e, etc.
> //get properly parser for current entry
> //use parser with zis (ZipInputStream)
> }
>
> good luck
> Ernesto
>
> Luke Shannon escribió:
>
> >Hello;
> >
> >Anyone have an ideas on how to index the contents within zip files?
> >
>
Hello;
Anyone have an ideas on how to index the contents within zip files?
Thanks,
Luke
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello;
I'm trying to create a Filter that only retrieves documents with a path
field containing a sub string(s).
I can get the Filter to work if the BooleanQuery below (used to create the
Filter) contains only TermQueries (this requires me to know the exact path).
But not if it contains Wildcard?
Responding to this posts. Please disreguard.
Sorry.
- Original Message -
From: "Luke Shannon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users List"
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 5:16 PM
Subject: MultiField Queries without the QueryParser
> Hello
Hello;
The book meantions the MultiFieldQueryParser as one way of dealing with
multifield queries. Can someone point me in the direction of other ways?
Thanks,
Luke
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional c
.
Thanks!
Luke
- Original Message -
From: "Todd VanderVeen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users List"
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 6:26 PM
Subject: Re: Optional Terms in a single query
> Luke Shannon wrote:
>
> >The API I'm working with combi
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 5:33 PM
Subject: Re: Optional Terms in a single query
> Luke Shannon wrote:
>
> >Hi;
> >
> >I'm trying to create a query that look for a field containing type:181
and
> >name doesn't contain tim, bill or harry.
>
1 PM
Subject: Re: Optional Terms in a single query
> On Monday 21 February 2005 23:23, Luke Shannon wrote:
> > Hi;
> >
> > I'm trying to create a query that look for a field containing type:181
and
> > name doesn't contain tim, bill or harry.
>
> typ
Hi;
I'm trying to create a query that look for a field containing type:181 and
name doesn't contain tim, bill or harry.
+(type: 181) +((-name: tim -name:bill -name:harry +oldfaith:stillHere))
+(type: 181) +((-name: tim OR bill OR harry +oldfaith:stillHere))
+(type: 181) +((-name:*(tim bill harry)
Hello;
Does anyone see a problem with the following approach?
For synonyms, rather than putting them in the index, I put the original term
and all the synonyms in the query.
Every time I create a query, I check if the term has any synonyms. If it
does, I create Boolean Query OR'ing one Query obj
return result;
}
}
Luke Shannon | Software Developer
FutureBrand Toronto
207 Queen's Quay, Suite 400
Toronto, ON, M5J 1A7
416 642 7935 (office)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is exactly what I was looking for.
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: "Steven Rowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users List"
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: Analyzing Advise
> Luke Shannon wrote:
> > But now that I'
Hi;
I'm having a situation where my synonyms weren't working for a particular
field.
When I looked at the indexing I noticed it was a Keyword, thus not
tokenized.
The problem is when I switched that field to Text (now tokenized with my
SynonymAnalyzer) a bunch of query queires broke that where t
Nice work Eric. I would like to spend more time playing with it, but I saw a
few things I really liked. When a specific query turns up no results you
prompt the client to preform a free form search. Less sauvy search users
will benefit from this strategy. I also like the display of information when
Thanks Erik. Option 2 sounds like the path of least resistance.
Luke
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Hatcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users List"
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 9:05 PM
Subject: Re: Query Question
> On Feb 17, 2005, at 5:51 P
hen you
call the toString():
+(type:203) +(name:*home\**)
This looks right to me.
Any theories as to why the it would not match:
Document (relevant fields):
Keyword
Keyword
Is the \ escaping both * characters?
Thanks,
Luke
----- Original Message -
From: "Luke Shannon"
That is a query toString(). I created the Query using a Wildcard Query
object.
Luke
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Hatcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users List"
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 3:00 PM
Subject: Re: Query Question
>
> O
Hello;
Why won't this query find the document below?
