Re: copyright and NFS

2003-01-13 Thread robin szemeti
On Saturday 11 January 2003 13:08, Nicholas Clark wrote: If you have a short answer to the above question, consider this analogy: If I have a physical book, I could unbind it, and allow different programmers to borrow only the pages they needed. What stops me unbinding my electronic file into

Yet another XML problem - this time XML::Simple!

2003-01-13 Thread Andy Williams \(IMAP HILLWAY\)
Hi, I'm having an XML nightmare! First .NET SOAP servers and now this! I am trying to generate an XML configuration file to provide so inforamtion for our graphing server to produce graphs from. A correct xml file should look like this: chart name=My Chart setting height=300 width=800

Re: copyright and NFS

2003-01-13 Thread Andy Wardley
Lusercop wrote: Yes, but a) Lawrence Lessig (Larry Lessig - we love Larrys) is a lawyer in America rather than in the UK, and b) you're forgetting about the UK test cases that have already happened. No, I'm not forgetting about anything. I'm paraphrasing what Larry said. My point, or rather

Re: copyright and NFS

2003-01-13 Thread Paul Mison
On 13/01/2003 at 11:05 +, Andy Wardley wrote: In short, the Disney corporation is making sure that no-one ever does to them what Walt Disney did to others. The term of copyright law has been extended 11 times in the last 40 years, coincidentally around the time that the copyright on the

Re: copyright and NFS

2003-01-13 Thread Andy Wardley
Nigel Hamilton wrote: Umm ... Copyright only grants 'the right to copy' to the author. True. But that wasn't how it used to be. More importantly, it is now a totally absurd situation because works are copied every time you open a web page. Copyright should restrict publishing, not

Re: copyright and NFS

2003-01-13 Thread Andy Wardley
Nicholas Clark wrote: Under traditional law, what's to stop you taking your legally owned copy of the file, and placing it on a networked file system such as NFS. There is still only one copy of the file (on your server) yet now you can let all the programmers read from the one copy

Re: copyright and NFS

2003-01-13 Thread Nigel Hamilton
Hi Andy, I think Lawrence Lessig and Richard Stallman should think a little more about their audience. Yes ... we all read books and listen to music ... but a great majority of us are also authors - we write web pages, emails, manuals, specs, books, talks and programs

Re: copyright and NFS

2003-01-13 Thread Ben
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 11:32:38AM -0600, Nigel Hamilton wrote: Soon enough the 'rage against the machine' rhetoric is going to sound tired ... both Lessig and Stallman, can choose to send a more positive message (albeit a bit boring) ... the fact is no corporation ever had an 'idea'

Re: copyright and NFS

2003-01-13 Thread Andy Wardley
Nigel Hamilton wrote: I think Lawrence Lessig and Richard Stallman should think a little more about their audience. I think Lessig does very well at targetting his audience. Yes ... we all read books and listen to music ... but a great majority of us are also authors - we

Re: copyright and NFS

2003-01-13 Thread Nigel Hamilton
I think Lawrence Lessig and Richard Stallman should think a little more about their audience. Yes ... we all read books and listen to music ... but a great majority of us are also authors - we write web pages, emails, manuals, specs, books, talks and programs (esp). And yet

Re: copyright and NFS

2003-01-13 Thread Paul Mison
On 13/01/2003 at 12:01 -0600, Nigel Hamilton wrote: [...] the power is in the author's hands to licence it whatever way they want! What if your rights as an author are drowned out by your employer's contract over you? Who was the person at Disney who drew Ariel, the Little Mermaid, for the

Re: copyright and NFS

2003-01-13 Thread Nigel Hamilton
HI Paul, I could read the Lessig article 100 times ... it doesn't change the facts: * copyright law protects individual authors - first and foremost - by protecting their intellectual output * copyright is instant, automatic, free, flexible (e.g., GPL) and close to

Re: copyright and NFS

2003-01-13 Thread Mark Fowler
Nigel Hamilton wrote: If people aren't too bored already by this, I'd like to give a couple of tech talks on intellectual property in the coming months ... That would be great. One scheduled for March, and one for May[1]. This is probably one of those things that'll be best as a presentation

Tech meeting note

2003-01-13 Thread Mark Fowler
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Mark Fowler wrote: That would be great. One scheduled for March, and one for May[1]. This is probably one of those things that'll be best as a presentation followed by a lot of questions in the pub later. [1] Though I'm not sure about all this yet, Lot's of conferences

Re: copyright and NFS

2003-01-13 Thread Andrew Wilson
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 12:01:12PM -0600, Nigel Hamilton wrote: Where do you think the rights come from in the first place? Society (governments) decided to grant them to whomever. The GPL, CCL, Berkley licence (pick your licence) all rely on one thing: Copyright. And the power is in

Re: copyright and NFS

2003-01-13 Thread Andy Wardley
Nigel Hamilton wrote: I could read the Lessig article 100 times ... it doesn't change the facts: No disprespect, but Lessig is a lawyer and seems to understand the issues relating to copyright law very well indeed. If you think he's missed the facts then I suggest you take it up with him.

Re: copyright and NFS

2003-01-13 Thread Shevek
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Andy Wardley wrote: Nicholas Clark wrote: Under traditional law, what's to stop you taking your legally owned copy of the file, and placing it on a networked file system such as NFS. There is still only one copy of the file (on your server) yet now you can let all

Re: copyright and NFS

2003-01-13 Thread Shevek
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Nigel Hamilton wrote: HI Paul, I could read the Lessig article 100 times ... it doesn't change the facts: * copyright law protects individual authors - first and foremost - by protecting their intellectual output * copyright is instant,

Re: copyright and NFS

2003-01-13 Thread Piers Cawley
Nigel Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: HI Paul, I could read the Lessig article 100 times ... it doesn't change the facts: * copyright law protects individual authors - first and foremost - by protecting their intellectual output * copyright is instant,

Re: copyright and NFS

2003-01-13 Thread Nigel Hamilton
HI Piers, It's what authors do with these rights that's the 'main game' ... corporations don't have ideas - people do. You are aware of how close the US Recording Industry got to having music written while under contract to a record company reclassified as 'work for hire', ie

Re: copyright and NFS

2003-01-13 Thread Dave Cross
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 11:13:05AM +, Paul Mison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On 13/01/2003 at 11:05 +, Andy Wardley wrote: In short, the Disney corporation is making sure that no-one ever does to them what Walt Disney did to others. The term of copyright law has been extended 11

Re: Tech meeting note

2003-01-13 Thread David Cantrell
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 02:26:03PM +, Mark Fowler wrote: Though I'm not sure about all this yet, Lot's of conferences we may need to work around this year. Eight of them. Eight! German Perl Workshop 5th-17th March YAPC::Israel 12th May YAPC::Canada 15th-16th May

Re: Tech meeting note

2003-01-13 Thread Peter Sergeant
German Perl Workshop 5th-17th March That'll be 5th-7th March. Anyone going? (Apart from Nicholas Clark of course.) Yup, I'm giving a talk on heuristic detection of email-borne viruses with Perl... +Pete