Re: Master branch partially opened for LyX 2.1.0

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: Am Sonntag, 6. April 2014 um 13:13:08, schrieb Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org That sort of patch is fine with me, once all of you figure out what exactly the best way to do it is. I think the attached patch

Re: LyX 2.1.0

I did both now. JMarc Thanks, Vincent

LyX 2.1.0

At the moment I've a few issues left that I think need some consideration. - As it seems that nearly all communications with the translators are going solely by private mail by Uwe, and as Uwe apparently left without further notice after sending his last e-mails, I've no clue on what translations

Re: LyX 2.1.0

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org> wrote: > 08/04/2014 11:19, Vincent van Ravesteijn: > >> At the moment I've a few issues left that I think need some consideration. >> >> - As it seems that nearly all communications with the t

Re: LyX 2.1.0

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn <v...@lyx.org> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > <lasgout...@lyx.org> wrote: >> 08/04/2014 11:19, Vincent van Ravesteijn: >> >>> At the moment I've a few issues le

Re: Master branch partially opened for LyX 2.1.0

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sonntag, 6. April 2014 um 13:13:08, schrieb Richard Heck > >> > > That sort of patch is fine with me, once all of you figure out what > >> > > >> > > exactly the best > >> > > >> > > way to do it is. > >> >

Re: LyX 2.1.0

> I did both now. > > JMarc > Thanks, Vincent

Re: A small bug maybe and a small request

On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote: 2014-04-07 10:23 GMT+02:00 Murat Yildizoglu: Hi, I use Lyx under OSX Mavericks. I have discovered a small problem in beta2 yesterday: \Omega is invisible in a math inset (but becomes visible when the cursor leaves it).

Re: A small bug maybe and a small request

On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Murat Yildizoglu murat.yildizo...@u-bordeaux4.fr wrote: Concerning the accents, the trick of typing twice would be a solution indeed, I was not aware of it. But it does not works in my case, I get a^{î}, instead of a^{i}. I'm not sure where this comes

Re: A small bug maybe and a small request

On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > 2014-04-07 10:23 GMT+02:00 Murat Yildizoglu: > >> Hi, >> I use Lyx under OSX Mavericks. >> I have discovered a small problem in beta2 yesterday: \Omega is invisible >> in a math inset (but becomes visible when the cursor

Re: A small bug maybe and a small request

On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Murat Yildizoglu < murat.yildizo...@u-bordeaux4.fr> wrote: > > Concerning the accents, the trick of typing twice would be a solution > indeed, I was not aware of it. > > But it does not works in my case, I get a^{î}, instead of a^{i}. > > I'm not sure where this

Re: [patch] [important] fix invalid iterator

Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef op 5-4-2014 12:55: This patch fixes a fatal error of mine. I compared begin and end iterators of two different containers (constructed in args()) in InsetLayout. This could result in * a crash (happens if you load a document with arguments for which you do not have

Re: [patch] [important] fix invalid iterator

Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef op 6-4-2014 19:22: 2014-04-06 18:53 GMT+02:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn: Please commit to master. Done. I did not write a comment yet, since I do not know what to write. Jürgen I've no idea either. We can't put comments for each container that is returned

Re: [patch] [important] fix invalid iterator

Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef op 5-4-2014 12:55: This patch fixes a fatal error of mine. I compared begin and end iterators of two different containers (constructed in args()) in InsetLayout. This could result in * a crash (happens if you load a document with arguments for which you do not have

Re: [patch] [important] fix invalid iterator

Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef op 6-4-2014 19:22: 2014-04-06 18:53 GMT+02:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn: Please commit to master. Done. I did not write a comment yet, since I do not know what to write. Jürgen I've no idea either. We can't put comments for each container that is returned

Re: request for decisions for the release of LyX 2.1

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote: Dear LyX developers, as I don't understand what is nowadays going with LyX I trigger a discussion. To be honest, this makes me want to stop reading immediately. Also, the remarks that you need to have a position within the

Re: request for decisions for the release of LyX 2.1

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote: - For an unknown reason an RC had to be released before the docs were ready while I requested 2 more weeks. But an undocumented feature is an unknown/unused and therefore untested. The goal is to have a stable release therefore

