I mean my own automatisms, acquired from long practice. In fact, I am quite
dated myself!
Edwin Leuwen explained to me how to get back the old "classical" icons in the
preference settings, therefore I withdraw my "benign remark".
Thanks again for all the work that went into this nice 2.0 version
On 05/12/2011 09:34 AM, Jean Kaplan wrote:
> Thanks for this wonderful Lyx 2.0 release. I particularly appreciate the
> advanced find and replace facility which can now be used in math formulae,
> and the spell check on the fly.
> A benign remark though : Why did you change some icons in the tool
Jean Kaplan wrote:
> A benign remark though : Why did you change some icons in the tool bars: many
> automatisms have to be rebuilt
because not everybody wants to live in the 1990s for the rest of their lives?
in case of nostalgia or hard to shake habits you can change the icons
to "classic" in
Thanks for this wonderful Lyx 2.0 release. I particularly appreciate the
advanced find and replace facility which can now be used in math formulae, and
the spell check on the fly.
A benign remark though : Why did you change some icons in the tool bars: many
automatisms have to be rebuilt
Anyway
On 08.05.2011 11:00, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Public release of LyX version 2.0.0
===
We are proud to announce the public release of LyX 2.0.0.
[...]
The LyX team.
http://www.lyx.org
Congratulations and many many thanks to the team !
BR,
Olivier
gt; Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.0.0 is released
>
> Public release of LyX version 2.0.0
> ===
>
> We are proud to announce the public release of LyX 2.0.0.
>
> With this release, LyX celebrates 15 years of existence, and we start
> a ne
Thank you for everything to everyone that contributed!
LyX is a beautiful piece of software.
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 5:00 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Public release of LyX version 2.0.0
> ===
>
> We are proud to announce the public release of LyX 2.0.0.
>
> With this
Congrats!
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 5:00 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Public release of LyX version 2.0.0
> ===
>
> We are proud to announce the public release of LyX 2.0.0.
>
> With this release, LyX celebrates 15 years of existence, and we start
> a new family of 2.x r
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Murat Yildizoglu wrote:
> Thanks a lot to the team for this new version of this beautiful software!
> Congratulations for your efficiency and creativity!
> A happy Lyxer ;-)
I second Murat's words!
Congratulations!
Paul
Thanks a lot to the team for this new version of this beautiful software!
Congratulations for your efficiency and creativity!
A happy Lyxer ;-)
Murat
--
Prof. Murat Yildizoglu
Université Paul Cézanne (Aix-Marseille 3)
GREQAM (UMR CNRS 6579)
Centre de la Vieille Charité
2, rue de la Charité
132
Congratulations all development team.
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> Public release of LyX version 2.0.0
>> ===
>>
>> We are proud to announce the public release of LyX 2.0.0.
>>
> Ya
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Public release of LyX version 2.0.0
> ===
>
> We are proud to announce the public release of LyX 2.0.0.
>
Yay!!
> With this release, LyX celebrates 15 years of existence, and we start
> a new family of 2.x rele
Public release of LyX version 2.0.0
===
We are proud to announce the public release of LyX 2.0.0.
With this release, LyX celebrates 15 years of existence, and we start
a new family of 2.x releases to acknowledge LyX's passing from a child
to an adult. We hope you
Release of LyX version 2.0.0 (release candidate 3)
==
We are pleased to announce the third release candidate of LyX 2.0.0.
Some polishing and critical bugfixing has been done, the final
release is expected in a few weeks.
The file RELEASE-NOTES lis
Release of LyX version 2.0.0 (release candidate 2)
==
We are pleased to announce the second release candidate of LyX 2.0.0.
Due to the numerous requests we added more sets of toolbar icons (based on
Oxygen and LibreOffice themes) which can be easily
Il 14/03/2011 09:41, Stephan Witt ha scritto:
In my ~/.lyx I have:
\spellchecker \spellcheck_continuously
Really? You have no spell checker but have enabled spellcheck_continuously?
I'm sure it derives from tens and tens of different development versions
of LyX with different options which I
Le 14/03/2011 09:41, Stephan Witt a écrit :
Ok, I think it's the fact on Mac my runtime does not check for array indices
out of bounds.
I don't know how to enable this with cmake+Xcode. Just another construction
area...
I think this crashes boost on Mac OS X.
