Giuseppe Ghibò wrote:
The most difficult things IMHO would be building from the same
syncronized data. In that case you might choose a master server and
several mirrors. The master might have multiple internet access points
(e.g. from two providers) and will be the only one who might receive
Marc Paré wrote:
Le 2010-09-30 07:21, Graham Lauder a écrit :
The feel to me that came from the brainstorming was that Mageia
could be
marketed as the Family Distro.
I think that if you target the software packages that are compatible
with Educational software advocated by educational
André Machado wrote:
Can you reprogram URPMI to download packages from smaller to larger?
Given that you want to be installing them as they are downloaded, won't
the inter-package dependencies dictate the real order ? I mean, you can
try installing the smaller ones first, but the first one
Graham Lauder wrote:
In a phrase: Horse Doo doo
[]
Mageia has a donation system
[]
We do this because at the end of the day infrastructure costs, marketing
costs, a whole pile of things cost. One day some patch or application, which
is essential but completely non-sexy could
Could the admin for this list please change the Reply-To default to the
list itself ? The other Mageia lists appear to have done this, but this
one still sends replies to both the sender and the list. I've just had
one experience where the reply goes to the sender and *not* to the
list. I'm
I'm not sure what's going on with this ML. I responded to a post by
Graham Lauder, and it ended up going to him but not the ML. He then
responded to me privately, and we both agreed to repost to the ML.
According to the gmane archives, he did, but I never received his
repost, so I can't place
Graham Lauder wrote:
On Saturday 02 Oct 2010 01:14:36 Frank Griffin wrote:
And you miss my point entirely, there is NO trumpeting, that's
advertising, there is no exclusion, rather inclusion of a missed market
Oh, come on. Trumpeting and advertising are essentially the same thing
Luca Berra wrote:
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 07:49:29PM -0400, Frank Griffin wrote:
I'd like to propose the following model for updating released versions:
1) Users should not have to see, except in minor ways, the different
repositories. Urpmi may see them, and advanced or ideologically polar
Marc Paré wrote:
So, as to your proposal, I am in agreement with it. Maybe a suggestion
(more of a question), seeing as the issues have to deal more with the
dependencies of a roll-back, what if, Backports would install,
somehow the software updates in a self compartment kind of way (sorry
my
Marc Paré wrote:
So, in terms of space used for this, if you had to install all 6,
would this tax the system so much and risk filling up the hardrive
needlessly.
Not really, since the old versions would be removed when the new ones
were installed. The behavior I described is not part of the
Renaud MICHEL wrote:
If you still have the old package (which could have been reconstructed with
the --repackage option of urpmi), rpm can upgrade to an older version using
the --oldpackage option. So, if the dependencies are sill met with the old
package you won't have the uninstall
Marc Paré wrote:
Thanks. So this thread is to see if there were a possibility to
programme a more efficient roll-back option so that it would be more
aware of the previous dependencies needs for the previous version.
Having double dependencies is not so much of a problem, it is the
rollback
Michael Scherer wrote:
touching /home is forbidden in %pre and %post per policy.
1) you cannot be sure that every user are available ( ie, using
ldap/nis )
2) you cannot be sure that someone is not already using the
directory/config file ( ie, shared home by nfs, or multiuser system )
3)
Renaud MICHEL wrote:
On Wednesday 13 octobre 2010 at 23:34, Frank Griffin wrote :
One way of doing it might be, having identified packages that require
this sort of support, to wrap the executables with scripts that do this
the next time a user runs the software before the real executable
Tux99 wrote:
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
As mirror maintainer/owner of Mandriva Linux and future Mageia
(ftp.mandrivauser.de) I discussed this problem with my friends and we
decided not to mirror PLF although a German university does
(ftp.gwdg.de). The point is that our
Maarten Vanraes wrote:
Op maandag 06 december 2010 16:30:00 schreef Hoyt Duff:
Again, a good argument for a name with no conflicts and no negative
meanings: paris.
no negative meaning???
Paris Hilton anyone???
Hoyt is obviously not a subscriber to The Reg :-)
Michael Scherer wrote:
Why include gcj in fact ?
I wondered about this when I took a look at some Java packages (e.g.
maven) to see how easy they would be to upgrade. A huge amount of
complexity was introduced by the desire of the existing RPMs to produce
a gcj version of the tool involved.
Farfouille wrote:
I propose to keep the restriction, but to allow some exception, mainly
blockbuster like
Eclipse and Netbeans in order to build an appealing distro.
