On 1/26/21 4:27 PM, Yuriy Skalko wrote:
I would think Marginal Notes could certainly go with notes. But
footnotes are so common, at least in academic writing, that I'd be
reluctant to move them another keystroke away.
Riki
But frequent usage of menu for this is not very effective. There is
Also I think marginal notes are too different sorts of notes than the
ones in the Notes submenu. Footnotes and marginal notes are part of the
document structure, the other notes are more editorial devices (the
rather esoteric "gray text", whose purpose I never fully grasped, note
might be a
Am Dienstag, dem 26.01.2021 um 13:59 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly
Heck:
> But footnotes are so common, at least in academic writing, that I'd
> be reluctant to move them another keystroke away.
I agree.
Also I think marginal notes are too different sorts of notes than the
ones in the Notes
I would think Marginal Notes could certainly go with notes. But footnotes are
so common, at least in academic writing, that I'd be reluctant to move them
another keystroke away.
Riki
But frequent usage of menu for this is not very effective. There is a
convenient toolbar button for this.
On 1/26/21 1:50 PM, Yuriy Skalko wrote:
But I agree with another Andrew's proposition:
I realise this adds another item to a long Insert menu, but an
overall shrinkage by one follows if "Footnote" and "Marginal Note"
are included under "Note".
The Insert m
ver, I do not think that we should structure the menu based on
English semantics.
Jürgen
I agree that current state of menu is better where these items are
grouped. Also TOC is very common at the end of the books in Russian and
nomenclatures -- at the front.
But I agree with anothe
Am Dienstag, dem 26.01.2021 um 15:42 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc
Lasgouttes:
> Fair enough. But the naming is more descriptive than conceptual (if I
> may say so).
Definitely. I hope someone comes with a more succinct label. Looking at
the LibreOffice and MS Word cases, I fear this is not easy to
Le 26/01/2021 à 15:08, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Am Dienstag, dem 26.01.2021 um 11:23 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc
Lasgouttes:
Can we have something that combines front and end matters?
Like what we have now :-)?
Fair enough. But the naming is more descriptive than conceptual (if I
may say
Am Dienstag, dem 26.01.2021 um 11:23 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc
Lasgouttes:
> Can we have something that combines front and end matters?
Like what we have now :-)?
BTW LibreOffice has it in "Insert > Table of Contents and Index" (which
is odd since this also contains Bibliography, LOF, LOT). German
Le 26/01/2021 à 11:07, Jean-Pierre Chrétien a écrit :
Le 26/01/2021 à 09:37, José Abílio Matos a écrit :
One striking example for me is the case of Portuguese books where the
TOC was placed at the end. The idea is that in this case you can
interpret the TOC as some kind of index. Actually it
Le 26/01/2021 à 09:37, José Abílio Matos a écrit :
One striking example for me is the case of Portuguese books where the TOC was
placed at the end. The idea is that in this case you can interpret the TOC as
some kind of index. Actually it even received the name of index while the index
was
On Tuesday, January 26, 2021 7:27:06 AM WET Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> I prefer functional category over positional. TOC, LOF, LOT (the latter
> two often in the backmatter BTW, sometimes even the former), indexes,
> nomenclature, references and glossaries all are lists with entries that
> refer
Am Dienstag, dem 26.01.2021 um 10:16 +1300 schrieb Andrew Parsloe:
> English *syntax* perhaps?
No, semantics (semasiology of "list" vs. "Verzeichnis").
> The semantics I had in mind was the division of a book into three
> parts: prelims (i.e. preliminary pages), text or body of the book,
> and
On 25/01/2021 11:15 pm, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Montag, dem 25.01.2021 um 16:56 +1300 schrieb Andrew Parsloe:
(LyX 2.4.0 alpha) Inserted a TOC recently. My eye ran down the Insert
menu to Table..., realised that wasn't it, then back up the list to
"List/Contents/References", foun
Am Montag, dem 25.01.2021 um 16:56 +1300 schrieb Andrew Parsloe:
> (LyX 2.4.0 alpha) Inserted a TOC recently. My eye ran down the Insert
> menu to Table..., realised that wasn't it, then back up the list to
> "List/Contents/References", found and duly inserted the TOC inset.
(LyX 2.4.0 alpha) Inserted a TOC recently. My eye ran down the Insert
menu to Table..., realised that wasn't it, then back up the list to
"List/Contents/References", found and duly inserted the TOC inset.
Looking at the items in the submenu, I feel three of them (index,
no
I would say that the context menu could be useful too for that.
Note also that optional arguments are not only for custom insets...
JMarc
Le 14 juin 2015 00:38:31 CEST, aparsloe apars...@clear.net.nz a écrit :
).
This seems clumsy to me. A simple reordering of the Insert menu places
Dear LyX devs,
With the standard Insert menu, if you want to insert arguments into a
custom inset by menu you have to hunt among a lot of miscellaneous items
down in the nether region of the Insert menu, unhelpfully distant from
the Custom Inset entry that gives rise to them
Dear LyX devs,
With the standard Insert menu, if you want to insert arguments into a
custom inset by menu you have to hunt among a lot of miscellaneous items
down in the "nether region" of the Insert menu, unhelpfully distant from
the Custom Inset entry that gives ri
I would say that the context menu could be useful too for that.