Query:
+(type:203) +(name:*home\**)
Document (relevant fields):
Keyword
Keyword
I was hoping by escaping the * it would be treated as a string. What am I
doing wrong?
Thanks,
Luke
-
Hi All;
How could I handle doing a wildcard search on the input *mario?
Basically I would be interested in finding all the Documents containing
*mario
Here is an example of such a Query generated:
+(type:138) +(name:**mario*)
How can I let Lucene know that the star closest to Mario on the left
Thanks Eric. This is indeed the way to go.
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Hatcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users List"
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: Negative Match
>
> On Feb 11, 2005, at 9:52 AM, Luke Shannon wro
e
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Hatcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users List"
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 7:23 PM
Subject: Re: Negative Match
>
> On Feb 10, 2005, at 4:06 PM, Luke Shannon wrote:
>
> > I think I found a pretty good way
I think I found a pretty good way to do a negative match.
In this query I am looking for all the Documents that have a kcfileupload
field with any value except for jpg.
Query negativeMatch = new WildcardQuery(new Term("kcfileupload",
"*jpg*"));
BooleanQuery typeNegAll = new Boole
Are there any issues with having a bunch of boolean queries and than adding
them to one big boolean queries (making them all required)?
Or should I be looking at Query.combine()?
Thanks,
Luke
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Hatcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users List"
Sent: Tu
Are there any issues with having a bunch of boolean queries and than adding
them to one big boolean queries (making them all required)?
Or should I be looking at Query.combine()?
Thanks,
Luke
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Hatcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users List"
Sent: Tu
I implemented this concept for my ends with query. It works very well!
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Hostetter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users List"
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 9:37 PM
Subject: Re: Starts With x and Ends With x Queries
>
> : Also keep in mind that QueryP
Bingo. Thanks!
Luke
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Hostetter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users List"
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 5:10 PM
Subject: Re: RangeQuery With Date
> : Your dates need to be stored in lexicographical order for the RangeQuery
> : to work.
> :
> : Inde
Hi;
I am working on a set of queries that allow you to find modification dates
before, after and equal to a given date.
Here are some of the before queries I have been playing with. I want a query
that pull up dates modified before Nov 11 2004:
Query query = new RangeQuery(null, new Term("modifi
Hello;
I have these two documents:
Text
Keyword
Text
Text
Text
Text
Text
Text
Text
Text
Text
Text
Text
Text
Keyword
Keyword
Text
Text
Text
Text
Text
Text
Text
Text
Text
Text
I would like to be able to match a name fields that starts with testing
(specifically) and those that end with it.
I th
Hello;
I think Chris's approach might be helpfull, but I can't seems to get it to
work.
So since I running out of time and I still need to figure out "starts with"
and "ends with" queries, I have implemented a hacky solution to getting all
documents with a kcfileupload field present that does not
Hi Chris;
So the result would contain all documents that don't have field f containing
x?
What I need to figure out how to do is return all documents that have a
field f, but does not contain x.
Thanks for your post.
Luke
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Hostetter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
ord("owner", "jake"));
document.add(Field.Text("keywords", "jakes sensitive info"));
writer.addDocument(document);
writer.close();
}
public void testSecurityFilter() throws Exception {
TermQuery query = new TermQuery(new Term("keywords",
rtEquals(1, hits.length());
assertEquals("elwood is safe",
"jakes sensitive info", hits.doc(0).get("keywords"));
}
}
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 13:04:50 -0500, Luke Shannon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello;
>
> I have a query that finds documen
ex term of "stillhere" in that field. It depends on how you built
the index (index and stored fields are different), but I would check on
that. Also maybe try out TermQuery and see if that does anything for
you.
> -Original Message-
> From: Luke Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL
ng x
First thing that jumps out is case-sensitivity. Does your olFaithFull
field contain "stillHere" or "stillhere"?
