On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Jason Childs <
obliv...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm responding to my original post to try and minimize confusion
> (hopefully). Here is a resubmittal of the original 17 patches plus
> another 6 that get the total for bamboo support to 23. To
On Sun, 2010-01-24 at 19:31 -0800, Ping Cheng wrote:
> > It's just a matter of sending sequence
> > of packets with a serial number to select which channel gets the data in
> > X, right?
>
> How can you store three sets (2 fingers and one pad) of data with only
> two channels? Maybe you assumed u
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Jason Childs
wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-01-23 at 20:40 -0800, Ping Cheng wrote:
>> If we go with this serial number approach, tcp2fg will definitely need
>> to be updated. My concern is if you can receive both pad and 2FGT
>> data in the same packet (in the kernel), wh
On Sat, 2010-01-23 at 20:40 -0800, Ping Cheng wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Jason Childs
> wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I'm responding to my original post to try and minimize confusion
> > (hopefully). Here is a resubmittal of the original 17 patches plus
> > another 6 that get the tot
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Jason Childs
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm responding to my original post to try and minimize confusion
> (hopefully). Here is a resubmittal of the original 17 patches plus
> another 6 that get the total for bamboo support to 23.
I think you've updated the original 1
Hi guys,
I'm responding to my original post to try and minimize confusion
(hopefully). Here is a resubmittal of the original 17 patches plus
another 6 that get the total for bamboo support to 23. Touch is now at
95% working by my estimation. There is still a random cursor popping
when exiting a
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Chris Bagwell wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Jason Childs <
> obliv...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ping,
>>
>> I'm attaching a tar.bz2 of 17 patches that capture the changes I've done
>> over the last three days. I started a git reposito
Yes, I was asking Bastian since he is the author of the patch. Now we are
off that thread, we could do something on our own :).
Do you mean adding #ifdef's to the code? It works for the current
linuxwacom structure. But it may not work well for the next
generation. Please share what you have for
Not a problem to do, I though you were asking Bastian about it. While I'm at
it would you like me to consolidate all the kernel versions down to one. I
already did this based on the 0.8.5-4 release and test compiled the combined
source against kernel 2.6.9 thru 2.6.31. It would just be a matter of
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Jason Childs <
obliv...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
> > 0001-Input-wacom-Debian-patch-for-device-ids.patch
> >
> > No real comment on this one. It worked for me and I saw no issues.
> > I'm not sure I understand background of why patch was written. I
> > thin
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Jason Childs <
obliv...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Ping,
>
> Quick question on the use of BTN_TOUCH in the kernel driver. Does this have
> any use I'm not aware of? It doesn't appear to be used in the X driver I'd
> like to bring the touch nomenclature inline
Ping,
Quick question on the use of BTN_TOUCH in the kernel driver. Does this have
any use I'm not aware of? It doesn't appear to be used in the X driver I'd
like to bring the touch nomenclature inline with the synaptics use of the
BTN_FINGER/BTN_DOUBLETAP/BTN_TRIPLETAP for one/two/three finger eve
Jason and Chris,
I am slow in reviewing the patches. But I do want to share my thoughts so I
don't block your progress. See my comments inline.
Ping
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Jason Childs <
obliv...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Chris,
>
> Thanks for the feedback, I've got two more fr
Chris,
Thanks for the feedback, I've got two more from tonight as well plus a
fix to patch 0011. In patch 0011 I messed up the logic on resetting
firstFinger to zero in the kernel code. The 0019 makes sure horizontal
scroll will work on TPC2FG's, and 0020 fixes a problem pointed out by
Favux with
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Jason Childs <
obliv...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Hi Ping,
>
> I'm attaching a tar.bz2 of 17 patches that capture the changes I've done
> over the last three days. I started a git repository with the base
> 0.8.5-9 source from sourceforge, so some of the pa
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Jason Childs <
obliv...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Hi Ping,
>
> I'm attaching a tar.bz2 of 17 patches that capture the changes I've done
> over the last three days. I started a git repository with the base
> 0.8.5-9 source from sourceforge, so some of the pat
Hi Jason,
I didn't get a chance to go through the patches today and I don't feel I
have time to do so in the coming days. So, I am "giving up". Well, I mean
we will rely on you to work on the linuxwacom patches and Chris on
xf86-input-wacom patches, respectively. I will address your original em
Chris, response inline
On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 21:22 -0600, Chris Bagwell wrote:
> Jason, I've been holding off until your latest patches before I looked
> in depth into xf86-input-wacom to get rid of the unwanted button press
> for touch pad. Now that I'm digging into your patches (specifically,
>
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Jason Childs <
obliv...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Hi Ping,
>
> I'm attaching a tar.bz2 of 17 patches that capture the changes I've done
> over the last three days.
>
> At this point the patch gets the Bamboo P&T touch working with capacity,
> relative mode,
Hi Ping,
I'm attaching a tar.bz2 of 17 patches that capture the changes I've done
over the last three days. I started a git repository with the base
0.8.5-9 source from sourceforge, so some of the patches will look
useless as I changed stuff along the way. Also is there a change to get
the git re
20 matches
Mail list logo