Do you know other softwares that are worth to be exception ?
The only one that comes to mind is JBoss, but I'm sure there
Renaud MICHEL wrote:
Or maybe, if the jar in the external dependency plugin is actually the same
(or compatible) version as the on from the normal package maybe we could
make a plugin package only containing the eclipse related files
(plugin.properties) and creating a symlink to the system
Renaud MICHEL wrote:
On mercredi 12 janvier 2011 at 23:54, Frank Griffin wrote :
Users of things like NetBeans and Eclipse are used to the mechanisms
provided by those tools for managing plugin installation, and are not
going to take kindly to having to use rpmdrake instead.
Well, I
Daniel Kreuter wrote:
I don't agree with you at that point. I always take the tarball from
eclipse.org http://eclipse.org (for eclipse) or netbeans.org
http://netbeans.org (for netbeans) instead of the one's of
repository provided by the distro.
The reason is quite simple, the one's
David Sjölin wrote:
I would be interested in this, especially for the first versions. But
as you say, one could install it oneself on a VirtualBox, but with
some distributions I've used graphics can be complicated to get right
in VirtualBox.
Could you be more specific ?
Maybe I'm missing
Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
Now with LVM, what do I do?
Pretty much exactly the same, if that's what you want. LVM is just a
layer of indirection that you place on top of *only* those partitions
you want LVM to control. It lets you create multiple virtual
partitions each of which includes one
I previously registered with the Mageia identity server, but when I try
to log in, I get incorrect user name or password . I went through the
Reset Password process, and the server must know me because it included
my name. I entered the same password I had set previously, and it
seemed to accept
Romain d'Alverny wrote:
- did the password reset process go smoothly?
AFAICS
- did you try alternatively with your login, instead of your email?
That did it, using just ftg rather than the full email address. The
confusion stems from the fact that bugzilla, which keeps you logged in
After some back-and-forth in MDV bug
https://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=62374 , it comes out that MDV no
longer intends to support boot.iso or isolinux installs, except as a
low-priority item. So I just thought I'd ask here whether we intend to
continue to support this type of install.
Olivier Blin wrote:
It is planned to keep supporting DrakX installer + drakxtools in Mageia,
as you can see in alpha1
That's good to hear. I always thought the MDV install with all its
options was one of the best parts. I realize that we had only an ISO,
and while I test-installed that,
Romain d'Alverny wrote:
The points to decide here are:
a) should a contributor provide a public email address, to be used in
changelogs, commits and everywhere her contribution to the project
needs an id or contact id? (for instance changelog, commit, document
authoring)
b) should a
Romain d'Alverny wrote:
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 21:54, Frank Griffin f...@roadrunner.com wrote:
Maarten Vanraes wrote:
C. how about we make packagename@packages.mageia.org, which could use the
maintainers database to forward the email to maintainers (in case of more)
(this could also
Oliver Burger wrote:
Normally this is working nicely, but if you are using extensions to postgres
like postgis and so on (which may or may not be packaged and thus be selve
compiled), it can be a pain in the ass.
can be -- usually is.
I don't actually use postgre, but I have
I understand that virtualbox and vbox additions cannot both be installed
on the same system because of conflicts. But why, when I try to update
a system with virtualbox installed and vboxadditions not installed, do I
get prompts about vboxadditions not being installable ? What is asking
for
On 03/23/2011 08:45 AM, Olivier Blin wrote:
Don't you have x11 packages for vbox guest installed?
That was it, thanks.
Apparently virtualbox-additions and the x11 package were forced on
during my post-installation processing. Is there an rpm or urpmq query
that will highlight conflicts
I updated cauldron this morning, and later rebooted my desktop. My
r8169 on eth0 is suddenly having problems, maybe due to the new kernel.
The chipset is an r8169 variant:
Mar 23 15:58:23 localhost kernel: r8169 Gigabit Ethernet driver
2.3LK-NAPI loaded
Mar 23 15:58:23 localhost kernel:
On 03/24/2011 04:57 AM, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
A possible solution for people with such a setup could be a non-free
driver cd ISO which they could include in the installation process.
Excellent suggestion, and it dovetails with another problem: being able
to do a network install over a
On 03/24/2011 12:41 PM, andre999 wrote:
Frank Griffin a écrit :
Is there an rpm or urpmq query
that will highlight conflicts between installed packages on a system ?
For example, if I installed dkms-virtualbox and then installed
dkms-vboxadditions with --force, is there a query which would
On 03/24/2011 04:37 PM, Thomas Backlund wrote:
I'm not sure it's broken.
