if my clients (cpu 667Mhz, 128M ram) need to play mpeg2 files (on the
server), do i have enable local application?
how many clients can be connected at maximum?
thanks!
_
Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change p
Hello all,
We've got a pretty good beta release of LTSP available for download. It
is currently
called 2.09pre3.
We've talked quite a bit about the naming convention of the releases,
and when this
is package is final (real soon now), it will be called 3.0.0. At that
point, we
will adopt a n
Jim McQuillan wrote:
> Clayton,
>
> In almost all cases, your kernels should download in under 1 second.
>
> The card that is taking alot longer, and having neighbour table
> overflows, is probably having
> a resource conflict of some sort.
We get "neighbour table overflows" on all our ltsp w
Clayton Rogers wrote:
> I have two questions that have been bothering us for a while.
That would be "bothering Clayton Rogers" for a while
>
>
> Q1. We have two machines. One machine has a 100Mb card which loads
> the kernel off the tft
That would be tftp
> server in no time, less then a s
Clayton,
In almost all cases, your kernels should download in under 1 second.
The card that is taking alot longer, and having neighbour table
overflows, is probably having
a resource conflict of some sort.
Can you try putting the card in another slot?
Is the IRQ or IO-Address of the card conf
I have two questions that have been bothering us for a while.
Q1. We have two machines. One machine has a 100Mb card which loads the
kernel off the tft server in no time, less then a second. The machine
with the 10Mb network card takes anywhere between 30-120 seconds. Why
is it so? Is this
by what method are you booting?
David Anders wrote:
> howdy all,
>
> one out there using ltsp over 802.11b? i've got a wavelan point-to-point
> WAN running and booting ltsp over the WAN. everything boots fine,
> however the X-windows responses are very slow. i've checked the
> bandwidth on th
Y'all seen this already i bet.
--
Michael H. Collins http://www.linuxlink.com
AdmiralPenguinista Navy International
This ain't California http://www.geekaustin.org
Science is not a crime.honk if you fsck
--- Be
This may have been covered elsewhere, but I have a question. I'll be happy when the
search function begins
to work...
I now have three clients on my network using version 2.08. I find that when I'm
logged in at the server and
any one of the three users logs out and attempts to log back in, the
I haven't use any wireless set ups for ltsp yet, sounds interesting
thou.
What window manager / desktop are you running?
Even though bandwith seems ok, it there not some kind
of encoding/decoding that goes on both ends for security reasons?
How does the speed compare to your wired setup?
What
I have found a solution to my own problem !!!
if you run the command:
/usr/bin/esdctl unlock
from within the user session, the problem goes away.
> I have successfully configured my diskless LTSP clients to play remote
> sound via ESD, with RedHat 7.0, GNOME desktop, and LTSP V2.07, but I ha
howdy all,
one out there using ltsp over 802.11b? i've got a wavelan point-to-point
WAN running and booting ltsp over the WAN. everything boots fine,
however the X-windows responses are very slow. i've checked the
bandwidth on the WAN and i'm getting very consistent 11mb connection.
any ideas on
Hi All!
I have just installed LTSP 2.09pre3 on a Slackware 8.0 server, using the
resierfs, for the most part. I am using the
default vmlinuz.ltsp kernel that gets installed from the lts_kernel package.
I am also booting from diskette. When my worksatation boots, it finds the
DHCP server noprobl
giorgio rossi wrote:
>Hi Everyone
>
>Finally, ltsp running but, have a little problem :
>The workstation in same class of the server have not a problem (PIII 500
>Matrox g400 ) , the other client P133 and 486 have a problem with XF86server
>I have try to put another line in lts.conf but nothi
Hi Everyone
Finally, ltsp running but, have a little problem :
The workstation in same class of the server have not a problem (PIII 500
Matrox g400 ) , the other client P133 and 486 have a problem with XF86server
I have try to put another line in lts.conf but nothing to do.
only a little result
Horst,
Could you find out the PCI Device and Vendor ID numbers?
Some bios implementations will display that information as part of the
bootup sequence.
Or, if you could put that network card in a machine with a hard drive,
do a lspci -n
and send me the results. Maybe it just isn't in the n
Jim,
In your answer to Doug last week you said
> Doug,
>
> ...
>
> 2) Option-128 is a vendor ID tag. The value 'e4:45:74:68:00:00' is a
> special value indicating
> Etherboot. That is, etherboot recognizes that number. Etherboot
> will ignore any additional
> options, lik
17 matches
Mail list logo
