Title: RE: [IFWP] BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Non-member submission from [[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ron Bennett)]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
How much more difficult must this get with multiple registries? Some
centralized point of reference is clearly necessary for each
Title: RE: [IFWP] Unethical advertising tactics continue by CORE members?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Interesting... looks like we may have an intellectual property test
sooner than we thought.
Gene Marsh
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: RE: [IFWP] Constituency?
Chris,
I feel the best possible place for the prospectice gTLD registries constituency is in the gTLD Registries DNSO. The ICANN board has not agreed with that assertion. I have submitted, on behalf of the TLDA (as you know), a suggestion of several
: Monday, May 31, 1999 2:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IFWP] gTLD constituency
Gene and all,
I did subscribe to your admin list. However I noticed that your
Archives
link is broken...
Marsh, Miles (Gene) wrote:
Michael,
When you get the chance, please visit http
Title: TLDA lists and web page
While the TLDA web page has been on line for several weeks, several area were incomplete. There is certainly more to be done at our home, but all are welcome to look in and join our mail lists. The mail list archives will be up later this week.
This opens a new
Title: RE: [IFWP] gTLD constituency
Ivan,
I invite you to join (personally or for NetNames) the Top Level Domain Association (http://www/tlda.org). Let me know if you have any questions.
Gene Marsh
-Original Message-
From: Ivan Pope [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
Title: RE: [IFWP] Today's ICANN's Berlin Meeting (Wedesday)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jon,
A suggestion was made to look at ActiveWorlds (an excellent idea).
This could allow for the interaction of hundreds on-line real-time. I
have a *spare* license for an
Title: Goose and gander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The spirit of the actions taken in Berlin were
contrary to the sprit of the white paper--that
decisions be consensus based and bottom up.
This move on the WIPO paper was top down,
said Brian O'Shaughnessy, spokesman
Title: RE: [IFWP] Re: [dnso.discuss] Modifications to ICIIU Guidelines and NCDNHC definition
Michael,
Please add the voice of the TLDA and its associate individuals and organizations.
++
Gene Marsh
interim secretary, Top Level Domain Association
-Original Message-
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 31, 1999 8:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IFWP] Goose and gander
On Mon, 31 May 1999 20:38:29 -0400, Marsh, Miles (Gene)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
, but I don't support something just because they oppose the
ISOC
also. It takes more than that. Michael, oops again...the ICIIU
doesn't meet the qualifications.
On Mon, 31 May 1999 20:50:51 -0400, Marsh, Miles (Gene)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael,
Please add the voice of the TLDA
Title: TLDA gTLD DNSO Recognition
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Esther and the ICANN Board of Directors;
The Top Level Domain Association (TLDA) submits this memo for
immediate reconsideration of the TLDA as an ICANN recognized gTLD DNSO
constituency as defined in the
Title: RE: [IFWP] Board Resolution on Constituencies
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Esther,
Can we have access to the proposals for review by the Internet
community?
++
Gene Marsh
interim secretary, Top Level Domain Association
-Original Message-
From:
Subject: Re: [IFWP] Time to lay out the hand
At 12:24 AM 5/24/99 -0400, Marsh, Miles (Gene) wrote:
The Internet is, in large measure, the result of the
forward thinking,
creative people who have been commenting on the issues. Hear
their
What an odd thing to say.
In fact very
Title: RE: [IFWP] Time to lay out the hand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, May 24, 1999 4:13PM, Karl Auerbach wrote:
The IETF has had many major debates, red faces, sweat pouring
out, people
shouting, people screeming. I know, I was there doing some of the
Title: Time to lay out the hand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Esther,
The past few weeks have passed with a flurry of messages back and
forth on a number of critical topics. During this time, the
principals involved with the ICANN process have been unfortunately
missing
Title: RE: [IFWP] Request for reconsideration: inclusion of the Individuals' Constituency at the Berlin meeting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I must agree. Whether or not Joop's efforts have validity or not (I
happen to feel that they do), there should be a formal
Title: Closed v. Open TLDs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Message as sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There is certainly validity to the prospect of both open and closed
TLDs in
both the ccTLD and gTLD areas. However, to further divide either
constituencies or the obvious
Marsh
-Original Message-
From: Einar Stefferud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 1999 1:51 PM
To: Richard J. Sexton
Cc: Joop Teernstra; Richard J Sexton; Marsh, Miles (Gene); Jay
Fenello
Subject: Re: What does this mean about IDNO or TLDA?
OK -- What does
Title: RE: [IFWP] Re: A Commentary on WIPO's final report on domain names
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I think we would all be surprised to see the ICANN Board take action
in Bonn, since we will all be in Berlin waiting for them.
Based on actions we have seen to date, I
Title: RE: [IFWP] ICANN's Bylaws and WIPO Report
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bret,
The danger is in the if any clause. ICANN could misconstrue this as
an open door to take action due to the current lack of a formal SO.
Gene Marsh
anycastNET Incorporated
Title: RE: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yes, and while the government has attempted to address the issue of
turning over certain operational characteristics of the Internet, I do
not believe they have addresses the issue of turning over the
Title: RE: [IFWP] ICANN and WIPO in Berlin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Esther,
I am also curious as to your response. These are important issues for
all of us.
Thanks!
