Re: simple [patch] support for verbatim*

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 01:04:56PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > On 11/23/2015 11:41 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:35:24AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Le > > 23/11/2015 01:59, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : >>> Am 23.11.2015 um 00:07 > schrieb Scott Kostyshak: >>> I

Re: URL check in our lyx-sources

Am Montag, 23. November 2015 um 12:15:18, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 01:12:01PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Montag, 23. November 2015 um 10:29:20, schrieb Kornel Benko > > > > > > I will take a look at this soon. To create the

Re: simple [patch] support for verbatim*

On 11/23/2015 11:41 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:35:24AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Le > 23/11/2015 01:59, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : >>> Am 23.11.2015 um 00:07 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: >>> I wish I had the knowledge to review the patch but I do not >>> >>> I

Re: URL check in our lyx-sources

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 08:38:48PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Montag, 23. November 2015 um 12:15:18, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 01:12:01PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > Am Montag, 23. November 2015 um 10:29:20, schrieb Kornel Benko > > >

Re: categorizing export tests

Am Montag, 23. November 2015 um 16:38:20, schrieb Guenter Milde ... > >> Up to here, I hope we can agree. > > > Partly. I made the comments where I think it should be more precise. > > Which of the follwing is true? > > a) whether a combination of document, output

Re: simple [patch] support for verbatim*

Le 23/11/2015 01:59, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : Am 23.11.2015 um 00:07 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: I wish I had the knowledge to review the patch but I do not I don't understand why. It is a simple decision if we want support for the verbatim* environment in LyX or not. This environment is in basic

Re: [PATCH] Re: Regression in lyx2lyx box alignment

Le 22/11/2015 18:52, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : I am fine with your patch to be in but there are more things to do: I know, but my patch never intended to do this things. This patch is merely a spin-off of the discussion about your commit. My idea was to allow to set the alignment of the box

Re: [PATCH] Re: Regression in lyx2lyx box alignment

Le 21/11/2015 10:02, Georg Baum a écrit : You have my vote for submitting this. Thanks. It is in now. JMarc

Re: [PATCH] Remove duplicate check for NLS

Le 21/11/2015 04:19, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : In the output of configure, I see: ... checking whether NLS is requested... yes checking for msgfmt... /usr/bin/msgfmt checking for gmsgfmt... /usr/bin/msgfmt checking for xgettext... /usr/bin/xgettext checking for msgmerge... /usr/bin/msgmerge

Re: URL check in our lyx-sources

Am Sonntag, 22. November 2015 um 19:04:08, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 03:44:55PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Checking accessible urls, I get > > > > time out Error url: "ftp://ftp.agu.org/journals/latex/journals; > > lib/doc/Additional.lyx:u10211 >

Re: [LyX/master] theorems-ams: add solution environment

Ping, ping Am Freitag, 20. November 2015 um 16:49:53, schrieb Kornel Benko > Am Mittwoch, 18. November 2015 um 02:36:56, schrieb Uwe Stöhr > > > commit 0ae337014ec6cfbe7bb884c4f70b8e66764c22c8 > > Author: Uwe Stöhr > > Date: Wed Nov 18

Re: URL check in our lyx-sources

Am Montag, 23. November 2015 um 10:29:20, schrieb Kornel Benko > > I will take a look at this soon. To create the above list did you have > > to copy/paste each individual failing URL from LastTest.log or is there > > an easier way? > > I had to copy/paste. But we could adapt the

Re: categorizing export tests

Dear Kornel and Scott (and everyone else interested in export tests), On 2015-11-22, Kornel Benko wrote: > We apparently don't understand each other. Indeed, there is a misunderstanding, but I believe to be a bit wiser now. Please correct me where I am still wrong. > For me, ignored test is

Re: categorizing export tests

Am Montag, 23. November 2015 um 13:09:40, schrieb Guenter Milde > Dear Kornel and Scott (and everyone else interested in export tests), > > On 2015-11-22, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > We apparently don't understand each other. > > Indeed, there is a misunderstanding, but

Re: simple [patch] support for verbatim*

On 11/23/2015 02:23 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 01:04:56PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: >> On > 11/23/2015 11:41 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:35:24AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Le 23/11/2015 01:59, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : >>> Am

