On 5/24/19 1:04 AM, Anthony wrote:
I am trying to show my students the idea of reducing (cancelling)
fractions.
I know of the package named cancel, and this works in ERT mode.
I really don’t want to use ERT if I can help it.
Of course, I would like it to work in the maths-display mode
I am trying to show my students the idea of reducing (cancelling) fractions.
I know of the package named cancel, and this works in ERT mode.
I really don’t want to use ERT if I can help it.
Of course, I would like it to work in the maths-display mode.
Kind Regards,
Anthony
Sent from Mail for
Le 12/04/2018 à 23:13, Anders Host-Madsen a écrit :
I attach two screen shots. At least in my opinion the \pi/2 is too low
in the math input mode. This is on Mac.
This may be a matter of spacing between the fraction bar and the
character. One day I will try to understand the rules implemented
Yes, I can see it. The issue is that the \pi in math input mode is smaller than
the \pi in latex, which makes it look unbalanced in math input mode. Probably
nothing to do about that.
On 04/12/2018 05:13 PM, Anders Host-Madsen wrote:
I attach two screen shots. At least in my opinion the \pi/2 is too low
in the math input mode. This is on Mac.Inline image
Inline image
The dividing lines for the fractions both look pretty well centered to
me. I think the issue may be that
Le 12/04/2018 à 21:21, Anders Host-Madsen a écrit :
It seems to me that LyX 2.3 sets fractions slightly too low compared to
the baseline when entering equations. Of course once they are typeset,
they move to the correct position. But in the math input mode it's
almost as though fraction
On 04/12/2018 03:21 PM, Anders Host-Madsen wrote:
It seems to me that LyX 2.3 sets fractions slightly too low compared
to the baseline when entering equations. Of course once they are
typeset, they move to the correct position. But in the math input mode
it's almost as though fractions a
It seems to me that LyX 2.3 sets fractions slightly too low compared to the
baseline when entering equations. Of course once they are typeset, they move to
the correct position. But in the math input mode it's almost as though
fractions are in subscript mode. Anyone else noticed?
pol wrote:
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
What document class? I just tried the article class, and fractions in
display mode appeared (in the DVI) in display style. In fact, I tried
\[\frac{a}{b}=\dfrac{a}{b}={\displaystyle \frac{a}{b}}\]
(using LyX math insets, not ERT) and got a formula with three
Brian Kidd wrote:
> the \dfrac command will give you a fraction in display style without
> having to explicitly type \displaystyle. if you want fewer
> keystrokes, then an alternative to setting the default fraction to be
> in display style would be to create a custom bind for dfrac.
>
Thank you,
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> What document class? I just tried the article class, and fractions in
> display mode appeared (in the DVI) in display style. In fact, I tried
>
> \[\frac{a}{b}=\dfrac{a}{b}={\displaystyle \frac{a}{b}}\]
>
> (using LyX math insets, not ERT) and got a
pol wrote:
Fractions in equations in display mode are not in display style. The
explicit command \displaystyle before the fraction has to be entered, to
render the display style.
Can you confirm that?
How to set the fraction display style s default, when the math expression is
in display mode
19, 2007, at 12:19 PM, pol wrote:
Fractions in equations in display mode are not in display style. The
explicit command \displaystyle before the fraction has to be
entered, to
render the display style.
Can you confirm that?
How to set the fraction display style s default, when the math
Fractions in equations in display mode are not in display style. The
explicit command \displaystyle before the fraction has to be entered, to
render the display style.
Can you confirm that?
How to set the fraction display style s default, when the math expression is
in display mode?
thank you
Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
Some fractions are available, like
� to � cup parmesan cheese
(for those who don't have this character, it says "1/2 to 3/4 cup"
Anyways some characters don't appear to be available (even though I found
some entities for them), so I am using ERT for
problem is that I can't find all the fractions
I need with existing characters. I do have 1/4, 1/2, and 3/4 already. But
I don't have:
1/3
1/5
1/8
2/3
I can't find those. (If you have those on a Unix system, please email
those characters to me.)
For now, I just use:
$\frac{1}{3}$
$\f
Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
Some fractions are available, like
? to ? cup parmesan cheese
(for those who don't have this character, it says "1/2 to 3/4 cup"
Anyways some characters don't appear to be available (even though I found
some entities for them), so I am using ERT for
06:47 p.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: display in lyx fractions like $\frac{1}{3}$ ?
