for an
example.
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
to be added to the bugzilla so that
this isn't forgotten (unless a developer immediately starts working on
this).
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Christian Ridderström [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| duh... unless we suddenly entered a world without software bugs, how can
| you say that the code defines the intended behaviour?
|
How can you
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
Christian Ridderström wrote:
I've _suffered_ this feature in MS-Word... for me, the main problem
was the distraction from content. E.g., I frequently found myself
spending time on fixing spelling(*) instead of content -- I prefer
-exam-at-time aspect made
me not want to get sidetracked ;-)
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
... I think of it as a footnote marker
that indicates that it's the unnumbered version of the environment.
Additionally, it makes remembering the keyboard shortcuts pretty easy.
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
unnumbered.png
Description
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | duh... unless we suddenly entered a world without software bugs, how can
> | you say that the code defines the intended behaviour?
> |
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
> Christian Ridderström wrote:
> >> > I've _suffered_ this "feature" in MS-Word... for me, the main problem
> >> > was the distraction from content. E.g., I frequently found myself
> >> > spend
ss the "writing-home-exam-at-time" aspect made
me not want to get sidetracked ;-)
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
m used to the '*' now... I think of it as a footnote marker
that indicates that it's the unnumbered version of the environment.
Additionally, it makes remembering the keyboard shortcuts pretty easy.
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
unnumbered.png
Descr
was the grammatical squiggly lines...
of course, it's a bit unfair to expect the software to understand grammar
when the text contains equations etc.
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Christian Ridderström wrote:
Altough I've never used it myself, and my first impression is more or
less like yours, the fact that there are so many people asking for it
makes me think it must be bit more than a ... feel-good... thing. Just
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Janus Sandsgaard wrote:
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Christian Ridderström wrote:
I'd like to give this (-infinity) in priority... but then I don't know
what priority to give suggestions for an Office assistant, i.e. Clippy
;-)
;-)
I am sure a flyspell-mode
o just before final print)
/Christian
(*) Something I _really_ hated was the grammatical squiggly lines...
of course, it's a bit unfair to expect the software to understand grammar
when the text contains equations etc.
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Christian Ridderström wrote:
>
> >> Altough I've never used it myself, and my first impression is more or
> >> less like yours, the fact that there are so many people asking for it
> >> makes me think it must
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Janus Sandsgaard wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Christian Ridderström wrote:
>
> > I'd like to give this (-infinity) in priority... but then I don't know
> > what priority to give suggestions for an Office assistant, i.e. "Clippy"
> > ;-)
&g
not have a home directory on that
machine, but I don't know if that actually matters).
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
? contrib.diff
Index: download/contrib.php3
===
RCS file: /cvs/lyx/www
e account also does not have a home directory on that
machine, but I don't know if that actually matters).
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
? contrib.diff
Index: download/contrib.php3
===
above can easily be extended to extract those as well.
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
Christian Ridderström wrote:
Speaking of that, I used my script to see how the lfuns have changed
between the recent releases. The lfuns for Lyx 1.3.1 - 1.3.3 are the
same, but the n:o lfuns has dropped from 241 to 238 in the latest
CVS. However
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
In other words, I'm quite happy with 'mathed' and 'texted'.
I'll consider this settled then :)
(Now I'd just like to know what they are)
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Christian == Christian Ridderström [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Christian What would this lfun2lfun-script operate on? (Or do you
Christian mean that it would act like a filter on commands typed in
Christian the mini-buffer, see what I wrote
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
Christian Ridderström wrote:
that also extracts any available help text from stdtoolbars.ui.
Actually, since the ui-file uses a few command sequences, it ends up
being a bit like examples of how you can use the command, see
http://wiki.lyx.org
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
Sure. Whatever.
It's all a pipe dream anyway.
For the future, I've pasted some notes here:
http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/Devel/Lfun2lfun
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
put some descriptions,
the script above can easily be extended to extract those as well.
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > Speaking of that, I used my script to see how the lfuns have changed
> > between the recent releases. The lfuns for Lyx 1.3.1 - 1.3.3 are the
> > same, but the n:o lfuns has dropped from 241 to 238
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
> In other words, I'm quite happy with 'mathed' and 'texted'.
I'll consider this settled then :)
(Now I'd just like to know what they are)
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Christian" == Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Christian> What would this lfun2lfun-script operate on? (Or do you
> Christian> mean that it would act like a filter
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > that also extracts any available help text from stdtoolbars.ui.
> > Actually, since the ui-file uses a few command sequences, it ends up
> > being a bit like examples of how you can use the comma
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Sure. Whatever.
> It's all a pipe dream anyway.
For the future, I've pasted some notes here:
http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/Devel/Lfun2lfun
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Christian == Christian Ridderström [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Users will find that they are then able to test these currently
incompatible insets inside each other.
