Thank you for sharing.
- Original Message -
From: CJ Daniel
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2015 3:57 PM
Subject: Re: OS X beta.
Well said,
CJ
On Aug 7, 2015, at 7:09 PM, gs wrote:
Chris,
Most of us have already
;d make up his mind which way he flies, once and for
> all.
>
> Chris.
>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: Ray Foret Jr <mailto:rforet7...@comcast.net>
>> To: Mac Visionaries List <mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>
>> Sent: Friday, August 07, 2015
7;t discuss it, then you can't.
I just wish he'd make up his mind which way he flies, once and for all.
Chris.
> - Original Message -
> From: Ray Foret Jr <mailto:rforet7...@comcast.net>
> To: Mac Visionaries List <mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>
which way he flies, once and for all.
Chris.
- Original Message -
From: Ray Foret Jr
To: Mac Visionaries List
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2015 6:30 AM
Subject: Re: OS X beta.
Well, Chris, don't let Tylor's remark to me bother yuh. It's just Tylor
being Tylor
;
> Tylor, was that really necessary?
>
> Chris.
>
> - Original Message - From: "Littlefield, Tyler"
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 7:06 PM
> Subject: Re: OS X beta.
>
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Did you have to ch
Tylor, was that really necessary?
Chris.
- Original Message -
From: "Littlefield, Tyler"
To:
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 7:06 PM
Subject: Re: OS X beta.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Did you have to check a "constantly barefooted" box on
2015 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: OS X beta.
Careful George,
You’ll set him off again…for the umteenth time. I mean after all, when I
posted this msg this thread was up to a count of 38. Oh, and about a dozen of
those were from He whom shall not be mentioned.
Sort of ridiculous,
CJ
You asked. All I did was truthfully answer your question.
Chris.
- Original Message -
From: "Les Kriegler"
To:
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: OS X beta.
OK, but how many people that are now in the public program really understand
that. No wonder i
com>
> [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>] On Behalf Of Christopher-Mark
> Gilland
> Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 11:58
> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com <mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>
> Subject: Re: OS X beta.
>
t;> On 8/6/2015 1:56 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland wrote:
>>> Diddo.
>>>
>>> Chris.
>>>
>>>
>>> - Original Message - *From:* Joe Quinn
>>> <mailto:jdawg1...@gmail.com> *To:*
>>> <mailto:macvisionaries@googl
ings so public beta
>> means no nda.
>>
>> On 8/6/2015 1:56 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland wrote:
>>> Diddo.
>>>
>>> Chris.
>>>
>>>
>>> - Original Message - *From:* Joe Quinn
>>> <mailto:jdawg1...@gmail.com
56 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland wrote:
>> Diddo.
>>
>> Chris.
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: Joe Quinn <mailto:jdawg1...@gmail.com>
>> To: <mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>> <mailto:macvisio
stall, for what it's
>>>> worth.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, there are some issues, but I don't think they're to the point of
>>>> being debilitating.
>>>>
>>>> Chris.
>>>>
>>>>> - Ori
lf into the agreement.
>
> Chris.
>
> - Original Message - From: "Les Kriegler"
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 3:30 PM
> Subject: Re: OS X beta.
>
>
> I've worked under NDA agreements. Any Indiana ever doubt with I had to sign.
>
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: OS X beta.
I've worked under NDA agreements. Any Indiana ever doubt with I had to sign.
Are you saying the people participate in the Public Beta sign an agreement.
If they do, then I understand what you were talking about if they don't,
ll though, yes, Sadam, I think it's safe to install, for what it's
> worth.
>
> Yeah, there are some issues, but I don't think they're to the point of being
> debilitating.
>
> Chris.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Sadam Ahmed
> To:
aries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: OS X beta.
Who cares about a NDA? Especially if the internet's already talking
about it.
On 8/6/2015 8:20 PM, Littlefield, Tyler wrote:
> Look, If you agree to a NDA in any form before getting a beta,
> whether or not you understand it or agree with it, you are
:jdawg1...@gmail.com> *To:*
>>> <mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>macvisionaries@googlegroups.
com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>>>
>>>
*Sent:* Thursday, August 06, 2015 12:24 PM
>>> *Subject:* Re: OS X beta.
>>>
>>>
y about things so public beta
>> means no nda.
>>
>>> On 8/6/2015 1:56 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland wrote:
>>> Diddo.
>>>
>>> Chris.
>>>
>>>
>>> - Original Message - *From:* Joe Quinn
>>> <mailt
t;> Chris.
>>
>>
>> - Original Message - *From:* Joe Quinn
>> <mailto:jdawg1...@gmail.com> *To:*
>> <mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>
>>
>>
*Sent:* Thursday, August 06, 2015 12:24 PM
: Thursday, August 06, 2015 11:58
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: OS X beta.
Yeah...
I kind a wondered that same thing.
Chris.
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Miller <mailto:miller...@gmail.com>
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com <mailto:macvi
t;
*Sent:* Thursday, August 06, 2015 12:24 PM
*Subject:* Re: OS X beta.
as I've said, and I remember responding to this exact question,
so, rather than reply again, I'll just put my original reply
below. It still stands. The only thing I'll say different is that
Yeah...