Realtek is known to have somewhat crappy NICs that can tend to lock up
in a middle state if a driver probe comes too fast, and then they
dont react to any link or driver loading anymore.
One way that might help is to
This has really moved away from the question of providing
drivers/firmware to a pissing contest about whose philosophy the
default offerings should represent.
Presumably, FLOSS supporters are satisfied with the state of the current
ISOs, and https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=523 would
On 03/25/2011 03:49 PM, Anne nicolas wrote:
2011/3/25 Remy CLOUARDshikam...@mandriva.org:
Welcome Oliver !
Indeed welcome in hell :)
You're certainly a recognized name around here, and best of luck.
@Anne, in my old company, when a developer reached lofty enough stature
to be invited to
On 03/26/2011 01:11 AM, andre999 wrote:
Frank Griffin a écrit :
From what you say, there are not a lot of points of disagreement
between us, on this issue.
We both have contributed to open source for a long time, you
apparently mostly on developement/packaging, myself mostly
translating
On 03/26/2011 06:37 PM, Maarten Vanraes wrote:
During the times mandriva had several CDs to install it, the new ones often
only dl'ed one and complained when stuff didn't work.
I forsee possibly here the same issue with this, people will forget to
download the extra non_free CD, or do not care
On 03/26/2011 08:58 PM, Tux99 wrote:
And why should all of us suffer the hassle of a DVD + a CD (how would that
work for all those that use USB-sticks, do they now need two sticks?
I guess you must have missed the six or so times I stated that I don't
give a rat's whatever about whether
On 03/27/2011 06:33 PM, andre999 wrote:
Frank Griffin a écrit :
On 03/26/2011 06:37 PM, Maarten Vanraes wrote:
During the times mandriva had several CDs to install it, the new ones
often
only dl'ed one and complained when stuff didn't work.
I forsee possibly here the same issue
This has been going on for several days, so it's not mirror lag. If you
use --keep, these conflicts are holding up install of a slew of
libreoffice packages. There appears to be a conflict between cairo and
cairo-xcb, and either poppler13 should replace poppler12, or else they
shouldn't have
34/37: texlive
#
/usr/share /
/
/var/lib/texmf /
Error: `pdftex -ini -jobname=jadetex -progname=jadetex *jadetex.ini' failed
Error: `pdftex -ini -jobname=pdfjadetex -progname=pdfjadetex
*pdfjadetex.ini' failed
On 03/29/2011 11:20 AM, Ahmad Samir wrote:
On 29 March 2011 13:55, Frank Griffinf...@roadrunner.com wrote:
This has been going on for several days, so it's not mirror lag. If you use
--keep, these conflicts are holding up install of a slew of libreoffice
packages. There appears to be a
On 03/29/2011 12:12 PM, Ahmad Samir wrote:
On 29 March 2011 17:47, Frank Griffinf...@roadrunner.com wrote:
??? Then shouldn't 13 replace 12 ? Various of the new packages, e.g.
inkscape, require 13.
It is, urpmi is asking you to remove 12 to install 13.
I meant silently and automatically,
On 03/29/2011 03:01 PM, Ahmad Samir wrote:
[...]
“attach”...
Anyway, from the log:
auto-select: adding lib64cairo-xcb2-1.10.2-4.mga1.x86_64 replacing
lib64cairo-xcb2-1.10.2-3.mga1.x86_64
which means you have lib64cairo-xcb2 installed (rpm -qa lib64cairo*
should confirm/deny); this is not the
It writes a search line to /etc/resolv.conf of the not-fully-qualified
hostname rather than the domain names returned by the DHCP server.
For instance, if the hostname is ftglap and the domain names returned
by the server are x.y.z y.z, you get search ftglap rather than
search x.y.z y.z as
On 04/13/2011 07:39 PM, Frank Griffin wrote:
It writes a search line to /etc/resolv.conf of the
not-fully-qualified hostname rather than the domain names returned by
the DHCP server.
For instance, if the hostname is ftglap and the domain names
returned by the server are x.y.z y.z, you get
On 04/14/2011 07:28 AM, Tux99 wrote:
Does anyone know what the status of the buildsystem with regards to
building dual core/tainted packages from a single source rpm is?
And to re-ask a related question that was never resolved: is tainted
supposed to be a replacement for PLF, or will PLF
On 04/14/2011 06:14 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
IMHO, that's worth a addition to some errata or upgrade notes.
There was also a previous issue on either the cooker or mageia-dev list
(probably cooker) where the poster had a situation where a newer (Cisco)
DHCP server was returning only the
[root@ftglap network-scripts]# urpmi --auto-select
A requested package cannot be installed:
wine-1.3.18-1.mga1.i586 (due to conflicts with wine64-1.3.18-1.mga1.x86_64)
Continue installation anyway? (Y/n)
The following package has to be removed for others to be upgraded:
wine-1.3.17-1.mga1.i586
On 04/17/2011 10:01 AM, Anssi Hannula wrote:
Try --debug to see why is it trying to install both wine and wine64.
Hmm, I thought this sounded familiar. I had the same problem on Cooker
in January, and Ahmad pointed me to this:
On 04/22/2011 07:18 AM, Frank Griffin wrote:
There doesn't seem to be a config option to control this feature, so
I'm guessing it's a build option that just got turned on, if it's an
option at all.
I found it, in Edit-Preferences-Advanced-General Enable Global
search and Indexer. Most
On 04/22/2011 09:11 AM, nicolas vigier wrote:
What is upstream default ?
On, I guess. Every google hit I got for global-message-db was a
complaint about having to track down what was eating the disk :-)
On 04/22/2011 12:07 PM, Ahmad Samir wrote:
If it doesn't impact performance badly, 118MB on a 1TB HDD is
nothing... should be left as upstream default, enabled.
Well, I wasn't concerned with the disk space per se, but with the fact
that a file as large as my entire mailstore is modified every
This has been discussed in several threads in Cooker over the years.
Every new postgreSQL package conflicts with the previous version. It
neither replaces it, nor can it be installed alongside of it, e.g.
Some requested packages cannot be installed:
lib64pq9.0_5-9.0.4-1.mga1.x86_64 (due to
On 03/27/2011 12:42 PM, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
On 26 March 2011 18:58, Ahmad Samirahmadsamir3...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks like X crashes, please check /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old...
you may have better luck in /var/log/gdm/
I just got back to testing this, and it works OK now.
The following has been going on for a few days now:
The following packages can't be installed because they depend on packages
that are older than the installed ones:
maven-surefire-provider-junit-2.8-2.mga1
mojo-signatures-1.1-0.4.svn11457.2.mga1
animal-sniffer-1.6-9.mga1
maven-3.0.3-3.mga1
The following packages have to be removed for others to be upgraded:
systemd-sysvinit-18-1.mga1.x86_64
(due to conflicts with SysVinit[ 9.mga1-9.mga1])
On 04/29/2011 02:52 PM, Ahmad Samir wrote:
Without urpmi --debug output, no one can start to guess.
[root@ftgme2 grub]# urpmi --auto-select --debug
getting lock on urpmi
parsing: /etc/urpmi/mediacfg.d/Devel-1-x86_64
examining synthesis file [/var/lib/urpmi/Core Release/synthesis.hdlist.cz]
On 04/29/2011 03:21 PM, Frank Griffin wrote:
On 04/29/2011 03:15 PM, Dexter Morgan wrote:
This is because i redone all the java stack from scratch.
If you can help me to find the packages that need a release bump i
will do it and help the upgrade.
Do you need anything in addition
Installation failed:file
/usr/lib64/girepository-1.0/GData-0.0.typelib from install of
lib64gdata10-0.7.1-1.mga2.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
lib64gdata7-0.6.6-1.mga1.x86_64
libgdata.so.10()(64bit) is needed by
evolution-data-server-3.0.2.1-1.mga2.x86_64
On 06/10/2011 06:46 AM, Michael Scherer wrote:
While I have no issue with gnome-shell, I have read enough reports of
people not happy with it to know we would head to a 2nd kde 4.0 story.
So maybe we could start to learn from the past and discuss with users to
explain the update, see why they do
On 06/10/2011 07:44 AM, Dexter Morgan wrote:
maybe 1 wait to have gnome 3 and then speak about gnome2
Could you post here when all of the GNOME3 packages are in Cauldron ?
On 06/10/2011 07:39 AM, Kira wrote:
In the past time, there's KDE3 and KDE4 co-exist together in the
repository,
maybe we can do it again?
Good idea. I'm not much of a KDE user, but I noticed that the DMs
offered both KDE3 and 4, which seems like a very easy way to switch back
and forth (if
Just updated and rebooted a system which was last rebooted Jun 7, and
both GDM and KDM fail to log into my GNOME DE with a greyish popup
saying failed to load your GNOME session.