Re: request for decisions for the release of LyX 2.1

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote: - For an unknown reason an RC had to be released before the docs were ready while I requested 2 more weeks. But an undocumented feature is an unknown/unused and therefore untested. The goal is to have a stable release

Re: request for decisions for the release of LyX 2.1

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Dear LyX developers, > > as I don't understand what is nowadays going with LyX I trigger a > discussion. > To be honest, this makes me want to stop reading immediately. Also, the remarks that you need to have a position within

Re: request for decisions for the release of LyX 2.1

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > - For an unknown reason an RC had to be released before the docs were ready > while I requested 2 more weeks. But an undocumented feature is an > unknown/unused and therefore untested. The goal is to have a stable release >

Re: request for decisions for the release of LyX 2.1

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > - For an unknown reason an RC had to be released before the docs were ready > while I requested 2 more weeks. But an undocumented feature is an > unknown/unused and therefore untested. The goal is to have a stable release >

Re: [LyX/master] French splash.lyx: a fix by Jean-Pierre

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 2:12 AM, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@lyx.org wrote: commit aea6ddfcb96ac7f060c589cefc9e1219da5653d4 Author: Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@lyx.org Date: Thu Apr 3 02:12:05 2014 +0200 French splash.lyx: a fix by Jean-Pierre diff --git a/lib/examples/fr/splash.lyx

Re: Figure 0

For a change, why not seeing the good part of my work - in this case the benefit of user feedback for a tricky problem that was not easy to locate and not easy to verify that it was fixed? We are in a testing period and the aim if to get user feedback. And once again, why not trusting me

Re: [LyX/master] French splash.lyx: a fix by Jean-Pierre

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 2:12 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > commit aea6ddfcb96ac7f060c589cefc9e1219da5653d4 > Author: Uwe Stöhr > Date: Thu Apr 3 02:12:05 2014 +0200 > > French splash.lyx: a fix by Jean-Pierre > > diff --git a/lib/examples/fr/splash.lyx

Re: Figure 0

> > >> For a change, why not seeing the good part of my work - in this case the >> benefit of user feedback for a tricky problem that was not easy to locate >> and not easy to verify that it was fixed? We are in a testing period and >> the aim if to get user feedback. And once again, why not

Re: Figure 0

On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote: Am 31.03.2014 22:50, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: I found now a recipe to reproduce, see http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9070 This bug is now fixed and I prepared an installer for this:

Re: Figure 0

On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 31.03.2014 22:50, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: > > > I found now a recipe to reproduce, see >> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9070 >> > > This bug is now fixed and I prepared an installer for this: >

Re: [LyX/master] Fixing #7987: deleted text in change-tracking mode is not found in Advanced FR any more.

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta tomm...@lyx.org wrote: On 29/03/14 17:50, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Tomasso's patch was not improving the situation, but was somehow hiding the underlying mess by building some messy function on top of it. well, I have to some-what

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote: Am 31.03.2014 23:56, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Rtl and contextual characters are separate issues. And what should we do now? Do you see the bug in my screenshot or is this OK for you? regards Uwe I cut out two

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.orgwrote: 01/04/2014 09:28, Vincent van Ravesteijn: I cut out two words, both in the wikipedia text, and the text in LyX. Are you sure that the words in the left column are the same as those in the right column

Re: [parch] silence boost compiler warnings

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote: The attached patch gets rid of these annoying gcc 4.8 compiler warnings pointing to boost (usued typedefs etc.). I have collected the fixed both from boost itself [1] and from the patchset used by Fedora for their boost

Re: [parch] silence boost compiler warnings

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.orgwrote: 01/04/2014 11:07, Vincent van Ravesteijn: On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org mailto:sp...@lyx.org wrote: I propose to commit this to 2.2-staging. The compiler noise

Re: [parch] silence boost compiler warnings

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote: 2014-04-01 11:41 GMT+02:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn: What about scheduling Juergen's patch to some 2.1.x release (maybe not 2.1.1). JMarc Looks sensible. I propose I apply this to my own working branch and see

