Re: Does anyone use math inset locking?

Le 06/12/2023 à 00:48, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : I doubt it's worth the effort to get it working again. But maybe just comment it out, in case anyone decides they want to work on it. It s commented out at 94118b865e2. The ticket about its resurrection is here: https://www.lyx.org/trac

Re: Does anyone use math inset locking?

'locked' math inset behaves as a unit > > > // that is traversed by a single /. > > > case LFUN_INSET_TOGGLE: > > >     cur.recordUndo(); > > >     lock(!lock()); > > >     cur.popForward(); > > >     break; > > > > >

Re: Does anyone use math inset locking?

if that is actually related to the issue I was looking at, but I had never heard of this feature. Does anyone use it? Can someone give me an example of a case where it is used? Is it indeed saved in the file format? I think I might find this feature useful. It is fun to discover new features no matter

Re: Does anyone use math inset locking?

if that is actually related to the issue I was looking at, but I had never heard of this feature. Does anyone use it? Can someone give me an example of a case where it is used? Is it indeed saved in the file format? I think I might find this feature useful. It is fun to discover new features no matter how

Re: Does anyone use math inset locking?

if that is actually related to the issue I was looking at, but I had never heard of this feature. Does anyone use it? Can someone give me an example of a case where it is used? Is it indeed saved in the file format? I think I might find this feature useful. I had never heard of this, but I can see how it would

Does anyone use math inset locking?

at, but I had never heard of this feature. Does anyone use it? Can someone give me an example of a case where it is used? Is it indeed saved in the file format? I think I might find this feature useful. It is fun to discover new features no matter how long I've been around LyX. Scott inset-toggle

Re: Does anyone use dvipdfmx to export Hebrew files?

x. > > > This doesn't > > > work for me anymore, and I'm wondering if it is worth the effort to try > > > to fix it on > > > my system, or whether I should just drop these tests (in favor of the > > > XeTeX and > > > LuaTeX tests). > > &g

Re: Does anyone use dvipdfmx to export Hebrew files?

e effort to try to > > fix it on > > my system, or whether I should just drop these tests (in favor of the XeTeX > > and > > LuaTeX tests). > > > > Does the export work for anyone? To check, you first need to uncheck "use > > system > &

Re: Does anyone use dvipdfmx to export Hebrew files?

these tests (in > favor of the XeTeX and LuaTeX tests). > > Does the export work for anyone? To check, you first need to uncheck "use > system fonts" in document settings. Works for me. Both on texlive and miktex. > If it does work, does anyone know whether this converter chain

Re: Does anyone use dvipdfmx to export Hebrew files?

rop these tests (in favor of the XeTeX and > LuaTeX > tests). > > Does the export work for anyone? To check, you first need to uncheck "use > system fonts" > in document settings. > > If it does work, does anyone know whether this converter chain is used in >

Does anyone use dvipdfmx to export Hebrew files?

for anyone? To check, you first need to uncheck "use system fonts" in document settings. If it does work, does anyone know whether this converter chain is used in practice these days? Here is my terminal output with the error: $ cd lib/examples/he && lyx Welcome.lyx This is pdfTeX, V

Re: Anyone running LyX on Wayland?

On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 09:49:32AM +0100, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: > Le 13/03/2023 à 09:45, Jean-Pierre Chrétien a écrit : > > Le 13/03/2023 à 09:38, Jean-Pierre Chrétien a écrit : > > > > > In addition I get this: > > > > Warning: Failed to produce 1 preview snippet(s) > > > > Not in

Re: Anyone running LyX on Wayland?

Le 13/03/2023 à 09:45, Jean-Pierre Chrétien a écrit : Le 13/03/2023 à 09:38, Jean-Pierre Chrétien a écrit : In addition I get this: Warning: Failed to produce 1 preview snippet(s) Not in addition, I get this one whatever the value of QT_QPA_PLATFORM. -- Jean-Pierre -- lyx-devel mailing

Re: Anyone running LyX on Wayland?

Le 13/03/2023 à 09:38, Jean-Pierre Chrétien a écrit : Le 13/03/2023 à 02:25, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : I get the following messages in the terminal:    QSocketNotifier: Can only be used with threads started with QThread    qt.qpa.wayland: Wayland does not support QWindow::requestActivate()

Re: Anyone running LyX on Wayland?