Gene Marsh
anycastNET Incorporated
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Greenwell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
I understand your position, but with that argument, telephone listings
are a customer database as well.
Gene...
-Original Message-
From: A.M. Rutkowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 1999 9:56 PM
To:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I would concur with this approach.
Gene Marsh
Diebold Incorporated / anycastNET Incorporated
- -Original Message-
From: Bret A. Fausett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 1999 11:53 AM
To: ICANN
Cc: IFWP; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Esther,
I need to add a couple points to Jay's comments. In Section 4 is
written:
The legal delegation and practical relationship between ICANN,
governments
and ccTLD administrators Changes in policy for registrations under a
gTLD
(for example, as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Esther,
I understand your response to Jay. However, the text reads that Mike
Roberts will be giving this report, not the GAC. Can you explain the
positioning here?
Gene Marsh
- -Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OK, then does Firestone have a right to the use of
firestone.tires.com? Or should it be firestone.tire.com? Or
Firestone.rubber.com?
This does not work either.
Gene Marsh
anycastNET Incorporated
- -Original Message-
From: Greg Skinner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Raw data is not typically considered intellectual property.
Information can be. The basic information in the NSI database is raw
data.
-Original Message-
From: Martin B. Schwimmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 1999
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg,
The whole idea behind the TLDA is to garner exactly the type of
consensus you are referring to. No one believes the process will
happen magically and without pain. But, if we can start the process
moving forward in an open forum, the chances
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brad,
Individuals will certainly be welcome associates within the TLDA
organization. Sorry, I cannot address the policy of any of the other
constituancies.
Gene Marsh
- -Original Message-
From: Bret A. Fausett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roberto,
I agree with many of your assertions. That is the guiding reason
behind the formation of the TLDA. I would invite you and others to
participate in the TLDA as it fully forms.
Gene Marsh
- -Original Message-
From: Roberto Gaetano
n it
is so patently clear that thiiis entire DNS MESS has grown up out of
the contentiousness of plans to add new gTLDs.
Best...\Stef
- --- Forwarded Message
From: "Marsh, Miles (Gene)" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ellen,
Not so, as they have not proposed a constituancy as defined by ICANN.
They are all, of course, welcome to join the efforts of the TLDA, as
are you.
Gene...
- -Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ellen,
Thanks for your response. Although we certainly will have some basic
criteria for "association" with the TLDA, we are trying to avoid too
structured an approach to participation. The first priority is to get
the individuals and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yes Richard... or possibly two functional groups of the same
organization, thereby allowing for "sub-constituancies" while not
going constituancy crazy. In any case, we need NSI and NSI needs us
for many of the potential efforts.
Gene...
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ken,
I can only speak specifically for the TLDA, but I believe you will
find a similar approach from all the constituancy groups.
The interests of individuals is considered very significant, and they
are very welcome to join in our discussions.
anycastNET Incorporated
-Original Message-
From: Marsh, Miles (Gene)
Sent: Monday, April 26, 1999 11:35 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris (and the lists),
I have forwarded a copy of our announcement to Don Telage for his
review and requested conference with him. Don's intentiuons were, I
am guessing, the same as ours: get some gTLD constituancy rolling by
the deadline. I hope
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Richard,
This approach could be easily moved to a gTLD admin approach... the
model works if done well.
Gene...
- -Original Message-
From: Richard J. Sexton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 1999 3:26 PM
To: [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Esther,
I can appreciate your feeling that the scope of the testbed should be
limited and controllable. However, read between the lines: These
people are saying that you have not included those most expert in this
area as part of the decision
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Esther,
On this point I have to agree with you completely. The thought that
an overseeing agency should be responsible for the integrity of data
for disparate systems is contrary to both the nature of the Internet
and good business practice.
The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bravo, Stef, and you know you are far from alone.
Gene...
- -Original Message-
From: Einar Stefferud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 1999 2:57 PM
To: Michael Gendron
Cc: 'Dr Nii Quaynor'; Michael Sondow; ICANN MAC list;
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jorge,
No one is denying the necessity for this function to be present, or
for the IRAC to be created. The problem is the methods by which the
members were selected. There was no open review process of potential
candidates. The ICANN Board has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dr. Lisse,
I am puzzled as to why an alternative approach would discombobulate
(confuse) you to such an extent. If you choose to conform, then
conform and leave the innovation to those with vision.
Gene Marsh
Diebold Incorporated
- -Original
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This sounds like a bit of a closed approach to me.
Gene Marsh
Diebold Incorporated
- -Original Message-
From: Richard J. Sexton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 1999 4:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IFWP]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dr. Lisse,
Just as it is YOU who makes the dicision, it is OTHERS who will (and
have) decided to follow an alternative DNS root structure. Lack of
appropriate action by ICANN and others will not stop that appropriate
action.
Gene Marsh
Diebold
BUT, in the mean time it may all well become a moot point. Progress
will not wait for ICANN to get it's act together. This issues to be
addressed today will be addressed, and not wait until ICANN gets going
in 12-18 months.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Weisberg [mailto:[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vint,
This was not intended to be an advertisement in any way shap or form,
although I do see how some may have mis-interpreted it that way.
The intention was solely to foster a separate discussion regarding
IPv8, a topic which is not popular on
49 matches
Mail list logo
