The shortcuts for the search box's forward and backward search arrows are
supposed to be M-f and M-b. But, in Lyx 1.1.6fix2, they move the cursor back
and forth in the search text window, rather than activating forward or backward
searching.
If this is a bug, is this the proper place to report
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 07:57:12AM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
>
> > I do not consider seriously Metafont fonts since they are ugly,
> > starting with Computer Modern. Euler is a notable exception because
> > it was designed by Herman Zapf, of course. But it's available as
> > Ty
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 07:19:31PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> script/mathop seperation. new base class "MathUpDownInset" for both.
Here is a new buglist:
Array/eqnarray
*- Mutation from inline formula to eqnarray generates a numbered eqnarray
*- After pressing S-ctrl-M in an eqnarray, th
script/mathop seperation. new base class "MathUpDownInset" for both.
This one was more difficult than expected... *sigh*
Cursor movement is possibly again "unusual" but that should be fixable...
Andre'
--
André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
? mathe
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 11:35:38AM -0400, Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
>
> This has come up a time or two, and as I spend more time writing tests
> and using old ones, I'm ready to bite it off (besides, I'm probably
> years from having the time to write useful code that wouldn't eat to
> much tim
Looks to me like the auto-generated file slot.h wasn't auto-generated!
If you haven't got slot.h (or if it exists but is empty) in the sigc++
directory then
Go into the sigc++ directory, type
make distclean
make
and see what messages you get.
Angus
ps, it'd be useful if you coul
> "Jon" == Jon Milton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jon> However I am already using GCC. The start of libtool says :
What version of gcc are you using? For lyx 1.1.6xx, this should be at
least gcc 2.8.1, and for 1.2.0cvs, it should be at least gcc 2.95.2.
JMarc
> Hmm, do we want to do that or have more generic methods in Inset that
> could be overloaded as you show for DialogInset and differently for
> collapsable insets? This would seem simpler, like
>
> class Inset {
>
> void close();
> bool isOpen();
>
> }
>
> Then these methods could be imp
Hi,
I'm attempting to compile Lyx onto a Solaris platform but am getting what looks like
the Sun CC bug described in the INSTALL file :
o On Solaris, compiling with Sun CC 6.0 or less will fail in the sigc++
directory. Sun's compiler can't handle some of the constructs in this
library
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I will also need a way of toggling or, alternatively, to know
>> whether an inset is open or closed. Is that possible?
>>
>> JMarc
Angus> Does this cover it? Angus
Hmm, do we want to do that or have more generic methods in Inset tha
> I will also need a way of toggling or, alternatively, to know whether
> an inset is open or closed. Is that possible?
>
> JMarc
Does this cover it?
Angus
class dialogInset: public Inset {
public:
/**Pass this reference from the daughter class c-tor
E.g. from InsetCite pas
This has come up a time or two, and as I spend more time writing tests
and using old ones, I'm ready to bite it off (besides, I'm probably
years from having the time to write useful code that wouldn't eat to
much time of others reading it :)
Anyway, my general notions are
1) it would be a di
On 11-Jul-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> open-stuff is what is bound to C-o in 1.1.6 and earlier. Basically it
[snip good explanation]
> Is it clearer now?
It is indeed!
> Similarly, we will need a way to replace "{toggle|close|open} all
> {floats|figures|footnotes}" that we used to have. I
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> Does this mean we basically have two things:
Andre> - "ordinary" scriptinsets that appear after say 'a' or nothing
Andre> that don't have \limit/\nolimit
Andre> - mathops (\sum, \sin, \underbrace...) that can have su*scripts
Andr
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> On 11-Jul-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Yes, but an open one is HIGLY_EDITABLE, and thus currently,
>> open-stuff just enters the inset in this case, which is not very
>> useful. It should rather act as a toggle, and do t
> Dekel> Or \limits after \sin
>
> \sin is a \mathop, right?
>
> Dekel> And note that currently a subscript after \underbrace is
> Dekel> rendered incorrectly.
>
> In fact, \underbrace is a \mathop too. Mathed should know about which
> insets/entities are mathops.
Does this mean we basically h
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> On 11-Jul-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> If I want to disable footnote-insert in a float, I do not want to
>> construct a dummy footnote just for the pleasure of knowing that I
>> cannot insert it here a disable the functi
> LaTeX will choke on double scripts such as "A_{s}_{t}", so we can't have
> two script insets in sequence. But then, what happens if you have
> "A_{s}B_{t}"? and delete the B (e.g., in order to replace it by C)? The
> intermediate state would be the illegal "A_{s}_{t}", but we must allow
> it so
On 11-Jul-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Yes, but an open one is HIGLY_EDITABLE, and thus currently, open-stuff
> just enters the inset in this case, which is not very useful. It
> should rather act as a toggle, and do the same for insets with a popup
> (and be renamed to toggle-stuff, or to
> And note that currently a subscript after \underbrace is rendered incorrectly.