Le 13/03/2023 à 02:25, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : I get the following messages in the terminal: QSocketNotifier: Can only be used with threads started with QThread qt.qpa.wayland: Wayland does not support QWindow::requestActivate() Does anyone else get these with Wayland? No,; but I

Re: Anyone running LyX on Wayland?

Am Sonntag, dem 12.03.2023 um 21:25 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > I get the following messages in the terminal: > >   QSocketNotifier: Can only be used with threads started with QThread >   qt.qpa.wayland: Wayland does not support QWindow::requestActivate() > > Do

Re: Anyone running LyX on Wayland?

On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 09:25:44PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > I get the following messages in the terminal: > > QSocketNotifier: Can only be used with threads started with QThread > qt.qpa.wayland: Wayland does not support QWindow::requestActivate() > > Do

Anyone running LyX on Wayland?

I get the following messages in the terminal: QSocketNotifier: Can only be used with threads started with QThread qt.qpa.wayland: Wayland does not support QWindow::requestActivate() Does anyone else get these with Wayland? Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- lyx-devel

Re: Has anyone tried the Mold linker?

On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 04:26:33PM +, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Tuesday, 8 March 2022 18.21.25 WET Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > Has anyone tried Mold when linking LyX? I've been curious about it for a > > while. I just checked Ubuntu 22.04 daily and it has it packaged,

Re: Has anyone tried the Mold linker?

On Tuesday, 8 March 2022 18.21.25 WET Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Has anyone tried Mold when linking LyX? I've been curious about it for a > while. I just checked Ubuntu 22.04 daily and it has it packaged, which > makes it more interesting to try when I find the time. > > Some refere

Has anyone tried the Mold linker?

Has anyone tried Mold when linking LyX? I've been curious about it for a while. I just checked Ubuntu 22.04 daily and it has it packaged, which makes it more interesting to try when I find the time. Some references if curious: https://github.com/rui314/mold/releases/tag/v1.1.1 https

Re: Does anyone make a MinGW build from Debian-based distro?

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 04:15:46PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 1/10/22 13:30, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > I'm interested in making a MinGW for a Windows user. > > > > From what I understand, development/cmake/scripts/cmingw might be only for > > Fedora-like distros? At least,

Re: Does anyone make a MinGW build from Debian-based distro?

On 1/10/22 13:30, Scott Kostyshak wrote: I'm interested in making a MinGW for a Windows user. From what I understand, development/cmake/scripts/cmingw might be only for Fedora-like distros? At least, mingw32-cmake does not exist on Ubuntu from what I can see. I think it will be enough to

Does anyone make a MinGW build from Debian-based distro?

I'm interested in making a MinGW for a Windows user. From what I understand, development/cmake/scripts/cmingw might be only for Fedora-like distros? At least, mingw32-cmake does not exist on Ubuntu from what I can see. There is also a script development/cmake/scripts/xmingw. When I run the

Re: Anyone on TeX Live 2021 pretest ? (to confirm a regression for ja LilyPond)

NCY" > > > Is this actually true? > > > > I have an up-to-date TL21 installation and still get the issue. I'm not > > sure if the quoted statement was meant to be only about pdflatex. > > Ok, we'll need to figure out whether there are security implicatio

Re: Anyone on TeX Live 2021 pretest ? (to confirm a regression for ja LilyPond)

On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 10:19:20AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > > > to need the flag "-dALLOWPSTRANSPARENCY" on TL21. Adding the > > > > > > following > > > > > > line to my preferences file fixes some tests: > > > > > > > > > > > > \converter "ps" "pdf" "ps2pdf -dALLOWPSTRANSPARENCY

Re: Anyone on TeX Live 2021 pretest ? (to confirm a regression for ja LilyPond)

On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 11:40:13AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 11:09:12AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 02:19:26PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 04:57:49PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > > On Sat, May 29, 2021 at

Re: Anyone on TeX Live 2021 pretest ? (to confirm a regression for ja LilyPond)

Am Mon, 14 Jun 2021 11:40:13 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda : > On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 11:09:12AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 02:19:26PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 04:57:49PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > > On Sat, May 29, 2021 at

Re: Anyone on TeX Live 2021 pretest ? (to confirm a regression for ja LilyPond)

On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 11:09:12AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 02:19:26PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 04:57:49PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 01:45:24PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > I think there is a

