Graham Cobb wrote:
>> Personally, I would much rather the autobuilder dependency problem
was fixed
>> (with some method for submiting multiple packages with build
dependencies and
>> having them build in the right order, with the dependencies being
satisfied)
>> instead of this particular fe
Ed Bartosh wrote:
> 2009/8/26 David Greaves :
>> Ed Bartosh wrote:
>>> 2009/8/26 Graham Cobb :
Will it handle build dependencies? I.e. if I create an autobuild tag for
libaaa and also for application-aaa (with a build dependency on libaaa),
will
it submit the library build fir
2009/8/26 Ed Bartosh :
> 2009/8/26 Niels Breet :
>> On Wed, August 26, 2009 20:33, Ed Bartosh wrote:
>>> 2009/8/26 Marius Vollmer :
>>>
ext Ed Bartosh writes:
>>>
>>> What do you think about using pre_upload_command and
>>> post_upload_command features of dput? If we allow to create dire
2009/8/26 Niels Breet :
> On Wed, August 26, 2009 20:33, Ed Bartosh wrote:
>> 2009/8/26 Marius Vollmer :
>>
>>> ext Ed Bartosh writes:
>>>
>>
>> What do you think about using pre_upload_command and
>> post_upload_command features of dput? If we allow to create directory using
>> pre_upload_command
On Wed, August 26, 2009 20:33, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> 2009/8/26 Marius Vollmer :
>
>> ext Ed Bartosh writes:
>>
>
> What do you think about using pre_upload_command and
> post_upload_command features of dput? If we allow to create directory using
> pre_upload_command, uploading multiple sources into
2009/8/26 David Greaves :
> Ed Bartosh wrote:
>> 2009/8/26 Graham Cobb :
>>> Will it handle build dependencies? I.e. if I create an autobuild tag for
>>> libaaa and also for application-aaa (with a build dependency on libaaa),
>>> will
>>> it submit the library build first? Will it wait for it t
Ed Bartosh wrote:
> 2009/8/26 Graham Cobb :
>> Will it handle build dependencies? I.e. if I create an autobuild tag for
>> libaaa and also for application-aaa (with a build dependency on libaaa), will
>> it submit the library build first? Will it wait for it to finish before
>> submitting the app
2009/8/26 Marius Vollmer :
> ext Ed Bartosh writes:
>
>> It doesn't matter what triggers the build in this particular case.
>> Dput doesn't support multiple package uploads, period.
>
> There is a established protocol for uploading packages to a buildbot.
> The formats of the files are defined, an
ext Ed Bartosh writes:
> It doesn't matter what triggers the build in this particular case.
> Dput doesn't support multiple package uploads, period.
There is a established protocol for uploading packages to a buildbot.
The formats of the files are defined, and it is also defined which file
to up
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 18:38:53 Ed Bartosh wrote:
> I thought you have some machinery for watching your builds, no?
No, I have a script for submitting the builds in groups (ones with no
dependencies between them), guessing how long those builds will take
(assuming nothing in the queue ahead
2009/8/26 Jeremiah Foster :
>
> On Aug 26, 2009, at 18:05, Andrew Flegg wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 16:25, Ed Bartosh wrote:
>>> 2009/8/26 Andrew Flegg :
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 16:17, Ed Bartosh wrote:
>
> Build-Depends is OK. scp is hackish.
Why is scp hackish? I us
2009/8/26 Graham Cobb :
> On Wednesday 26 August 2009 16:59:54 Ed Bartosh wrote:
>> 2009/8/26 Graham Cobb :
>> > It would be good if there was a way to upload the files using (say) scp
>> > to a staging area and then trigger the build using the web interface.
>>
>> Too complicated, I'd say. I think
On Aug 26, 2009, at 18:05, Andrew Flegg wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 16:25, Ed Bartosh wrote:
>> 2009/8/26 Andrew Flegg :
>>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 16:17, Ed Bartosh wrote:
Build-Depends is OK. scp is hackish.
>>>
>>> Why is scp hackish? I use it in preference to dput all the time
On Aug 26, 2009, at 17:46, Graham Cobb wrote:
> I would if it meant the autobuilder would handle the dependencies!