/var/log/gdm/0.log shows a segfault backtrace in fglrx, but this could
be a red herring, since KDE starts fine for
On 06/10/2011 12:37 PM, Daniel Le Berre wrote:
Got the same problem this morning on a Mageia 1 RC that had not been
updated for two weeks, and that I updated yesterday.
The following GNOME3 packages seem to have gotten installed in spite of
--keep:
gnome-icon-theme
gnome-menus
On 06/12/2011 02:02 PM, Sander Lepik wrote:
https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1756
Thanks for the response. I saw that one, but it only deals with JSON,
and it's marked FIXED. There seemed to be more involved here.
Is the GNOME3 upload complete to the point where bug reports will be
useful ?
On 06/13/2011 04:05 PM, Dexter Morgan wrote:
nice i fix this one
The reason I ask is that on an ID previously using GNOME 2.32, the
desktop comes up, but launching any application drives the video crazy.
You can see the app window some of the time, but after a second or two
of video
On 06/13/2011 04:12 PM, Frank Griffin wrote:
On 06/13/2011 04:05 PM, Dexter Morgan wrote:
nice i fix this one
The reason I ask is that on an ID previously using GNOME 2.32, the
desktop comes up, but launching any application drives the video
crazy. You can see the app window some
On 06/14/2011 08:22 AM, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
Upgrading stable firefox to firefox5rc and importing firefox-{beta,aurora}
are two distinct orthogonal things IMHO.
since firefox5 is near being released, I think we should update
main xulrunner+firefox to 5 anyway
Whatever we do, please don't
On 06/14/2011 08:56 AM, Dexter Morgan wrote:
if you can provide the urpmi logs i would be glad to fix this as
quickly as possible
I didn't keep the stdout, although the fact that the package is
installed is logged in /var/log/messages, the conflict errors are not.
However, the last ones I
On 06/14/2011 09:07 AM, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
So, IMHO this discussion is as meaningless as the famous/infamous vi
vs emacs discussions of way back when.
+1
Not to mention that if you don't like getting emails, you can always
simply use the archives to find what interests you.
On 06/14/2011 09:27 AM, Dexter Morgan wrote:
Conflicts should be fixed now.
In order to separate the upgrade issues, I just did a fresh Cauldron
GNOME install in a VBox VM, and tried to log in.
I get the flat (not striped) blue background, probably because your
dependency fix hasn't come
On 06/14/2011 09:38 AM, Lee Forest wrote:
And keeping one golden rule of software development in mind, don't let
your system do redundant tasks. Look how many times a conversation is
repeated throughout its life time in a mailing list. Thats alot of
redundant data using up server traffic.
On 06/14/2011 10:04 AM, Dexter Morgan wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Frank Griffinf...@roadrunner.com wrote:
On 06/14/2011 09:27 AM, Dexter Morgan wrote:
If I try to install gnome-themes-standard, I get conflicts with
gnome-themes-2.32, which has been pulled in by epiphany-2.32.
On 06/14/2011 10:22 AM, Lee Forest wrote:
On 06/14/2011 10:03 AM, Frank Griffin wrote:
That's not caused by an ML, it's caused by people being lazy and
quoting the entire message to which they're replying, which is a
breach of netiquette. As is top-posting :-)
Android mail does
On 06/14/2011 01:33 PM, Jehan Pagès wrote:
Hi,
This has all been discussed before. See the thread at
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.mageia.devel/924
On 06/14/2011 06:40 PM, Dexter Morgan wrote:
Do you have gnome-control-center installed
I have the same situation, and gnome-control-center is installed.
I think it's time for you to actually test the reproducible cases we've
given you. Unless you have first-hand knowledge that your
On 06/16/2011 03:42 AM, Thorsten van Lil wrote:
I know what you mean. I feel the very same.
* You get the a somelike systray, if you move the mouse to the
bottom-right corner (at least networkmanager and mgaonline is there).
* virtual desktops are now known as Activities. If a window is
On 06/16/2011 10:55 AM, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
Next: when I come from a locked screen, giving the password to unlock
it, only the background shows. No top bar, nothing happening when I
move the mouse to any side,top, bottom. I have to Clt+Alt+Back out.
This happens 3 out of 5 today.
This was
...has been offline for about 12 hours
On 06/23/2011 05:35 AM, Frank Griffin wrote:
...has been offline for about 12 hours
and just came back.