Re: [LyX/master] This is LyX 2.1.0rc1

Stephan Witt schreef op 1-4-2014 17:02: Shouldn't master be changed back to 2.1.0dev? Stephan I guess so. I did this now. Vincent

Re: LyX 2.1RC1 tarball on ftp.lyx.org misses 4 image files

Uwe Stöhr schreef op 31-3-2014 23:40: The tarball misses the 4 image files tabular-feature_move-*.png (spotted by Koji) regards Uwe I fixed this. Vincent

Re: Remove Confusing Filters From File Dialog

Richard Heck schreef op 31-3-2014 20:34: Vincent, This patch removes the confusing filters from the file dialog. I suggest it for 2.1.0. Richard I applied this patch to master. Vincent

Re: [LyX/master] partly revert commit a860d18b5a722606c68fb1a4ec22ffe3e99792e6

Uwe Stöhr schreef op 31-3-2014 0:40: Am 30.03.2014 21:52, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: @@ -227,6 +227,33 @@ svexamplesdir = $(pkgdatadir)/examples/sv dist_svexamples_DATA = \ examples/sv/splash.lyx +springerexamplesdir = $(pkgdatadir)/examples/springer +dist_springerexamples_DATA

Re: [LyX/master] Fixing #7987: deleted text in change-tracking mode is not found in Advanced F any more.

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta <tomm...@lyx.org> wrote: > On 29/03/14 17:50, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > > Tomasso's patch was not improving the situation, but was somehow hiding > the underlying mess by building some messy function on top of it. > &

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Uwe Stöhr <uwesto...@web.de> wrote: > Am 31.03.2014 23:56, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: > > > Rtl and contextual characters are separate issues. >> > > And what should we do now? > Do you see the bug in my screenshot or is this

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org>wrote: > 01/04/2014 09:28, Vincent van Ravesteijn: > > I cut out two words, both in the wikipedia text, and the text in LyX. >> Are you sure that the words in the left column are the same as those i

Re: [parch] silence boost compiler warnings

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > The attached patch gets rid of these annoying gcc 4.8 compiler warnings > pointing to boost (usued typedefs etc.). I have collected the fixed both > from boost itself [1] and from the patchset used by Fedora for their

Re: [parch] silence boost compiler warnings

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org>wrote: > 01/04/2014 11:07, Vincent van Ravesteijn: > >> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller <sp...@lyx.org >> <mailto:sp...@lyx.org>> wrote: >> I propose to comm

Re: [parch] silence boost compiler warnings

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller <sp...@lyx.org> wrote: > 2014-04-01 11:41 GMT+02:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn: > > What about scheduling Juergen's patch to some 2.1.x release (maybe not >>> 2.1.1). >>> >>> JMarc >>> >> &

Re: [LyX/master] This is LyX 2.1.0rc1

Stephan Witt schreef op 1-4-2014 17:02: Shouldn't master be changed back to 2.1.0dev? Stephan I guess so. I did this now. Vincent

Re: LyX 2.1RC1 tarball on ftp.lyx.org misses 4 image files

Uwe Stöhr schreef op 31-3-2014 23:40: The tarball misses the 4 image files tabular-feature_move-*.png (spotted by Koji) regards Uwe I fixed this. Vincent

Re: Remove Confusing Filters From File Dialog

Richard Heck schreef op 31-3-2014 20:34: Vincent, This patch removes the confusing filters from the file dialog. I suggest it for 2.1.0. Richard I applied this patch to master. Vincent

Re: [LyX/master] partly revert commit a860d18b5a722606c68fb1a4ec22ffe3e99792e6

Uwe Stöhr schreef op 31-3-2014 0:40: Am 30.03.2014 21:52, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: @@ -227,6 +227,33 @@ svexamplesdir = $(pkgdatadir)/examples/sv dist_svexamples_DATA = \ examples/sv/splash.lyx +springerexamplesdir = $(pkgdatadir)/examples/springer +dist_springerexamples_DATA

