On 08-Oct-99 David S de Lis wrote:
Hi all,
Hi David!
[sniped good explanation]
I think I'd like to hear other developers points of views regarding this
issue. As I said before, it's not big thing, but I thought it deserved a
defense... :)
I think Jean-Marc is right ;), if we introduce
On 10-Oct-99 Garst R. Reese wrote:
go to:
http://bragg.phys.uwm.edu/xforms/
and get the bxforms .89 for glibc2.1
I wouldn't advice to do this! I have discovered problems with
lyx-1.0.4 with bxforms-.89. Use .88 version then you won't have
any unexpected problems!!!
Greets Jürgen
"Kayvan" == Kayvan A Sylvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kayvan On Sun, Oct 10, 1999 at 08:00:46AM -0400, Bobby de Vos wrote:
Maybe you have a different lyx RPM? The only 1.0.4 lyx rpm on
rpmfind.net was from MandrakeSoft. Is there another 1.0.4 lyx rpm
somewhere? I have KDE libs installed
"Kayvan" == Kayvan A Sylvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kayvan On Sat, Oct 09, 1999 at 07:03:38PM -0400, Bobby de Vos wrote:
I think I may have found the problem. It only dumps core when I run
as root, having run su - from a user account. lyx cannot open the
display in this case. If lyx can
"Karl" == Karl JH Millar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Karl It may be that your colourmap is full. XForms just dumps core on
Karl initialization if there aren't many colours available. Then
Karl again it could be something else.
If it dumps core, this means that you have a xforms version which
I think Jean-Marc is right ;), if we introduce this we want it right
straight away and as this is document specific it's related to the
document and not to the locale. We have so many hacks in the source
I agree with the original poster that it's an improvement to translate
the fixed text to
Hi,
Trying to get Finnish ispell to work under LyX.
Made a finnish.aff, and a (small) finnish.dict, created a finnish.hash and put
it in /usr/lib/ispell/ where it belongs; and it works with
ispell -d finnish mytext.lyx
But from
lyx mytext.lyx
it doesn't work from the menu!
Error
However, when running this it does not
have /usr/local/bin in the path (at least with RedHat-6.0 default
configuration of rpm) and consequently did not find my sgmltools-2
installation.
That is a problem with your setting the PATH for root.
The spec file sources your /etc/profile.
On Mon, 11 Oct 1999, Mate Wierdl wrote:
However, when running this it does not
have /usr/local/bin in the path (at least with RedHat-6.0 default
configuration of rpm) and consequently did not find my sgmltools-2
installation.
That is a problem with your setting the PATH for
On Mon, Oct 11, 1999 at 03:55:27PM +0100, Horst G Kausch wrote:
assume it is safe to do so. Should it put it in the beginning or the
end of PATH?
Mate
I know that. The point is that it is the default configuration for
Redhat-6.0 and also appropriate from RedHat's point of view:
On Mon, 11 Oct 1999, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
So, I agree with Mate: It is the sysadmin's responsibility to fix root's
PATH when adding non-standard components to the system.
The real fix is to repackage sgmltools as an RPM (it's really quite simple)
or to fix root's PATH if you insist on
On Fri, Oct 08, 1999 at 04:35:16PM -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
Several months ago, I sent a note to this list asking about DocBook
support in Lyx, and you all said "it'll be here soon." Well, it is here
and it is great. You guys have put out a great product, and are to be
commended. Thanks a
On Fri, Oct 08, 1999 at 02:13:30PM +0100, Horst G Kausch wrote:
I finally had time to get lyx-1.0.4.tar.gz:
[rpm issues]
* I am pleased to report that all issues with DocBook support I reported
work find for me now.
:) And keep the reports coming :)
Horst
--
José
On Sun, 03 Oct 1999 10:57:42 -0400, Yang Dehua wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yang Dehua [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
132 +++ rc = stream('chkconfig.sed', 'c', 'seek +'size);
REX0026: Error 26 running G:\xfree86\lib\x11\lyx\configure.cmd, line
132:
Invalid whole
On Mon, Oct 11, 1999 at 04:32:32PM +0100, Horst G Kausch wrote:
I agree.
OK, we all agree then.
Unfortunately, all to often contributed .rpms (i.e. not officially part of
RedHat) are installed into /usr/local not /usr.
I would have packed sgmltools-2.0.x up as an rpm but version
LyX says I don't have foiltex.
I use teTeX 1.0, which has:
/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/foiltex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/foiltex/fltfonts.def
/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/foiltex/foil17.clo
/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/foiltex/foil20.clo
/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/foiltex/foil25.clo
On 10 Oct 1999, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| the new strand yet but I already have some doubts about the recent removal
| of one of those tests.
That test was completely bogus, since it demanded that a std::string
cannont contain '\0', so the test had
On Mon, 11 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LyX says I don't have foiltex.
I use teTeX 1.0, which has:
teTeX-1.0 and onwards doesn't include foiltex anymore because of copyright
reasons. Did you add the foiltex installation yourself? or part of a
Debian or FreeBSD package? Then you may
On Tue, Oct 12, 1999 at 01:23:12PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
On Mon, 11 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LyX says I don't have foiltex.
I use teTeX 1.0, which has:
teTeX-1.0 and onwards doesn't include foiltex anymore because of copyright
reasons. Did you add the foiltex
Wow.
Such immediate, content-rich answers deserve Steve Job's best all time
compliment: "insanely great!"
Thanks guys.
On 08-Oct-99 David S de Lis wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi David!
