On 2/23/07, Shlomi Asaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks a Lot Tee
what i don't understand is- you create a table layout, so why not using a
Table if u already has the structure, and even a little more expensive then
table- you have another element- the clearing one.
Because using the table wo
Thanks a Lot Tee
what i don't understand is- you create a table layout, so why not using a
Table if u already has the structure, and even a little more expensive then
table- you have another element- the clearing one.
On 2/22/07, Tee G. Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 21, 2007, at 3:29
On Friday 23 February 2007 17:35, Tim wrote:
> Easy. Tell them to "Right click" the search button and open results in
> a new window.
> Anything else will fail to validate as a strict doctype and be less
> accessible.
>
> Tim
> ]
>
> On 23/02/2007, at 5:09 PM, Gallagher, Robin wrote:
> > Users of t
Hi
I have done all following changes in my jsp page. I am using struts and
even have saved my Hindi text in a application recourse file and have
save that file in a UTF-8 encoding format.
I can see in browser the encoding is getting set to UTF-8 because of the
jsp tag (<[EMAIL PROTECTED] encodi
On 2/23/07, Gallagher, Robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Users of the search engine on my intranet site wold like to have the results
open in a new page. Can anyone suggest a valid method to do this in xhtml
1.1?
Hi Robin,
Roger Johansson has a pretty good (and easy to implement) script:
http:/
Easy. Tell them to "Right click" the search button and open results in
a new window.
Anything else will fail to validate as a strict doctype and be less
accessible.
Tim
]
On 23/02/2007, at 5:09 PM, Gallagher, Robin wrote:
Users of the search engine on my intranet site wold like to have the
re
Check out footerStickAlt from the man in blue -
http://www.themaninblue.com/writing/perspective/2005/08/29/
Your css looks similar - you might read through his write-up and see
if there are some clues. I notice that he uses position: relative for
the footer, which you don't, and that might keep
* html, body { height: 100%;}
* html #container {height: 1%;}
The first one is wrong because there's a comma in there and you're
applying a rule that you already have on the body and the second one
isn't needed because you've already applied a height to #container.
Thanks for that John - I ca
Users of the search engine on my intranet site wold like to have the
results open in a new page. Can anyone suggest a valid method to do this
in xhtml 1.1?
Thanks
> Robin Gallagher
> DSTO Intranet & Internet Manager
> (03) 9626 7386
>
>
>
*
Lynn,
Check out footerStickAlt from the man in blue - http://
www.themaninblue.com/writing/perspective/2005/08/29/
Your css looks similar - you might read through his write-up and see
if there are some clues. I notice that he uses position: relative for
the footer, which you don't, and that
Looks OK at my end. The two other things I'd remove would be:
* html, body { height: 100%;}
* html #container {height: 1%;}
The first one is wrong because there's a comma in there and you're
applying a rule that you already have on the body and the second one isn't
needed because you've alre
It's margin-bottom: -40px on #container which is causing the problem.
If it's there to make the footer stick to the bottom, you might want
to look at a different implementation.
Thanks John but having removed it, the problem remains.
http://www.westernwebdesign.com.au/test/newindex.html
It's margin-bottom: -40px on #container which is causing the problem. If
it's there to make the footer stick to the bottom, you might want to look
at a different implementation.
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:36:47 +1000, Lyn Patterson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good morning
http://www.westernw
On Feb 22, 2007, at 4:53 AM, Nisha Kumari wrote:
I am trying to implement internationalization for my site. But when I am
trying to enter some Hindi text in a text box (struts html:text) the
value I m getting in my action is not expected one. Getting some
corrupted value rather than Hindi entered
Good morning
http://www.westernwebdesign.com.au/test/newindex.html
I am having more trouble with this relatively simple design than with
far more complicated sites. . The problem only seems to occur in IE at
res 800 x 600. At res 1024 x 768 it is fine and in Fx at 800 x 600 it
is fine but
One I remember is the discussion about a persons dvd list. I remember because I
personally use a table for my Phantom comic collection, so much easier than
using anything else...
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 23/02/2007 2:05:59 am >>>
"Could you elaborate on the misuse of s?"
I can't remember any spe
On Feb 22, 2007, at 4:53 AM, Nisha Kumari wrote:
Hi All.
I am trying to implement internationalization for my site. But when
I am
trying to enter some Hindi text in a text box (struts html:text) the
value I m getting in my action is not expected one. Getting some
corrupted value rather than
Thanks Paul, and Eugenio
I did validate the code (no errors). I'm just checking to see if
there's something I missed, trying to understand why Visual Studio
would report an error.
On Feb 22, 2007, at 12:32 PM, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Rolf SF wrote:
I can't seem to find a definitive answ
Rolf SF wrote:
I can't seem to find a definitive answer on whether it's valid to
include a span within a caption in a table.
A colleague mentioned that Visual Studio has thrown a warning: Element
'span' cannot be nested within element 'caption'
According to the HTML 4.01 DTD, caption can conta
Caption and span are inline elements, I don't see any problems in merging them.
Checked an example code at W3C HTML validator, and it validated ok.
Best regards;
Eugenio Costa.
On 2/22/07, Rolf SF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can't seem to find a definitive answer on whether it's valid to includ
I can't seem to find a definitive answer on whether it's valid to
include a span within a caption in a table.
A colleague mentioned that Visual Studio has thrown a warning:
Element 'span' cannot be nested within element 'caption'
Anyone?
Thanks,
Rolf
Designer wrote:
However, this is like saying "I don't use tables, but I wish I could, so
I'm going to do the next best thing and make some divs behave like a
table with cells" - Isn't it?