I kind a wondered that same thing.
Chris.
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Miller
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 1:14 PM
Subject: Re: OS X beta.
What are you talking about? They don’t allow anything that hasn’t been
I've not seen anything stating one could be discussed but not the other.
I'm not sure where you're getting that impression.
Chris.
- Original Message -
From: Joe Quinn
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 1:03 PM
Subject
Diddo.
Chris.
- Original Message -
From: Joe Quinn
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 12:24 PM
Subject: Re: OS X beta.
as I've said, and I remember responding to this exact question, so, rather
than reply again, I'll just put m
gt;>>>>> On Aug 6, 2015, at 9:49 AM, Christopher-Mark Gilland
>>>>>>> mailto:clgillan...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have to say in this particular case, I agree with Sadam. It's not
>>>>>>&
ust wanted a general yes, or no.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I guess the only agreement with Ray I would have is, admittedly, this is
>>>>>> kind of a grey area, as what one may think is unstable, someone else may
>>>>>> not really be as concer
;>>>>
>>>>> I guess the only agreement with Ray I would have is, admittedly, this is
>>>>> kind of a grey area, as what one may think is unstable, someone else may
>>>>> not really be as concerned about.
>>>>>
>>>>> Over all t
t;> not really be as concerned about.
>>>>
>>>> Over all though, yes, Sadam, I think it's safe to install, for what it's
>>>> worth.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, there are some issues, but I don't think they're to
t; Over all though, yes, Sadam, I think it's safe to install, for what it's
>>> worth.
>>>
>>> Yeah, there are some issues, but I don't think they're to the point of
>>> being debilitating.
>>>
>>> Chris.
>>>
>>>>
Yup, sure does.
Chris.
- Original Message -
From: Joe Quinn
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: OS X beta.
The only thing that has changed in the betas is that you no longer "need" to
have a developer acco
: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Sadam Ahmed
Sent: Thursday, 6 August 2015 11:21 PM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: OS X beta.
So, where in my message am I going into specifics?
Yes it’s stable at this time. Or no hold off
s safe to install, for what it's
>> worth.
>>
>> Yeah, there are some issues, but I don't think they're to the point of being
>> debilitating.
>>
>> Chris.
>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>> From: Sadam Ahmed
&g
;s
> worth.
>
> Yeah, there are some issues, but I don't think they're to the point of being
> debilitating.
>
> Chris.
>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: Sadam Ahmed <mailto:sadam.li...@gmail.com>
>> To: macvisionaries@googlegroup
In the first place, asking if beta software is stable is an
oxymoron. If stability is a concern, I would wait for the final release.
From E.T.'s Keyboard...
ancient.ali...@icloud.com
Many believe that we have been visited
in the past. What if it were true?
On 8/6/2015 6:21 AM, Sadam Ahmed
acvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: OS X beta.
So, where in my message am I going into specifics?
Yes it’s stable at this time. Or no hold off there are a couple of issues.
That would suffice.
With Best regards,
Sadam Ahmed
So, where in my message am I going into specifics?
Yes it’s stable at this time. Or no hold off there are a couple of issues. That
would suffice.
With Best regards,
Sadam Ahmed
Diploma of International Business candidate
RMIT University
Blog:
Http://www.SadamAhmed.com
Sent usin
ust 06, 2015 7:30 AM
Subject: Re: OS X beta.
With respect, I disagree. You did ask for something to specific to discuss
with you either privately or otherwise. To ask how stable a beta OS is
something that touches on a degree of specifity which is not something I for
one am willing to go in
OK, yes, it's stable.
There. I won't say more though.
Chris.
- Original Message -
From: sadam.li...@gmail.com
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 5:39 AM
Subject: Re: OS X beta.
Ray,
I'm not asking for specifics.
2015 5:23 AM
Subject: Re: OS X beta.
Let me gentally remind you that we cannot discuss beta findings here.
Sincerely,
The Constantly Barefooted Ray
Still a happy Mac, Verizon Wireless iPhone 6+ and Apple TV user!
Sent from my Mac,
the only computer with full accessibility for
With respect, I disagree. You did ask for something to specific to discuss
with you either privately or otherwise. To ask how stable a beta OS is
something that touches on a degree of specifity which is not something I for
one am willing to go in to.
Sincerely,
The Constantly Barefooted Ray
Ray,
I'm not asking for specifics.
Only gauging the suitability of putting this on my Mac.
The question was quite broad.
Don't think it breaks NDA.
Sent from my iPhone
--
> On 6 Aug 2015, at 7:23 pm, Ray Foret Jr wrote:
>
> Let me gentally remind you that we cannot discuss beta fi
Let me gentally remind you that we cannot discuss beta findings here.
Sincerely,
The Constantly Barefooted Ray
Still a happy Mac, Verizon Wireless iPhone 6+ and Apple TV user!
Sent from my Mac,
the only computer with full accessibility for the blind built-in
> On Aug 6, 2015, at 2:40 AM, sadam
43 matches
Mail list logo