I know.
Andre'
--
André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 11-Jul-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Well, it will work when you insert inside the minipage inset which is
> inside the float, right?
Well yes you're probably right, hmmm, wait, hmmm, well as it is now NO,
but we can make it work like that anyway. The problem still remains how
to make a
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Because having a hideDialog signal or close() method makes
Angus> sense only for those methods that have a popup.
Well, all the insets have edit(), which acts as a kind of open(), so
they could have a close().
Angus> This is the
On 11-Jul-2001 Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 03:26:27PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>>
>> Another question to floats. Could we assume that floats are allowed ONLY in
>> top level paragraphs? (this means not inside a paragraph which is inside a
>> InsetText?) This wo
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> On 11-Jul-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> I still do not know what to do about that. Currently, when an inset
>> is HIGHLY_EDITABLE (like an open footnote, or a math inset),
>> open-stuff just enters the inset, whih is not
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Well at it is now you're not allowed to insert
Juergen> Footnotes/Marginnotes inside Floats. But I will change this
Juergen> as it IS BOGUS. I could have a minipage inset inside the
Juergen> float and therein the footnotes and
On 11-Jul-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> If I want to disable footnote-insert in a float, I do not want to
> construct a dummy footnote just for the pleasure of knowing that I
> cannot insert it here a disable the function.
Well we can just add another function which takes the CODE. I now
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> This would allow to grey out invalid entries in menus as necessary
>> (tell that an inset cannot be inserted without actually
>> constructing it)
Juergen> Why is this not possible with the inset-pointer? Anyway I
Juergen> guess we c
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 03:26:27PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> Another question to floats. Could we assume that floats are allowed ONLY in
> top level paragraphs? (this means not inside a paragraph which is inside a
> InsetText?) This would make it easier to be sure that we don't missuse floa
On 11-Jul-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I still do not know what to do about that. Currently, when an inset is
> HIGHLY_EDITABLE (like an open footnote, or a math inset), open-stuff
> just enters the inset, whih is not very useful IMO. For collapsable
> insets, it would be better to have a
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 02:41:00PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Dekel> How about opening a question dialog that says "Footnotes in a
> Dekel> float must be inside a minipage (note that the footnotes will
> Dekel> appear at the bo
On 11-Jul-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Dekel> How about opening a question dialog that says "Footnotes in a
> Dekel> float must be inside a minipage (note that the footnotes will
> Dekel> appear at the bottom of the minipage instead of at the bottom
> Dekel> of the page). Do you wish to in
On Wednesday 11 July 2001 13:58, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> On Wednesday 11 July 2001 13:32, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >> Is there a way, for insets which have a popup associated to them,
> >> to send a 'close' signal to
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 02:47:51PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Andre> - The \limit/\nolimit information is part of this inset.
> >
> > Note that this information only makes sense for some kind of elements
> > (\mathop) before the *scripts.
>
> \underbrace seems to be another canditate...
O
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Could you accept the following:
Sounds good (the parts I grok, at least).
One gotcha:
LaTeX will choke on double scripts such as "A_{s}_{t}", so we can't have
two script insets in sequence. But then, what happens if you have
"A_{s}B_{t}"? and delete the B (e.g., in orde
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> On Wednesday 11 July 2001 13:32, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Is there a way, for insets which have a popup associated to them,
>> to send a 'close' signal to the popup? Could we have a toggle-open
>> method in insets that just d
Could this method take a Inset::Code as parameter instead of an inset?
As far as I can see, the current implementations only look at this
value anyway.
This would allow to grey out invalid entries in menus as necessary
(tell that an inset cannot be inserted without actually constructing it)
JMa
On Wednesday 11 July 2001 13:32, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Is there a way, for insets which have a popup associated to them, to
> send a 'close' signal to the popup? Could we have a toggle-open method
> in insets that just does the right thing (also for insetcollapsable)?
These insets (the GU
> Andre> - The \limit/\nolimit information is part of this inset.
>
> Note that this information only makes sense for some kind of elements
> (\mathop) before the *scripts.
\underbrace seems to be another canditate...