--Leto
> -Original Message-
> From: Luke Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> This works:
>
> query1 = QueryParser.parse("jpg&q
This works:
query1 = QueryParser.parse("jpg", "kcfileupload", new StandardAnalyzer());
query2 = QueryParser.parse("stillHere", "olFaithFull", new
StandardAnalyzer());
BooleanQuery typeNegativeSearch = new BooleanQuery();
typeNegativeSearch.add(query1, false, false);
typeNegativeSearch.add(query2,
I did, I have ran both queries in Luke.
kcfileupload:ppt
returns 1
olFaithfull:stillhere
returns 119
Luke
- Original Message -
From: "Maik Schreiber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users List"
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 4:55 PM
Subject: Re: Parsing The Query: Every document
Yes. There should be 119 with stillHere, and if I run a query in Luke on
kcfileupload = ppt, it returns one result. I am thinking I should at least
get this result back with: -kcfileupload:jpg +olFaithFull:stillhere?
Luke
- Original Message -
From: "Maik Schreiber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
Hello,
Still working on the same query, here is the code I am currently working
with.
I am thinking this should bring up all the documents that have
olFaithFull=stillHere and kcfileupload!=jpg (so anything else)
query1 = QueryParser.parse("jpg", "kcfileupload", new StandardAnalyzer());
query2 =
Ok.
I have added the following to every document:
doc.add(Field.UnIndexed("olFaithfull", "stillHere"));
The plan is a query that says: olFaithull = stillHere and kcfileupload!=jpg.
I have been experimenting with the MultiFieldQueryParser, this is not
working out for me. From a syntax how is thi
Thanks!
I can wait for the release.
Luke
- Original Message -
From: "Andrzej Bialecki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users List"
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: Synonyms Not Showing In The Index
> Andrzej Bialecki
Hello;
I have a query that finds document that contain fields with a specific
value.
query1 = QueryParser.parse("jpg", "kcfileupload", new StandardAnalyzer());
This works well.
I would like a query that find documents containing all kcfileupload fields
that don't contain jpg.
The example I fou
The indexing process is totally synchronized in our system. Thus if an
Indexing thread starts up and the index exists, but is locked, I know this
to be the only indexing processing running so the lock must be from a
process that got stopped before it could finish.
So right before I begin writing t
Hello;
It seems my Synonym analyzer is working (based on some successful queries).
But I can't see the synonyms in the index using Luke. Is this correct?
Thanks,
Luke
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Actually now that I am looking at it, I think I am already accomplishing it.
I wanted all the documents with Mario in either field to show up.
There are two, but one has them in both fields in the Document. This is
correct.
Thanks for the help. It would have taken me a while to catch that.
Luke
This is it. Thank Maik. One of the docs had the result in both name and
desc.
Not sure how to handle this yet, I still don't know enough about
QueryParsing.
Luke
- Original Message -
From: "Maik Schreiber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users List"
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 6
Hello;
Getting squinted with Query Parsing. I have a questions:
Query query = MultiFieldQueryParser
.parse("mario", new String[] { "name", "desc" }, new int[] {
MultiFieldQueryParser.NORMAL_FIELD,
MultiFieldQueryParser.NORMAL_FIELD }, new StandardAnalyzer());
Inde
In our application I use regular expressions to strip all tags in one
situation and specific ones in another situation. Here is sample code for
both:
This strips all html 4.0 tags except , , , , , ,
:
html_source =
Pattern.compile("",
Pattern.CASE_INSENSITIVE).matcher(html_source).replaceAll("");
Hello;
I have a situation where I need to combine the fields returned from one
document to an existing document.
Is there something in the API for this that I'm missing or is this the best
way:
//add the fields contained in the PDF document to the existing doc Document
Document attachedDoc = Luc
Not sure if the API provides a method for this, but you could use Luke:
http://www.getopt.org/luke/
It gives you a count and lets you step through each Doc looking at their
fields.
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Lynch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users List"
Sent: Tuesday, Februar
the top.
> You should check out the Explanation class, which can dump all scoring
> factors in text or HTML format.