Christian Thanks... I stored your answer in the so far very small
this was nicely phrased and created this page:
http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/Devel/Goals
for discussing/listing development goals.
/Christian
--
Dr. Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44 http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Christian" == Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Users will find that they are then able to test these currently
> >> incompatible insets inside each other.
&
c) and are now busy to build
> something sensible from the shards.
I thought this was nicely phrased and created this page:
http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/Devel/Goals
for discussing/listing development goals.
/Christian
--
Dr. Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44 http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
' (or any other textual description) of
lfuns, preferably so that I can have a script extract it.
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
verbing)
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
I've seen 'IU' several times now in the headers of posts...
is this the same as UI?
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
Christian Ridderström wrote:
I've seen 'IU' several times now in the headers of posts...
is this the same as UI?
No.
UI: user interface.
IU: inset unification. The on-going process of merging the mathed and
'other' insets.
Users
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
at least alot must be have been going on inside.
Would it make sense to try and assemble descriptions for the lfuns as they
are in HEAD (possibly context-dependent), in order to get a bit closer to
a serious scripting interface?
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Christian Ridderström wrote:
Speaking of that, I used my script to see how the lfuns have changed
between the recent releases. The lfuns for Lyx 1.3.1 - 1.3.3 are the
same, but the n:o lfuns has dropped from 241 to 238 in the latest CVS.
However, the n:o lfuns
' (or any other textual description) of
lfuns, preferably so that I can have a script extract it.
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
his verbing)
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
I've seen 'IU' several times now in the headers of posts...
is this the same as UI?
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Christian Ridderström wrote:
>
> > I've seen 'IU' several times now in the headers of posts...
> > is this the same as UI?
>
> No.
> UI: user interface.
> IU: inset unification. The on-going process of merging th
hat each lfun actually does?
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
.. 238
both 1.3.3 and HEAD is... 206
so at least alot must be have been going on "inside".
Would it make sense to try and assemble descriptions for the lfuns as they
are in HEAD (possibly context-dependent), in order to get a bit closer to
a se
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Christian Ridderström wrote:
>
> Speaking of that, I used my script to see how the lfuns have changed
> between the recent releases. The lfuns for Lyx 1.3.1 - 1.3.3 are the
> same, but the n:o lfuns has dropped from 241 to 238 in the latest CVS.
> However
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
Christian Ridderström wrote:
So far it seems clear as crystal, but looking at the enum names and
the strings for the user commands I get confused. Which one is
supposed to define(*) the intended behaviour of the LFUN?
That's clear. LyX acts
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
Christian Ridderström wrote:
duh... unless we suddenly entered a world without software bugs, how
can you say that the code defines the intended behaviour?
If you're going to be rude, I'll keep my
spelling will make it
easier to search the site etc.
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > So far it seems clear as crystal, but looking at the enum names and
> > the strings for the user commands I get confused. Which one is
> > supposed to "define"(*) the intended behaviour
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > duh... unless we suddenly entered a world without software bugs, how
> > can you say that the code defines the intended behaviour?
> >
>
> If you're
consistent spelling will make it
easier to search the site etc.
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 03:06:12PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
This is about a _minor_ problem, for now I'm really only planning to
bugzilla and forget about it.
However, if you already are in math-mode, you accidentally insert
which name is
supposed to define/indicate the intended behaviour of the function.
confused
/Christian
(*) I mean define in the sense that I think the name, either of the
enum, or of the command string should be clearly connected to the
intended action of the LFUN.
--
Christian Ridderström
thing?
Btw, I was actually expecting this to work (wishful thinking?):
command-sequence ert-insert texCmd;
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 03:06:12PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > This is about a _minor_ problem, for now I'm really only planning to
> > "bugzilla and forget" about it.
> >
> > However, if you alrea
press the
Home-key in mathEd or textEd, but that I'm confused about which name is
supposed to "define/indicate" the intended behaviour of the function.
confused
/Christian
(*) I mean "define" in the sense that I think the name, either of the
enum, or of the command string should
thing?
Btw, I was actually expecting this to work (wishful thinking?):
command-sequence ert-insert texCmd;
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
-mode-toggle' then?
Or this just a side-effect of that the keyboard bindings are the same for
textEd and MathEd, i.e. C-m - math-mode and the rest follows?
Anyway, these are mostly random thoughts since it's Friday.
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http
d something like 'math-mode-toggle' then?
Or this just a side-effect of that the keyboard bindings are the same for
textEd and MathEd, i.e. C-m -> math-mode and the rest follows?
Anyway, these are mostly random thoughts since it's Friday.
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström
this:
a + ( b + c ) + d| [C-Left]a +|( b + c ) + d
I hope you can understand what I mean with these examples.
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 08:19:16PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
You need to fix your window manager? SCNR
Indeed. Save a few small changes I use the same configuration as 14
years ago.
ok... and all new WM features since
select up
to word boundaries.