Andre'
--
André Pönitz . [EMA
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dekel> How about opening a question dialog that says "Footnotes in a
Dekel> float must be inside a minipage (note that the footnotes will
Dekel> appear at the bottom of the minipage instead of at the bottom
Dekel> of the page). Do you wish t
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> Ok, I am convinced now. Could you accept the following:
Andre> - There is a sub/superscript inset.
Andre> - The \limit/\nolimit information is part of this inset.
Note that this information only makes sense for some kind of ele
> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jean-Marc> I have began to re-implement open-stuff. I now have the two
Jean-Marc> following methods (plus some glue code):
OK, thanks for not telling me that my code was bogus %-] I now
commited something that is supposed to w
Ok, I am convinced now.
Could you accept the following:
- There is a sub/superscript inset.
- The \limit/\nolimit information is part of this inset.
- When written to LaTeX, it will simply output _{...}^{...}.
- When displayed on screen, it will look one char/inset back and use that
info
> Interesting.
>
> For "$foo{X_{s}}bar$", that would mean:
> * cursor to the left of "X_{s}" -> whole formula highlighted
Well... just a frame. Not a solid box..
> * cursor to the left of "X" -> just "X" highlighted
> There's no case where "X_{s}" gets highlighed, so there's no indication
>
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > "Garst" == Garst R Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Garst> The subject says all. Garst
>
> Yes, it is "azure". The question is, should we change it to be the
> same grey as boxen?
>
> JMarc
Right, but I have to tilt my laptop screen for the azure to
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > cursor position -- hard to explain/draw cursor-at-the-left-of-base vs.
> >.
>
> I am thinking about a special box around "current inset" - something not
> too visible - maybe with 'linen' colour. So one gets a hint where the
> cursor really is.
Interesting.
For "$foo
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 12:00:17PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Dekel> Actually, footnote.sty will not help for a tabular inside a
> > Dekel> float. In this case, you need to put the tabular inside a
> > Dekel> minipage. So LyX should check if t
> "Garst" == Garst R Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Garst> The subject says all. Garst
Yes, it is "azure". The question is, should we change it to be the
same grey as boxen?
JMarc
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 12:00:17PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Dekel> Actually, footnote.sty will not help for a tabular inside a
> Dekel> float. In this case, you need to put the tabular inside a
> Dekel> minipage. So LyX should check if the tabular is not already
> Dekel> inside a minip
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> What about '\-' within words to specify hyphena(...)ion?
>> What about using the hyphenation special inset for that?
Andre> Convincing argument.
Andre> And what about "= ? (with \documentclass[german...]{...})
This will not wor
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dekel> On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 10:58:16AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>> So this seems a good option. I would have some more!
>>
>> - If you use long-tabular footnotes are working without this
>> preamble stuff!
>>
>> - If you use the min
> cursor position -- hard to explain/draw cursor-at-the-left-of-base vs.
>cursor-to-the-left-of-whole-inset.
I am thinking about a special box around "current inset" - something not
too visible - maybe with 'linen' colour. So one gets a hint where the
cursor really is.
Andre'
--
André Pönitz .
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 10:58:16AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> So this seems a good option. I would have some more!
>
> - If you use long-tabular footnotes are working without this preamble stuff!
>
> - If you use the minipage switch for a cell then footnotes are also working
> without th
On 10-Jul-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> And what if footnote.sty is not installed?
>
> Dekel> It is in macros/latex/required/
>
> OK, OK, I should have checked first :)
So this seems a good option. I would have some more!
- I
On 10-Jul-2001 Eran Tromer wrote:
> But these are mere trifles, now that LyX starts with Juergen's new
> development banner... :-)
We like to have visual feedback of a "lived" Developer's meeting ;)
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jü
The subject says all.
Garst
On 09-Jul-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Why not always draw the inset inlined?
> If the user wants, he can put the inset in a paragraph of its own.
Well this is easy to answer! Inlined TextInsets can not break row! So
you would have to write all your LaTeX code in one row, this may be nice
for some
On 09-Jul-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> It has never been supported, it has just happened to work by chance.
> And you can continue to use it, just don't complain when it breaks.
Well we just have to remember it Lars. When we do "old document read" that
if we get to an inset in LaTeX mode w
On 09-Jul-2001 Alejandro Aguilar Sierra wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
>> Yes!?
>>
>> Well then try http://www.lyx.org/~jug/Italy2 and you're on the right track!
>
> Well, I only see some ugly php4 code. ;-)
>
> http://www.lyx.org/~jug/Italy2/photo.php?name=DSCN0093.jpg
58 matches
Mail list logo