>
> Otis
>
>
> --- Luke Shannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi All;
> >
> > I just want to make sure I have the right idea about
Hi All;
I just want to make sure I have the right idea about boosting.
So if I boost a document (Document A) after I index it (lets say a score of
2.0) Lucene will now consider this document relativly more important than
other documents in the index with a boost factor less than 2.0. This boost
f
+range
>
> The grayed-out text has the section name and page number, so you can
> quickly locate this stuff in your ebook.
>
> Otis
> P.S.
> Do you know if Indigo/Chapters has Lucene in Action on their book
> shelves yet?
>
>
> --- Luke Shannon <[EMAIL PROTEC
Hello;
My lucene application has been performing well in our company's CMS
application. The plan now is too offer "advanced searching".
I just bought the eBook version of Lucene in Action to help with my research
(it is taking Amazon for ever to ship the printed version to Canada).
The book look
just for debugging
> purposes like this.
>
> java org.pdfbox.searchengine.lucene.LucenePDFDocument
>
> and it should print out the fields of the lucene Document object. Is the
> url there and is it correct?
>
> Ben
>
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2005, Luke Shannon wrote:
>
ePDFDocument.getDocument()
> method?
>
> Ben
>
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2005, Luke Shannon wrote:
>
> > Hello;
> >
> > Our CMS now allows users to create PDF documents (uses FOP) and than
search
> > them.
> >
> > I seem to be able to index these documents o
Hello;
Our CMS now allows users to create PDF documents (uses FOP) and than search
them.
I seem to be able to index these documents ok. But when I am generating the
results to display I get a Null Pointer Exception while trying to use a
variable that should contain the url keyword for one of thes
gt; String indexLocation = "/home/quilombo/indexHtmlCapoeira/index";
>
> thanks for your help
>
> philippe
>
>
> On Friday 14 January 2005 18:33, Luke Shannon wrote:
> > The jsp is having some trouble locating the index folder. It is probably
> > the path y
sage has been
> "unable to open the directory"
>
> thanks
> philippe
>
> On Friday 14 January 2005 17:56, Luke Shannon wrote:
> > Does it give some sort of error message?
> >
> > Luke
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "phil
Does it give some sort of error message?
Luke
- Original Message -
From: "philippe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 11:39 AM
Subject: where to place the index directory
> Hi everybody,
>
> can someone help me ?
>
> i have a problem with my index ?
>
> on my loca
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users List"
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 3:24 AM
Subject: RE: what if the IndexReader crashes, after delete, before close.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Luke Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: maandag 10 januari 2005 15:46
Aan:
I run the indexer in our CMS everytime a content change has occured. It is
an incremental update so only documents that generate a different UID than
the coresponding UID in the index get processed.
Luke
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin L. Cobb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users Lis
One thing that will happen is the lock file will get left behind. This means
when you start back up and try to create another Reader you will get a file
lock error.
Our system is threaded and synchronized. Thus when a Reader is being created
I know it is the only one (the Writer comes after the re
This may not be a simple way, but you could just do a quick check on the
folder to see if there is more than one file containing the name segment.
Luke
- Original Message -
From: "Crump, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 2:24 PM
Subject: Check to see if ind
Hello Jac;
If you have verified that the index folder is indeed being create and their
is a segment(s) file(s) in it, check that the IndexSearcher in the demo is
pointing to that location. This is a easy error to make and would account
for the error message no segments folder.
Luke
- Origin
This is taken from the example code writen by Doug Cutting that ships with
Lucene.
It is the key our system uses. It also comes in handy when incrementally
updating.
Luke
public static String uid(File f) {
// Append path and date into a string in such a way that lexicographic
// sorting give
I had a similar situation with the same problem.
I found the previous system was creating all the object (including the
Searcher) and than updating the Index.
The result was the Searcher was not able to find any of the data just added
to the Index.
The solution for me was to move the creation of
If you opened an IndexReader was has it also been closed before you attempt
to delete?