Anyway, just a thought.
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
an InsetText in mathed with all its
functionality...
That' much better, and since I assume the TextInset would automatically
inherit the right behaviour of the keyboard shortcuts. Implementing the
above would therefore be a waste of time in the long run.
/Christian
--
Dr. Christian Ridderström
of this thread)
--
Dr. Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44 http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
[C-Right] a + ( b + c ) + d|
Going in the other direction, C-Left should move until it has skipped one
sub-inset or reached the beginning, i.e. like this:
a + ( b + c ) + d| [C-Left]a +|( b + c ) + d
I hope you can understand what I mean with these examples.
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 08:19:16PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > > > You need to fix your window manager? SCNR
> > >
> > > Indeed. Save a few small changes I use the same configuration as 14
> > >
larly, S-C-Left/Right should select up
to word boundaries.
Anyway, just a thought.
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
the
above would therefore be a waste of time in the long run.
/Christian
--
Dr. Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44 http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
to a few times per page), and also the case of dialogs? If you are
dead-set on using boxes, just say so ...
/Christian (getting tired of this thread)
--
Dr. Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44 http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
unrelated: If you do Ctrl-q when in a math-inset and discard the
changes, lyx says it caught a bug once it has quit.
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
ature is usable.
Not bad... I think this should be applied.
Perhaps unrelated: If you do Ctrl-q when in a math-inset and discard the
changes, lyx says it caught a bug once it has quit.
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
Hi
Have the method of getting subscripts changed or something in 1.4 xforms?
When I press '_' I actually get a '_' instead of a subscript?
(Same thing goes for superscripts, '^' inserts a '^' :-(
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
/passwords.txt
-rw-rw chrwiki /home/lyx/www/pmwiki/passwords.txt
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
Hi
Have the method of getting subscripts changed or something in 1.4 xforms?
When I press '_' I actually get a '_' instead of a subscript?
(Same thing goes for superscripts, '^' inserts a '^' :-(
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
ian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
/passwords.txt
-rw-rw chrwiki /home/lyx/www/pmwiki/passwords.txt
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
... bah, this gets too complicated...
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
in Germany for a while. He
considered doing a phd, so it would be kind of fun to give him a thesis so
he sees what he missed :)
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 11:30:20AM +0100, Christian Ridderström spake thusly:
How about modes for controlling if markup borders (i.e. insets?) should be
shown, these could be:
* Don't show any boxes etc
* Only show box of the inset(s
of a special situation here? (could you give an example)
I remember it being a bit annoying to know where you are when you use C-e,
but I couldn't find an example just now.
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Christian Ridderström wrote:
And that's not because that's the natural way with the all-boxes
approaches but because it's the way I think of the text markup. And
not being sure whether I am inside or outside makes me uncomfortable.
Are you thinking of a special
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 11:30:20AM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
For formulas, I want very fine-grained control of 'where' the cursor is,
so the 2-cursor approach is useful, even if it sometimes feels like you
are pressing the left/right
to it.
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
conclusion (?) is perhaps that a 'word' in a formula should
correspond to something like a 'term' in a mathematical expression.
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
?--\
and then when you press delete again, you end up with
a^2+|
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
to make xforms behave as qt in this respect.
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 12:53:04PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
With the ERT inset (in textEd) for instance, this is not really a problem
since you have the visual barrier (box) that you pass through.
Well, the idea of all-boxes is to have
table-of-contents
thing working so that the FAQ.Unsorted will become a bit more sane)
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
's not the same as a being in a
subscript to me, since the subscript "belongs" to something. A footnote
might belong to something though... bah, this gets too complicated...
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
awyer, and studied in Germany for a while. He
considered doing a phd, so it would be kind of fun to give him a thesis so
he sees what he "missed" :)
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 11:30:20AM +0100, Christian Ridderström spake thusly:
>
> > How about modes for controlling if markup borders (i.e. insets?) should be
> > shown, these could be:
> > * Don't show any boxes etc
it's the way I think of the text markup. And
> not being sure whether I am inside or outside makes me uncomfortable.
Are you thinking of a special situation here? (could you give an example)
I remember it being a bit annoying to know where you are when you use C-e,
but I couldn't find an example just now.
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > And that's not because that's the natural way with the all-boxes
> > approaches but because it's the way I think of the text markup. And
> > not being sure whether I am inside or outside makes me uncomfortable.
>
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 11:30:20AM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > For formulas, I want very fine-grained control of 'where' the cursor is,
> > so the 2-cursor approach is useful, even if it sometimes feels like you
> >
ple who're used to it.
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
conclusion (?) is perhaps that a 'word' in a formula should
correspond to something like a 'term' in a mathematical expression.
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
1101 - 1200 of 1976 matches
Mail list logo