> I would
> even manually create the dependency graph using a web interface if
> analysing
> Build-Depends is too hard!
It would be cool if we could generate a web based depend
2009/8/26 Andrew Flegg :
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 16:25, Ed Bartosh wrote:
>> 2009/8/26 Andrew Flegg :
>>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 16:17, Ed Bartosh wrote:
Build-Depends is OK. scp is hackish.
>>>
>>> Why is scp hackish? I use it in preference to dput all the time. What
>>> value does dp
2009/8/26 Marius Vollmer :
> ext Ed Bartosh writes:
>
>>> Not if the .changes files are uploaded last as - AIUI - these are
>>> what trigger the build to occur. This is why it's already beholden on
>>> people using scp to uploade tarballs etc. before the .changes.
>>>
>> .dsc file triggers the bui
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 16:59:54 Ed Bartosh wrote:
> 2009/8/26 Graham Cobb :
> > It would be good if there was a way to upload the files using (say) scp
> > to a staging area and then trigger the build using the web interface.
>
> Too complicated, I'd say. I think developers would prefer using
ext Ed Bartosh writes:
>> Not if the .changes files are uploaded last as - AIUI - these are
>> what trigger the build to occur. This is why it's already beholden on
>> people using scp to uploade tarballs etc. before the .changes.
>>
> .dsc file triggers the build in current implementation, as fa
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 16:25, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> 2009/8/26 Andrew Flegg :
>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 16:17, Ed Bartosh wrote:
>>>
>>> Build-Depends is OK. scp is hackish.
>>
>> Why is scp hackish? I use it in preference to dput all the time. What
>> value does dput give for the extras autobuilder
2009/8/26 Graham Cobb :
> On Wednesday 26 August 2009 16:15:24 Niels Breet wrote:
>> On Wed, August 26, 2009 16:44, Andrew Flegg wrote:
>> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 15:29, Ed Bartosh wrote:
>> >> Submitting is the main problem. As far as I know dput can't upload
>> >> several packages at the same t
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 16:15:24 Niels Breet wrote:
> On Wed, August 26, 2009 16:44, Andrew Flegg wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 15:29, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> >> Submitting is the main problem. As far as I know dput can't upload
> >> several packages at the same time. Any ideas how to do this?
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Graham Cobb wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 August 2009 12:13:42 Anderson Lizardo wrote:
>> It would be nice if it could support those projects that keep only the
>> debian/ directory under revision control. We do that for many PyMaemo
>> packages, because there is no poin
2009/8/26 Andrew Flegg :
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 16:17, Ed Bartosh wrote:
>>
>> Build-Depends is OK. scp is hackish.
>
> Why is scp hackish? I use it in preference to dput all the time. What
> value does dput give for the extras autobuilder?
>
dput is a standard tool for uploading packages to bui
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 16:17, Ed Bartosh wrote:
>
> Build-Depends is OK. scp is hackish.
Why is scp hackish? I use it in preference to dput all the time. What
value does dput give for the extras autobuilder?
Cheers,
Andrew
--
Andrew Flegg -- mailto:and...@bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org/
Mae
2009/8/26 Andrew Flegg :
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 16:00, Ed Bartosh wrote:
>> 2009/8/26 Andrew Flegg :
>>>
>>> Bypass dput and use scp directly?debian/control's Build-Depends should
>>> be enough to say something like "if there is a dependency on something
>>> else on the queue, build it first".
>
On Wed, August 26, 2009 16:44, Andrew Flegg wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 15:29, Ed Bartosh wrote:
>
>> 2009/8/26 Graham Cobb :
>>
>>
>>> Personally, I would much rather the autobuilder dependency problem
>>> was fixed (with some method for submiting multiple packages with build
>>> dependencies
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 16:00, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> 2009/8/26 Andrew Flegg :
>>
>> Bypass dput and use scp directly?debian/control's Build-Depends should
>> be enough to say something like "if there is a dependency on something
>> else on the queue, build it first".
>>
> Me personally don't like thi
On Aug 26, 2009, at 16:29, Ed Bartosh wrote:
>>> I'm thinking about to add this feature to autobuilder. With
>>> developers
>>> don't need to prepare package's source and upload it to autobuilder
>>> queue. They just need to tag the sources.
>>
>> How is the version specified? Is the tag name
2009/8/26 Andrew Flegg :
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 15:29, Ed Bartosh wrote:
>> 2009/8/26 Graham Cobb :
>>
>>> Personally, I would much rather the autobuilder dependency problem was fixed
>>> (with some method for submiting multiple packages with build dependencies
>>> and
>>> having them build in
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 15:29, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> 2009/8/26 Graham Cobb :
>
>> Personally, I would much rather the autobuilder dependency problem was fixed
>> (with some method for submiting multiple packages with build dependencies and
>> having them build in the right order, with the dependencie
2009/8/26 Graham Cobb :
> On Wednesday 26 August 2009 11:54:13 Ed Bartosh wrote:
>> I'm thinking about to add this feature to autobuilder. With developers
>> don't need to prepare package's source and upload it to autobuilder
>> queue. They just need to tag the sources.
>
> How is the version speci
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 8:42 AM, Graham Cobb wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 August 2009 12:00:50 Anderson Lizardo wrote:
>> Well, we had the same problem so we produced a modified version that
>> is built using sbox's host-g++/host-gcc. This allows to use the same
>> binary both in x86 and ARMEL targets,
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 11:54:13 Ed Bartosh wrote:
> I'm thinking about to add this feature to autobuilder. With developers
> don't need to prepare package's source and upload it to autobuilder
> queue. They just need to tag the sources.
How is the version specified? Is the tag name used?
Wi
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 12:13:42 Anderson Lizardo wrote:
> It would be nice if it could support those projects that keep only the
> debian/ directory under revision control. We do that for many PyMaemo
> packages, because there is no point keeping the entire source if we
> are only touching the
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 12:00:50 Anderson Lizardo wrote:
> Well, we had the same problem so we produced a modified version that
> is built using sbox's host-g++/host-gcc. This allows to use the same
> binary both in x86 and ARMEL targets, and is a lot faster on ARMEL
> (and does not segfault).
2009/8/26 Anderson Lizardo :
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 6:54 AM, Ed Bartosh wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm thinking about to add this feature to autobuilder. With developers
>> don't need to prepare package's source and upload it to autobuilder
>> queue. They just need to tag the sources.
>>
>> This is how
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 6:54 AM, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm thinking about to add this feature to autobuilder. With developers
> don't need to prepare package's source and upload it to autobuilder
> queue. They just need to tag the sources.
>
> This is how i plan to implement it:
> 1. Svn hook
Hey
I think this would be a very nice feature :)
//Sampo
> Hi,
>
> I'm thinking about to add this feature to autobuilder. With developers
> don't need to prepare package's source and upload it to autobuilder
> queue. They just need to tag the sources.
>
> This is how i plan to implement it:
>
[CC'ing the last uploader for the package, according to the debian/changelog]
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 5:12 AM, Graham Cobb wrote:
> Cmake is required to build opensync. It works fine on Diablo. However, in
> the Fremantle SDK it is broken (segfault during "Check for working C
> compiler:" step).
Hi,
I'm thinking about to add this feature to autobuilder. With developers
don't need to prepare package's source and upload it to autobuilder
queue. They just need to tag the sources.
This is how i plan to implement it:
1. Svn hook will be creating description file or record in the
database if n
Hi,
2009/8/26 Venugopal Rao Gubbala :
> 1. Which Operating System (Windows, Ubuntu) is recommended for
> Developing applications for Maemo ? Can anyone tell me steps to setup my
> initial environment?
I suggest you to use a Debian base distribution, like Debian itself or
Ubuntu (please note
Cmake is required to build opensync. It works fine on Diablo. However, in
the Fremantle SDK it is broken (segfault during "Check for working C
compiler:" step).
Cmake is not part of the SDK (it should be, but that is another matter). It
is in extras-devel.
Does anyone know who packaged cmak
42 matches
Mail list logo
