Hi,
I am using jnlp file to give a web start for the users. The client will
be able to launch chainsaw using the jnlp link.
I wanted to know how and where to provide in the jnlp file, the location
for the xml file which has the settings for the socket receiver
I am setting up. I don't know what
On Jun 5, 2007, at 10:12 AM, Geoff Peart wrote:
Is there a high level changes/inclusion list available for 1.2.15?
Thanks
Geoffrey
A change report is part of the release candidate and is also
available at http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/changes-
report.html#1.2.15. The final change
Thanks for the clarification, Curt. It helps a lot. --Wayne
Curt Arnold wrote:
On Jun 5, 2007, at 10:43 AM, Wayne Cannon wrote:
In a different thread, Steve Souza said that log4j development had
stagnated (my words, not his, re version 1.3). Is this true? If
this is true, is it simply be
On Jun 5, 2007, at 10:43 AM, Wayne Cannon wrote:
In a different thread, Steve Souza said that log4j development had
stagnated (my words, not his, re version 1.3). Is this true? If
this is true, is it simply because log4j is a mature product and is
a good product needing little ongoing de
I believe Ceki has designed logback as a replacement for log4j but
log4j is controlled by apache so it will determine if development of
log4j continues or not. i.e. log4j and logback will probably compete
to be the best logging library and we will reap the benefits. :-)
On 6/5/07, Wayne Cannon <
I heard that too, but it was from the author in response to purchasing
his log4j documentation -- a reputable, but not exactly unbiased,
source. I haven't heard any more about logback from any other source.
--Wayne
Arthur Blake wrote:
I thought logback would be the eventual replacement of l
I thought logback would be the eventual replacement of log4j...
http://logback.qos.ch/
- Original Message
From: Wayne Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Log4J Users List
Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2007 11:43:28 AM
Subject: Great product like log4j stagnant?
In a different thread, Steve Souza
I should clarify that there is definitely new development, however the
codeline labeled 1.3 is no longer being worked (for reasons I don't know).
But as a previous poster said log4j is still alive and well and will roll
most of these changes into the log4j 1.2 codeline. We are at 1.2.14, now
and
In a different thread, Steve Souza said that log4j development had
stagnated (my words, not his, re version 1.3). Is this true? If this
is true, is it simply because log4j is a mature product and is a good
product needing little ongoing development effort of significance, or is
there a new/re
Hi,
I have used RepositorySelector to implement application specific logging on
Weblogic 8.1.6 server using Log4j 1.2.14 versions.
Logging takes place as intended from all java class files when applications
are hot deployed on weblogic (start weblogic server and deploy applications
through conso
Is there a high level changes/inclusion list available for 1.2.15?
Thanks
Geoffrey
-Original Message-
From: Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 2:12 AM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: Re: Logging - What good is it ?
On Jun 4, 2007, at 7:44 PM, Steve Souza w
ok, I see in this class structure the receiver, but not the
SocketReceiver.
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4j/companions/component/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/log4j/
Will this mailing list be notified when log4j 1.2.15 is released?
On 6/5/07, Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
12 matches
Mail list logo