Note also that optional arguments are not only for custom insets...
JMarc
Le 14 juin 2015 00:38:31 CEST, aparsloe <apars...@clear.net.nz> a écrit :
).
>
>This seems clumsy to me. A simple reordering of the Insert
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:58:29 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] Disable custom insets insert menu if read only
Before, if a document was read only and had no custom insets
defined, the submenu would be enabled.
---
src/frontends/qt4/Menus.cpp | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff
Le 28/07/2014 17:35, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
JMarc (don't worry if you can't look at this before you leave on
vacation), I first interpreted your response in this thread as
disagreeing with the patches I proposed. Upon rereading I think there
was a misunderstanding because of poor description
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
lasgout...@lyx.org wrote:
Le 28/07/2014 17:35, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
JMarc (don't worry if you can't look at this before you leave on
vacation), I first interpreted your response in this thread as
disagreeing with the patches I
Help)) {
enabled = true;
break;
}
--
1.8.3.2
From 2d594c6be3e495b3652474d9a1f8a2aee8586577 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2
Le 28/07/2014 17:35, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
JMarc (don't worry if you can't look at this before you leave on
vacation), I first interpreted your response in this thread as
disagreeing with the patches I proposed. Upon rereading I think there
was a misunderstanding because of poor description
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> Le 28/07/2014 17:35, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>
>> JMarc (don't worry if you can't look at this before you leave on
>> vacation), I first interpreted your response in this thread as
>> disagreeing with the
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 4:02 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
lasgout...@lyx.org wrote:
19/02/2014 23:02, Scott Kostyshak:
I'm planning to commit these after 2.1 is released. If anyone has
comments or would like to see them in 2.1 let me know.
Concerning menus, the Apple HIG says:
Ensure that a
Am Freitag, 21. Februar 2014 um 10:36:51, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
skost...@lyx.org
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 4:02 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
lasgout...@lyx.org wrote:
19/02/2014 23:02, Scott Kostyshak:
I'm planning to commit these after 2.1 is released. If anyone has
comments or would like
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote:
Am Freitag, 21. Februar 2014 um 10:36:51, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
skost...@lyx.org
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 4:02 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
lasgout...@lyx.org wrote:
19/02/2014 23:02, Scott Kostyshak:
I'm planning to
Am Freitag, 21. Februar 2014 um 10:56:19, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
skost...@lyx.org
I think that I again gave a poor description of the patch (I'm on a
roll here). The patch enables expanding of submenus even when all of
the items are disabled. For example, go to Help Introduction. The
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 4:02 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> 19/02/2014 23:02, Scott Kostyshak:
>
>> I'm planning to commit these after 2.1 is released. If anyone has
>> comments or would like to see them in 2.1 let me know.
>
>
> Concerning menus, the Apple HIG says:
>
>
Am Freitag, 21. Februar 2014 um 10:36:51, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 4:02 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> wrote:
> > 19/02/2014 23:02, Scott Kostyshak:
> >
> >> I'm planning to commit these after 2.1 is released. If anyone has
> >>
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Freitag, 21. Februar 2014 um 10:36:51, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
>
>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 4:02 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>
>> wrote:
>
>> > 19/02/2014 23:02, Scott Kostyshak:
>
>>
Am Freitag, 21. Februar 2014 um 10:56:19, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> I think that I again gave a poor description of the patch (I'm on a
> roll here). The patch enables expanding of submenus even when all of
> the items are disabled. For example, go to Help > Introduction. The
>
19/02/2014 23:02, Scott Kostyshak:
I'm planning to commit these after 2.1 is released. If anyone has
comments or would like to see them in 2.1 let me know.
Concerning menus, the Apple HIG says:
Ensure that a submenu’s title is undimmed even when all its commands are
unavailable. As with
19/02/2014 23:02, Scott Kostyshak:
I'm planning to commit these after 2.1 is released. If anyone has
comments or would like to see them in 2.1 let me know.
Concerning menus, the Apple HIG says:
Ensure that a submenu’s title is undimmed even when all its commands are
unavailable. As with
: [PATCH 3/4] Disable branches insert menu if read only
---
src/frontends/qt4/Menus.cpp | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/frontends/qt4/Menus.cpp b/src/frontends/qt4/Menus.cpp
index bf7d1a7..dfba0e6 100644
--- a/src/frontends/qt4/Menus.cpp
+++ b/src/frontends/qt4
On 02/19/2014 05:02 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
I'm planning to commit these after 2.1 is released. If anyone has
comments or would like to see them in 2.1 let me know.
This looks pretty safe to me. I'd have no objection to its going into
2.1.0, but it's Vincent's call.
rh
ep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:58:29 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] Disable custom insets insert menu if read only
Before, if a document was read only and had no custom insets
defined, the submenu would be enabled.
