Although Avid hasn't officially stated when 8.0.4 will be released, it's likely
to be by the middle of June. Again, that's not official but probable.
Slau
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to m
I'm not able to give estimates.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com [mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Karen Lewellen
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 1:09 PM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: an Imac and voiceover?
Hi
Hi. ah, neat, thanks for the info.
Cameron.
From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
[mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Chris Blouch
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 4:36 PM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: an Imac and voiceover?
AppleWorks was
isionaries@googlegroups.com
[mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Olivia Norman
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 12:49 PM
To: list voiceover
Subject: Re: an Imac and voiceover?
This is, indeed, a fun topic! I am a complete Apple enthusiast, and I
wasn't
fully aware of all that the olde
voiceover
Subject: Re: an Imac and voiceover?
This is, indeed, a fun topic! I am a complete Apple enthusiast, and I wasn't
fully aware of all that the older macs could do until this thread! :)
Do you guys remember the old Apple 2E computer? With the floppy disks? I
had one of those unti
ent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 11:47 AM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: an Imac and voiceover?
laughter!
i was feeling the same. I got my answer long ago. Tiger is all this might do,
making it not worth the upgrade, since as it is now it works fine for my
personal needs.
Once pro tools giv
ent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 11:47 AM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: an Imac and voiceover?
laughter!
i was feeling the same. I got my answer long ago. Tiger is all this might do,
making it not worth the upgrade, since as it is now it works fine for my
personal needs.
Once pro tools giv
laughter!
i was feeling the same. I got my answer long ago. Tiger is all this might
do, making it not worth the upgrade, since as it is now it works fine for
my personal needs.
Once pro tools gives me a reason, I can simply get another machine.
Kare
On Wed, 19 May 2010, Ben Mustill-Rose wrote
for the sake of everyones sanitty on the list, shal we just agree to
disagree on this one Karren?
To answer your original question, if the iMac has a 600mhz cpu, it
will be able to run tiger (The first version of osx with voiceover)
well enough but will not be able to run leopard or snow leopard -
Hi,
Yes, that's correct. It depends on what configuration she has, but Leopard can
use G4 and G5 867MHZ processors.
Regards,
Nic
Mobile Me: nic2...@me.com
GoogleTalk: chojiro1...@gmail.com
Facebook
Twitter
Skype: Kvalme
MSN Messenger: nico...@home3.gvdnet.dk
Yahoo! Messenger: cin368
AIM: cincins
; meets your needs etc, then to you
personally, it's not out dated.
Cameron.
-Original Message-
From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
[mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Karen Lewellen
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 12:30 PM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject:
18, 2010 4:38 PM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: an Imac and voiceover?
Again, and I do this not to pick on you, but to I hope encourage you to
own your personal choices, without projecting on to anyone else.
what you mean I think is that for you personally these things are
important.
An
I just read a blog post on something else, and I noticed that one of the
people who commented on the post said she had an iMac with Leopard. She
didn't give any other details about her configuration, so I don't know how
helpful this is.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
needs etc, then to you
>> personally, it's not out dated.
>>
>> Cameron.
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>> [mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Karen Lewellen
>> Sent:
r needs etc, then to you
personally, it's not out dated.
Cameron.
-Original Message-
From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
[mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Karen Lewellen
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 12:30 PM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: an Ima
list voiceover
Subject: Re: an Imac and voiceover?
This is, indeed, a fun topic! I am a complete Apple enthusiast, and I wasn't
fully aware of all that the older macs could do until this thread! :)
Do you guys remember the old Apple 2E computer? With the floppy disks? I
had one of those un
for sure.
>>
>> Cameron.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>> [mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Olivia Norman
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 12:49 PM
>> To: list voiceove
machine I owned that's for sure.
>
> Cameron.
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Olivia Norman
> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 12:49 PM
> To: list voiceover
> Subj
day, May 18, 2010 12:30 PM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: an Imac and voiceover?
this is a fun topic.
I invite you to think about computers slightly differently, say like a
mode of transportation.
There are some who do not feel their needs are met unless they are zipping
along
groups.com
[mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Olivia Norman
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 12:49 PM
To: list voiceover
Subject: Re: an Imac and voiceover?
This is, indeed, a fun topic! I am a complete Apple enthusiast, and I wasn't
fully aware of all that the older macs could do until thi
This is, indeed, a fun topic! I am a complete Apple enthusiast, and I wasn't
fully aware of all that the older macs could do until this thread! :)
Do you guys remember the old Apple 2E computer? With the floppy disks? I had
one of those until middle school, reluctantlyy moved to windows for a wh
this is a fun topic.