Re: Anyone on TeX Live 2021 pretest ? (to confirm a regression for ja LilyPond)

On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 02:19:26PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 04:57:49PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 01:45:24PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > I think there is a related issue: Some exports that use ps2pdf now seem > > > to need the flag

Re: Anyone on TeX Live 2021 pretest ? (to confirm a regression for ja LilyPond)

On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 04:57:49PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 01:45:24PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > I think there is a related issue: Some exports that use ps2pdf now seem > > to need the flag "-dALLOWPSTRANSPARENCY" on TL21. Adding the following > > line to my

Re: Anyone on TeX Live 2021 pretest ? (to confirm a regression for ja LilyPond)

On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 01:45:24PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > I think there is a related issue: Some exports that use ps2pdf now seem > to need the flag "-dALLOWPSTRANSPARENCY" on TL21. Adding the following > line to my preferences file fixes some tests: > > \converter "ps" "pdf" "ps2pdf

Re: Anyone on TeX Live 2021 pretest ? (to confirm a regression for ja LilyPond)

Am Sun, 30 May 2021 13:21:18 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 09:12:35AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Sun, 30 May 2021 08:56:17 +0200 > > schrieb Kornel Benko : > > > > > > I took a look at sub getConverter($$) but I'm not sure my Perl skills > > > > are good

Re: Anyone on TeX Live 2021 pretest ? (to confirm a regression for ja LilyPond)

On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 09:12:35AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sun, 30 May 2021 08:56:17 +0200 > schrieb Kornel Benko : > > > > I took a look at sub getConverter($$) but I'm not sure my Perl skills > > > are good enough to create a non-hackish patch. Kornel, are you > > > interested? > > > >

Re: Anyone on TeX Live 2021 pretest ? (to confirm a regression for ja LilyPond)

Am Sun, 30 May 2021 08:56:17 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko : > > I took a look at sub getConverter($$) but I'm not sure my Perl skills > > are good enough to create a non-hackish patch. Kornel, are you > > interested? > > > > Scott > > I will have a look. > and here the patch. Kornel

Re: Anyone on TeX Live 2021 pretest ? (to confirm a regression for ja LilyPond)

Am Sat, 29 May 2021 13:45:24 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 10:24:15AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Sat, 22 May 2021 21:43:18 -0400 > > schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > > > > On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 05:26:10PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > Am Sat, 22 May

Re: Anyone on TeX Live 2021 pretest ? (to confirm a regression for ja LilyPond)

On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 10:24:15AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sat, 22 May 2021 21:43:18 -0400 > schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > > On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 05:26:10PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > Am Sat, 22 May 2021 16:51:43 +0200 > > > schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > > > > > > > Am

Re: Anyone on TeX Live 2021 pretest ? (to confirm a regression for ja LilyPond)

Am Sat, 22 May 2021 21:43:18 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 05:26:10PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Sat, 22 May 2021 16:51:43 +0200 > > schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > > > > > Am Samstag, dem 22.05.2021 um 16:33 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > > > Fine. But how

Re: Anyone on TeX Live 2021 pretest ? (to confirm a regression for ja LilyPond)

On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 05:26:10PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sat, 22 May 2021 16:51:43 +0200 > schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > > > Am Samstag, dem 22.05.2021 um 16:33 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > > Fine. But how to explain that running with 2020-dvipdfmx compiles on > > > TL20, but the

Re: Anyone on TeX Live 2021 pretest ? (to confirm a regression for ja LilyPond)

Am Sat, 22 May 2021 16:51:43 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Samstag, dem 22.05.2021 um 16:33 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > Fine. But how to explain that running with 2020-dvipdfmx compiles on > > TL20, but the same dvipdfmx (copied from TL20) fails if using TL20 env. > > Stricter

Re: Anyone on TeX Live 2021 pretest ? (to confirm a regression for ja LilyPond)

Am Samstag, dem 22.05.2021 um 16:33 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Fine. But how to explain that running with 2020-dvipdfmx compiles on > TL20, but the same dvipdfmx (copied from TL20) fails if using TL20 env. Stricter security measures have been introduced with TL 21 [1]. The produced DVI is

Re: Anyone on TeX Live 2021 pretest ? (to confirm a regression for ja LilyPond)

Am Sat, 22 May 2021 16:07:17 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Samstag, dem 22.05.2021 um 15:13 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > > what is the behavior on the released TexLive 2021? > > > > Still same. Does not compile due to error from dvipdfmx. > > The issue I have linked to has been

Re: Anyone on TeX Live 2021 pretest ? (to confirm a regression for ja LilyPond)

Am Samstag, dem 22.05.2021 um 16:23 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > Who is "we"? > > Peoples running the tests? But if this just hides a real bug, what is the purpose of changing the tests? Jürgen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- lyx-devel mailing list

Re: Anyone on TeX Live 2021 pretest ? (to confirm a regression for ja LilyPond)

Am Sat, 22 May 2021 16:06:26 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Samstag, dem 22.05.2021 um 14:37 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > Is there any reason why we have to compile with platex? > > Who is "we"? Peoples running the tests? > > Selecting non-text fonts, the compilation succeeds

Re: Anyone on TeX Live 2021 pretest ? (to confirm a regression for ja LilyPond)

Am Samstag, dem 22.05.2021 um 15:13 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > what is the behavior on the released TexLive 2021? > > Still same. Does not compile due to error from dvipdfmx. The issue I have linked to has been fixed, so this must be something else and should be reported to the dvipdfmx

Re: Anyone on TeX Live 2021 pretest ? (to confirm a regression for ja LilyPond)

Am Samstag, dem 22.05.2021 um 14:37 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Is there any reason why we have to compile with platex? Who is "we"? > Selecting non-text fonts, the compilation succeeds (with lualatex and > also with xetex). Fine, but I suppose some people still prefer to use platex. So even

Re: Anyone on TeX Live 2021 pretest ? (to confirm a regression for ja LilyPond)

Am Sat, 22 May 2021 14:56:58 +0200 schrieb Dr Eberhard W Lisse : > And, > > what is the behavior on the released TexLive 2021? Still same. Does not compile due to error from dvipdfmx. > el > > On 2021-05-22 14:37 , Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Tue, 23 Mar 2021 10:50:16 -0400 > > schrieb Scott

Re: Anyone on TeX Live 2021 pretest ? (to confirm a regression for ja LilyPond)

And, what is the behavior on the released TexLive 2021? el On 2021-05-22 14:37 , Kornel Benko wrote: Am Tue, 23 Mar 2021 10:50:16 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:52:49AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Montag, dem 22.03.2021 um 10:51 +0100 schrieb Kornel

Re: Anyone on TeX Live 2021 pretest ? (to confirm a regression for ja LilyPond)

Am Tue, 23 Mar 2021 10:50:16 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:52:49AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Am Montag, dem 22.03.2021 um 10:51 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > > Same here. Error in running > > > dvipdfmx -o ... > > > > Maybe

Re: Anyone on TeX Live 2021 pretest ? (to confirm a regression for ja LilyPond)

On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:52:49AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Montag, dem 22.03.2021 um 10:51 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > Same here. Error in running > > dvipdfmx -o ... > > Maybe https://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/2021-March/046609.html Thanks for confirming Kornel, and for

Re: Anyone on TeX Live 2021 pretest ? (to confirm a regression for ja LilyPond)

Am Montag, dem 22.03.2021 um 10:51 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Same here. Error in running > dvipdfmx -o ... Maybe https://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/2021-March/046609.html Jürgen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- lyx-devel mailing list

Re: Anyone on TeX Live 2021 pretest ? (to confirm a regression for ja LilyPond)

Am Wed, 17 Mar 2021 22:44:24 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > The ctests for the Japanese LilyPond example file are failing on TeX > Live 2021 pretest. Attached is a minimal example. It compiles for me on > TeX Live 2020 but not TeX LIve 2021 pretest. Is anyone using the pretest

Re: Anyone on TeX Live 2021 pretest ? (to confirm a regression for ja LilyPond)

. Is anyone using the pretest and can confirm it fails for you? Scott -- To email me replace 'nospam' with 'el' -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Anyone on TeX Live 2021 pretest ? (to confirm a regression for ja LilyPond)

The ctests for the Japanese LilyPond example file are failing on TeX Live 2021 pretest. Attached is a minimal example. It compiles for me on TeX Live 2020 but not TeX LIve 2021 pretest. Is anyone using the pretest and can confirm it fails for you? Scott LilyPond_Book.lyx Description

Re: has anyone tested master with GCC 7.1?

Am Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 um 14:57:11, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > Le 03/05/2017 à 14:40, Kornel Benko a écrit : > > Just compiled. This are the logged warnings: > > /usr/src/lyx/lyx-git/3rdparty/mythes/1.2.5/mythes.cxx:51:29: warning: > > comparison between signed and

Re: has anyone tested master with GCC 7.1?

Le 03/05/2017 à 14:40, Kornel Benko a écrit : Just compiled. This are the logged warnings: /usr/src/lyx/lyx-git/3rdparty/mythes/1.2.5/mythes.cxx:51:29: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]

Re: has anyone tested master with GCC 7.1?

Am Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 um 13:54:14, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org> > Le 03/05/2017 à 13:21, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > I'm just curious, has anyone tested compiling master with GCC 7.1? > > I'm wondering if any of the changes [1] affect LyX. > >

Re: has anyone tested master with GCC 7.1?

Le 03/05/2017 à 13:21, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : I'm just curious, has anyone tested compiling master with GCC 7.1? I'm wondering if any of the changes [1] affect LyX. Not me. Latest ubuntu has 6.3. We might have some new warnings, although clang++ does not show any (and we use coverity now

has anyone tested master with GCC 7.1?

I'm just curious, has anyone tested compiling master with GCC 7.1? I'm wondering if any of the changes [1] affect LyX. Scott [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Is anyone planning to test TL 2017 pre-test?

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:22:26AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Dear all, > > Is anyone planning to test TL 2017 pretest? It begins 16 April [1]. I am > planning to install it and run all of our export tests. Some will surely > fail. And then it will be a question of whether we

Anyone who wants to run the ctests that currently cannot?

Dear all, Is there anyone who would like to run the ctests but currently cannot because of some reason (e.g. error)? Running all of the ctests can take a long time, but perhaps you want to know how to run only some of them? Please feel free to ask any question. Scott signature.asc Description

Is anyone planning to test TL 2017 pre-test?

Dear all, Is anyone planning to test TL 2017 pretest? It begins 16 April [1]. I am planning to install it and run all of our export tests. Some will surely fail. And then it will be a question of whether we need to change our LaTeX export. Hopefully we will not, but it is good to plan

Re: Anyone interested in testing to compile using a docker container?

ld-lyx-using-ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake" > to build LyX as if the build was done in a Ubuntu environment. > > In case anyone would like to test this (e.g. to better be able to help me > figure out why a specific build configuration isn't producing the source > pacakge), here's the

Anyone interested in testing to compile using a docker container?

Hi, I've tested to compile LyX locally using one of the Docker containers, i.e. I was on a mac and used the Docker image "build-lyx-using-ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake" to build LyX as if the build was done in a Ubuntu environment. In case anyone would like to test this (e.g. to better be ab

Re: Can anyone build with mingw?

Am 07.01.2016 um 19:04 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 06:58:37PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: >> >> >> Am 28.12.2015 um 14:48 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: Ah, the cmakebin variable is not set, a rest of the bot script. Replacing the variable by

Re: Can anyone build with mingw?

Am 28.12.2015 um 14:48 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: Ah, the cmakebin variable is not set, a rest of the bot script. Replacing the variable by cmake should fix it. committed this. Yes this was the problem. There seem to be several unset variables. Can we use set -u with /bin/sh or is that

Re: Can anyone build with mingw?

11:07:18AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: > >> > Am 28. Dezember 2015 07:28:55 MEZ, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > ><skost...@lyx.org>: > >> > >On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 05:52:04AM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> > >> Peter recently added a script to bu

Re: Can anyone build with mingw?

, schrieb Scott Kostyshak ><skost...@lyx.org>: >> > >On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 05:52:04AM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> > >> Peter recently added a script to build LyX with mingw, but it >does >> > >not >> > >> work for me. Does i

Re: Can anyone build with mingw?

Am Montag, 28. Dezember 2015 um 13:06:14, schrieb Kornel Benko > Am Montag, 28. Dezember 2015 um 12:56:01, schrieb Kornel Benko > > > > > So we need g++-mingw-w64-i686 package too (not only gcc-mingw-w64-i686) > > > > Now it started ... > > > > And stopped

Anyone using the Qt dev branch?

I've come across a bug when using LyX compiled against Qt's dev branch (which is what will become version 5.5). I have no idea if the bug is on the Qt side, or if a LyX bug somehow was surfaced; or if the behavior is specific to something specific to my setup. I would thus like to see if someone

Anyone using the Qt dev branch?

I've come across a bug when using LyX compiled against Qt's dev branch (which is what will become version 5.5). I have no idea if the bug is on the Qt side, or if a LyX bug somehow was surfaced; or if the behavior is specific to something specific to my setup. I would thus like to see if someone

Anyone Using 2.2dev on Windows?

Is anyone out there using 2.2dev on Windows? If so, could you have a look at bug #9234? Thanks, Richard

Anyone Using 2.2dev on Windows?

Is anyone out there using 2.2dev on Windows? If so, could you have a look at bug #9234? Thanks, Richard

Re: Is adding modules slow for anyone else?

to see if (1) anyone else has noticed this or I am just being picky/ I have a slow computer; and (2) if anyone has an idea why it is slow. Are these modules in the recent layout format? Maybe some layout2layout conversion takes time. Jürgen Scott

Re: Is adding modules slow for anyone else?

that and thought I would check in here first to see if (1) anyone else has noticed this or I am just being picky/ I have a slow computer; and (2) if anyone has an idea why it is slow. Are these modules in the recent layout format? Maybe some layout2layout conversion takes time. I'm not sure why

Re: Is adding modules slow for anyone else?

, updateModuleInfo() is called three times. I have not investigated much beyond that and thought I would check in here first to see if (1) anyone else has noticed this or I am just being picky/ I have a slow computer; and (2) if anyone has an idea why it is slow. Are these modules in the recent

Re: Is adding modules slow for anyone else?

ed much > beyond that and thought I would check in here first to see if (1) > anyone else has noticed this or I am just being picky/ I have a slow > computer; and (2) if anyone has an idea why it is slow. Are these modules in the recent layout format? Maybe some layout2layout conversion takes time. Jürgen > > Scott

Re: Is adding modules slow for anyone else?

ot investigated much beyond that and thought I would check in here first to see if (1) anyone else has noticed this or I am just being picky/ I have a slow computer; and (2) if anyone has an idea why it is slow. Are these modules in the recent layout format? Maybe some layout2layout conversion takes

Re: Is adding modules slow for anyone else?

other parts of LyX, it feels a little slow to >>> me. >>> >>> One thing I've noticed is that every time I click "Add", >>> updateModuleInfo() is called three times. I have not investigated much >>> beyond that and thought I would check in here

Is adding modules slow for anyone else?

to other parts of LyX, it feels a little slow to me. One thing I've noticed is that every time I click Add, updateModuleInfo() is called three times. I have not investigated much beyond that and thought I would check in here first to see if (1) anyone else has noticed this or I am just being picky/ I

Is adding modules slow for anyone else?

t relative to other parts of LyX, it feels a little slow to me. One thing I've noticed is that every time I click "Add", updateModuleInfo() is called three times. I have not investigated much beyond that and thought I would check in here first to see if (1) anyone else has noticed this or I am

Re: introduction to programming LyX, anyone?

On 11/01/2011 02:56 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: So, did you find something to implement ? Nothing that would be simple enough for me. It will take a year, I guess, until I understand how to deal with a project of this size (given that I come to it only from time to time) Yet, I'd

Re: introduction to programming LyX, anyone?

On 11/01/2011 02:56 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: So, did you find something to implement ? Nothing that would be simple enough for me. It will take a year, I guess, until I understand how to deal with a project of this size (given that I come to it only from time to time) Yet, I'd

Re: introduction to programming LyX, anyone?

in understanding all the layers of the code, actions taken between them, etc. The existing code not thoroughly commented, if at all, and it's sometimes hard to guess what some methods are for. Is there anyone here willing to write a short summary, or an introduction to programming LyX? Someone who has

Re: introduction to programming LyX, anyone?

fficulties in understanding all the layers of the code, actions taken between them, etc. The existing code not thoroughly commented, if at all, and it's sometimes hard to guess what some methods are for. Is there anyone here willing to write a short summary, or an introduction to programming LyX? Someo

Re: introduction to programming LyX, anyone?

