Herbert Voß wrote:
> aehm, nevertheless, it seems to be a qt-bug ...
Attached is the fix for 1.3.4 (I can't compile 1.4 right now).
Jean-Marc, can this go in?
Jürgen
Index: src/frontends/qt2/QDocument.C
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/c
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Patch and screen shot attached.
and just so the xforms world doesn't feel left out, I've finished that
dialog too. Patch attached FYI.
--
Angus
xforms.diff.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 10:04:17PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
>> Good to hear. Is lyx-1.4 stable enough already for a PHD with 300 pages?
>
> Not at all.
>
> [Btw whom do you expect to read a PhD thesis with 300 pages?]
In law, PhDs are about 200-300 pages lo
On Thursday 04 December 2003 11:30 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 07:44:56PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Patch and screen shot attached.
>
> A bit hard to see !
I didn't want to swamp the list with a huge screendump.
> What's the red in the dialog ? Baaddd...
;-) It's a bit
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 07:44:56PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Patch and screen shot attached.
A bit hard to see !
What's the red in the dialog ? Baaddd...
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 05:53:18PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Herbert Voß wrote:
> > aehm, nevertheless, it seems to be a qt-bug ...
>
> Attached is the fix for 1.3.4 (I can't compile 1.4 right now).
> Jean-Marc, can this go in?
My question (for 1.4.0cvs) would be why this isn't entire
Herbert Voß wrote:
> aehm, nevertheless, it seems to be a qt-bug ...
Attached is the fix for 1.3.4 (I can't compile 1.4 right now).
Jean-Marc, can this go in?
Jürgen
Index: src/frontends/qt2/QDocument.C
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx
I have tried to make the ui as simple and intuitive as possible. Therefore the
code may look a bit tricky (but it works in all cases afaict). And another
small enhancement to lengthcombo was needed.
Hope you like it. I will apply during the weekend if I get no objections.
Jürgen
qbox.diff.gz
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 06:25:24PM +0100, Michael Schmitt spake thusly:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > Martin> Talking about looks, see the attached.
>
> Looks good, Martin!
>
> >
> > |some contents here|
> > name
> >
> > This would reduce the height
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 03:48:11PM -0300, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> If some inset *after* gets into the row or not determines the position of
> some inset in the row (before), don't you agree?
Oh, yes
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over
John Levon wrote:
> Why ? If I start at the top, then inset + 1 can know its absolute
> position surely, since all insets before have been calculated.
for instance rebreaking cannot be done without knowing all insets in the
paragraph (in the worst case)...
If some inset *after* gets into the row
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 02:54:14PM -0300, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> no, the parent-relative position of the inset depends on it's own size *and*
> other insets sizes at the same level (moreover, before *and* after it), and
Why after ? I can't think of a case (well, tables, but that's all in one
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 06:22:55PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Thursday 04 December 2003 6:03 pm, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 05:39:09PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > > I suspect that the crashing will go away if you revert André's two
> >
On Thursday 04 December 2003 6:03 pm, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 05:39:09PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > I suspect that the crashing will go away if you revert André's two
> > > patches of yesterday evening.
> >
> > It looks like the fault lies w
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 05:39:09PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > I suspect that the crashing will go away if you revert André's two
> > patches of yesterday evening.
>
> It looks like the fault lies with the second of the two patches.
>
> $ cvs2 -q diff -D "2003-12-3 18:
John Levon wrote:
> OK, can you explain why we don't update the positions in stage 1 then ?
> Isn't everything before the inset that could affect position updated by
> then ?
no, the parent-relative position of the inset depends on it's own size *and*
other insets sizes at the same level (moreove
Angus Leeming wrote:
> I suspect that the crashing will go away if you revert André's two
> patches of yesterday evening.
It looks like the fault lies with the second of the two patches.
$ cvs2 -q diff -D "2003-12-3 18:00" -D "2003-12-3 19:00" > tmp.diff
$ patch -p0 -R < tmp.diff
Fixes things
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Martin> Talking about looks, see the attached.
Looks good, Martin!
|some contents here|
name
This would reduce the height of the inset...
You can even do
some contents here
\---name-/
and avoid the frame altogether.
Ha
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> I am getting this on trying to load a file I was able to edit
> yesterday:
>
> $ lyx fsmon.lyx
> BufferView::Pimpl::fitCursor.
> Assertion triggered in T& boost::optional::operator*() [with T =
> int] by fai ing check "m_initialized" in file
> ../../lyx/boost/boost/option
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 03:55:40PM +, John Levon spake
Martin> thusly:
>> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 04:17:34PM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
>>
>> > Shouldn't we concentrate on bug fixing rather than starting new
>> projects?
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 07:14:18PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Talking about looks, see the attached.
Looks good
regards
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 03:55:40PM +, John Levon spake thusly:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 04:17:34PM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
>
> > Shouldn't we concentrate on bug fixing rather than starting new projects?
>
> I think we're all agreed that the current char style stuff (modulo some
> min
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> Assertion triggered in T& boost::optional::operator*() [with T =
> int] by fai ing check "m_initialized" in file
> ../../lyx/boost/boost/optional.hpp:193 Aborted (core dumped)
> Do you think this is related?
Yes.
--
Angus
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 04:42:47PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Michael Schmitt wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > does anybody know why the insertion of an arbitrary inset makes LyX
> > crash?
>
> If you kept the rest of the backtrace, you'd see that the culprit was
> parInsetIterator or some such.
I
Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does anybody know why the insertion of an arbitrary inset makes LyX
> crash?
If you kept the rest of the backtrace, you'd see that the culprit was
parInsetIterator or some such.
--
Angus
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 05:11:06PM +0100, Michael Schmitt spake thusly:
>
> Michael Schmitt wrote:
>
> > John Levon wrote:
> >
> >> I think we're all agreed that the current char style stuff (modulo some
> >> minor changes in the way the insets look) should stay as is for now.
>
> > Which char
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 03:09:20AM +0100, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
> I recognise several of these from my personal experience with LyX, but
> let me add that on several occasions I've simply thought that:
>
> "ok, there's this little problem, but who cares, LyX is still so good"
people sho
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 12:12:13AM -0300, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> > Why is draw() updating anything ? Shouldn't that be in the stage before
> > the actual draw() ? draw() should be logically const, no ?
>
> But we have a two stages mechanism: dimensions are computed on the first
> stage, posi
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> SUFFIX = .C .fd
Angus> .fd.C: $(SHELL) $(SCRIPT) $<
Angus> Patch attached. Ok to apply to 13x, Jean-Marc?
Yes.
JMarc
Michael Schmitt wrote:
John Levon wrote:
I think we're all agreed that the current char style stuff (modulo some
minor changes in the way the insets look) should stay as is for now.
> Which char styles are supported at the moment?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/lyx-devel-1.4.0-devel/lib/layouts> grep Char
On Thursday 04 December 2003 15:17, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Dear Martin et al.,
>
> do you need some more comments? Ok, here are mine :-)
Good to hear.
> > Yes, box removing by is 'direct manipulation' according to
> > this definition.
> >
> > Nobody, not a single person! complained about
Hi,
does anybody know why the insertion of an arbitrary inset makes LyX crash?
Michael
LyXFunc::dispatch: cmd: action: 3 arg: '' x: 0 y: 0
BufferView::Pimpl::fitCursor.
Redraw screen
BufferView::Pimpl::fitCursor.
Redraw scree
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:49:03AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Same argument as John's when he opposed equivalent changes in mathed.
> Nobody, not a single person! complained about this since 1.3.0 is out.
> I am really tempted to call this argument 'FUD'.
Oh come on.
john
--
Khendon's Law:
John Levon wrote:
Shouldn't we concentrate on bug fixing rather than starting new projects?
I think we're all agreed that the current char style stuff (modulo some
minor changes in the way the insets look) should stay as is for now.
That means existing documents will be converted?
Which char styl
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 04:17:34PM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Shouldn't we concentrate on bug fixing rather than starting new projects?
I think we're all agreed that the current char style stuff (modulo some
minor changes in the way the insets look) should stay as is for now.
We're talking
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 10:43:34AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Having it in the menu would make it discoverable, describing it in the
> UserGuide is sufficient in my opinion.
Then we have reached a complete impasse, alas. At christmas.
> > http://www.usabilityfirst.com/glossary/main.cgi?functi
Dear Martin et al.,
do you need some more comments? Ok, here are mine :-)
> Yes, box removing by is 'direct manipulation' according to
> this definition.
> Nobody, not a single person! complained about this since 1.3.0 is out.
> I am really tempted to call this argument 'FUD'.
Personally, I have
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> [Btw whom do you expect to read a PhD thesis with 300 pages?]
>
His supervisor? Nah... he won't bother ;-)
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 12:56:57PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Thursday 04 December 2003 12:54 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 01:34:29AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> > > > John Levon wrote:
> > > >> Strikes me as a highly dubious thing to
On Thursday 04 December 2003 1:17 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Btw: You know Pontius and Pilatus version 2003_de?