Re: My current test failures

On 2015-11-21, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: --] > > Below are my current (on 77979d91) test failures: Newsgroups: gmane.editors.lyx.devel From: Guenter Milde Subject: Re: My current test failures References: <20151121160534.GA2808@cotopaxi>

Re: [PATCH] Fix offset error in computation of hfills

Le 23/11/2015 17:05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : This patch is part of ticket: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9860 Consider the file newfile1.lyx in attachment. The length of hfills is not computed correctly, since the minimal size of each hfill is forgotten. Basically, a 'wid = hfill' has

Re: simple [patch] support for verbatim*

OK, so we are going to support verbatim* It's possible. If Uwe can post a complete patch, I can try doing it. Here it is. I don't think it is worth it to create a new function but I am not the Python expert. thanks and regards Uwe development/FORMAT | 5

Re: [LyX/master] theorems-ams: add solution environment

Am 23.11.2015 um 13:18 schrieb Kornel Benko: >> diff --git a/lib/layouts/theorems-ams.inc b/lib/layouts/theorems-ams.inc +Style Solution + CopyStyle Definition + LatexName sol + LabelString "Solution \thetheorem." Uwe, are you sure about

Re: Win and Mac 2.2.0alpha1 installations independent, right?

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 01:31:53AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 21.11.2015 um 18:28 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > >I would like to say that "you may install 2.2.0alpha1 without affecting > >your current installation of LyX" and that "you may use the two versions > >simulaneously without conflict".

Re: My current test failures

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 10:40:11PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2015-11-21, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: --] > > > > Below are my current (on 77979d91) test failures: > > Newsgroups: gmane.editors.lyx.devel > From: Guenter Milde >

Re: Win and Mac 2.2.0alpha1 installations independent, right?

Am 24.11.2015 um 01:56 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: The svgz icons aren't displaying for me in 2.2 and evidently... Interesting. This is bad news. I thought they are only shown with Qt 5.5 but I compiled alpha1 with Qt 4.8. regards Uwe

Re: [PATCH] Re: Regression in lyx2lyx box alignment

Am 23.11.2015 um 11:45 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: As already said, the problem is not about an extra \par, but the fact that the center environments adds some extra space. Yes. Sorry, I meant the extra space. And this was the reason why I once added the possibility to set the vertical

Re: Win and Mac 2.2.0alpha1 installations independent, right?

Am 21.11.2015 um 18:28 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: I would like to say that "you may install 2.2.0alpha1 without affecting your current installation of LyX" and that "you may use the two versions simulaneously without conflict". This is true on e.g. Ubuntu. Can someone confirm this is true for Mac

Re: [PATCH] Fix offset error in computation of hfills

Am 23.11.2015 um 18:05 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: Can I commit this first patch? The patch looks reasonable but why is this change necessary?: - dim = Dimension(10, 10, 10); + dim = Dimension(5, 10, 10); Maybe the reason for the values should be documented in

Re: Win and Mac 2.2.0alpha1 installations independent, right?

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 02:03:14AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 24.11.2015 um 01:56 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > >>The svgz icons aren't displaying for me in 2.2 and evidently... > > > >Interesting. This is bad news. > > I thought they are only shown with Qt 5.5 but I compiled alpha1 with Qt

Re: Win and Mac 2.2.0alpha1 installations independent, right?

Am 22.11.2015 um 01:03 schrieb Andrew Parsloe: Windows 7: yes, it installs beside 2.1, but I get the attached welcome screen in which the default toolbar icons are unavailable. I cannot reproduce this. i tested LyX 2.2alpha1 on 3 different Win 7 PCs. Thus I propose to uninstall alpha1 and

Re: simple [patch] support for verbatim*

Am 24.11.2015 um 01:44 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: typo: "einvironments" -> "environments" Thanks, fixed in the attached patch. + [502, [revert_verbatim]], Do you think 'revert_verbatim_star' would be a better name? Fine, it is in the attached patch. Besides these, the new patch

Re: simple [patch] support for verbatim*

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 01:28:41AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > OK, so we are going to support verbatim* > > >It's possible. If Uwe can post a complete patch, I can try doing it. > > Here it is. > > I don't think it is worth it to create a new function but I am not the > Python expert. If Richard

Re: Win and Mac 2.2.0alpha1 installations independent, right?