[sniped good explanation]
>
> I think I'd like to hear other developers points of views regarding this
> issue. As I said before, it's not big thing, but I thought it deserved a
> defense... :)
I think Jean-Marc is right ;), if we
On 10-Oct-99 Garst R. Reese wrote:
> go to:
> http://bragg.phys.uwm.edu/xforms/
> and get the bxforms .89 for glibc2.1
I wouldn't advice to do this! I have discovered problems with
lyx-1.0.4 with bxforms-.89. Use .88 version then you won't have
any unexpected problems!!!
Greets Jürgen
> "Kayvan" == Kayvan A Sylvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kayvan> On Sun, Oct 10, 1999 at 08:00:46AM -0400, Bobby de Vos wrote:
>> Maybe you have a different lyx RPM? The only 1.0.4 lyx rpm on
>> rpmfind.net was from MandrakeSoft. Is there another 1.0.4 lyx rpm
>> somewhere? I have KDE libs
> "Kayvan" == Kayvan A Sylvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kayvan> On Sat, Oct 09, 1999 at 07:03:38PM -0400, Bobby de Vos wrote:
>> I think I may have found the problem. It only dumps core when I run
>> as root, having run su - from a user account. lyx cannot open the
>> display in this case.
> "Karl" == Karl JH Millar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Karl> It may be that your colourmap is full. XForms just dumps core on
Karl> initialization if there aren't many colours available. Then
Karl> again it could be something else.
If it dumps core, this means that you have a xforms version
> I think Jean-Marc is right ;), if we introduce this we want it right
> straight away and as this is document specific it's related to the
> document and not to the locale. We have so many hacks in the source
I agree with the original poster that it's an improvement to translate
the fixed text
Hi,
Trying to get Finnish ispell to work under LyX.
Made a finnish.aff, and a (small) finnish.dict, created a finnish.hash and put
it in /usr/lib/ispell/ where it belongs; and it works with
ispell -d finnish mytext.lyx
But from
lyx mytext.lyx
it doesn't work from the menu!
Error
However, when running this it does not
have /usr/local/bin in the path (at least with RedHat-6.0 default
configuration of rpm) and consequently did not find my sgmltools-2
installation.
That is a problem with your setting the PATH for root.
The spec file sources your /etc/profile.
On Mon, 11 Oct 1999, Mate Wierdl wrote:
> However, when running this it does not
>have /usr/local/bin in the path (at least with RedHat-6.0 default
>configuration of rpm) and consequently did not find my sgmltools-2
>installation.
>
> That is a problem with your setting the
On Mon, Oct 11, 1999 at 03:55:27PM +0100, Horst G Kausch wrote:
> > assume it is safe to do so. Should it put it in the beginning or the
> > end of PATH?
> >
> > Mate
>
> I know that. The point is that it is the default configuration for
> Redhat-6.0 and also appropriate from RedHat's point
On Mon, 11 Oct 1999, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> So, I agree with Mate: It is the sysadmin's responsibility to fix root's
> PATH when adding non-standard components to the system.
>
> The real fix is to repackage sgmltools as an RPM (it's really quite simple)
> or to fix root's PATH if you
On Fri, Oct 08, 1999 at 04:35:16PM -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
> Several months ago, I sent a note to this list asking about DocBook
> support in Lyx, and you all said "it'll be here soon." Well, it is here
> and it is great. You guys have put out a great product, and are to be
> commended.
On Fri, Oct 08, 1999 at 02:13:30PM +0100, Horst G Kausch wrote:
> I finally had time to get lyx-1.0.4.tar.gz:
[rpm issues]
> * I am pleased to report that all issues with DocBook support I reported
> work find for me now.
:) And keep the reports coming :)
> Horst
--
José
On Sun, 03 Oct 1999 10:57:42 -0400, Yang Dehua wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Yang Dehua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > >
>> > > > 132 +++ rc = stream('chkconfig.sed', 'c', 'seek +'size);
>> > > >REX0026: Error 26 running G:\xfree86\lib\x11\lyx\configure.cmd, line
>> > >
On Mon, Oct 11, 1999 at 04:32:32PM +0100, Horst G Kausch wrote:
> > I agree.
> >
> OK, we all agree then.
>
> Unfortunately, all to often contributed .rpms (i.e. not officially part of
> RedHat) are installed into /usr/local not /usr.
>
> I would have packed sgmltools-2.0.x up as an rpm but
LyX says I don't have foiltex.
I use teTeX 1.0, which has:
/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/foiltex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/foiltex/fltfonts.def
/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/foiltex/foil17.clo
/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/foiltex/foil20.clo
/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/foiltex/foil25.clo
On 10 Oct 1999, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | the new strand yet but I already have some doubts about the recent removal
> | of one of those tests.
>
> That test was completely bogus, since it demanded that a std::string
> cannont contain '\0', so the
On Mon, 11 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> LyX says I don't have foiltex.
>
> I use teTeX 1.0, which has:
teTeX-1.0 and onwards doesn't include foiltex anymore because of copyright
reasons. Did you add the foiltex installation yourself? or part of a
Debian or FreeBSD package? Then you
On Tue, Oct 12, 1999 at 01:23:12PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > LyX says I don't have foiltex.
> >
> > I use teTeX 1.0, which has:
>
> teTeX-1.0 and onwards doesn't include foiltex anymore because of copyright
> reasons. Did you add the foiltex
Wow.
Such immediate, content-rich answers deserve Steve Job's best all time
compliment: "insanely great!"
Thanks guys.
40 matches
Mail list logo
