 Thread Myles Watson
Author: jcrouse Date: 2008-01-11 19:23:47 +0100 (Fri, 11 Jan 2008) New Revision: 3046 Modified: trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/targets/buildtarget Log: Add the ability to extend CFLAGS as needed for several new distros Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Peter Stuge

[LinuxBIOS] r3046 - trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/targets

2008-01-11 Thread svn
Author: jcrouse Date: 2008-01-11 19:23:47 +0100 (Fri, 11 Jan 2008) New Revision: 3046 Modified: trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/targets/buildtarget Log: Add the ability to extend CFLAGS as needed for several new distros Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Peter Stuge [EMAIL

[LinuxBIOS] INIT detected.

2008-01-11 Thread Steve Isaacs
Is this message normal or does it indicate a problem that needs to be corrected? INIT detected from {APICID = 00 NODEID = 00 COREID = 00} --- Issuing SOFT_RESET... Looking at the code this is emitted in model_fxx/init_cpus.c when cpu_init_detectedx is non-zero. Thanks, Steve --

Re: [LinuxBIOS] AMD SimNOW question

2008-01-11 Thread Myles Watson
There are a couple of ways, which you can find here: http://linuxbios.org/AMD_SimNow if you want it to go to a file, instead of cat /home/myles/.simnow/com1/simnow_out try cat /home/myles/.simnow/com1/simnow_out myfile.log otherwise, if you're using snserial there is some option to do

[LinuxBIOS] [BUILDROM] Consolidate all the geode Linuxbios targets

2008-01-11 Thread Jordan Crouse
I'm about to introduce some new code, but first, this is some cleanup of the linuxbios/ directory - all the geode targets were the same, so I consolidated them. Jordan -- Jordan Crouse Systems Software Development Engineer Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [BUILDROM] Consolidate all the geode

Re: [LinuxBIOS] AMD SimNOW question

2008-01-11 Thread Marc Karasek
No the serial port output looks ok. It is the vga ouput I need to capture. The kernel as loader is crashing... /* Marc Karasek MTS Sun Microsystems mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ph:770.360.6415 */ Myles Watson wrote: There are a couple of ways, which you

Re: [LinuxBIOS] AMD SimNOW question

2008-01-11 Thread Jordan Crouse
On 11/01/08 14:44 -0700, Myles Watson wrote: There are a couple of ways, which you can find here: http://linuxbios.org/AMD_SimNow if you want it to go to a file, instead of cat /home/myles/.simnow/com1/simnow_out try cat /home/myles/.simnow/com1/simnow_out myfile.log

Re: [LinuxBIOS] r3046 - trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/targets

2008-01-11 Thread Myles Watson
-Original Message- From: Corey Osgood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 12:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: 'Jordan Crouse'; linuxbios@linuxbios.org Subject: Re: [LinuxBIOS] r3046 - trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/targets Myles Watson wrote: Author: jcrouse Date:

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Consolidate all the geode Linuxbios targets

2008-01-11 Thread Jordan Crouse
On 11/01/08 14:56 -0700, Jordan Crouse wrote: I'm about to introduce some new code, but first, this is some cleanup of the linuxbios/ directory - all the geode targets were the same, so I consolidated them. As an aside, I tried all the Geode targets to make sure they work, and it looks like

Re: [LinuxBIOS] r3046 - trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/targets

2008-01-11 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
On 11.01.2008 20:41, Myles Watson wrote: -Original Message- From: Corey Osgood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 12:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: 'Jordan Crouse'; linuxbios@linuxbios.org Subject: Re: [LinuxBIOS] r3046 - trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/targets Myles

Re: [LinuxBIOS] INIT detected.

2008-01-11 Thread Steve Isaacs
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 13:57 -0700, Marc Jones wrote: This could indicate a real problem. It means that the core was unexpectedly reset at some point. This is checked in cache_as_ram.inc. Look for /* check if cpu_init_detected */. Yes, as it turns out this is a real problem. The

Re: [LinuxBIOS] AMD SimNOW question

2008-01-11 Thread Marc Karasek
Is there anyway under SimNow to send the console output to a log file. I have linuxbios up and running :-) but the Linux kernel I have as a boot loader is crashing.. I have tried to stop it at the point when it starts dmping the same message to the screen but it is nearly impossible to time

Re: [LinuxBIOS] AMD SimNOW question

2008-01-11 Thread Myles Watson
Sorry I misunderstood. I still recommend the same thing, only tell the Linux kernel to use the serial port as the console, console=ttyS0,115200 You don't want to try to capture the actual VGA probably. Good luck, Myles -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

[LinuxBIOS] r93 - buildrom-devel/packages/busybox/conf

2008-01-11 Thread svn
Author: myles Date: 2008-01-11 21:02:53 +0100 (Fri, 11 Jan 2008) New Revision: 93 Added: buildrom-devel/packages/busybox/conf/defconfig-serengeti_cheetah-x86_64 Log: Sorry I missed this file in an earlier commit. Signed-off-by: Myles Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Myles Watson [EMAIL

Re: [LinuxBIOS] r3021 build service

2008-01-11 Thread ron minnich
On Jan 11, 2008 2:07 PM, Marc Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I made a very sexy picture of what a failover coreboot v2 image looks like and what ROM_IMAGE_SIZE and other variables are. http://www.coreboot.org/Anatomy_of_a_Failover_LinuxBIOSv2_Image I think we should make you Chairman of the

Re: [LinuxBIOS] r3021 build service

2008-01-11 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
On 11.01.2008 23:07, Marc Jones wrote: I made a very sexy picture of what a failover coreboot v2 image looks like and what ROM_IMAGE_SIZE and other variables are. http://www.coreboot.org/Anatomy_of_a_Failover_LinuxBIOSv2_Image Great, thanks! One of the things I'd always wanted to have an

Re: [LinuxBIOS] r3021 build service

2008-01-11 Thread Marc Jones
Marc Jones wrote: Myles Watson wrote: Here's my attempt at fixing abuild for serengeti_cheetah_fam10. It's pretty trivial, since I'm just using the ROM_IMAGE_SIZE in Config.lb and putting it in Config-abuild.lb. When I reduce this size (past what it is in Config-abuild.lb), it gives me

[LinuxBIOS] AMD SimNOW (program) fails to run

2008-01-11 Thread Andon Tschauschev
Hello, I want to use SimNow 4.4.2, but it fails to run. OS is openSUSE 10.3 x86_64, 1GB RAM, Kernel version: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ uname -a Linux freezer 2.6.22.13-0.3-default #1 SMP 2007/11/19 15:02:58 UTC x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ CPU Info: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ cat

Re: [LinuxBIOS] AMD SimNOW question

2008-01-11 Thread Jordan Crouse
On 11/01/08 16:51 -0500, Marc Karasek wrote: No the serial port output looks ok. It is the vga ouput I need to capture. The kernel as loader is crashing... Oh, wow... I don't think there's any way to do that. You can log the I/O and memory space accesses, but you can't log the screen.

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [BUILDROM] Consolidate all the geode Linuxbios targets

2008-01-11 Thread ron minnich
Fix the payloads on alix1c and msm800sev. ron Fix these to use a more standard relative path for payload. Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: targets/digitallogic/msm800sev/Config.lb === ---

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Consolidate all the geode Linuxbios targets

2008-01-11 Thread Jordan Crouse
On 11/01/08 14:34 -0800, ron minnich wrote: Fix the payloads on alix1c and msm800sev. ron Fix these to use a more standard relative path for payload. Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Jordan Crouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] And thank you for your speed! Index:

[LinuxBIOS] r3047 - in trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/targets: digitallogic/msm800sev pcengines/alix1c

2008-01-11 Thread svn
Author: rminnich Date: 2008-01-11 23:37:27 +0100 (Fri, 11 Jan 2008) New Revision: 3047 Modified: trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/targets/digitallogic/msm800sev/Config.lb trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/targets/pcengines/alix1c/Config.lb Log: Fix these to use a more standard relative path for payload. Signed-off-by:

[LinuxBIOS] r3047 - in trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/targets: digitallogic/msm800sev pcengines/alix1c

2008-01-11 Thread svn
Author: rminnich Date: 2008-01-11 23:37:27 +0100 (Fri, 11 Jan 2008) New Revision: 3047 Modified: trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/targets/digitallogic/msm800sev/Config.lb trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/targets/pcengines/alix1c/Config.lb Log: Fix these to use a more standard relative path for payload. Signed-off-by:

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Consolidate all the geode Linuxbios targets

2008-01-11 Thread ron minnich
On Jan 11, 2008 2:38 PM, Jordan Crouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fix these to use a more standard relative path for payload. Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Jordan Crouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Committed revision 3047. -- linuxbios mailing list

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Consolidate all the geode Linuxbios targets

2008-01-11 Thread Jordan Crouse
On 11/01/08 14:37 -0800, ron minnich wrote: On Jan 11, 2008 2:38 PM, Jordan Crouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fix these to use a more standard relative path for payload. Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Jordan Crouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Committed revision

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] buildrom: add extract and busybox-config, uclibc-config targets

2008-01-11 Thread Ward Vandewege
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 04:39:57PM -0700, Myles Watson wrote: Sorry to be so dense, but it looks like you added mkdir -p in a lot of places for directories, even though there are already makefile rules for them. Right, that was stupid, I had not noticed those. This patch fixes that, and it's

[LinuxBIOS] r95 - buildrom-devel/config/platforms

2008-01-11 Thread svn
Author: jcrouse Date: 2008-01-11 23:53:36 +0100 (Fri, 11 Jan 2008) New Revision: 95 Modified: buildrom-devel/config/platforms/alix1c.conf buildrom-devel/config/platforms/msm800sev.conf Log: [BUILDROM] Bump the mem800sev and alix1c revisions Bump the linuxbios revision of the mem800sev and

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Consolidate all the geode Linuxbios targets

2008-01-11 Thread Jordan Crouse
On 11/01/08 17:50 -0500, Ward Vandewege wrote: On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 03:45:28PM -0700, Jordan Crouse wrote: And the associated patch to bump the revision in buildrom. !DSPAM:4787f1d7211931030414324! [BUILDROM] Bump the mem800sev and alix1c revisions Bump the linuxbios

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Consolidate all the geode Linuxbios targets

2008-01-11 Thread Jordan Crouse
On 11/01/08 17:50 -0500, Ward Vandewege wrote: On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 03:45:28PM -0700, Jordan Crouse wrote: And the associated patch to bump the revision in buildrom. !DSPAM:4787f1d7211931030414324! [BUILDROM] Bump the mem800sev and alix1c revisions Bump the linuxbios

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Consolidate all the geode Linuxbios targets

2008-01-11 Thread Ward Vandewege
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 03:45:28PM -0700, Jordan Crouse wrote: And the associated patch to bump the revision in buildrom. !DSPAM:4787f1d7211931030414324! [BUILDROM] Bump the mem800sev and alix1c revisions Bump the linuxbios revision of the mem800sev and alix1c to take advantage of the

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] buildrom: add extract and busybox-config, uclibc-config targets

2008-01-11 Thread Myles Watson
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 04:39:57PM -0700, Myles Watson wrote: Sorry to be so dense, but it looks like you added mkdir -p in a lot of places for directories, even though there are already makefile rules for them. Right, that was stupid, I had not noticed those. This patch fixes that, and

[LinuxBIOS] r3047 build service

2008-01-11 Thread LinuxBIOS information
Dear LinuxBIOS readers! This is the automated build check service of LinuxBIOS. The developer rminnich checked in revision 3047 to the LinuxBIOS source repository and caused the following changes: Change Log: Fix these to use a more standard relative path for payload. Signed-off-by: Ronald G.

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Messing with CAR in a big way

2008-01-11 Thread Rudolf Marek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Imho you must copy the data from CAR, because when it is OFF, no writeback is done to memory: (from BKDG) Temporary data stored in the cache during boot cannot be written back to DRAM after enabling the DRAM controller using a CLFLUSH or WBINVB

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Messing with CAR in a big way

2008-01-11 Thread ron minnich
On Jan 11, 2008 4:13 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ron, where would you like to have the CAR area to avoid copying the stack around in v2? Any places where stack location is hardcoded without using the usual #define? If you could put it at x80 that would work very

Re: [LinuxBIOS] PATCH: lx car that returns from disable_car

2008-01-11 Thread Marc Jones
Marc Jones wrote: ron minnich wrote: Marc, here are the register dumps. As a reminder, we seem to have no memory above 1M. It looks like stage2 has problems. The MSRs are not setup beyond what stage1 did to allow stage2 to run. Specificly, geodelx_pci_domain_phase2() is not running.

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Messing with CAR in a big way

2008-01-11 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
On 12.01.2008 01:25, ron minnich wrote: On Jan 11, 2008 4:13 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ron, where would you like to have the CAR area to avoid copying the stack around in v2? Any places where stack location is hardcoded without using the usual #define?

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Messing with CAR in a big way

2008-01-11 Thread ron minnich
On Jan 11, 2008 4:35 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One zero too many? Your location would be 8 MB. That is impossible according to the BKDG. yes, my mistake. ron Be advised that car on older opterons is a bit tricky, due to limitations in the hardware. I can't test

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] v3: Print a message before resetting the processor

2008-01-11 Thread ron minnich
Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Messing with CAR in a big way

2008-01-11 Thread ron minnich
For reference here is the geode lx disable car. CAR is at 8. The steps are to re-enable cache (for loop), then dirty all the tags for the CAR area (cld; rep movsl; etc); then write it all back (wbinvd). Works really well. for (i = 0; i ARRAY_SIZE(msr_table); i++)

[LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] v3: Print a message before resetting the processor

2008-01-11 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
After configuring the PLL registers on Geode LX, we have to reset the processor. However, nothing in the log tells the user why the processor is being reset. Example log follows: LinuxBIOS-3.0.0 Fri Jan 11 15:53:52 MST 2008 starting... Choosing fallback boot. [...] Fallback failed. Try normal

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Messing with CAR in a big way

2008-01-11 Thread ron minnich
On Jan 11, 2008 4:33 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12.01.2008 01:18, Rudolf Marek wrote: Temporary data stored in the cache during boot cannot be written back to DRAM after enabling the DRAM controller using a CLFLUSH or WBINVB instruction. The cache should be

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Messing with CAR in a big way

2008-01-11 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
On 12.01.2008 01:18, Rudolf Marek wrote: Imho you must copy the data from CAR, because when it is OFF, no writeback is done to memory: (from BKDG) Temporary data stored in the cache during boot cannot be written back to DRAM after enabling the DRAM controller using a CLFLUSH or WBINVB

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Messing with CAR in a big way

2008-01-11 Thread ron minnich
On Jan 11, 2008 5:10 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you want CAR to start at 0x8 and end at 0x87FFF Oh shoot, I just realized, on LX it goes from 88000 to 88fff. But it doesn't matter that much. 8 to 87fff is fine too. ron -- linuxbios mailing list

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Intel refactoring and microcode updates

2008-01-11 Thread ron minnich
note that on V3, we have the neat ability to put microcode in LAR, and find it there on boot. So we might have another top level directory: /microcode And then you can figure out, long after the bios is built, which microcode updates you want to support. ron -- linuxbios mailing list

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] v3: Print a message before resetting the processor

2008-01-11 Thread Torsten Duwe
On Saturday 12 January 2008, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: BIOS_EMERG is a bit strong because every cold boot will trigger that code path by design. OTOH after the new PLL values the machine _is_ unusable unless reset, right? As I replied to Ron, this message should be prioritised as high as

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Intel refactoring and microcode updates

2008-01-11 Thread joe
Quoting Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 03:54:18PM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote: On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 09:42:00AM -0500, Corey Osgood wrote: Peter Stuge wrote: I think we need to make it configurable. I don't like that. With a factory bios, you expect the correct

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] v3: Print a message before resetting the processor

2008-01-11 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
On 12.01.2008 01:58, Torsten Duwe wrote: On Saturday 12 January 2008, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: After configuring the PLL registers on Geode LX, we have to reset the processor. However, nothing in the log tells the user why the processor is being reset. +

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] v3: Print a message before resetting the processor

2008-01-11 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
On 12.01.2008 01:53, ron minnich wrote: Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, r553. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios

[LinuxBIOS] r553 - LinuxBIOSv3/arch/x86/geodelx

2008-01-11 Thread svn
Author: hailfinger Date: 2008-01-12 02:09:47 +0100 (Sat, 12 Jan 2008) New Revision: 553 Modified: LinuxBIOSv3/arch/x86/geodelx/geodelx.c Log: After configuring the PLL registers on Geode LX, we have to reset the processor. However, nothing in the log tells the user why the processor is being

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Messing with CAR in a big way

2008-01-11 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
On 12.01.2008 01:45, ron minnich wrote: For reference here is the geode lx disable car. CAR is at 8. The steps are to re-enable cache (for loop), then dirty all the tags for the CAR area (cld; rep movsl; etc); then write it all back (wbinvd). Works really well. for (i = 0; i

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] v3: Print a message before resetting the processor

2008-01-11 Thread Torsten Duwe
On Saturday 12 January 2008, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: After configuring the PLL registers on Geode LX, we have to reset the processor. However, nothing in the log tells the user why the processor is being reset. + printk(BIOS_INFO, Resetting the processor after PLL +

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] v3: Print a message before resetting the processor

2008-01-11 Thread Torsten Duwe
On Saturday 12 January 2008, ron minnich wrote: Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [BIOS_INFO vs. BIOS_EMERG] Think about it this way: whichever log level is set, the information that a repeating log is intentional should be there. Torsten -- linuxbios mailing list

[LinuxBIOS] r553 - LinuxBIOSv3/arch/x86/geodelx

2008-01-11 Thread svn
Author: hailfinger Date: 2008-01-12 02:09:47 +0100 (Sat, 12 Jan 2008) New Revision: 553 Modified: LinuxBIOSv3/arch/x86/geodelx/geodelx.c Log: After configuring the PLL registers on Geode LX, we have to reset the processor. However, nothing in the log tells the user why the processor is being

[LinuxBIOS] Welcome to coreboot.

2008-01-11 Thread ron minnich
Welcome to coreboot! It's been 10 years (in octal anyway!) since the first successful LinuxBIOS boot. In those days, by design, LinuxBIOS looked like this: LinuxBIOS = (core boot code) + (Linux kernel) We did not consider LinuxBIOS to be separable in any way from Linux, and in fact the name

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Messing with CAR in a big way

2008-01-11 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
On 12.01.2008 02:23, ron minnich wrote: On Jan 11, 2008 5:10 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you want CAR to start at 0x8 and end at 0x87FFF Oh shoot, I just realized, on LX it goes from 88000 to 88fff. But it doesn't matter that much. 8 to 87fff is

Re: [LinuxBIOS] AMD SimNOW (program) fails to run

2008-01-11 Thread Peter Stuge
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 02:01:22PM -0800, Andon Tschauschev wrote: info: creating device #8 AweSim Processor FixIt: Error: Unable to allocate processor model memory. Aborted .. mmap(0x54, 2147483648, PROT_NONE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS|MAP_NORESERVE, -1, 0) = -1 ENOMEM

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Intel refactoring and microcode updates

2008-01-11 Thread Peter Stuge
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 05:27:48PM -0800, ron minnich wrote: note that on V3, we have the neat ability to put microcode in LAR, and find it there on boot. So we might have another top level directory: /microcode And then you can figure out, long after the bios is built, which microcode

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Intel refactoring and microcode updates

2008-01-11 Thread Corey Osgood
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 03:54:18PM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote: On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 09:42:00AM -0500, Corey Osgood wrote: Peter Stuge wrote: I think we need to make it configurable. I

[LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] Drop microcode references from Via CPUs

2008-01-11 Thread Corey Osgood
Via C3 datasheets don't make any mention of microcode updates, and the C7 bios programmer's guide explicitly states they're not necessary, and leaves it at that. Even if they are possible and exist, we don't have any info on it, nor any updates, so drop these unneeded references. Signed-off-by:

Re: [LinuxBIOS] AMD SimNOW (program) fails to run

2008-01-11 Thread yhlu
On Jan 11, 2008 7:05 PM, Peter Stuge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 02:01:22PM -0800, Andon Tschauschev wrote: info: creating device #8 AweSim Processor FixIt: Error: Unable to allocate processor model memory. Aborted .. mmap(0x54, 2147483648,