Re: [LyX/master] partly revert commit a860d18b5a722606c68fb1a4ec22ffe3e99792e6

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote: Am 30.03.2014 21:52, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: @@ -227,6 +227,33 @@ svexamplesdir = $(pkgdatadir)/examples/sv dist_svexamples_DATA = \ examples/sv/splash.lyx +springerexamplesdir = $(pkgdatadir)/examples

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote: Am 30.03.2014 15:38, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: When Implementing support for the new languages in LyX 2.1 I forgot that Urdu and Systriac are RTL-languages: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-to-left The attached simple patch

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Uwe Stöhr schreef op 31-3-2014 23:04: Am 31.03.2014 09:55, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: You say: I would like to have that in master because otherwise Urdu support will not work as advertised in http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX21; However, Urdu is still unusable even with your patch. How

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Op 31 mrt. 2014 23:35 schreef Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de: Am 31.03.2014 23:25, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: How do you come to the conclusion? I draw this conclusion because a user writing Urdu has made a bug report that all characters appear as separate characters and they do

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Op 31 mrt. 2014 23:35 schreef Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de: Am 31.03.2014 23:25, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: How do you come to the conclusion? I draw this conclusion because a user writing Urdu has made a bug report that all characters appear as separate characters and they do

[patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Op 1 apr. 2014 00:19 schreef Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.dejavascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','uwesto...@web.de'); : Am 31.03.2014 23:56, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Rtl and contextual characters are separate issues. And what should we do now? Do you see the bug in my screenshot or is this OK

Re: [LyX/master] partly revert commit a860d18b5a722606c68fb1a4ec22ffe3e99792e6

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Uwe Stöhr <uwesto...@web.de> wrote: > Am 30.03.2014 21:52, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: > > > @@ -227,6 +227,33 @@ svexamplesdir = $(pkgdatadir)/examples/sv >>> dist_svexamples_DATA = \ >>> examples/sv

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 30.03.2014 15:38, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: > > When Implementing support for the new languages in LyX 2.1 I forgot that >> Urdu and Systriac are >> RTL-languages: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-to-left >> >> The attached

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Uwe Stöhr schreef op 31-3-2014 23:04: Am 31.03.2014 09:55, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: You say: "I would like to have that in master because otherwise Urdu support will not work as advertised in http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX21; However, Urdu is still unusable even with your

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Op 31 mrt. 2014 23:35 schreef "Uwe Stöhr" <uwesto...@web.de>: > > Am 31.03.2014 23:25, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: > > >>> How do you come to the conclusion? >> >> >> I draw this conclusion because a user writing Urdu has made a bug repo

Re: [patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Op 31 mrt. 2014 23:35 schreef "Uwe Stöhr" <uwesto...@web.de>: > > Am 31.03.2014 23:25, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: > > >>> How do you come to the conclusion? >> >> >> I draw this conclusion because a user writing Urdu has made a bug repo

[patch for master]: Urdu font not rendering properly in the editor

Op 1 apr. 2014 00:19 schreef "Uwe Stöhr" <uwesto...@web.de<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','uwesto...@web.de');> >: > > Am 31.03.2014 23:56, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: > > >> Rtl and contextual characters are separate issues. > > > And what should

Re: Win installer: cannot install if already installed

On Sunday, March 30, 2014, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote: Am 29.03.2014 10:48, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: This sounds like nonsense that installing 2.0.7 over 2.0.6 is ok, but installing over 2.0.7 suddenly leads to problems. Well, when you need to install LyX 2.0.7 over LyX

Re: [request for a revert in master]: Re: general problem: some template do not compile because of includes

Uwe Stöhr schreef op 30-3-2014 17:46: Am 30.03.2014 16:05, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: To do so, can I revert?: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/3471874ed09c8b78addb9a5df260379014cab52b/lyxgit As this only affects documentation files I did this now. This stretches the phrase documentation

Re: Win installer: cannot install if already installed

Uwe Stöhr schreef op 30-3-2014 17:15: Am 30.03.2014 12:54, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Well, the clue was in the last sentence. I asked: do I have to be a computer expert to install LyX again ? Apparently, yes. I can't believe you don't want to ask the average LyX user to copy his