---
src/frontends/qt4/M
On 02/19/2014 05:02 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
I'm planning to commit these after 2.1 is released. If anyone has
comments or would like to see them in 2.1 let me know.
This looks pretty safe to me. I'd have no objection to its going into
2.1.0, but it's Vincent's call.
rh
Custom InsetLayout X has an Argument Y. We have:
Insert Custom X, but
Insert Y
I think both X and Y should appear under Insert Custom.
Agreed?
Julien
Julien Rioux wrote:
I think both X and Y should appear under Insert Custom.
Agreed?
If you refer to InsetArgument: No.
All arguments should appear at the same place, namely the inset top level
menu.
Actually, I think that the Custom submenu is horrible UI design. Likewise
Edit
On 12/01/2013 4:54 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Julien Rioux wrote:
I think both X and Y should appear under Insert Custom.
Agreed?
If you refer to InsetArgument: No.
All arguments should appear at the same place, namely the inset top level
menu.
Actually, I think that the Custom submenu
Julien Rioux wrote:
Should we kill the Custom submenu then?
We need to have a good alternative first. We cannot simply put all custom
insets to the top level menu, since this is too large already.
I suppose we should define multiple anchors in the menu where custom insets
could be assigned
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote:
Julien Rioux wrote:
Should we kill the Custom submenu then?
We need to have a good alternative first.
I think a good starting point would be fixing
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7877 . This looks like a relatively
Custom InsetLayout X has an Argument Y. We have:
Insert > Custom > X, but
Insert > Y
I think both X and Y should appear under Insert > Custom.
Agreed?
Julien
Julien Rioux wrote:
> I think both X and Y should appear under Insert > Custom.
>
> Agreed?
If you refer to InsetArgument: No.
All arguments should appear at the same place, namely the inset top level
menu.
Actually, I think that the "Custom" submenu is horrible UI design. Likewise
Edit >
On 12/01/2013 4:54 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Julien Rioux wrote:
I think both X and Y should appear under Insert > Custom.
Agreed?
If you refer to InsetArgument: No.
All arguments should appear at the same place, namely the inset top level
menu.
Actually, I think that the "Custom"
Julien Rioux wrote:
> Should we kill the Custom submenu then?
We need to have a good alternative first. We cannot simply put all custom
insets to the top level menu, since this is too large already.
I suppose we should define multiple "anchors" in the menu where custom insets
could be assigned
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Julien Rioux wrote:
>> Should we kill the Custom submenu then?
>
> We need to have a good alternative first.
>
I think a good starting point would be fixing
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7877 . This looks like a
Hi, Vincent you suggested I report recent regressions to the list, and
this commit was from yesterday.
To reproduce:
1) Press Ctrl-Shift-F to open the advanced find pane (KK: \CF)
2) Press Alt-I to open the insert menu (KK: \Ai)
I then get the following Crash. This appears to be a regression
Hi, Vincent you suggested I report recent regressions to the list, and
this commit was from yesterday.
Yes, I did. My suggestion was even to not create a bugreport for it.
This kind of things will be fixed very quickly.
Fixed at r35863.
Vincent
Ah.. and thanks for reporting and checking upon us.
Vincent
Hi, Vincent you suggested I report recent regressions to the list, and
this commit was from yesterday.
To reproduce:
1) Press Ctrl-Shift-F to open the advanced find pane (KK: \CF)
2) Press Alt-I to open the insert menu (KK: \Ai)
I then get the following Crash. This appears to be a regression
> Hi, Vincent you suggested I report recent regressions to the list, and
> this commit was from yesterday.
Yes, I did. My suggestion was even to not create a bugreport for it.
This kind of things will be fixed very quickly.
Fixed at r35863.
Vincent
Ah.. and thanks for reporting and checking upon us.
Vincent
"Baruch" == Baruch Even [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Baruch On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Lior Silberman wrote:
Int 1.1.5, the shortcut for "Insert-Figure" was M-i g and for
"Insert-Footnote" it was M-i f. In the current menu defs, the
Figure entry also has an 'F', overriding the 'footnote'.
Since
> "Baruch" == Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Baruch> On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Lior Silberman wrote:
>> Int 1.1.5, the shortcut for "Insert->Figure" was M-i g and for
>> "Insert->Footnote" it was M-i f. In the current menu defs, the
>> Figure entry also has an 'F', overriding the
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Lior Silberman wrote:
Int 1.1.5, the shortcut for "Insert-Figure" was M-i g and for
"Insert-Footnote" it was M-i f. In the current menu defs, the Figure
entry also has an 'F', overriding the 'footnote'.
Since there is no 'o' in this menu so far, I think we should
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Lior Silberman wrote:
> Int 1.1.5, the shortcut for "Insert->Figure" was M-i g and for
> "Insert->Footnote" it was M-i f. In the current menu defs, the Figure
> entry also has an 'F', overriding the 'footnote'.
>
> Since there is no 'o' in this menu so far, I think we
60 matches
Mail list logo