On 30/10/2011 04:18, Xu Wang wrote: I agree with you Philip! I have been wanting to write a similar email for a while. I would love to help develop LyX. In fact, I learned C++ with that being my primary purpose. But I am still lost when trying to navigate the code. I would love for some of

Re: introduction to programming LyX, anyone?

On 30/10/2011 02:59, PhilipPirrip wrote: Hi Vincent. Thanks for the reply. One day I hope there would emerge a sort of an overview of the whole code, to help the new beginners. I'm sure that making inset by coping some other shouldn't be that hard. But then it comes to all sorts of things that

Re: introduction to programming LyX, anyone?

On 10/30/2011 07:39 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: For example, what would need to be changed if I just introduce \begin{otherlanguage}{xyz} \end{otherlanguage} as the environment of the inset? Probably no source code change is required for that simple change. Have a look at InsetFlex. Think I

Re: introduction to programming LyX, anyone?

Op 30-10-2011 2:59, PhilipPirrip schreef: Hi Vincent. Thanks for the reply. One day I hope there would emerge a sort of an overview of the whole code, to help the new beginners. I'm sure that making inset by coping some other shouldn't be that hard. But then it comes to all sorts of things that

Re: introduction to programming LyX, anyone?

On 10/30/2011 08:32 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: We are trying to generalise the Insets a bit, so that we don't need a special class of Insets for all latex commands there are out there. So, like Abdel said, if this can be done via an InsetFlex it would be preferable. But if you want a nice

Re: introduction to programming LyX, anyone?

Op 30-10-2011 8:53, PhilipPirrip schreef: On 10/30/2011 08:32 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: We are trying to generalise the Insets a bit, so that we don't need a special class of Insets for all latex commands there are out there. So, like Abdel said, if this can be done via an InsetFlex it

Re: introduction to programming LyX, anyone?

On 10/30/2011 09:16 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: This makes me to think to introduce a property editor that a lot of applications have. If I understood correctly, this would be great, and would also enhance many existing insets. My idea about this is that you want the *.layout file* to

Re: introduction to programming LyX, anyone?

On 10/30/2011 03:32 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Op 30-10-2011 2:59, PhilipPirrip schreef: First of all, be sure that people think that a foreign language inset is useful. Otherwise, it might be a waste of your time implementing something that may not be used. I've just tried to

Re: introduction to programming LyX, anyone?

2011/10/30 Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net: On 10/30/2011 03:32 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Op 30-10-2011 2:59, PhilipPirrip schreef: First of all, be sure that people think that a foreign language inset is useful. Otherwise, it might be a waste of your time implementing something that

Re: introduction to programming LyX, anyone?

On 10/30/2011 04:48 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote: 2011/10/30 Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net: On 10/30/2011 03:32 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Op 30-10-2011 2:59, PhilipPirrip schreef: First of all, be sure that people think that a foreign language inset is useful. Otherwise, it might be a

Re: introduction to programming LyX, anyone?

On 30/10/2011 04:18, Xu Wang wrote: I agree with you Philip! I have been wanting to write a similar email for a while. I would love to help develop LyX. In fact, I learned C++ with that being my primary purpose. But I am still lost when trying to navigate the code. I would love for some of

Re: introduction to programming LyX, anyone?

On 30/10/2011 02:59, PhilipPirrip wrote: Hi Vincent. Thanks for the reply. One day I hope there would emerge a sort of an overview of the whole code, to help the new beginners. I'm sure that making inset by coping some other shouldn't be that hard. But then it comes to all sorts of things that

Re: introduction to programming LyX, anyone?

On 10/30/2011 07:39 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: For example, what would need to be changed if I just introduce \begin{otherlanguage}{xyz} \end{otherlanguage} as the environment of the inset? Probably no source code change is required for that simple change. Have a look at InsetFlex. Think I

Re: introduction to programming LyX, anyone?

Op 30-10-2011 2:59, PhilipPirrip schreef: Hi Vincent. Thanks for the reply. One day I hope there would emerge a sort of an overview of the whole code, to help the new beginners. I'm sure that making inset by coping some other shouldn't be that hard. But then it comes to all sorts of things that

Re: introduction to programming LyX, anyone?

On 10/30/2011 08:32 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: We are trying to generalise the Insets a bit, so that we don't need a special class of Insets for all latex commands there are out there. So, like Abdel said, if this can be done via an InsetFlex it would be preferable. But if you want a nice

  1   2   3   4   >