For the last several days in my Cauldron KDE desktop, multiple instances
of the Available Device notification keep coming up entitled
Coherence Test Content.
This appears to be caused by the following in /etc/coherence/coherence.conf:
plugin active=yes
nameCoherence Test Content/name
On 07/05/2011 10:22 AM, John Balcaen wrote:
2011/7/5 Frank Griffinf...@roadrunner.com:
For the last several days in my Cauldron KDE desktop, multiple instances of
the Available Device notification keep coming up entitled Coherence Test
Content.
The notification is probably related to the
Has anyone else noticed that as of updating yesterday or today, the
windows in KDE have no titlebars, and cannot be moved or closed (except
through the individual app) ?
I used to see this occasionally under GNOME 2.32, but logging out/in
again usually put it right. That doesn't work in the
On 07/15/2011 02:28 PM, Frank Griffin wrote:
Has anyone else noticed that as of updating yesterday or today, the
windows in KDE have no titlebars, and cannot be moved or closed
(except through the individual app) ?
I used to see this occasionally under GNOME 2.32, but logging out/in
again
On 07/16/2011 07:29 AM, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
you still can use the kernel 2.6 which is installed on your machine,
installing a newer kernel doesn't uninstall the previous one.
yes, I can, but only because I've edited menu.lst _manually_.
the new kernel added 2 grub entries, at the end,
On 07/18/2011 12:40 PM, Ahmad Samir wrote:
okular needs to be updated (or the libpoppler-qt4-devel provides re-added).
Fixed, okular now uses the pkgconfig() BR.
Thanks !
On 07/16/2011 01:39 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
'Twas brillig, and Ahmad Samir at 16/07/11 09:06 did gyre and gimble:
On 15 July 2011 23:20, Colin Guthriemag...@colin.guthr.ie wrote:
'Twas brillig, and Balcaen John at 15/07/11 20:16 did gyre and gimble:
I just finished to push compiz 0.8.8
[root@ftgme2 ftg]# urpmi --auto-select --debug
getting lock on urpmi
parsing: /etc/urpmi/mediacfg.d/Devel-1-x86_64
examining synthesis file [/var/lib/urpmi/Core Release/synthesis.hdlist.cz]
examining synthesis file [/var/lib/urpmi/Core Release
Debug/synthesis.hdlist.cz]
examining synthesis file
On 07/19/2011 12:08 PM, Frank Griffin wrote:
auto-select: adding maven2-2.2.1-72.mga2.noarch replacing
maven2-2.2.1-70.mga1.noarch
Actually, it looks like it *is* supposed to replace, so why the conflicts ?
For a couple of days now:
[root@ftgme2 ftg]# urpmi --auto-select --debug
getting lock on urpmi
parsing: /etc/urpmi/mediacfg.d/Devel-1-x86_64
examining synthesis file [/var/lib/urpmi/Core Release/synthesis.hdlist.cz]
examining synthesis file [/var/lib/urpmi/Core Release
installing task-kde4-minimal-4.7.0-1.mga2.noarch.rpm
kde-l10n-es-4.7.0-1.mga2.noarch.rpm kde-l10n-fr-4.7.0-1.mga2.noarch.rpm
kde-l10n-en_US-4.7.0-1.mga2.noarch.rpm
kde-l10n-en_GB-4.7.0-1.mga2.noarch.rpm
kde-l10n-it-4.7.0-1.mga2.noarch.rpm task-kde4-4.7.0-1.mga2.noarch.rpm
On 08/01/2011 10:59 AM, Kira wrote:
在 Mon, 01 Aug 2011 22:55:02 +0800, Frank Griffin f...@roadrunner.com
寫道:
I tried GDM and GNOME3 after the latest metacity update for
registration, to see if the Alt-F4 mess and other anomalies were
gone. The Alt-F4 mess seems to be, but there have been
Doing a fresh install, after partitioning but before package selection
(last popup shows looking for installed packages), you get an error
panel saying:
An error occurred
rm of /mnt/var/cache/urpmi/mirrors.cache failed: No such file or directory
Clicking OK sends you back to disk partitioning
On 08/05/2011 12:24 PM, Frank Griffin wrote:
Doing a fresh install, after partitioning but before package selection
(last popup shows looking for installed packages), you get an error
panel saying:
An error occurred
rm of /mnt/var/cache/urpmi/mirrors.cache failed: No such file or
directory
On 08/05/2011 03:12 PM, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
Just fixed in SVN
Thanks !
1 - 100 of 335 matches
Mail list logo
