Re: [Ltsp-discuss] No mount of filesystem (still)

2004-05-05 Thread Aleš Jagodnik
dana, which ltsp kernel do you have (/tftpboot/lts/...)? which ltsp 3 or 4? do you have same network cards on server and workstation? I have tried ltsp 4 on suse and ltsp 3 and 4 on gentoo, but all these with the same kernel (ltsp 3). as far as permissions, on gentoo I even tried 777-ing whole va

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Mounting filesystem still hangs -usinganothercomputer as workstation

2004-05-05 Thread Aleš Jagodnik
lts.conf: [Default] SERVER = 192.168.0.2 XSERVER= auto X_MOUSE_PROTOCOL = "PS/2" X_MOUSE_DEVICE = "/dev/psaux" X_MOUSE_RESOLUTION = 400 X_MOUSE_BUTTONS= 3 USE_XFS= N SCREEN_01 = startx [ws

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Mounting filesystem still hangs - usinganothercomputer as workstation

2004-05-05 Thread Robin Green
I don't know if this has been mentioned on this thread already, but have you checked your DNS? NFS needs some sort of name resolution otherwise it will hang, in my experience. -- Robin "Left to its own devices, the free market always seeks a work force that is hungry, desperate, and cheap - a wo

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Still not mounting filesystem

2004-05-05 Thread jam
Dana, All of that is correct. Jim. On Wed, 5 May 2004, Dana Persells wrote: > A little more... > I went into /opt/ltsp/i38/etc and looked at fstab > which was/is empty. There is a hosts (file) but gedit > can't find it. There is no hosts.allow. There also are > not many subdirectories. Is all

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] DHCP on another box. SOLVED

2004-05-05 Thread Pete
We converted your setting to Novell's DHCP config and it worked. Thanks for the hint Peter Patrick Barber wrote: Pete wrote: Hi All : What needs to be done on the LTSP server if I want to turn of the DHCP server on the LTSP box and have it replaced by another server on the same subnet. I k

[Ltsp-discuss] Still not mounting filesystem

2004-05-05 Thread Dana Persells
A little more... I went into /opt/ltsp/i38/etc and looked at fstab which was/is empty. There is a hosts (file) but gedit can't find it. There is no hosts.allow. There also are not many subdirectories. Is all this correct or have I found something? Regards, Dana _

[Ltsp-discuss] No mount of filesystem (still)

2004-05-05 Thread Dana Persells
Hi, I have continued to check out everything I can think of to get the system to mount. I went into dhcp and lts and changed the address to 192.168.0.254 thinking something would fail sooner. No such luck, it runs fine and then still stops at mount. I keep thinking that there must be

[Ltsp-discuss] XServer crash with StarOffice 7.0

2004-05-05 Thread Kai Wollweber
Hello, working with StarOffice 7.0 I get a XServer crash on LTSP 3. The terminal "golgi" is a HP PC with pentium 300 MHz, 128 MB RAM and cirrus graphic chip on board. Before adding a NFS swapfile we had serveral server crashes with StarOffice on this type of terminal. After adding the swap fil

[Ltsp-discuss] Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Mounting filesystem still hangs -usinganothercomputer as workstation

2004-05-05 Thread ajagodnik
bash-2.05b# exportfs /var/opt/ltsp/swapfiles 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 /opt/ltsp/i386 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 bash-2.05b# cat /etc/exports /opt/ltsp/i386 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0(ro,no_root_squash,async) /var/opt/ltsp/swapfiles 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0(rw,no_root_squas

[Ltsp-discuss] Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Mounting filesystem still hangs - usinganothercomputer as workstation

2004-05-05 Thread ajagodnik
hi, I get: rpc.mountd: authenticated mount request from ws001.mreza1:693 for /opt/ltsp/i386 (/opt/ltsp/i386) "Then you know your exported data is correctly mounted." however, my workstation stops (problem posted in another thread) But does this message means that nfs works correctly? what is

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Mounting filesystem still hangs - using anothercomputer as workstation

2004-05-05 Thread jkp
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>Dana, >> >>The dhcpd file looks fine. I was hoping to see a problem with your >>subnet mask or broadcast address. I've seen that cause big problems. >> >>Ok, lemme ask this, Can you cycle the power on the network switch ? >> >>Sometimes that causes problems. >> >>A

[Ltsp-discuss] possible hardware problem?

2004-05-05 Thread ajagodnik
Hi, previously I had problems with client stopping at Now I installed a fresh copy of Gentoo, followed their howto, helped myself with LTSP configuration and still exactly the same problem could it be some hardware problem? 1) it is not the swithch, I connected just server-ws001 with crossover

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] ltspcfg script (ltsp4) detects wrong display manager

2004-05-05 Thread jam
Martin, Thanks. RH9 is one of my development/test machines, and it has worked fine here. I'll take another look at it, and see what's going on. Jim McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wed, 5 May 2004, sysadmin wrote: > Having had great success with LTSP3, we decided on the rollout > of the new s

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] ltspcfg script (ltsp4) detects wrong display manager

2004-05-05 Thread Marcos Aurelio Rodrigues
sysadmin wrote: Having had great success with LTSP3, we decided on the rollout of the new servers (RH9 kernel 2.4.20-8) to change to LTSP4. It all works swimmingly, once I overcame a problem with the ltspcfg script. Running option 7 (XDMCP configuration) insists that gdm is our display manager, e

[Ltsp-discuss] ltspcfg script (ltsp4) detects wrong display manager

2004-05-05 Thread sysadmin
Having had great success with LTSP3, we decided on the rollout of the new servers (RH9 kernel 2.4.20-8) to change to LTSP4. It all works swimmingly, once I overcame a problem with the ltspcfg script. Running option 7 (XDMCP configuration) insists that gdm is our display manager, even though we are

[Ltsp-discuss] [MailServer Notification]To Recipient virus found and action taken.

2004-05-05 Thread Administrator
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has detected virus-infected attachment(s). Sender = Mail Delivery System Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject = [Ltsp-discuss] Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Scanning time = 05/05/2004 11:09:45 Engine/Pattern = 7.000-1004/885 Action on virus

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] internet access + shorewall

2004-05-05 Thread Varun
Jason Young wrote: Varun, If you're using Shorewall under Webmin, your file called "policy" in "/etc/shorewall" should look something like this: #SOURCE DESTPOLICY LOG LIMIT:BURST # LEVEL loc net

Virus Alert - ScanMail for Lotus Notes --> [Ltsp-discuss] Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

2004-05-05 Thread Viruslog
ScanMail has detected a virus during a real-time scan of the mail traffic. Date: 05/05/2004 10:47:19 Subject: [Ltsp-discuss] Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Virus: WORM_NETSKY.AB File: myabuselist.pif From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: Deleted; S

[Ltsp-discuss] Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

2004-05-05 Thread Mail Delivery System
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message has been rejected because it has a potentially e