That explains a lot about your mood. Ughhh! You have my sympathies.
A
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 02:17:16PM +0100, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
> A: Hey look, I've a document and a photocopy of it and _you_
>want a stamp on the letter.
'latter', i.e. on the photocopy.
Andre'
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 01:08:38PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Thursday 04 December 2003 1:00 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 12:27:12PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > > Better this way?
> > >
> > > Personal feeling? Yes, although my suggestion of draw, priv_draw would
On Thursday 04 December 2003 1:00 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 12:27:12PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > Better this way?
> >
> > Personal feeling? Yes, although my suggestion of draw, priv_draw would
> > result in only one virtual function here as opposed to your two. Perh
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 12:27:12PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Better this way?
>
> Personal feeling? Yes, although my suggestion of draw, priv_draw would result
> in only one virtual function here as opposed to your two. Perhaps ;-)
>
> As for simple: I think that even the button insets nee
On Thursday 04 December 2003 12:54 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 01:34:29AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> > > John Levon wrote:
> > >> Strikes me as a highly dubious thing to do, but since I'm not doing
> > >> any
> > >
> > > Why?
> >
> > Actually,
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 01:34:29AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>
> > John Levon wrote:
> >
> >> Strikes me as a highly dubious thing to do, but since I'm not doing
> >> any
> >
> > Why?
>
> Actually, what would be nice is
I hate this.
And I still hate Lars (for sui
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 01:05:35AM +, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 10:04:17PM -0300, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>
> > > Strikes me as a highly dubious thing to do, but since I'm not doing any
> >
> > Why?
>
> Why is draw() updating anything ?
It is updating the drawing positi
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 12:44:15AM +, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 11:09:45PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Hi, joohn!
>
> Bah, my keyboard is dyiing :(
>
> > I've just regained the ability to hit InsetExternal by updating the
> > cache data. I suspect that other insets a
On Thursday 04 December 2003 12:17 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > > I've just regained the ability to hit InsetExternal by updating the
> > > cache data. I suspect that other insets are missing this too.
> > >
> > > void InsetExternal::draw(PainterInfo & pi, int x, int y) const
> > > {
> > > +
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 10:04:17PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 11:56:36PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
>
> >> BTW, what has happened to the footnote numbering patch? Is the latex
> >> counter implementation up to the task now
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 12:44:15AM +, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 11:09:45PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Hi, joohn!
>
> Bah, my keyboard is dyiing :(
>
> > I've just regained the ability to hit InsetExternal by updating the
> > cache data. I suspect that other insets a
Edwin Leuven wrote:
> on opening the userguide and scrolling down with the mouse lyx
> crashes
Some invalidation of iterators --- André et al.'s world.
How do you find the scrolling with the mouse?
--
Angus
on opening the userguide and scrolling down with the mouse lyx
crashes
> Some invalidation of iterators --- André et al.'s world.
yep
How do you find the scrolling with the mouse?
can't scroll very much because it crashes lyx
what changed? it seems as if it's more controlled ie in 1.3.3 there's
most recent cvs.
Regards,
Jürgen.
Edwin Leuven wrote:
>> How do you find the scrolling with the mouse?
> can't scroll very much because it crashes lyx
> what changed? it seems as if it's more controlled ie in 1.3.3
> there's more flicker and selecting while dragging down the mouse is
> too fast...
I tried to make it controllable
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:43:16AM +0100, Helge Hafting wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> >>I can't even unapply a change of some text to bold in mathed without
> >>running round the houses.
> >
> >
> >What's wrong with ?
> >
>
> People don't think of text as formulas. In the text, I expect
> b
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 07:06:18PM +, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 06:56:19PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > > > If you really want, you can add two or three generic items (undo inner
> > > > level, split inner box, merge adjacent boxes) but I doubt anybody ever
> > > > will
Andre Poenitz wrote:
I can't even unapply a change of some text to bold in mathed without
running round the houses.
What's wrong with ?
People don't think of text as formulas.
In the text, I expect backspace to erase the character (or other
object) to the left of the cursor. It has always bee
on opening the userguide and scrolling down with the mouse lyx crashes
opening the userguide and clicking on 'navigate' in the menu has the
same effect
Assertion triggered in T& boost::optional::operator*() [with T = int]
by failing check "m_initialized" in file
../../lyx-devel/boost/boost/o
59 matches
Mail list logo