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 7:39 PM
Subject: Deleting an index
I'm writing some junit tests for my search code (which layers on top
This is a good place to start for extracting the content from power point
files:
http://www.mail-archive.com/poi-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg04809.html
Luke
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Cortes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 1
Nice Work!
Congratulations Guys.
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Hatcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Lucene List"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 3:52 AM
Subject: Lucene in Action e-book now available!
> The Lucene in Action e-book
I use "Luke". It is pretty good.
http://www.getopt.org/luke/
Luke
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Cortes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 8:32 AM
Subject: LIMO problems
> Hi, I'm tying Limo (Index Monitor of Lucene) and I have a problem,
Hi;
The indexReader has a delete method that can do this:
public final void delete(int docNum)
throws IOException
Deletes the document numbered docNum. Once a document is deleted it will not
appear in TermDocs or TermPostitions enumerations. Attempts to read its
field with the document(int) metho
there be logic in the flaw (swap that), or could you be catching an
> Exception that is thrown only on Winblows due to Windows not letting
> you do certain things with referenced files and dirs?
>
> Otis
>
> --- Luke Shannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello
ed, so you need a new IndexSearcher. Could
> there be logic in the flaw (swap that), or could you be catching an
> Exception that is thrown only on Winblows due to Windows not letting
> you do certain things with referenced files and dirs?
>
> Otis
>
> --- Luke Shannon <[EM
Hello All;
Things have been running smoothly on Linux for sometime. We set up a version
of the site on a Win2K machine, this is when all the "fun" started.
A pdf would be added to the system. The indexer would run, find the new
file, index it and successfully complete the update of the index fold
I think the read locks are preventing you from deleting from the index with
your reader and writing to the index with a writer at the same time.
If you never use a writer than I guess you don't need to worry about this.
But how do you create the indexes?
Luke
- Original Message -
From:
fully support PDF security.
>
> Ben
>
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Luke Shannon wrote:
>
> > Hello All;
> >
> > Perhaps this should be on the PDFBox forum but I was curious if anyone
has
> > seen this error parsing PDF documents using packages other than PDFBox.
>
Hello All;
Perhaps this should be on the PDFBox forum but I was curious if anyone has
seen this error parsing PDF documents using packages other than PDFBox.
/usr/tomcat/fb_hub/GM/Administration/Document/java/java_io.pdf
java.io.IOException: You do not have permission to extract text
The weird t
As I understand it optimization is when you merge several segments into one
allowing for faster queries.
The FAQs and API have further details.
http://lucene.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/faq/faqmanager.cgi?file=chapter.indexing&toc=faq#q24
Luke
- Original Message -
From: "Miguel Angel" <[EM
PDF(s) can definitely slow things down, depending on their size.
If there are a few larger PDF documents that time is definitely possible.
Luke
- Original Message -
From: "Miguel Angel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 11:25 AM
Subject: How m
Hey All;
Is it possible for there to be a situation where the locking file is in place
after the reader has been closed?
I have extra logging in place and have followed the code execution. The reader
finishes deleting old content and closes (I know this for sure). This is the
only reader insta
Check out:
http://jakarta.apache.org/poi/
- Original Message -
From: "Miguel Angel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 4:49 PM
Subject: DOC, PPT index???
> Hi !!!
> Lucene can index the files (do, ppt the MS OFFICE ??)
> How do you can this in
Thank you for the suggestion.
I ended up biting the bullet and re-working my indexing logic. Luckily the
system itself knows what the "current" version of a document is (otherwise
it won't know which one to display to the user) for any given folder.
I was able to get a static method I could call
I have not extensively tried the snowtide package but they have a trial
> download and the docs show that it should be just as easy to integrate as
> PDFBox is. They list pricings on there site as well, which is nice that
> it is not hidden as some software companies do.
>
> Ben
&
Hi;
I am using the PDFBox's getLuceneDocument method to parse my PDF documents. It
returns good results and was very easy to integrate into the project. However
it is slow.