JMarc
Am 14.03.2011 um 08:34 schrieb Tommaso Cucinotta:
> Il 14/03/2011 07:59, Stephan Witt ha scritto:
>> Am 13.03.2011 um 22:25 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
>>
>>> Op 13-3-2011 22:20, Tommaso Cucinotta schreef:
Il 13/03/2011 21:46, Vincent van Ravesteijn ha scritto:
> A backtrace would be
Il 14/03/2011 07:59, Stephan Witt ha scritto:
Am 13.03.2011 um 22:25 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
Op 13-3-2011 22:20, Tommaso Cucinotta schreef:
Il 13/03/2011 21:46, Vincent van Ravesteijn ha scritto:
A backtrace would be more useful :S..
I know, sorry, but I reduced the problem to a simp
Am 14.03.2011 um 07:59 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Am 13.03.2011 um 22:25 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
>
>> Op 13-3-2011 22:20, Tommaso Cucinotta schreef:
>>> Il 13/03/2011 21:46, Vincent van Ravesteijn ha scritto:
A backtrace would be more useful :S..
>>> I know, sorry, but I reduced the pro
Am 13.03.2011 um 22:25 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
> Op 13-3-2011 22:20, Tommaso Cucinotta schreef:
>> Il 13/03/2011 21:46, Vincent van Ravesteijn ha scritto:
>>> A backtrace would be more useful :S..
>> I know, sorry, but I reduced the problem to a simple test-case:
>>
>> 1. C-n (new documen
Am 14.03.2011 um 04:32 schrieb John McCabe-Dansted:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>> Op 13-3-2011 22:35, Tommaso Cucinotta schreef:
>>> Il 13/03/2011 22:25, Vincent van Ravesteijn ha scritto:
>>> the funny thing is that, if I write a test-case with that autotes
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Op 13-3-2011 22:35, Tommaso Cucinotta schreef:
>> Il 13/03/2011 22:25, Vincent van Ravesteijn ha scritto:
>> the funny thing is that, if I write a test-case with that autotests
>> testing machinery, then LyX passes it with no proble
Am 13.03.2011 um 22:39 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
> Op 13-3-2011 22:35, Tommaso Cucinotta schreef:
>> Il 13/03/2011 22:25, Vincent van Ravesteijn ha scritto:
>>> Can you check whether this is fixed by r37899 ? If not, can you try to
>>> revert to r37462. Maybe it's also a regression introduc
Op 13-3-2011 22:35, Tommaso Cucinotta schreef:
Il 13/03/2011 22:25, Vincent van Ravesteijn ha scritto:
Can you check whether this is fixed by r37899 ? If not, can you try
to revert to r37462. Maybe it's also a regression introduced in r37463.
the funny thing is that, if I write a test-case with
Il 13/03/2011 22:25, Vincent van Ravesteijn ha scritto:
Can you check whether this is fixed by r37899 ? If not, can you try to
revert to r37462. Maybe it's also a regression introduced in r37463.
the funny thing is that, if I write a test-case with that autotests
testing machinery, then LyX pass
Op 13-3-2011 22:20, Tommaso Cucinotta schreef:
Il 13/03/2011 21:46, Vincent van Ravesteijn ha scritto:
A backtrace would be more useful :S..
I know, sorry, but I reduced the problem to a simple test-case:
1. C-n (new document)
2. a b
3. [Shift+Left][Shift-left] (select the " b" part, includin
Il 13/03/2011 21:46, Vincent van Ravesteijn ha scritto:
A backtrace would be more useful :S..
I know, sorry, but I reduced the problem to a simple test-case:
1. C-n (new document)
2. a b
3. [Shift+Left][Shift-left] (select the " b" part, including the leading
space)
4. [Space]
Kaboom!
Hope
Op 13-3-2011 21:44, Tommaso Cucinotta schreef:
Il 12/03/2011 09:59, Tommaso Cucinotta ha scritto:
Apologies for the very informal bug report.
This time I collected more information (attached the last lines of the
output of -dbg any while I was working, I also have the whole 26MB log
of the se
Il 12/03/2011 09:59, Tommaso Cucinotta ha scritto:
Apologies for the very informal bug report.
This time I collected more information (attached the last lines of the
output of -dbg any while I was working, I also have the whole 26MB log
of the session, but I doubt it would be useful).
When it
Il 07/03/2011 23:02, Pavel Sanda ha scritto:
Public release of LyX version 2.0.0 (release candidate 1)
=
Apologies for the very informal bug report.
I used LyX from svn (probably r37891, but not completely sure)
for editing a paper, with
Am 11.03.2011 um 14:11 schrieb Joachim Osnabryg:
> Am 07.03.11 23:02, schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>> Tarballs can be found atftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.0/ .
>> Binaries should follow soon.
>
> I see 2 MacOSX binaries on the server,
>
> one: LyX-2.0.0rc1+qt4-tiger.dmg
> second: LyX-2.0.0rc1+
Am 07.03.11 23:02, schrieb Pavel Sanda:
Tarballs can be found atftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.0/ .
Binaries should follow soon.
I see 2 MacOSX binaries on the server,
one: LyX-2.0.0rc1+qt4-tiger.dmg
second: LyX-2.0.0rc1+qt4.dmg
To be sure I ask: Is the second one that which will go w
Public release of LyX version 2.0.0 (release candidate 1)
=
We are pleased to announce the first release candidate of LyX 2.0.0.
Since the last beta releases became stable enough for a regular work
we switched to release candidate, freezed n
For anyone else who used the unofficial Windows installer and now gets
the error messages
The layout file requested by this document x.layout is not usable...
please see my bug report for the fix.
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7315
-Ben
2011/2/14 Michal :
>> Thanks so much for doing this
> Thanks so much for doing this! One problem is that the program
> installed by this stores preferences in the LyX 1.6 locations (both
> in the registry and under %APPDATA%\lyx16). This obviously causes
> problems when installed alongside the real LyX 1.6.
>
> Does anyone know why this might
> From: Michal
> Sent: Tue, 8 February, 2011 15:13:24
>
> > Pre-release of LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 4)
> > ==
> In case anyone is interested, I've uploaded win32 'alternate'
> installer of beta4 (actually, it is r37563, because of the grave
> regr
> > but please do the announcement on users list yourself.
> I've tried, but my announcement mail is being rejected
> (well... *ignored* would be a better word).
Never mind, it turned out to be just some sort of a delay. I've just
received a 'Please confirm your message' mail, so in the end
On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 17:10:05 +0100
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> ok if its a question of bandwidth, then look here:
> ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/contrib/unofficial/
Thank you!
> but please do the announcement on users list yourself.
I've tried, but my announcement mail is being rejected
(well... *ig
Michal wrote:
> > unless you want to become responsible for windows installer for next
> > releases i'm not going to upload this. (aren't you by chance NSIS
> > coder with spare time for new official installer? our windows wing
> > slowly starts to deteriorate...)
> Unfortunately, I don't have
> unless you want to become responsible for windows installer for next
> releases i'm not going to upload this. (aren't you by chance NSIS
> coder with spare time for new official installer? our windows wing
> slowly starts to deteriorate...)
Unfortunately, I don't have spare time at all - I've
Michal wrote:
> > Pre-release of LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 4)
> > ==
> In case anyone is interested, I've uploaded win32 'alternate'
> installer of beta4 (actually, it is r37563, because of the grave
> regression fixed in this rev):
>
> http://msys.inf
From: Pavel Sanda
To: LyX devel
Cc: lyx-us...@lists.lyx.org; lyx-annou...@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Mon, February 7, 2011 4:45:15 AM
Subject: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 4)
[...]
export LyX files as a single archive containing linked material
(e.g. images) directly via export menu.
[...]
Pre-release of LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 4)
==
We are pleased to announce the fourth public pre-release of LyX 2.0.0.
Except usual bugfixing we fixed random crashes connected with the
new background export and compilation feature.
As far as new features is c
Stephan Witt wrote:
> What I do not understand:
> why depends the call of GuiDialog::updateView() on the result of canApply()?
these two commits may reveal something
r22049 (younes, 'Factorize general code out of GuiDialog...')
r29217 (vfr, 'Enable dialogs that can apply for read-only documents.'
Am 12.01.2011 um 23:15 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Am 12.01.2011 um 20:21 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>>
>>> Stephan Witt wrote:
I tried to verify this... it seems the flow of control is too tricky.
The thesaurus dialog "cannot apply" (Dialog::canApply() return false).
T
Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 12.01.2011 um 20:21 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>
> > Stephan Witt wrote:
> >> I tried to verify this... it seems the flow of control is too tricky.
> >> The thesaurus dialog "cannot apply" (Dialog::canApply() return false).
> >> Therefore when buffer is readonly the Dialog::chec
Am 12.01.2011 um 20:21 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>> I tried to verify this... it seems the flow of control is too tricky.
>> The thesaurus dialog "cannot apply" (Dialog::canApply() return false).
>> Therefore when buffer is readonly the Dialog::checkStatus() method
>> doesn't call
Stephan Witt wrote:
> I tried to verify this... it seems the flow of control is too tricky.
> The thesaurus dialog "cannot apply" (Dialog::canApply() return false).
> Therefore when buffer is readonly the Dialog::checkStatus() method
> doesn't call GuiDialog::updateView() and the current selection
Am 12.01.2011 um 15:57 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Am 12.01.2011 um 13:14 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
>
>>>
>>> The real problem is: why shouldn't I be able to look up
>>> something with thesaurus when viewing an read-only lyx file.
>>
>>
>> What is _exactly_ the problem then ?
>>
>> (I can't
Am 12.01.2011 um 13:14 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
>>
>> The real problem is: why shouldn't I be able to look up
>> something with thesaurus when viewing an read-only lyx file.
>
>
> What is _exactly_ the problem then ?
>
> (I can't test the Thesaurus right now)
If the file is writable no
>
> The real problem is: why shouldn't I be able to look up
> something with thesaurus when viewing an read-only lyx file.
What is _exactly_ the problem then ?
(I can't test the Thesaurus right now)
Vincent
Am 12.01.2011 um 09:54 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
>> But one could rename and save the help-file thus making it writable
>>
>> Wolfgang
>>
>
> Or type "buffer-toggle-read-only" in the command buffer.
>
> Or compile with DEVEL_VERSION.
The real problem is: why shouldn't I be able to look
Am 12.01.2011 um 09:23 schrieb Guenter Milde:
> On 2011-01-11, Murat Yildizoglu wrote:
>> 2011/1/11 Stephan Witt :
>
>>> ok - LyX can find the thesaurus files. I presume the document doc/Intro.lyx
>>> is not writable. Then the thesaurus (unfortunately) does not work properly.
>>> Just like you de
Pre-release of LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 3)
==
We are pleased to announce the third public pre-release of LyX 2.0.0.
Except usual bugfixing we addressed long-term slowness issues during this
cycle, in particular we tried to improve performance of the followin
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 03:06:20PM +0100, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > You must have a working lyxpipe. See Section 5.2 of the
> > "Additional Features" manual for how to set up it.
> >
> Nice, it works now. Thanks a lot for implementing th
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> You must have a working lyxpipe. See Section 5.2 of the
> "Additional Features" manual for how to set up it.
>
Nice, it works now. Thanks a lot for implementing this feature.
If I understand correctly, LyX cannot (or doesn't want to)
aut
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 12:28:01PM +0100, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> Dear all
>
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Pre-release of LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 2)
> > ==
> >
> [..]
> > * externally launched documents are now possible to load i
Dear all
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Pre-release of LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 2)
> ==
>
[..]
> * externally launched documents are now possible to load in an already
> running LyX instance
>
I cannot get this working. I'm using beta2
On Dec 7, 2010, at 6:56 PM, Murat Yildizoglu wrote:
> I have installed the Beta2 in Mac OSX. It just works out of the box.
> Magnificent!
> I have also read in detail the WhatsNew page and the additions are really
> impressive (I love many of them: Sweave support, inline spell-check, native
> sp
I have installed the Beta2 in Mac OSX. It just works out of the box.
Magnificent!
I have also read in detail the WhatsNew page and the additions are
really impressive (I love many of them: Sweave support, inline
spell-check, native spell checker on OSX, thesaurus, TikZ preview
support...
I w
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Pre-release of LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 2)
> ==
>
> We are pleased to announce the second public pre-release of LyX 2.0.0.
>
A lot of nifty features and fixes! Thanks for letting in so many, so late.
Regar
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 12/07/2010 05:59 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>>
>> We are pleased to announce the second public pre-release of LyX 2.0.0.
>
> Is there a Windows version of LyX 2 somewhere?
>
Yes. Uwe usually announces the availability of Win binaries severa
On 12/07/2010 05:59 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
We are pleased to announce the second public pre-release of LyX 2.0.0.
Is there a Windows version of LyX 2 somewhere?
Pre-release of LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 2)
==
We are pleased to announce the second public pre-release of LyX 2.0.0.
Due to the many reports we received, support for polyglossia, XeTeX's new
language interface and babel replacement, has been added. In the sa
Pre-release of LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 1)
==
We are pleased to announce the first public pre-release of LyX 2.0.0.
Development moved to the beta phase which basically means we will no
more include new features and focus on polishing the current ones.
We are
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
>>its the best time to contribute user's stuff (like modules) you
>> consider
>>worthy for lyx 2.0.
>>
> what is the expected timeline for the beta and final release ?
basically when #6417 is fixed and i hope it happens within few weeks.
final approx december.
Il 16/09/2010 15:23, Pavel Sanda ha scritto:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Public release of LyX version 2.0.0 (alpha 6)
=
We are pleased to announce the sixth alpha release of LyX 2.0.0.
some additional notes:
- since we are close to to beta - which
Am 16.09.2010 um 17:33 schrieb Marcelo Acuña:
>> Tarballs can be found at
>> ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.0/
>
> What is LyX-2.0.0alpha6+qt4.dmg?
The mountable disk image for Mac OSX 10.4 or later.
Stephan
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Public release of LyX version 2.0.0 (alpha 6)
> =
>
> We are pleased to announce the sixth alpha release of LyX 2.0.0.
some additional notes:
- since we are close to to beta - which should be basically just bugfixing -
its the be
Public release of LyX version 2.0.0 (alpha 6)
=
We are pleased to announce the sixth alpha release of LyX 2.0.0.
Please note that this release is for testing purposes only and
users are encouraged to use the current 1.6 stable release for any
serious wo
Op dinsdag 20 juli 2010 23:59:50 schreef Pavel Sanda:
> Public release of LyX version 2.0.0 (alpha 5)
> =
>
> We are pleased to announce the fifth alpha release of LyX 2.0.0.
>
> Please note that this release is for testing purposes only and
> users are
Am 20.07.2010 23:59, schrieb Pavel Sanda:
Binaries should follow soon.
Hi Pavel,
I put my binary here:
https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117&release_id=17753
Can you please put it on ftp.lyx.org?
thanks and regards
Uwe
Public release of LyX version 2.0.0 (alpha 5)
=
We are pleased to announce the fifth alpha release of LyX 2.0.0.
Please note that this release is for testing purposes only and
users are encouraged to use the current 1.6 stable release for any
serious wo
Public release of LyX version 2.0.0 (alpha 4)
=
We are pleased to announce the fourth alpha release of LyX 2.0.0.
Please note that this release is for testing purposes only and
users are encouraged to use the current 1.6 stable release for any
serious w
Am 16.05.2010 um 23:09 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Here it is:
>>
>> 20:40:51:860ms: Generiere Vorschau ...
>> 20:40:51:956ms: (buffer-view pdf2)
>> /Users/stephan/cvs/lyx/lyx-2.0.0alpha3/src/insets/InsetGraphics.cpp(459):
>> Comparing
>> /Users/stephan/cvs/lyx/lyx-build/LyX-2
Hi!
Pavel Sanda wrote:
i uploaded it, but also renamed to LyX-2.0.0alpha3+qt4-2.dmg so its
clear that it newer version than the friday's one.
pavel
It launches and works fine now. No crashes so far (Mac OS X 10.5.8 /
MacTeX)! Thanks!
Cheers,
--
Ricardo Rodríguez
CTO
eBiotic.
Life Scie
Stephan Witt wrote:
> Here it is:
>
> 20:40:51:860ms: Generiere Vorschau ...
> 20:40:51:956ms: (buffer-view pdf2)
> /Users/stephan/cvs/lyx/lyx-2.0.0alpha3/src/insets/InsetGraphics.cpp(459):
> Comparing
> /Users/stephan/cvs/lyx/lyx-build/LyX-2.0.0alpha3.app/Contents/Resources/images/buffer-new.pn
Am 16.05.2010 um 19:22 schrieb Anders Ekberg:
> On May 16, 2010, at 12:49 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
>> Anders Ekberg wrote:
>>> User's guide does not preview for me. I get a:
>>> "Error previewing format: pdf2"
>>> No messages in the console.
>>> For example the tutorial works fine.
>>
>> try vie
On May 16, 2010, at 12:49 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Anders Ekberg wrote:
>> User's guide does not preview for me. I get a:
>> "Error previewing format: pdf2"
>> No messages in the console.
>> For example the tutorial works fine.
>
> try view->messages and set "files used by lyx" and latex generati
Anders Ekberg wrote:
> User's guide does not preview for me. I get a:
> "Error previewing format: pdf2"
> No messages in the console.
> For example the tutorial works fine.
try view->messages and set "files used by lyx" and latex generation levels.
it might show something.
pavel
Thanks!
Stephan Witt wrote:
I'll have a look and tell you if any help is needed. I'm off this weekend and
therefore had no chance to test on leopard. Maybe I mad a mistake here and did
mix the build environments. I looks like the hunspell library was built for
10.6 only... I've struggled wit
On May 16, 2010, at 12:33 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> @Anders: pdf2 is pdflatex here and works with users guide (german version).
> Is it pdflatex for you too?
Yes, it is pdflatex. No crash, but the error message comes up almost
immediately.
/Anders
Am 16.05.2010 um 12:09 schrieb [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC.:
> Hi!
>
> Anders Ekberg wrote:
>>
>> User's guide does not preview for me. I get a:
>> "Error previewing format: pdf2"
>> No messages in the console.
>> For example the tutorial works fine.
>> Running Snow Leopard with latest MacTex. E
Hi!
Anders Ekberg wrote:
User's guide does not preview for me. I get a:
"Error previewing format: pdf2"
No messages in the console.
For example the tutorial works fine.
Running Snow Leopard with latest MacTex. Everything freshly installed (hard
disk crash...)
/Anders
It simply crashes he
On May 14, 2010, at 12:40 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 14.05.2010 um 08:45 schrieb [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC.:
>
>> Thanks to the whole LyX team and community for this great product I am just
>> starting to enjoy!
>>
>> Pavel Sanda wrote:
>>> Public release of LyX version 2.0.0 (alpha 3)
>>>
Thanks!
Stephan Witt wrote:
I've just uploaded the .dmg to my home at aussie. In the directory Software
located is the file LyX-2.0.0alpha3+qt4.dmg.
Because I had no time to solve the aspell issues and got no response from Kevin
Atkinson I build it with hunspell support only.
Pavel, please put
Am 14.05.2010 um 08:45 schrieb [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC.:
> Thanks to the whole LyX team and community for this great product I am just
> starting to enjoy!
>
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> Public release of LyX version 2.0.0 (alpha 3)
>> =
>>
>> We are p
Thanks to the whole LyX team and community for this great product I am
just starting to enjoy!
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Public release of LyX version 2.0.0 (alpha 3)
=
We are pleased to announce the third alpha release of LyX 2.0.0.
Please note that this
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> We are pleased to announce the third alpha release of LyX 2.0.0.
it starts to be clear that beta in may is not going to happen since
most people seems to be pretty busy now and TODO list is quite large.
i guess shifting relase plan + 1 month is most appropriate,
next alpha at
Public release of LyX version 2.0.0 (alpha 3)
=
We are pleased to announce the third alpha release of LyX 2.0.0.
Please note that this release is for testing purposes only and
users are encouraged to use the current 1.6 stable release for any
serious wo
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:42:25AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> But of course, word-level diff might bring more.
And also produce more readable results. In some cases, I see entire
paragraphs changed in a succession of striked out and underlined
characters, making them practically unreada
Pavel Sanda writes:
> * Comparison - IIRC Vincent considered some more work which would use
> words instead of characters to boost up the process.
>Currently the documents which are far from each other will
> never finish in a reasonable time.
> --Pavel:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Public release of LyX version 2.0.0 (alpha 2)
> =
there was plan to release first beta somewhere in may.
my plan is alpha3 on 10th may, then we will see whats
the status of features left.
as a slight remainder: TODO list, i tried to
Public release of LyX version 2.0.0 (alpha 2)
=
We are pleased to announce the second alpha release of LyX 2.0.0.
Please note that this release is for testing purposes only and
users are encouraged to use the current 1.6 stable release for any
serious w
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes:
> I have not contacted enchant/applespell author yet, but I will. However,
> seeing how enchant brings in glib dependency, it might be better to do
> our own applespell backend...
Actually I had :)
JMArc
BH writes:
> On the other hand, how likely is enchant+mac spell support in the near future?
I have not contacted enchant/applespell author yet, but I will. However,
seeing how enchant brings in glib dependency, it might be better to do
our own applespell backend...
JMarc
Stephan Witt wrote:
> What do others think?
>
> Pavel, should I provide a 2nd alpha with aspell support?
i can not comment on the technical part - whether apell is best choice
on Mac or not. but sure we want to have spelling checker working, so
if aspell is the right choice, then lets build it wit
Am 06.04.2010 um 04:12 schrieb BH:
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Finally I learned how to build aspell myself as universal static library.
>> So I'm able to provide a universal binary with aspell support.
>>
>> It is required to install aspell + dictionaries from macpo
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Finally I learned how to build aspell myself as universal static library.
> So I'm able to provide a universal binary with aspell support.
>
> It is required to install aspell + dictionaries from macports to make it work.
> The cocoAspell dicti
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