Re: [LyX/master] partly revert commit a860d18b5a722606c68fb1a4ec22ffe3e99792e6

Uwe Stöhr schreef op 30-3-2014 17:41: commit 5ff8a3941bae22ac03639a78ce3bfbfed7d55f08 Author: Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@lyx.org Date: Sun Mar 30 17:41:02 2014 +0200 partly revert commit a860d18b5a722606c68fb1a4ec22ffe3e99792e6 svmono and svmult must stay in the examples folder

Re: Win Installer problem with large paths

Uwe Stöhr schreef op 30-3-2014 5:44: Am 27.03.2014 23:50, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: The problem is that NSIS has a maximum string length of 1024 characters (including \r\n). My Path variable is longer than 1024, so ReadRegStr returns an empty string. See http://nsis.sourceforge.net

Re: Win Installer problem with large paths

Uwe Stöhr schreef op 30-3-2014 5:44: Am 27.03.2014 23:50, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: The problem is that NSIS has a maximum string length of 1024 characters (including \r\n). My Path variable is longer than 1024, so ReadRegStr returns an empty string. See http://nsis.sourceforge.net

Re: Win Installer problem with large paths

Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef op 30-3-2014 22:17: Yes, now MikTeX is found, but I'm now irritated that the installer starts installing MikTeX packages even if I said No when it asked me to check for MikTeX updates, _and_ while I've told MikTeX to ask me before automatically installing

Re: Win installer: cannot install if already installed

On Sunday, March 30, 2014, Uwe Stöhr <uwesto...@web.de> wrote: > Am 29.03.2014 10:48, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: > > This sounds like nonsense that installing 2.0.7 over 2.0.6 is ok, but >> installing over 2.0.7 suddenly >> leads to problems. >> > > W

Re: [request for a revert in master]: Re: general problem: some template do not compile because of includes

Uwe Stöhr schreef op 30-3-2014 17:46: Am 30.03.2014 16:05, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: To do so, can I revert?: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/3471874ed09c8b78addb9a5df260379014cab52b/lyxgit As this only affects documentation files I did this now. This stretches the phrase "documentation

Re: Win installer: cannot install if already installed

Uwe Stöhr schreef op 30-3-2014 17:15: Am 30.03.2014 12:54, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Well, the clue was in the last sentence. I asked: "do I have to be a computer expert to install LyX again ?" Apparently, yes. I can't believe you don't want to ask the "average"

Re: [LyX/master] partly revert commit a860d18b5a722606c68fb1a4ec22ffe3e99792e6

Uwe Stöhr schreef op 30-3-2014 17:41: commit 5ff8a3941bae22ac03639a78ce3bfbfed7d55f08 Author: Uwe Stöhr Date: Sun Mar 30 17:41:02 2014 +0200 partly revert commit a860d18b5a722606c68fb1a4ec22ffe3e99792e6 svmono and svmult must stay in the examples folder

Re: Win Installer problem with large paths

Uwe Stöhr schreef op 30-3-2014 5:44: Am 27.03.2014 23:50, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: The problem is that NSIS has a maximum string length of 1024 characters (including \r\n). My Path variable is longer than 1024, so ReadRegStr returns an empty string. See http://nsis.sourceforge.net

Re: Win Installer problem with large paths

Uwe Stöhr schreef op 30-3-2014 5:44: Am 27.03.2014 23:50, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: The problem is that NSIS has a maximum string length of 1024 characters (including \r\n). My Path variable is longer than 1024, so ReadRegStr returns an empty string. See http://nsis.sourceforge.net

Re: Win Installer problem with large paths

Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef op 30-3-2014 22:17: Yes, now MikTeX is found, but I'm now irritated that the installer starts installing MikTeX packages even if I said "No" when it asked me to check for MikTeX updates, _and_ while I've told MikTeX to ask me before automatically

Re: Win installer: cannot install if already installed

Uwe Stöhr schreef op 29-3-2014 4:46: Am 28.03.2014 22:20, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Can you please remove this feature that you cannot install LyX if the installer thinks it is already installed ? This was once added by user request. The idea and consensus was that one can install e.g

Re: [LyX/master] Fixing #7987: deleted text in change-tracking mode is not found in Advanced FR any more.

Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 29-3-2014 0:07: On 28/03/14 18:07, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: Please commit to the 2.2-staging branch. ok, no prob. I'll try to address your concerns in the new commit. So, it's in 2.2-staging, with 2 commits, as per your suggestion. Hmm, I don't see it.

Re: [patch] for master - fix for RJournal.layout

Richard Heck schreef op 29-3-2014 17:05: On 03/29/2014 12:26 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: While stepping through all template files I noticed that LyX informs me on opening the RJournal template file that the package msc is missing. The attached simple patch fixed this. Hmm. That is not in my tree:

Re: [patch] for master - fix for RJournal.layout

Uwe Stöhr schreef op 29-3-2014 5:26: While stepping through all template files I noticed that LyX informs me on opening the RJournal template file that the package msc is missing. The attached simple patch fixed this. OK to master or better LyX 2.1.1? regards Uwe I don't understand. When I

Re: [LyX/master] Fixing #7987: deleted text in change-tracking mode is not found in Advanced FR any more.

Richard Heck schreef op 29-3-2014 18:35: On 03/29/2014 07:28 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 29-3-2014 0:07: On 28/03/14 18:07, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: Please commit to the 2.2-staging branch. ok, no prob. I'll try to address your concerns in the new commit

Re: Trac: fixedinbranch, fixedintrunk ticket status

Richard Heck schreef op 28-3-2014 16:53: I think this one that you had earlier: new - fixed in master - fixed in master and stable - closed(fixed) new - fixed in stable - closed(fixed) new - fixed in stable - fixed in master and stable - closed(fixed) new - fixed in master - closed(fixed)

Re: Win installer: cannot install if already installed

Uwe Stöhr schreef op 29-3-2014 4:46: Am 28.03.2014 22:20, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Can you please remove this feature that you cannot install LyX if the installer thinks it is already installed ? This was once added by user request. The idea and consensus was that one can install e.g

Re: [LyX/master] Fixing #7987: deleted text in change-tracking mode is not found in Advanced F any more.

Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 29-3-2014 0:07: On 28/03/14 18:07, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: Please commit to the 2.2-staging branch. ok, no prob. I'll try to address your concerns in the new commit. So, it's in 2.2-staging, with 2 commits, as per your suggestion. Hmm, I don't see it.

Re: [patch] for master - fix for RJournal.layout

Richard Heck schreef op 29-3-2014 17:05: On 03/29/2014 12:26 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: While stepping through all template files I noticed that LyX informs me on opening the RJournal template file that the package "msc" is missing. The attached simple patch fixed this. Hmm. That is not in my

Re: [patch] for master - fix for RJournal.layout

Uwe Stöhr schreef op 29-3-2014 5:26: While stepping through all template files I noticed that LyX informs me on opening the RJournal template file that the package "msc" is missing. The attached simple patch fixed this. OK to master or better LyX 2.1.1? regards Uwe I don't understand. When

Re: [LyX/master] Fixing #7987: deleted text in change-tracking mode is not found in Advanced F any more.

Richard Heck schreef op 29-3-2014 18:35: On 03/29/2014 07:28 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 29-3-2014 0:07: On 28/03/14 18:07, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: Please commit to the 2.2-staging branch. ok, no prob. I'll try to address your concerns in the new commit

Re: Trac: fixedinbranch, fixedintrunk ticket status

Richard Heck schreef op 28-3-2014 16:53: I think this one that you had earlier: new -> fixed in master -> fixed in master and stable -> closed(fixed) new -> fixed in stable -> closed(fixed) new -> fixed in stable -> fixed in master and stable -> closed(fixed) new -> fixed in master ->

Re: [LyX/master] Fixing #7987: deleted text in change-tracking mode is not found in Advanced FR any more.