I invite you to think about computers slightly differently, say like a
mode of transportation.
There are some who do not feel their needs are met unless they are zipping
along on the super highway with the most recent off the showroom floor.
There are others, who will pay th
New to the list, thanks for the logic link.
On 5/18/10, Ben Mustill-Rose wrote:
> To the person asking about logic.
> It's been posted before on the list, but essentially, the link where
> you can download the scripts is
> http://www.sendspace.com/file/3wcqpv
> Hth.
>
> On 18/05/2010, Ben Mustill
To the person asking about logic.
It's been posted before on the list, but essentially, the link where
you can download the scripts is
http://www.sendspace.com/file/3wcqpv
Hth.
On 18/05/2010, Ben Mustill-Rose wrote:
> You said:
> now now, technology is only doorstop material when it no longer ser
You said:
now now, technology is only doorstop material when it no longer serves
its function.
I agree with this and own several older macs myself. However, people
(Not you poticually, just people in general) should be realistic about
what there hardware can and can not do.
pt has been accessible f
, I've got an intel iMac which I got in 2007, and it's working just fine. But
if your iMac you have is a power PC one, such as a g3, or g4, you're not going
to be able to. THe latest OS that you'll be able to, would be Tiger.
On May 17, 2010, at 6:33 PM, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> anyone runnin
iginal Message-
>> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>> [mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Ben Mustill-Rose
>> Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 9:06 PM
>> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: Re: an Imac and voiceover?
>>
>> Be pre
lf Of Ben Mustill-Rose
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 9:06 PM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: an Imac and voiceover?
Be prepared to get a new machine when you do want to change though -
that 600mhz thing should be used as a doorstop as apposed to a daw.
It's nice that finally
@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: an Imac and voiceover?
Be prepared to get a new machine when you do want to change though -
that 600mhz thing should be used as a doorstop as apposed to a daw.
It's nice that finally all these programs like logic and pro tools are
becoming usable by us; I can'
ld assume that 10.5 or
>> 10.6 would be preferable over tiger.
>>
>> Cameron.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>> [mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Ben Mustill-Rose
>&
-
From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
[mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Ben Mustill-Rose
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 8:21 PM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: an Imac and voiceover?
What I meant was that tiger was the first os that had vo built into
it, so
such is why I i knocked on the list door.
I too felt this processor, 600MHz, would not swing leopard.
Indeed pro tools only works in outspoken and os 9 which is what is on this
machine. I need to ask someone about the apple pro keyboard though, some
of the key names are different so some comman
preferable over tiger.
Cameron.
-Original Message-
From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
[mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Ben Mustill-Rose
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 8:21 PM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: an Imac and voiceover?
What I meant was that
What I meant was that tiger was the first os that had vo built into
it, so tiger would be the least you would have to put on there.
Leopard requires a 800mhz cpu, which from memory would be a g4 so if I
am correct, leopard will not run on it.
Also, I was under the impresssion that pro tools was o
now if you could get you leopard to tide you over, it will run on the g3.
On 2010-05-17, at 7:07 PM, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> I have a feeling, there is my issue. I was told it was, but when someone
> checked the numbers, it is listed as a g3, which even I know pre-dates the
> changes lol.
> I a
I have a feeling, there is my issue. I was told it was, but when someone
checked the numbers, it is listed as a g3, which even I know pre-dates the
changes lol.
I asked because it tells me if I should just keep waiting for pro tools, and
then make changes, or make a few changes now, or do nothi
if it is an intel processor it will run snowy just fine, and voiceover as well.
On 2010-05-17, at 6:42 PM, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> Tiger, but not snow leopard?
> presently its running os 9.22, so I did not even know it could run tiger.
> Any disadvantages to remaining at the tiger level?
> Thanks,
Tiger, but not snow leopard?
presently its running os 9.22, so I did not even know it could run tiger.
Any disadvantages to remaining at the tiger level?
Thanks,
On Mon, 17 May 2010, Ben Mustill-Rose wrote:
I'm not sure what your asking; so long as the iMac can run tiger it will run vo.
On 17
I'm not sure what your asking; so long as the iMac can run tiger it will run vo.
On 17/05/2010, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> anyone running a voiceover solid os x edition on an imac?
> will send the data specifics if that Will help.
> thanks,
> Karen
>
> --
> You received this message because you are
anyone running a voiceover solid os x edition on an imac?
will send the data specifics if that Will help.
thanks,
Karen
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
To un
40 matches
Mail list logo
