December 4th, 2007
Dear Lutenists:
The Spinacino Lute manuscript as an electronic book is a great gift. You
can almost feel the soft vellum under your hands. Almost makes one contemplate
the possibility of reprints in part or in whole. Illustrated manuscripts are so
exciting, it is
://mysite.verizon.net/vzepq31c/arthurjnesslutescores/
- Original Message -
From: Denys Stephens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Arthur Ness' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Lute Net'
lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 5:00 PM
Subject: RE: [LUTE] Re: Spinacino online
Dear Arthur,
Your information about
I think I'll be buying that one. E lucevan le stelle Records is a
brilliant label - I want to buy everything they've released. And
their CD artwork and booklets are the best - have a look at the cover
for La Musique Dangereuse:
http://www.elucevanlestelle.com/la-musique-dangereuse/
Andrew
it becomes that 'facsimilies'are not all that we
think they are!
Best wishes,
Denys
-Original Message-
From: Arthur Ness [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 December 2007 23:07
To: Lute Net
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Spinacino online
Dear Denys,
I think it was about the time of the Utrecht
those who have made this facsimile avaiable, most of
all the Jagellionian University in Cracow who now own
the original.
Best wishes,
Denys
-Original Message-
From: Sean Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 December 2007 04:40
To: Lute Net
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Spinacino online
Denys Stephens wrote:
Just casually looking through the new images
this evening f.37v of the Libro Primo caught my eye -
in the bottom stave, 7th complete measure, the fourth event
looks like a very indistinct '2' and someone has faintly
added a 2 below the stave line, plus a '1' (or an
Denys Stephens wrote:
Stephen Fryer is of course right in pointing out
that it's presumably the slight distortion of the pages
themselves that causes the stave lines to look distorted.
It seems clear from the Minkoff print that this distortion
was not evident in the photographs used to make
Ness [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 December 2007 23:00
To: Lute Net
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Spinacino online
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2007 9:22 AM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Spinacino online
Dear Wolfgang
/
- Original Message -
From: Denys Stephens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2007 5:48 PM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Spinacino online
Dear Arthur All,
Even though we are looking at two sets of images
of the same prints, the published and online facsimilies
That is simply stunning! Many thanks to you and John Griffiths.
Sean
On Nov 30, 2007, at 3:26 PM, Denys Stephens wrote:
Dear All,
The digital facsimile of the two Spinacino books has gone online today
as John Griffiths said it would in a mailing to the list a while ago:
Denys Stephens wrote:
Secondly, many of the stave lines in the online images
are very distorted, but in the Minkoff print they are dead
straight. So the stave lines must surely have been straight
when the Paris photos were taken. I wonder if the distortion that
has since occurred might have
Dear denys,
Do you noticed differences to the minkoff facsimile?
By the way:
E lucevan le stelle just published their spinacino cd.
Greetings
Wolfgang w. , member of the 7-c renaissance lute group! My one and
only...
http://www.elucevanlestelle.com/musicstore/website/it/index.php?section_
Very good news!
Now we can check the facsimile against Kenneth Be on YouTube, and D. Towne
on the Fronimo page (and perhaps someone may even take on to put also book
two there?). Kudos to all involved in putting this landmark facsimile freely
on the net!
Best wishes
G.
PS. The first duet
Dear Wolfgang,
On 12/1/2007, wolfgang wiehe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you noticed differences to the minkoff facsimile?
Interesting! I have both. Could you show us what differences you have
found thus far?
All the best,
Arto
To get on or off this list see list information at
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2007 9:22 AM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Spinacino online
Dear Wolfgang,
On 12/1/2007, wolfgang wiehe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you noticed differences to the minkoff
15 matches
Mail list logo
