Hello LyXers,
because some of you complain about the BaKoMa-license, I tried another way:
My MikTeX comes with the cm-fonts in Type1 format (pfb-files) created by
bluesky. I compiled the fonts for win2000 and winXP as installable
pfm-files.
Compiling for both systems was necessary because the
Rafal Maszkowski wrote:
ftp://ftp.icm.edu.pl/vol/rzm0/lyx/ is not a canonical path and now is
just wrong. The proper ones are e.g.:
ftp://sunsite.icm.edu.pl/pub/unix/editors/lyx/
http://sunsite.icm.edu.pl/pub/unix/editors/lyx/
rsync://sunsite.icm.edu.pl/pub/unix/editors/lyx/
Thanks,
This patch does the following:
- make Buffer::insertStringAsLines work when inserting in nested
insets
- set autoBreakRows_ to true for the top-level inset. Alfredo, is that
right?
- fix a first crash in BufferView::Pimpl::MenuInsertLyXFile
The situation of inserting files in nested
I have a patch, I'd like to commit. It consists of some of the stuff
which was approved, plus some comments for the code, and a little more
const-correctness here and there.
Also, I fixed the breakParagraph bug by remove some obsolete stuff.
There was some logic which is not relevant anymore.
On Thursday 27 January 2005 13:56, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
This patch does the following:
...
Comments welcome.
It is amazing what a zero size patch can do, isn't it? ;-)
JMarc
--
José Abílio
Jose' == Jose' Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jose' On Thursday 27 January 2005 13:56, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
This patch does the following:
Jose' ...
Comments welcome.
Jose' It is amazing what a zero size patch can do, isn't it? ;-)
Grr.
Index: src/BufferView_pimpl.C
Angus Leeming wrote:
Oh, if the file is meant to change only at predetermined times, then a
single line added to lyx_cb.C's Reconfigure would do the trick:
LatexFeatures::getAvailable();
no?
But you're probably right. Not worth it. At the moment.
I did it nevertheless. Patch attached.
Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote:
But the problem is that I can not make diffs for some reason. It just
hangs and hangs. Does anybody else experience this problem? CVS is soo
slow today.
What CVS client do you use? I've been using TortoiseCVS and it seems to
work well.
I have a question for you
Hi,
when testing the latesttex2lyx I get this:
$ ./tex2lyx ~/test.tex
Unable to determine the system directory having searched
/home/jamatos/lyx/lyx-devel/src/share/lyx-1.4.0cvs/
Try the '-sysdir' command line parameter or set the environment variable
LYX_DIR_13x to the LyX
Jose' Matos wrote:
$ ./tex2lyx ~/test.tex
Unable to determine the system directory having searched
/home/jamatos/lyx/lyx-devel/src/share/lyx-1.4.0cvs/
Try the '-sysdir' command line parameter or set the environment variable
LYX_DIR_13x to the LyX system directory containing the file
On Thursday 27 January 2005 17:26, Angus Leeming wrote:
A.
The scheme expects that the binary to be in the top-build-dir/src
directory, but tex2lyx is in the top-build-dir/src/tex2lyx directory.
See get_build_dirs:
string const binary_dir = OnlyPath(binary);
string const
Juergen Spitzmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Angus Leeming wrote:
Oh, if the file is meant to change only at predetermined times, then a
single line added to lyx_cb.C's Reconfigure would do the trick:
LatexFeatures::getAvailable();
no?
But you're probably right. Not worth it. At
Angus Leeming wrote:
Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote:
But the problem is that I can not make diffs for some reason. It just
hangs and hangs. Does anybody else experience this problem? CVS is soo
slow today.
What CVS client do you use? I've been using TortoiseCVS and it seems to
work well.
Me too. It has
Asger Ottar Alstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Angus Leeming wrote:
Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote:
But the problem is that I can not make diffs for some reason. It just
hangs and hangs. Does anybody else experience this problem? CVS is soo
slow today.
What CVS client do you use? I've been using
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Asger Ottar Alstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| | Angus Leeming wrote:
Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote:
But the problem is that I can not make diffs for some reason. It just
hangs and hangs. Does anybody else experience this problem? CVS is soo
slow
This is the convert patch I am going to commit unless I hear a lot of
bad language.
(There are some testing code that is not visible here that will also
be committed)
? Config
? convert-1.diff
? convert-2.diff
? convert-3.diff
? cppflags-1.diff
? idxupdown2-1.diff
? includes-1.diff
?
Here is the rough patch. Ignore all you do not like, but many changes
are good. I do not have time to make separate patch now. Sorry.
Regards,
Asger
lyx-devel.patch.bz2
Description: Binary data
On Friday 21 January 2005 08:28, G. Milde wrote:
Please find attached my work so far. If you copy lyx.py into the
pythonpath, pydoc will give you a nice view of the doc strings and
setup
Hi Gnter,
I would like to congratulate you for your work with the lyx server via
the
python
I wrote:
Compiling for both systems was necessary because the font handling is
slightly different:
WinXP doesn't accept the Win2000-compiled fonts (no installable
font).
Sorry, I didn't know that Win needs the pfm- AND the corresponding
pfb-files. I uploaded a new package
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 01:37:38PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
What I was not sure about is how you handle option=='foo bar'.
We don't. All hell breaks loose at this point and always has. The existing
code to split a string up into an argv array is:
:
[snip]
:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 08:15:10PM +, Andreas Vox wrote:
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
namespace support = lyx::support;
using std::ostream;
typedef liststring SnippetList;
is just baaaddd.
Ah, bad for *.h, ok for *.C?
Got it.
The reason being that *.h files are
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:16:38AM +0100, Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote:
John Weiss wrote:
[A great opportunity to have a little flame-fest.]
You're the one attacking me out-of-hand.
Not FUD. Reality. [Long story about something irrelevant.]
Took them YEARS to get it to that state.
Sad for
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 02:38:54PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
Which means that it's dead easy to set a break point in gdb. Any entry
into lyxbreaker is automatically invalid, so stop there and have a look at
the execution path to that point.
Try it yourself:
gdb ./lyx
(gdb) break
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 09:57:26PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
(This also reminded me how VERY VERY VERY unhappy I am about Math not
having its own top-level menu entry anymore. It is such a separate and
special part of both LyX and LaTeX, that this old practice was more than
justified.
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:30:45AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
John Weiss wrote:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 09:57:48PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
Cygwin's POSIX emulation layer avoids
the need for the various workarounds required when using other
compilers under MS-Windows.
See!
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 10:01:09AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Sure it is nice to compile on more than one compiler... but if the
result is muddier code then I am not sure about the gain. (and not
that I have not said that this is the case, just a thing to watch out
for.
And avoiding
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 02:24:05AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
What he means is that the figure is formally embedded in a paragraph
inside the float, which is formatted justified (out of alternatives
left, right, justified and centred). This means the picture will align
John Weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
In short: calling a function lyxbreaker is a Bad Idea, as it
implies that this function somehow damages LyX. Better to call it
lyxstopper or lyxbreakpt, the latter being far more descriptive if
its purpose.
But lyxbreaker has BOOST_ASSERT(false)
John Weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Now... now I'm not even sure I want to be bothered with LyX. I've
| been through 3 years of job-hell. I don't need this added stress.
Please take a step back.
If you knew the flak I have taken...
You really, really should come to a LyX meeting. Then we
John Weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:30:45AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
John Weiss wrote:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 09:57:48PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
Cygwin's POSIX emulation layer avoids
the need for the various workarounds required when using other
Lars Gullik Bjnnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John Weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Now... now I'm not even sure I want to be bothered with LyX. I've
| been through 3 years of job-hell. I don't need this added stress.
Please take a step back.
If you knew the flak I have taken...
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 02:21:01AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
Besides I am the only one allowed to be personally attacked in this
forum.
Oh come on, you must consider Andre here. (For which I'm a bit sorry...)
john
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 01:52:45AM +, Andreas Vox wrote:
John, after what you told us about your situation I can understand you
don't want any aggro from this list. But I don't see that *all* attack you,
Anyway, Mr. Weiss needs to know I've long since taken his title of
Least Popular John.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 07:03:11PM +, Jose' Matos wrote:
PS: In another movement (no pun John ;-) to help python scripting for lyx
Is this a test on whether I'm still listening? :)
Super-glad to see Asger back into the fold. He can be a less hated me!!
john
Howdy,
A colleague asked me if there was anything that MS word could do well, that
LyX couldn't, and all I could think of was drag-n-dropping image files
into the document. That got me to thinking what it would take to implement
it in LyX. Here's one solution, albeit somewhat naive perhaps, as
On 27.01.05, John Weiss wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 09:57:26PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
(This also reminded me how VERY VERY VERY unhappy I am about Math not
having its own top-level menu entry anymore. It is such a separate and
special part of both LyX and LaTeX, that this old
On 28.01.05, Andreas Vox wrote:
John Weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
In short: calling a function lyxbreaker is a Bad Idea, as it
implies that this function somehow damages LyX. Better to call it
lyxstopper or lyxbreakpt, the latter being far more descriptive if
its purpose.
Hello LyXers,
because some of you complain about the BaKoMa-license, I tried another way:
My MikTeX comes with the cm-fonts in Type1 format (pfb-files) created by
bluesky. I compiled the fonts for win2000 and winXP as installable
pfm-files.
Compiling for both systems was necessary because the
Rafal Maszkowski wrote:
> ftp://ftp.icm.edu.pl/vol/rzm0/lyx/ is not a canonical path and now is
> just wrong. The proper ones are e.g.:
>
> ftp://sunsite.icm.edu.pl/pub/unix/editors/lyx/
> http://sunsite.icm.edu.pl/pub/unix/editors/lyx/
> rsync://sunsite.icm.edu.pl/pub/unix/editors/lyx/
Thanks,
This patch does the following:
- make Buffer::insertStringAsLines work when inserting in nested
insets
- set autoBreakRows_ to true for the top-level inset. Alfredo, is that
right?
- fix a first crash in BufferView::Pimpl::MenuInsertLyXFile
The situation of inserting files in nested
I have a patch, I'd like to commit. It consists of some of the stuff
which was approved, plus some comments for the code, and a little more
const-correctness here and there.
Also, I fixed the breakParagraph bug by remove some obsolete stuff.
There was some logic which is not relevant anymore.
On Thursday 27 January 2005 13:56, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> This patch does the following:
...
> Comments welcome.
It is amazing what a zero size patch can do, isn't it? ;-)
> JMarc
--
José Abílio
> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jose'> On Thursday 27 January 2005 13:56, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> This patch does the following:
Jose'> ...
>> Comments welcome.
Jose'> It is amazing what a zero size patch can do, isn't it? ;-)
Grr.
Index:
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Oh, if the file is meant to change only at predetermined times, then a
> single line added to lyx_cb.C's Reconfigure would do the trick:
>
> LatexFeatures::getAvailable();
>
> no?
>
> But you're probably right. Not worth it. At the moment.
I did it nevertheless. Patch
Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote:
> But the problem is that I can not make diffs for some reason. It just
> hangs and hangs. Does anybody else experience this problem? CVS is soo
> slow today.
What CVS client do you use? I've been using TortoiseCVS and it seems to
work well.
I have a question for you
Hi,
when testing the latesttex2lyx I get this:
$ ./tex2lyx ~/test.tex
Unable to determine the system directory having searched
/home/jamatos/lyx/lyx-devel/src/share/lyx-1.4.0cvs/
Try the '-sysdir' command line parameter or set the environment variable
LYX_DIR_13x to the LyX
Jose' Matos wrote:
> $ ./tex2lyx ~/test.tex
> Unable to determine the system directory having searched
> /home/jamatos/lyx/lyx-devel/src/share/lyx-1.4.0cvs/
> Try the '-sysdir' command line parameter or set the environment variable
> LYX_DIR_13x to the LyX system directory containing the
On Thursday 27 January 2005 17:26, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> A.
>
> The scheme expects that the binary to be in the /src
> directory, but tex2lyx is in the /src/tex2lyx directory.
> See get_build_dirs:
>
> string const binary_dir = OnlyPath(binary);
> string const build_support_dir =
>
Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Oh, if the file is meant to change only at predetermined times, then a
>> single line added to lyx_cb.C's Reconfigure would do the trick:
>>
>> LatexFeatures::getAvailable();
>>
>> no?
>>
>> But you're probably right.
Angus Leeming wrote:
Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote:
But the problem is that I can not make diffs for some reason. It just
hangs and hangs. Does anybody else experience this problem? CVS is soo
slow today.
What CVS client do you use? I've been using TortoiseCVS and it seems to
work well.
Me too. It has
Asger Ottar Alstrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote:
>>
>>>But the problem is that I can not make diffs for some reason. It just
>>>hangs and hangs. Does anybody else experience this problem? CVS is soo
>>>slow today.
>> What CVS client do you use?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Asger Ottar Alstrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| | Angus Leeming wrote:
>>> Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote:
>>>
But the problem is that I can not make diffs for some reason. It just
hangs and hangs. Does anybody else experience this problem?
This is the convert patch I am going to commit unless I hear a lot of
bad language.
(There are some testing code that is not visible here that will also
be committed)
? Config
? convert-1.diff
? convert-2.diff
? convert-3.diff
? cppflags-1.diff
? idxupdown2-1.diff
? includes-1.diff
?
Here is the rough patch. Ignore all you do not like, but many changes
are good. I do not have time to make separate patch now. Sorry.
Regards,
Asger
lyx-devel.patch.bz2
Description: Binary data
On Friday 21 January 2005 08:28, G. Milde wrote:
>
> Please find attached my work so far. If you copy lyx.py into the
> "pythonpath", pydoc will give you a nice view of the doc strings and
> setup
Hi GÃnter,
I would like to congratulate you for your work with the lyx server via
the
I wrote:
Compiling for both systems was necessary because the font handling is
slightly different:
> WinXP doesn't accept the Win2000-compiled fonts ("no installable
> font").
Sorry, I didn't know that Win needs the pfm- AND the corresponding
pfb-files. I uploaded a new package
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 01:37:38PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > What I was not sure about is how you handle option=='foo bar'.
>
> We don't. All hell breaks loose at this point and always has. The existing
> code to split a string up into an argv array is:
:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 08:15:10PM +, Andreas Vox wrote:
>
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > namespace support = lyx::support;
> > using std::ostream;
> > typedef list SnippetList;
> >
> > is just baaaddd.
>
> Ah, bad for *.h, ok for *.C?
> Got it.
The reason being that *.h
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:16:38AM +0100, Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote:
> John Weiss wrote:
> [A great opportunity to have a little flame-fest.]
You're the one attacking me out-of-hand.
> >Not FUD. Reality. [Long story about something irrelevant.]
> > Took them YEARS to get it to that state.
>
>
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 02:38:54PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> Which means that it's dead easy to set a break point in gdb. Any entry
> into lyxbreaker is automatically invalid, so stop there and have a look at
> the execution path to that point.
>
> Try it yourself:
> gdb ./lyx
> (gdb)
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 09:57:26PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> (This also reminded me how VERY VERY VERY unhappy I am about Math not
> having its own top-level menu entry anymore. It is such a separate and
> special part of both LyX and LaTeX, that this old practice was more than
>
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:30:45AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> John Weiss wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 09:57:48PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >> Cygwin's POSIX emulation layer avoids
> >> the need for the various workarounds required when using other
> >> compilers under MS-Windows.
>
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 10:01:09AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Sure it is nice to compile on more than one compiler... but if the
> result is muddier code then I am not sure about the gain. (and not
> that I have not said that this is the case, just a thing to watch out
> for.
And
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 02:24:05AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> >What he means is that the figure is formally embedded in a paragraph
> >inside the float, which is formatted "justified" (out of alternatives
> >left, right, justified and centred). This means the picture will
John Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
...
> In short: calling a function "lyxbreaker" is a Bad Idea, as it
> implies that this function somehow damages LyX. Better to call it
> "lyxstopper" or "lyxbreakpt", the latter being far more descriptive if
> its purpose.
But lyxbreaker has "
John Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Now... now I'm not even sure I want to be bothered with LyX. I've
| been through 3 years of job-hell. I don't need this added stress.
Please take a step back.
If you knew the flak I have taken...
You really, really should come to a LyX meeting. Then
John Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:30:45AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> John Weiss wrote:
>>
>> > On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 09:57:48PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> >> Cygwin's POSIX emulation layer avoids
>> >> the need for the various workarounds required when
Lars Gullik BjÃnnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> John Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Now... now I'm not even sure I want to be bothered with LyX. I've
> | been through 3 years of job-hell. I don't need this added stress.
>
> Please take a step back.
>
> If you knew the flak I
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 02:21:01AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Besides I am the only one allowed to be personally attacked in this
> forum.
Oh come on, you must consider Andre here. (For which I'm a bit sorry...)
john
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 01:52:45AM +, Andreas Vox wrote:
> John, after what you told us about your situation I can understand you
> don't want any aggro from this list. But I don't see that *all* attack you,
Anyway, Mr. Weiss needs to know I've long since taken his title of
"Least Popular
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 07:03:11PM +, Jose' Matos wrote:
> PS: In another movement (no pun John ;-) to help python scripting for lyx
Is this a test on whether I'm still listening? :)
Super-glad to see Asger back into the fold. He can be a less hated me!!
john
Howdy,
A colleague asked me if there was anything that MS word could do well, that
LyX couldn't, and all I could think of was drag-n-dropping image files
into the document. That got me to thinking what it would take to implement
it in LyX. Here's one solution, albeit somewhat naive perhaps, as
On 27.01.05, John Weiss wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 09:57:26PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >
> > (This also reminded me how VERY VERY VERY unhappy I am about Math not
> > having its own top-level menu entry anymore. It is such a separate and
> > special part of both LyX and LaTeX, that
On 28.01.05, Andreas Vox wrote:
> John Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >
> ...
> > In short: calling a function "lyxbreaker" is a Bad Idea, as it
> > implies that this function somehow damages LyX. Better to call it
> > "lyxstopper" or "lyxbreakpt", the latter being far more descriptive
74 matches
Mail list logo