No, it is like saying "This isn't tabular data, but I want a tabular
layout, so my markup is not going
I think it is a solution for preventing the use of layout tables. I
wish I could use it, so a modern browser can see a nicely organized
site, a palm a linearized site, and a screen reader can read the
contents. A sort of way to device independency.
Regards;
Eugenio Costa.
On 2/22/07, Designer <[E
Thanks to all who responded. I must say that I basically agree with most
of what was said, but a few things still bother me, semantic-wise.
Firstly, doing it 'properly' could be seen as using the following:
#grid {display : table; }
#colalpha { width : 28em; display : table-cel
Steve Green wrote:
"Could you elaborate on the misuse of s?"
I can't remember any specific instances but over the last year on this list
there have been numerous discussions where people were trying to shoehorn
tabular data into definition lists when they clearly should have been using
tables. N
Hi,
It appears you are missing a closing quote:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of varun krishnan
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 12:12 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] re: please help me make this design work some way in firefox
an ie
Hi Guys,
I am working on this design
h
Hi Guys,
I am working on this design
http://www.vk123.com/modx/
The footer is not rendering sometimes properly in firefox.
What Could be the reason ?
thanks,
Varun
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guide
"Could you elaborate on the misuse of s?"
I can't remember any specific instances but over the last year on this list
there have been numerous discussions where people were trying to shoehorn
tabular data into definition lists when they clearly should have been using
tables. Nick has obviously not
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:48:21 -, Barney Carroll
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David Dorward wrote:
Every cell in a row represents a day in a week.
Every cell in a column represents the same day of the week.
Looks tabular to me.
Isn't the first precept of semantic markup that looks are no g
I think it depends how you'll lay it out.
If you're thinking about those ugly looking calendars on a blog's
side column, or a funkier 2.oh calendar webapp, then yes. It's gonna
be tabular.
If you're going to lay out a list item per month or week as one long
scrolly page, with every day on
David Dorward wrote:
Every cell in a row represents a day in a week.
Every cell in a column represents the same day of the week.
Looks tabular to me.
Isn't the first precept of semantic markup that looks are no guide as to
what things actually are?
Regards,
Barney
***
Andrew Maben wrote:
Perhaps you could chip in on a debate I'm having with myself: Is a
calendar tabular data?
Andrew
Not in the truest sense.
A calendar relies on one axis alone - time. By putting it into a table,
you are artificially constraining its info on false premises.
For instance,
Hello Andrew,
I think a calendar could be a tabular data or not.
You can make a calendar without a table at all.
Semantics is all about this, discussion what is right or wrong (it
leads you to anywhere but hey, we're humand and this is what we do, we
arguee and discuss all the time).
I mean, i
Hello Andrew,
There's a free tool to show you how you site will look in different
browsers and plataforms:
http://browsershots.org/
Take a time and submit you URL in there.
About your design, I like it, it's light, clean but the code it's kind
of full of redundancies...
For instance:
home
ser
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:25:42 -, Andrew Maben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Perhaps you could chip in on a debate I'm having with myself: Is a
calendar tabular data?
Every cell in a row represents a day in a week.
Every cell in a column represents the same day of the week.
Looks tabular to
On Feb 22, 2007, at 9:56 AM, Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
It's similar to the fad from a couple of years ago for marking up
calendars using floated s (or, possibly, s).
Perhaps you could chip in on a debate I'm having with myself: Is a
calendar tabular data?
Andrew
109B SE 4th Av
Gainesville
F
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would disagree with the statement "It is all semantics, and will be seen by
most designers as fundamentally incorrect and misleading". I suspect the
actual figure would be nearer 0.1% of designers, although most on this list
would likely agree with the statement.
Steve
OK - time to take the plunge...
I'm rewriting my site in what I hope is the 'right' way - semantic,
standards-compliant, accessible.
I've got a small problem on the home page: The bottom borders of the
nav items don't show up in IE7 (and I don't have IE6).
Any help with that (and any othe
On 22 Feb 2007, at 12:07:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A far bigger problem in my opinion is this recent fad for placing
tabular data
in definition lists. Where did that come from? The result really is
incomprehensible because even the best screen readers can make
little sense of
the resultin
On Feb 21, 2007, at 2:28 AM, David Dorward wrote:
Invisible text is hard to read against any background colour, and
you can't depend on images being loaded. This thread started
because of issues with alt text on image maps not showing up when
images weren't there.
... that will teach me
Hi All.
I am trying to implement internationalization for my site. But when I am
trying to enter some Hindi text in a text box (struts html:text) the
value I m getting in my action is not expected one. Getting some
corrupted value rather than Hindi entered text.
I have set charset to utf-8 in the
Designer wrote:
It seems to me that pragmatism can sometimes outbenefit the religion
of standards - and I'd really like some real world feedback on when
such a table approach causes real problems. (Yes, I know it's not
truly semantic, and I agree that it's a problem because of that).
If web
Barney is right about screen readers and tables. The behaviour varies insofar
as some screen readers (such as Fire Vox) announce the presence of all the
tables, some don't announce them at all and some (such as JAWS) announce some
tables and not others. I am not sure how it decides which it does an
Bob,
As long as you have an audio-only disclaimer just before stating "The
following object does not contain tabular data". Otherwise screen
readers (supposedly) and standardist developers browsing your site in
view-source mode (as one does) will get halfway through the content of
your first
Following on from recent conversations about floats etc, we can
summarise by saying that we can have three basic choices:
1.
#grid {display : table}
#colalpha { width : 58%; padding-right :20px; display :
table-cell; }
#colbeta { width : 38%; b
45 matches
Mail list logo