Some fractions are available, like
½ to ¾ cup parmesan cheese
(for those who don't have this character, it says "1/2 to 3/4 cup"
Anyways some characters don't appear to be available (
Some fractions are available, like
? to ? cup parmesan cheese
(for those who don't have this character, it says "1/2 to 3/4 cup"
Anyways some characters don't appear to be available (even though I found
some entities for them), so I am using ERT for example:
$\frac{1
Matt Williams wrote:
Dear List,
I'm trying to insert a (logical) formula, of the form:
a,b,c
if a,b,c -> d
-
d
I'm trying to do it using a fraction, but don't know how to get a double
top line. Any ideas?
Matt
Lyx 1.3.5 on Linux fc3
In a math display environment, you can put a 4x1 array, p
If you select fraction then in the top box of the fraction select matrix
and choose a 2x1 matrix then you get two lines on the top of the fraction.
I also chose a 1x1 matrix on the bottom so the format is the same.
The only draw back is that the bottom of the fraction is not left aligned.
See att
Dear List,
I'm trying to insert a (logical) formula, of the form:
a,b,c
if a,b,c -> d
-
d
I'm trying to do it using a fraction, but don't know how to get a double
top line. Any ideas?
Matt
Lyx 1.3.5 on Linux fc3
Kent Kostuk wrote:
> Here is what I am trying to do. I want to type (a+1)/(a+2) in a display
> formula without having to use the mouse to select the fraction button in
> the math panel. I was just looking for a quicker way to doing things. Am I
> stuck with the math panel?
open mathbox with
Le Samedi 8 Décembre 2001 23:54, vous avez écrit :
> Here is what I am trying to do. I want to type (a+1)/(a+2) in a display
> formula without having to use the mouse to select the fraction button in
> the math panel. I was just looking for a quicker way to doing things. Am I
> stuck with the mat
Here is what I am trying to do. I want to type (a+1)/(a+2) in a display
formula without having to use the mouse to select the fraction button in
the math panel. I was just looking for a quicker way to doing things. Am I
stuck with the math panel?
Kent Kostuk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOooops! Sorry! I thought it was the SUM! There is the button for fractions
in the mathpanel (on the rop, second one from left). Have you considered
using nicefrac?
On Saturday 08 December 2001 14:19, Rem wrote:
> click on the button under +- (on the right of the arrows) the first box
click on the button under +- (on the right of the arrows) the first box is
summation
R
- Original Message -
From: "Kent Kostuk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 1:59 PM
Subject: Fractions in mathmode
> Is there a qui
Is there a quick keyboard equivalent to the fractions "button" in the math
panel. I can't seem to find an ERT fractional equivalent to the sigma
\sigma. Is there one?
Kent Kostuk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Op dinsdag 13 november 2001 13:46, schreef Herbert Voss:
> "Egbert J.W. Boers" wrote:
> > Is there a way to make fractures like 6/7 look like ¾?
> http://www.lyx.org/help/mathmode.html#nicefrac
Almost. Unfortunately it still uses the "slash" in stead of the "fraction"
symbol -- and they are no
"Egbert J.W. Boers" wrote:
>
> Is there a way to make fractures like 6/7 look like ¾?
--
http://www.lyx.org/help/mathmode.html#nicefrac
HErbert
Is there a way to make fractures like 6/7 look like ¾?
Egbert
Michael Koundouros wrote:
>
> I want the fractions within my matrix to have displaystyle. I am using the
> following command in my preamble:
>
> \newcommand{\bigmath}[1]{\displaystyle{#1}}
>
> once in math-mode I create my matrix and use the command
> \bigmath{} in eac
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 11:12:16AM +0100, Michael Koundouros wrote:
> I want the fractions within my matrix to have displaystyle. I am using the
> following command in my preamble:
>
> \newcommand{\bigmath}[1]{\displaystyle{#1}}
>
> once in math-mode I create my matrix a
Hi,
I want the fractions within my matrix to have displaystyle. I am using the
following command in my preamble:
\newcommand{\bigmath}[1]{\displaystyle{#1}}
once in math-mode I create my matrix and use the command
\bigmath{} in each cell.
viewing the ps file shows that fractions above one
34 matches
Mail list logo
