t, do any processing/modifications you need to do, then seal on
output (and not change the message from that point).
Am I misunderstanding, or is this a bug on MS's end? If it's a bug...
any ideas on how to get that through to the right people at MS? I'm
guessing front-line support is not going to unders
the host OS (I routinely use it remotely, from my
> desktop Linux PC which has a full X desktop running).
Cockpit can provide some basic KVM/libvirt VM management (including
graphical and serial consoles) in a web browser.
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop m
money transfer notifications
from one bank; they have the typical "only for intended recipient,
notify sender if you aren't" disclaimer... along with the "this is sent
from noreply, do not reply" bit (so there's no way to satisfy the
"notify
them directly to the spam
folder now, hopefully it's dropping the reputation of the sender too
(IPs, domains, etc.) for repeatedly sending such junk.
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
onth VMs that include a /64. So that's not a good
excuse either.
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
artificial limitation; proper network support should not be an
up-sell.
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
itted via SMTP, the sender changes
it to:
..example.com
and then the receiver strips the leading dot to make it:
.example.com
as originally written.
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
Submitter:gosecure.net
Report-ID:3E142D0B10BBC11A97A7146A82662F23
I realized I was blocking reports as spam because of the various errors.
Oops.
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
Once upon a time, Jaroslaw Rafa said:
> Dnia 25.08.2023 o godz. 09:48:35 Chris Adams via mailop pisze:
> >
> > So even for transactional messages, there's usually an account making
> > the purchase, or something is being delivered to an address, or the
> > like.
to this address and (b)
don't send any mail for future transactions with the same delivery to
the same address without further input. Future orders that would have
transactional emails blocked should pop up and say "hey, this address is
flagged as NOT YOU, are y
essages - no Delta account to log in to).
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
gnal somebody that "something is
wrong"), but everything else should follow at minimum an opt-out system,
if not opt-in.
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
the only one
that can make them stop.
A few vendors manage to put a "this is not me" link in messages (which
is functionally an unsubscribe, even if you don't want to call it that).
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
http
), so I know instantly that this is not to me.
Why do vendors think they don't need an unsubscribe in this type of
mail? Just because their customers are dumb and don't know their own
email address doesn't mean they should continue sending personal
information about them to other people.
--
Chris
Once upon a time, Sean Kamath said:
> That’s how I learned BSD4.3’s csh had a fun history expression “bug” (it
> caused csh to coredump):
Yeah well, csh considered harmful. :)
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
ation protocols for
email, that's a funny hill to die on. The RFC defines the response
format, which doesn't have to be a text file on a POSIX system at all
(could be generated on the fly, could be on a non-POSIX system).
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mail
tried to forward it, but my server's spam filters rejected
the message (reject during SMTP, no bounce generated from my server).
Gmail generated a delivery status notification message... and sent that
directly to the Gmail spam folder.
Oops... :)
--
Chris Adams
t. And even the
density of capabale people is way to low to support friends-and-family.
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
Once upon a time, Ángel said:
> On 2022-08-21 at 15:18 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Also, I believe you can offer both RSA and EC certs, so shouldn't be
> > a negative to getting an EC cert (you just need to have RSA too).
>
> How would you do that?
>
> You could
e
TLSv1.3.
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
ap/scripts/ssl-enum-ciphers -p 25
gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com
Also, I believe you can offer both RSA and EC certs, so shouldn't be a
negative to getting an EC cert (you just need to have RSA too).
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
client and gnutls-cli make it
hard to replicate for testing. I will continue to look.
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
(rsa 2048) - A
| TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (rsa 2048) - A
So is there a bug on Google's side forcing SHA1, or am I missing
something (which is quite possible, getting into obscure bits of TLS
does trip me up)?
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@
rom: line (while recognizing the need to do the
rewrites), I have a script that recognizes a couple of rewrite methods
I've seen and reverses them for messages going into my mailing list
folders. It's very much just done based on what I've seen though, so
probably doesn't "fix" a lo
Is there anybody from EarthLink who can contact me off-list?
We are seeing emails sent to EarthLink recipients have the From header
domain overwritten with the CNAME the domain points to and would like to
discuss.
Thanks.
~ Chris
___
mailop mailing list
ttings. IIRC
I've seen that behavior from some (but not all) Google Home products and
the Netflix app on various devices.
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
Hi --
We are seeing some odd behavior with emails delivered to recipient
mailboxes protected by Carrierzone (https://carrierzone.com/).
Emails leaving our platform have a proper From header. However, when they
are received by Carrierzone, both the From and Return-Path headers have had
the domain
le things
(haven't had need to look at that in a while).
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
as practical.
Anybody know what the big guys (Google and the like) do? I thought
about setting up an address to always return 4xx and sending tests, but
I'm lazy so I figured I'd ask here instead. :)
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
list's From: header with a synthetic From: based on
> the contents of the Reply-To:.
Here's what I do (should work for most Mailman lists):
:0 f
* ^reply-to:
* ^x-beenthere: \/.*
{
MLADDR=$MATCH
:0 f
* $^from: .* via .* <$MLADDR>
* ^reply-to: \/
I can do to improve
the delivery of these messages?
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
to add
headers and the signing effectively says "don't", why should the list
accept the message?
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
ate email
addresses:
http://www.ex-parrot.com/pdw/Mail-RFC822-Address.html
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
on the front end. Looking at the last 3 weeks of logs, I
only see about 1 out of every 57,000 messages blocked as a virus.
Mostly just wondering if my virus filtering is hosed up, or have email
viruses really dropped that much (or are enough of the sources blocked
by DNS blocklists?). :)
--
Chris Adams
t had any v6
trouble since (just used for my personal stuff only so very low volume).
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
to decide if he/she
> wants to proceed (displaying information about the "last known" and
> the "new" certificates).
Aside from your Google-related questions, this is going to be a problem
with anybody using Let's Encrypt certs, as they'll typically chang
include the SPF "pass". The info at the support
page appears out of date and doesn't match the bounce message.
Any suggestions?
--
Chris Adams <c...@cmadams.net>
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org
ce and shoot them?
--
Chris Adams <c...@cmadams.net>
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
38 matches
Mail list logo