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 01:03:37PM +1300, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > Windows 7: yes, it installs beside 2.1, but I get the attached welcome > screen in which the default toolbar icons are unavailable. When I switch > from the Default icon set to the Classic, all the buttons are displayed > except

Re: simple [patch] support for verbatim*

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 02:01:04AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 24.11.2015 um 01:44 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > >typo: "einvironments" -> "environments" > > Thanks, fixed in the attached patch. > > >>+ [502, [revert_verbatim]], > > > >Do you think 'revert_verbatim_star' would be a

Re: simple [patch] support for verbatim*

On 11/23/2015 08:23 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 02:01:04AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: >> Am 24.11.2015 um 01:44 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: >> >>> Do you think 'revert_verbatim_star' would be a better name? >> Fine, it is in the attached patch. >> >> Besides these, the new patch

Re: Updating LyX.py after a format change

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 09:16:40PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 11/23/2015 09:06 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > Should this step be added to the steps we have in Development.lyx? > > > > For example, something like: > > > > 4. Update the

Re: simple [patch] support for verbatim*

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 09:10:23PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > Uwe, please test that this new patch does what you want it to do. I've > tested it, but only minimally. > > Another issue is that \verbatim* is not presently handled properly by > tex2lyx. If we are going to add verbatim* support

Re: Win and Mac 2.2.0alpha1 installations independent, right?

On 24/11/2015 1:56 p.m., Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 01:03:37PM +1300, Andrew Parsloe wrote: Windows 7: yes, it installs beside 2.1, but I get the attached welcome screen in which the default toolbar icons are unavailable. When I switch from the Default icon set to the

Updating LyX.py after a format change

Should this step be added to the steps we have in Development.lyx? For example, something like: 4. Update the range of file formats in the array format_relation in lib/lyx2lyx/LyX.py. Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Updating LyX.py after a format change

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 11/23/2015 09:06 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Should this step be added to the steps we have in Development.lyx? > > For example, something like: > > 4. Update the range of file formats in the array format_relation in > lib/lyx2lyx/LyX.py. Yes.

Re: Win and Mac 2.2.0alpha1 installations independent, right?

On 24/11/2015 1:35 p.m., Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 22.11.2015 um 01:03 schrieb Andrew Parsloe: Windows 7: yes, it installs beside 2.1, but I get the attached welcome screen in which the default toolbar icons are unavailable. I cannot reproduce this. i tested LyX 2.2alpha1 on 3 different Win 7

Re: My current test failures

On 2015-11-24, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 10:40:11PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: >> On 2015-11-21, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> > Below are my current (on 77979d91) test failures: >> Thank you for the list. However, I would rather call this a list of >> "export failures". >>

Re: [PATCH] Remove duplicate check for NLS

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:55:26AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 21/11/2015 04:19, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >In the output of configure, I see: > > > >... > >checking whether NLS is requested... yes > >checking for msgfmt... /usr/bin/msgfmt > >checking for gmsgfmt... /usr/bin/msgfmt >

Re: [PATCH] Remove duplicate check for NLS

Le 23/11/2015 17:36, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Yes, please commit. I tested and it works well. Done now. JMarc

Re: categorizing export tests

On 2015-11-23, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Montag, 23. November 2015 um 13:09:40, schrieb Guenter Milde > >> On 2015-11-22, Kornel Benko wrote: >> > We apparently don't understand each other. >> Indeed, there is a misunderstanding, but I believe to be a bit wiser now. >>

Re: simple [patch] support for verbatim*

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:35:24AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 23/11/2015 01:59, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : > >Am 23.11.2015 um 00:07 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > > >>I wish I had the knowledge to review the patch but I do not > > > >I don't understand why. It is a simple decision if we want

[PATCH] Fix offset error in computation of hfills

This patch is part of ticket: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9860 Consider the file newfile1.lyx in attachment. The length of hfills is not computed correctly, since the minimal size of each hfill is forgotten. Basically, a 'wid = hfill' has to be replaced by a 'wid += hfill'. The rest of the

Re: URL check in our lyx-sources

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 01:12:01PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Montag, 23. November 2015 um 10:29:20, schrieb Kornel Benko > > > > I will take a look at this soon. To create the above list did you have > > > to copy/paste each individual failing URL from LastTest.log or is