On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta tomm...@lyx.org wrote: commit cb351665f432671eb263eec76164aa546abd7151 Author: Tommaso Cucinotta tomm...@lyx.org Date: Thu Mar 27 23:12:56 2014 + First of all. Master is closed because we are between rc1 and final release. Please

Re: Trac: fixedinbranch, fixedintrunk ticket status

I thought about doing this a while ago. It would be a lot more useful. We also might change these to something like fixedindevel and fixedinstable. The trunk/branch language is a leftover from SVN and is confusing to newer folks. If we can agree on proper names. fixedinmaster, fixedinstable

Re: Trac: fixedinbranch, fixedintrunk ticket status

On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote: On 03/27/2014 07:37 PM, Richard Heck wrote: On 03/27/2014 07:15 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Hi all, Do we want to setup the fixedinbranch, and fixedintrunk status for tickets. This means, we don't have to work

Re: Trac: fixedinbranch, fixedintrunk ticket status

On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 9:38 AM, JeanMarc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.orgwrote: Is itvpossible to have human-readable names like Fixed in Master ? JMarc The status probably can't have spaces: new, closed, accepted, fixedinmaster, fixedinstable. The text describing the action to switch between

Re: Trac: fixedinbranch, fixedintrunk ticket status

On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote: 2014-03-28 8:57 GMT+01:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org: I implied if something is fixedinbranch it is either also fixedintrunk (or it was never in trunk). However, fixed in trunk implies to me that the bug

Re: Trac: fixedinbranch, fixedintrunk ticket status

On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote: 2014-03-28 10:56 GMT+01:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn: Do you prefer workflow as: new - fixed in master - fixed in master and stable - closed(fixed) new - fixed in stable - closed(fixed) new - fixed in stable - fixed

Re: about LyX's discussion culture

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote: I often got the feeling that the word of a developer does not count as much as the word of a user. For example when I see a potential bug I want to fix it before others can suffer from it (no matter if that would only affect

Confusing file-open filters in dialog

If the user wants to open a file, there is a list with filters reading: LyX Documents (*.lyx) LyX-1.3.x Documents (*.lyx13) LyX-1.4.x Documents (*.lyx14) LyX-1.5.x Documents (*.lyx15) LyX-1.6.x Documents (*.lyx16) This might be rather confusing for users that switch to LyX 2.1 from LyX 2.0 and

Re: Confusing file-open filters in dialog

On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote: 2014-03-28 15:49 GMT+01:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org: If the user wants to open a file, there is a list with filters reading: LyX Documents (*.lyx) LyX-1.3.x Documents (*.lyx13) LyX-1.4.x Documents (*.lyx14

Re: Confusing file-open filters in dialog

On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote: 2014-03-28 15:58 GMT+01:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org: That I don't know, but we can of course filter LyX Documents (*.lyx *.lyx13 *.lyx14 *.lyx15 *.lyx16). At least, this is less frightening to people

Win installer: cannot install if already installed

Uwe, Can you please remove this feature that you cannot install LyX if the installer thinks it is already installed ? First, the messagebox is so clumsy. Second, if you're wrong the user is left without options. Third, I have no idea why I couldn't just overwrite the previous install and why I

Re: #8860: assertion when entering an instant preview box

Hi Richard, I dived into this bug a while ago. The problem is that the math inset exists of two cells: the real one and an insetmathchar representing the extra whitespace in the malformed document.. Because the inset is supposed to consist of only one cell, things go wrong. Fyi Op 28 mrt. 2014

Re: [LyX/master] Fixing #7987: deleted text in change-tracking mode is not found in Advanced F any more.

On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > commit cb351665f432671eb263eec76164aa546abd7151 > Author: Tommaso Cucinotta > Date: Thu Mar 27 23:12:56 2014 + > > First of all. Master is closed because we are between rc1 and final release.

Re: Trac: fixedinbranch, fixedintrunk ticket status

> > I thought about doing this a while ago. It would be a lot more useful. We > also might change these to something like "fixedindevel" and > "fixedinstable". The trunk/branch language is a leftover from SVN and is > confusing to newer folks. > If we can agree on proper names. "fixedinmaster",

Re: Trac: fixedinbranch, fixedintrunk ticket status

On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org> wrote: > On 03/27/2014 07:37 PM, Richard Heck wrote: > >> On 03/27/2014 07:15 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Do we want to setup the fixedinbranch, and

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >