Am 24.06.2011 08:44, schrieb Thomas Loughin:
Because this problem occurs only with LyX and not elsewhere, I wonder whether
LyX somehow misinterprets my settings.
LyX does not and also cannot change the keyboard mappings of Windows. This would requie to use a
Windows API and we don't do this
hanks,
-Tom.
> From: t...@lyx.org
> CC: uwesto...@web.de
> To: rileycoyo...@hotmail.com; lasgout...@lyx.org
> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:18:55 +
> Subject: Re: #7647: Punctuation keys treated as dead keys
>
> #7647: Punctuation
Dear All,
I found something similar with a Hungarian keyboard: altgrey+^
apparently did not work. It turned out then that if you held the
altgrey+^ pressed then a number of ^^^ would appear. But it is still
impossible to produce one ^. And one °.
Gyorgy Pota
Hello:
I am running LyX 1.5.0rc1 on Windows XP with a US keyboard configured
as United States (international), so I can use dead keys.
All dead keys work properly in LyX except the circumflex accent (^)
key, which neither works in text mode nor in math mode (by the way, it
works properly
Hi!
The good news is that it works flawlessly in Qt/Aqua 3.3.3 :-)
(tested 1.4.0cvs HEAD and CoordBranch)
/Andreas
On Friday 26 November 2004 17:10, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> What is the status of that right now?
The problems seems to be related with an im-patch for qt (input metod).
When that patch is applied we have problems, when it is not everything is
OK.
Since I'm using the no im-patch I'm h
>>>>> "José" == José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> Hi, I don't remember when this started but now the dead keys
José> don't work with qt-3.3.3. This happens for lyx-qt 1.3.4, and for
José> lyx-qt 1.4.0cvs.
José>
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 09:22:29AM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
>It is not possible to insert a á, as I do get a ´a.
>
>With this bug lyx-qt becomes almost useless, as it is not possible, as an
> example, to use ^ for subscripts in mathed, it always inserts a ^. This
> suck
Hi,
I don't remember when this started but now the dead keys don't work with
qt-3.3.3. This happens for lyx-qt 1.3.4, and for lyx-qt 1.4.0cvs.
Notice that I'm using Fedora Core 2, but I saw this report for Mandrake,
Suse and gentoo, at least.
It is not possible to inse
Is it normal that things like '.' and ',' act as dead keys and produce
funny accents? I.e. . produces something like \cdot and ,M some ,
under an M?
Andre'
--
André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 03:22:44PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| >
| > | I will precise here what I had stated earlier about the dead keys not working.
| > | I am using the latest CVS version, right after an update.
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 03:22:44PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> | I will precise here what I had stated earlier about the dead keys not working.
> | I am using the latest CVS version, right after an update.
> | I have selected "No
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I will precise here what I had stated earlier about the dead keys not working.
| I am using the latest CVS version, right after an update.
| I have selected "No keymap" in the Edit->Preferences popup.
Please try again now. AFAIK everything sh
Hello,
I will precise here what I had stated earlier about the dead keys not working.
I am using the latest CVS version, right after an update.
I have selected "No keymap" in the Edit->Preferences popup.
I ran LyX with "lyx -dbg key" and I redirected stdout and stderr in
ould do with latin1 anyway.
>
> Adrien> The worst thing which can happen to you with those files is
> Adrien> to select the encoding latin9 in the Format->Document
> Adrien> window, without having a latin9.def file for inputenc,
> Adrien> because LaTeX will give you an
hi,
sorry for the multiple mails, my sendmail behaves a bit silly at the moment :(
> How did you produce this accent? Currently, you have an accent over
> nothing, which display is rather undefined... What did you want to do?
well, i just typed the dead acute and space...actually i wanted to d
> "Thorsten" == Thorsten Mika <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Can you send an example file?
>>
>> And a screenshot.
Thorsten> here it comes...
How did you produce this accent? Currently, you have an accent over
nothing, which display is rather undefined... What did you want to do?
JMarc
hi,
> > Can you send an example file?
>
> And a screenshot.
here it comes...
thorsten
Thorsten Mika mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hamm / GermanyTM5173-RIPE
lyx_screenshot.png
#LyX 1.1 created this file. For more info
hi dekel,
here it comes...
thorsten
Thorsten Mika mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hamm / GermanyTM5173-RIPE
lyx_screenshot.png
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 11:34:45AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Thorsten> i do not use a keymap. i see the acute and the grave, but
> Thorsten> they are strangely enough in the middle of the line
> Thorsten> (vertical) and not above the rest...any other idea?
> >> Are things better if you
> "Thorsten" == Thorsten Mika <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thorsten> hi,
>>
Thorsten> i do not use a keymap. i see the acute and the grave, but
Thorsten> they are strangely enough in the middle of the line
Thorsten> (vertical) and not above the rest...any other idea?
>> Are things better if y
hi,
>
> Thorsten> i do not use a keymap. i see the acute and the grave, but
> Thorsten> they are strangely enough in the middle of the line
> Thorsten> (vertical) and not above the rest...any other idea?
>
> Are things better if you use another screen font (something standard
> like "-*-times")
> "Thorsten" == Thorsten Mika <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thorsten> i do not use a keymap. i see the acute and the grave, but
Thorsten> they are strangely enough in the middle of the line
Thorsten> (vertical) and not above the rest...any other idea?
Are things better if you use another scree
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 12:52:09PM +, John Levon wrote:
>
> I think it was removed because the code was out of date, and there was no
> one to update it ... I could be wrong though
>
No it was removed because Lars didn't like it (there really was nothing
to update in the code more then movi
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 21:04:13 +0100 (MET)
> From: Thorsten Mika <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Thorsten Mika <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: fax support, dead keys and i18n (1.1.6)
> To
thon script and using the format converters. but i still miss the
phonebook...
>
> Thorsten> 2. the dead keys work, but they are not displayed
> Thorsten> correctly on the screen. is this my fault, fault of xfs, or
> Thorsten> libforms (0.89) problem?
>
> As far as I k
y the same
functionnality. If we do not build a dvi viewer into LyX, we have no
reason to built-in a fax sending program (OK, this is not a fair
comment, I do not need fax :). By installing a _real_ fax frontend,
you will have much better functionality, and LyX code will become
cleaner (which is
gt; stuff by hand is (though i got to admit only a tiny little) drag. if not, where
> do i have to remove comments to enable it again?
I think it was removed because the code was out of date, and there was no
one to update it ... I could be wrong though
> 2. the dead keys work, but they
enable it again?
2. the dead keys work, but they are not displayed correctly on the screen. is
this my fault, fault of xfs, or libforms (0.89) problem?
3. i cant get the international menus to work (i am german, my LANG is set to
DE, the help docs are selected correctly, but the menus stay
ing (in lyxlookup) and some magic is supposed to happen.
If I am not mistaken, this is what is explained in lyxrc.example
# By default, LyX takes over the handling of the dead keys (or accent
# keys) that may be defined for your keyboard. While this allows you
# to enter characters that would not
s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | |
| Lars> Lars> I thought you said that it work when you flipped the |
| Lars> Lars> overide_deadkey? | | Lars> to have it working you must
| Lars> bind the deadkey to accent-XX. | | With 1.1.5, both methods did
| Lars> work. Therefore, there s
thought you said that it work when you flipped the |
Lars> Lars> overide_deadkey? | | Lars> to have it working you must
Lars> bind the deadkey to accent-XX. | | With 1.1.5, both methods did
Lars> work. Therefore, there should be a way to | make it work
Lars> _without_ binding dead keys.
he deadkey to accent-XX.
|
| With 1.1.5, both methods did work. Therefore, there should be a way to
| make it work _without_ binding dead keys.
No. And I belive you are wrong. My guess is that in 1.1.5 the dead key
is always bound to the accent-XX.
Look at line 435 in lyx_main.C. (1.1.6)
We should perhaps bind them always.
Lgb
e, there should be a way to
make it work _without_ binding dead keys.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I still do not understand why dead keys do not work with 0.88.1, but
| maybe I will find out :) What would you try to look for? The
| differences in lyxlookup.C are really minor.
I thought you said that it work when you flipp
rms then eiter need a
Lars> function to reset the IC, or a function that returns the IC.
You could probably ask TC for something like that.
I still do not understand why dead keys do not work with 0.88.1, but
maybe I will find out :) What would you try to look for? The
differences in lyxlookup.C are really minor.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars> | BTW, how do you intercept deadkeys with 0.89? It seems to me
| Lars> that you | do not.
|
| Lars> in 0.89 deadkeys are handled by xforms.
|
| I thought you much prefered to intercept the deadkeys and handle them
| via LyX?
I have chan
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
Lars> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | |
Lars> Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lars> writes: | | Lars> > "Lars" == Lars Gull
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
| Lars> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | |
| Lars> Lars> I belive I have fixed this bug
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
Lars> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | |
Lars> Lars> I belive I have fixed this bug now. Please test. | | It
Lars> still does not work with 0.8
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> I belive I have fixed this bug now. Please test.
|
| It still does not work with 0.88.1
Works in 0.89 so looks like a problem with lyxlookup.
Override-X-deadkey?
|
| L
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I belive I have fixed this bug now. Please test.
It still does not work with 0.88.1
Lars> For all I know, KP_x have also been fixed by this.
Yes, these work.
JMarc
PS: here is the output when typing dead_acute and 'e'.
Wo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/lyxfunc.C,v
| retrieving revision 1.171
| diff -u -p -r1.171 lyxfunc.C
| --- lyxfunc.C 2000/12/18 14:21:57 1.171
| +++ lyxfunc.C 2000/12/18 22:04:19
| @@ -273,10 +273,16 @@ int LyXFunc::proces
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > I see that I have some more fixing to do...
|
| I would say that you are on the rigth track. Thanks.
Please try this (untested) patch.
Lgb
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/lyxfunc.C,v
retrieving revision 1.171
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 10:37:13PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | The result is funny, but it shouldn't surprise you. :-)
> | Next table gives the key in the first column, and the output in the
> | second, for the numerical keypad
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 03:25:41PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >
| > Can you check the current CVS and see if the problem has been fixed?
| > (I know that XForms 0.89 are not handled correctly currently)
|
| The result is funny,
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 03:25:41PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Can you check the current CVS and see if the problem has been fixed?
> (I know that XForms 0.89 are not handled correctly currently)
The result is funny, but it shouldn't surprise you. :-)
Next table gives the key in th
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I had open a new document, typed every key in the number pad area,
| including enter (as you can see) and exited after that.
|
| I looked for forms.h and I am using 0.88 fixlevel 1. I don't have any
| problem changing to 0.89.x but I a
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Dead keys are working (hard ;-).
good.
| But you also said previously:
|
| > For all I know, KP_x have also been fixed by this.
|
| And I interpreted that as the numerical key pad keys. Ok, I was wrong :),
| it hap
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 02:12:01PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Those are not dead keys.
> Are _dead_ keys working?
Dead keys are working (hard ;-).
But you also said previously:
> For all I know, KP_x have also been fixed by this.
And I interpreted that as t
est.
|
| I tested and still no output. I noticed that the debug output is richer so
| I am sending again the report updated.
|
| I had open a new document, typed every key in the number pad area,
| including enter (as you can see) and exited after that.
Those are not dead keys.
Are _dead_ keys working?
Lgb
On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 06:54:19AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | >
> | > Can you enable action too?
> | >
> | >-dbg key,action
> I belive I have fixed this bug now. Please test.
I tested and still no output. I noticed that the debug output is richer so
I am sending again the repo
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 02:26:56PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 01:21:32PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | > | > Until then I will ju
incorrectly...
|
| I tried to replace the kbsequence.[Ch] from 1.1.5 in 1.1.6cvs (I just
| had to add a parse(string const &) method), and the bug with
| accent-acute is gone, but I still can't use my dead keys!
So this is something that I have done somewhere...
| So it seems there ar
5 in 1.1.6cvs (I just
had to add a parse(string const &) method), and the bug with
accent-acute is gone, but I still can't use my dead keys!
So it seems there are two bugs here:
- a problem in kbsequence.* which breaks the accent-acute function.
However, the changes seem so straightfo
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 02:26:56PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 01:21:32PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > | > Until then I will just put it down as "not-a-bug".
> |
> | ;-)
>
> Can you enable a
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> Run with -dbg key,action
|
| Lars> and you will see something interesting.
|
| Nothing very exciting here. I begin to suspect something goes wrong in
| kbsequence (or so
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Run with -dbg key,action
Lars> and you will see something interesting.
Nothing very exciting here. I begin to suspect something goes wrong in
kbsequence (or somewhere else?). Anyway the problem as I report it has
nothing to d
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> something must have changed... do others also see this problem
| Lars> with dead keys and XForms 0.88?
|
| In fact, with
>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> something must have changed... do others also see this problem
Lars> with dead keys and XForms 0.88?
In fact, with latest cvs, I am not able to use the accent-acute
function. It produces s
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 01:21:32PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | > Until then I will just put it down as "not-a-bug".
|
| ;-)
Can you enable action too?
-dbg key,action
Lgb
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 01:21:32PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > Until then I will just put it down as "not-a-bug".
;-)
Workarea event: KEYBOARD
XLookupBoth/
WorkArea: Key is slash' [47]
WorkArea: Keysym is KP_Divide' [65455]
Workarea Diff: 1698151594
KeySym is KP_Divide[65455]
Key [9
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> _or_ really since this is supposed to be handled by lyxlookup,
Lars> something has changed there?
No, I had reverted lyxlookup mostly to the state it was in 1.1.5 (I
remove dependency on xforms headers, since it does not make
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 10:19:55AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > I began looking at this... but I am not going too look any further
| > until I get a good bug report.
| >
| > Until then I will just put it down as "not-a-bug".
|
|
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 10:19:55AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I began looking at this... but I am not going too look any further
> until I get a good bug report.
>
> Until then I will just put it down as "not-a-bug".
Ok, I got the point. Do you see this behaviour?
> Lgb
--
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 11:35:25PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >
| > something must have changed... do others also see this problem with
| > dead keys and XForms 0.88?
| >
| > Lgb
|
| Not directly r
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 11:35:25PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >
| > something must have changed... do others also see this problem with
| > dead keys and XForms 0.88?
| >
| > Lgb
|
| Not directly r
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 11:35:25PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> something must have changed... do others also see this problem with
> dead keys and XForms 0.88?
>
> Lgb
Not directly related I know, but in pre2 (I have not tried the more recent
cvs) I am un
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars,
|
| I am not able to make dead keys work with xforms 0.88. Here is the
| output I get when typing dead_acute+e:
|
| Workarea event: KEYBOARD
| XLookupBoth ´
| WorkArea: Key is `acute' [180]
| WorkArea: Keysym is `dead_ac
Lars,
I am not able to make dead keys work with xforms 0.88. Here is the
output I get when typing dead_acute+e:
Workarea event: KEYBOARD
XLookupBoth ´
WorkArea: Key is `acute' [180]
WorkArea: Keysym is `dead_acute' [65105]
Workarea Diff: 1596210107
KeySym is dead_acute[6510
Yves Bastide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Right, sorry. So lyx 1.1.6cvs + xforms 0.88 + XOpenIM should have
| the same problem. Isn't xfroms 0.90 supposed to be out before
| 1.1.6?
We can't count on that...
| Furthermore, why these two cases in WorkArea.C?
0.88 and 0.89? 0.89 has support f
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 07:31:54PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Yves Bastide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | I suppose this code is pristine X11R6.3, though I didn't look around.
> |
> | BTW, this only applies upto 1.1.5fix2, the 1.1.6 way is OK on this
> | point.
>
> Hmm, but for xfor
Yves Bastide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I suppose this code is pristine X11R6.3, though I didn't look around.
|
| BTW, this only applies upto 1.1.5fix2, the 1.1.6 way is OK on this
| point.
Hmm, but for xforms 0.88 lyx 1.1.6cvs does it the same was as
1.1.5fix2?
Lgb
Hi LyX mechanists,
concerning why dead keys kill LyX, the short version: XOpenIM doesn't
seems to work.
The long version:
This concerns XFree86 3.3.6 (X11R6.3).
LyX is killed by the XmbLookupString call when composing (the first
or second key depending on lyxrc.override_x_dea
Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > I really need some more information: what version of XForms,
| > what output do you get if you run LyX with "-dbg key"
| >
| I have xforms 0.88 and 0.89, both will crash.
| lyx -dbg key output when I type "abØö" The "Ø" is a standard key
| on norweg
"Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote:
>
> Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | I used to have the "^" key on my keyboard configured as a dead key,
> | i.e. Have to press ^ and space to get the "^" character. This is useful
> | for
>
> I really need some more information: what version of XFor
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| IMO I've a partial fix for this and will commit it now, as I've had
| a crash at home using an american-2.kmap (reading it on startup) and
| I've seen that this is due to changes from char array to string array!
|
| Please have a look at this as I real
On 28-Oct-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| Is this a known problem with a fix? Or should I try to do
>| something myself?
>| I don't know how hard it is to fix, but a lyx that don't die
>| from a unexpected key would be nice. Having the key perform
>| correctly would be even better of course
Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I used to have the "^" key on my keyboard configured as a dead key,
| i.e. Have to press ^ and space to get the "^" character. This is useful
| for
| typing stuff like ô. Several other keys are configured dead too,
| for easy typing of other accents/u
I used to have the "^" key on my keyboard configured as a dead key,
i.e. Have to press ^ and space to get the "^" character. This is useful
for
typing stuff like ô. Several other keys are configured dead too,
for easy typing of other accents/umlauts, like "äöé"
This works well in all the X11 pr
Jean-Marc,
I have found a quick & dirty solution to the dead keys problem; I totally
deactivate the deadkey event check in sub 'isDeadEvent' in file lyxlookup.C;
I force a return value of 'false' in all cases.
This solves the problem by now waiting for a smarter solution
g when a keymap is used? or
Lars> always?
OK, there is code in lyxrc.C like:
bindKey("~C-~S-~M-dead_acute", LFUN_ACUTE);
We could maybe conditionize it to some lyxrc variable to select
whether LyX should take over the handling of dead keys. I think there
should be an opti
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Jacques" == Jacques B Siboni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Jacques> But presently the problem occurs with lyx editor: generation
| Jacques> of accented characters is ok 'e leads to é `e leads to è "e
| Jacques> leads to ë but generation
> "Jacques" == Jacques B Siboni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jacques> But presently the problem occurs with lyx editor: generation
Jacques> of accented characters is ok 'e leads to é `e leads to è "e
Jacques> leads to ë but generation of standard apostrophe, double
Jacques> quote, caret (^), t
>>>>> "Arnd" == Arnd Hanses <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Arnd> Hi, just found a small, yet annoying bug relevant for those
Arnd> writing in multiple languages, who cannot change their keymap
Arnd> constantly:
Arnd> In forms for search, replace, etc. dea
Hi,
just found a small, yet annoying bug relevant for those writing in
multiple languages, who cannot change their keymap constantly:
In forms for search, replace, etc. dead keys do not work (at least with
cua bindings and german menus).
So I cannot replace ñ with Ñ. (Using vi etc. on *.lyx
86 matches
Mail list logo