Does anyone know of a faster package? Someone mentioned snowtide on an earlier
post. Anyone have experience with this pac
These are the ones I think. They were the first things I read on Lucene and
were very helpful.
http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2003/03/05/lucene.html
http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2003/01/15/lucene.html
- Original Message -
From: "Neelam Bhatnagar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Otis G
efilename" and "version" and make each a
keyword.
>
> Sort your query by version descending, and only use the first
> "basefile" you encounter.
>
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:05:19 -0500, Luke Shannon
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hey all;
> >
Hey all;
I have ran into an interesting case.
Our system has notes. These need to be indexed. They are xml files called
default.xml and are easily parsed and indexed. No problem, have been doing it
all week.
The problem is if someone edits the note, the system doesn't update the
default.xml.
Hello;
Hopfully I understand the question.
1. Modify the indexDoc(file) method to consider the file type pdf:
else if (file.getPath().endsWith(".html") ||
file.getPath().endsWith(".pdf")) {
2. Create a specific branch of code to create the lucene document from the
file type and than add it to t
Try this:
http://www.getopt.org/luke/
Luke
- Original Message -
From: "lingaraju" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 10:00 AM
Subject: tool to check the index field
> HI ALL
>
> I am having index file created by other pe
sing
> 'Concurrent' and 'updates' in the same sentence sounds like a possible
> source of the problem. You have to use a single IndexWriter and it
> should not overlap with an IndexReader that is doing deletes.
>
> Otis
>
> --- Luke Shannon <[EMAIL PR
e been indexed
correctly.
>
> my two cents
>
> Nader
>
>
>
> Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
>
> >'Concurrent' and 'updates' in the same sentence sounds like a possible
> >source of the problem. You have to use a single IndexWriter and it
&g
index, the IndexWriter runs one instance at a time, so what
kind of increments are we talking about it takes a bit of doing to overwhelm
Lucene.
>
> What's your update schedule, how big is the index, and after how many
updates does the system crash?
>
> Nader Henein
>
>
>
&
of increments are we talking about it takes a bit of doing to overwhelm
Lucene.
>
> What's your update schedule, how big is the index, and after how many
updates does the system crash?
>
> Nader Henein
>
>
>
> Luke Shannon wrote:
>
> >It conistantly breaks when
fs file (cfs files are compound files
> that contain all index files described at the above URL). Maybe you
> can provide the code that causes this error in Bugzilla for somebody to
> look at. Does it consistently break?
>
> Otis
>
>
> --- Luke Shannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I received the error below when I was attempting to over whelm my system with
incremental update requests.
What is this file it is looking for? I checked the index. It contains:
_4c.del
_4d.cfs
deletable
segments
Where does _4c.fnm come from?
Here is the error:
Unable to create the create the
rta.apache.org/lucene/docs/api/org/apache/lucene/index/IndexReader.html#getCurrentVersion(org.apache.lucene.store.Directory)
>
> Otis
>
>
> --- Luke Shannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It would nice if the IndexerSearcher contained a method that could
> &
www.pdfbox.org
Once you get the package installed the code you can use is:
Document doc = LucenePDFDocument.getDocument(file);
writer.addDocument(doc);
This method returns the PDF in Lucene document format.
Luke
- Original Message -
From: "Miguel Angel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <
It would nice if the IndexerSearcher contained a method that could return
the last modified date of the index folder it was created with.
This would make it easier to know when you need to create a new Searcher.
- Original Message -
From: "Otis Gospodnetic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucen
Hi Satoshi;
(B
(BI troubled shooted a problem similar to this by moving around a
(BIndexReader.isLocked(indexFileLocation) to determine exactly when the reader
(Bwas closed.
(B
(BNote: the method throws an error if the index file doesn't exist that you
(Bare checking on.
(B
(BLuke
(B
(B-
itional load
that might be caused by locking off pieces of the database rather then the
whole database. I think I need to look in the developer archives.
>
> JohnE
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Luke Shannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Monday, November 15,
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
