minal and its usb ports? Could students connect via bluetooth from their
terminals to their robots?
--
Bruce Anderson
Westmont High School, Room 44
4805 Westmont Avenue
Campbell, CA 95008
(408)378-1500 x6244
-
Check out th
What are the permissions on /dev/fuse?
Romain Surleau wrote:
> Warwick Bruce Chapman wrote:
>
>> Does fusermount have the correct permissions?
>>
>
> Yes it has. but is is located in /usr/local/bin ...
> I made a symlink in /usr/bin in case, but it didn'
Does fusermount have the correct permissions?
ostrich ~ # ls -l `which fusermount`
-rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 20556 Jan 26 13:52 /usr/bin/fusermount
If not:
chmod 4755 /usr/bin/fusermount
Romain Surleau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I posted the following question in december, and had no answer. I'm now
> reall
> Now gentoo portage ltsp are two versions 4.1 and 4.2.
Yes, but they are hard masked. They cannot be merged unless you unmask
them in /usr/portage/profiles/packages.mask. Until it gets fixed that
is, and I have submitted a solution (I hope).
Regards
--
Warwick Chapman
Managing Director
Cel
Hi All
Gentoo has hard masked LTSP and is (re)considering tagging it for
removal for the Portage tree because it is not currently maintained and
has a security issue (apparently). We are picking up maintainership of
this package.
First off, I need to verify whether there is infact an exploit
I received a mail from Rodney Arne Karlsen ,
which seems to be a colleague of you, or am I wrong?
Excellent. Rodney, if we can be of any assistance, please let us know.
V-Li
--
Warwick Chapman
Managing Director
Cellular: +27 83 7797 094
Hi All
Thusa (our company) will take over this ebuild under my direction. Please let us know where to get
onboard and what committments/updates are required to halt the removal
from the tree.
Donnie, please give me an idea of what your plans are for the
MueKow/Gentoo effort so we may assist.
Howdy
This potential problem occurred to me when answering the last question about
specifying unique configuration options for specific terminals.
We have two LTSP implementations we look after. The old one has a dhcpd.conf
file with the hard-coded MAC addresses in the file for each host, with
. Those
who understand binary, and those who don't.
Quoting Warwick Bruce Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Howdy
>
> The reason we are using the PXELINUX boot method is because we don't want to
>
> have to explicitly specify each client, as in K12LTSP (Which we find to
Howdy
As far as I know, this problem requires you to create a default case, and then
explicitly define exceptions in lts.conf.
For example if you have 30 workstations with 28 serial mice and two PS/2 mice,
then your lts.conf might look something like this:
[Default]
SERVER
0-Core]
> AutoLoginEnable=true
> AutoLoginUser=__account name__
> [X-__hostname__:0-Greeter]
> DefaultUser=__hostname__
> <--cut---
> 6. Run "echo [__hostname__] >>/opt/ltsp/i386/etc/lts.conf"
> 7. On the Station, run Etherboot and see if it starts up. If no
how to turn up debugging on the server to get more
> > >descriptive errors about what is failing.
> > >
> > >I wish you lots of luck though! Let us all know how it goes.
> > >- Jake
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >On Tue, Feb 25, 2003
he server, and the last few lines of the client's
> console log. Also, how long does it "sleep" when the problem occurs?
> - Jake
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 04:58:37PM +0200, Warwick Bruce Chapman wrote:
> > Howdy
> >
> > We have two Linux-Ma
Howdy
We have two Linux-Mandrake 9.0 LTSP Servers, but the second, which we've just
configured is only able to mount the root filesystem on a terminal once, there
after it just sleeps.
The only difference between the servers is that the problem one uses PXELINUX
to boot (the stuff in pxestuff-
Howdy
I have a room of 16 PC's which were working perfectly on Mandrake 8.2 and the
LTSP of that time (kernel 2.4.9-ltsp-6).
The NICs in all the Terminals are new PCI Intel eepro100.
Since installing Mandrake 9.0 and the latest LTSP (kernel 2.4.19-ltsp-1), six
of the terminals, give the follow
Howdy
Please help me out...
I have a room of 16 PC's which were working perfectly on Mandrake 8.2 and the
LTSP of that time, I do not have the version with me.
The NICs in all the Terminals are new PCI Intel eepro100.
6 of the terminals, give the following error:
Running /linuxrc
Mounti
to work with this. I hope LTSP and Mandrake ver 9 play together
nicely. It would be nice to get out of Windows and have something go right.
I hope this contributation helps others,
Bruce Gaylord (Gaillard)
---
This sf.net email is sponsore
to work with this. I hope LTSP and Mandrake ver 9 play together
nicely. It would be nice to get out of Windows and have something go right.
I hope this contributation helps others,
Bruce Gaylord (Gaillard)
---
This sf.net email is sponsore
What about the cost of the booth?
I looked on the web site and it was basicly avoided.
I can't imagine "inexpensive" in NYC.
Bruce Gaylord (Gaillard)
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Billson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tom Brown" <[EMAIL PROTEC
have the installed do it for you in redhat 7.2 or 7.3
Also I am somewhat new so find out other peoples answers befor totally
deciding to do anything.
I have more hardware to backup to than most people and I'm not sure what
information you might lose as you mentioned.
Bruce Gaylord (Gaillard)
-
es off.
You tell the boss its taken care of because you spent an extra $80 for the
3rd drive, and ignore the blinking warning light
Bruce Gaylord (Gaillard)
- Original Message -
From: "root" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "John McCreesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <
This is the best help I can give you.
http://www.ltsp.org/instructions-3.0.html
Look at the bottom of the page.
I configured ltsp on a workstation having a 3c905b pci network card and
it works fine. However, when i try to configure another client having a
3c509b ISA network adaptator, it gives
22 matches
Mail list logo
