Tell Yahoo it's not fixed yet.
-Tim
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 4:47 AM Gavin Montague via mailop
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering if anyone had any experience/suggestions regarding
> warming an IP address that delivers to Yahoo managed domains (yahoo,
> aol, sky.com, etc)?
>
I believe Bigpond maintains their own internal domain blacklists. It's been
a while, but postmas...@bigpond.com has been responsive for me in the past
in similar cases.
Tim Starr
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 4:59 AM John Gao via mailop
wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
>
>
> Does anyone
Some AWS IPs may have Good GPT rep, but I just found some for a client that
were either Low or Bad.
-Tim
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 4:34 AM Laura Atkins via mailop
wrote:
> AWS has good IP reputation - I’ve got one client sending <500K a month and
> one sending >20M a day off AWS and
”.
So, in past life I used the Python Unidecode library to sort similar
problems (not in email)
https://pypi.org/project/Unidecode/
See also
https://metacpan.org/pod/Text::Unidecode
As for emoji specific, I don't know.
--
Tim Bray
Huddersfield, GB
On 28/2/24 09:30, Rob Nagler via mailop wrote:
a mx ip4:139.177.203.52
You could try removing the redundant A/MX as they all point to
139.177.203.52.
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
Yahoo says they're aware & working on it.
-Tim
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 11:25 AM Andy Smith via mailop
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While trying to debug:
>
> <[redacted]@yahoo.co.uk>: host mx-eu.mail.am0.yahoodns.net[188.125.72.74]
> said:
> 554 5.7.9 Message not a
I had that happen to me yesterday, but I was able to get there from the
main page:
https://senders.yahooinc.com/smtp-error-codes/
I think they have the wrong URL in the bounce. Will report to Yahoo.
-Tim
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 11:25 AM Andy Smith via mailop
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Whi
Noted, will discontinue further replies.
-Tim
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 2:26 PM Graeme Fowler via mailop
wrote:
> On 14 January 2024 15:55:43 Graeme Fowler via mailop
> wrote:
>
>> Unless anyone has anything new, valid, on-point and worthy of further
>> discussion, I'd su
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 5:58 PM Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop
wrote:
[snip]
Dnia 12.01.2024 o godz. 14:04:59 Tim Starr via mailop pisze:
> > BIMI's value is not dependent upon MUAs
> > never doing anything outside its spec.
>
> Yes, it is. Because it depends on the condi
never doing anything outside its spec.
-Tim
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 12:05 PM Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop
wrote:
> Dnia 12.01.2024 o godz. 11:18:32 Tim Starr via mailop pisze:
> > By publishing the BIMI spec. No one's required to follow the spec, but if
> > they don't, then they're
By publishing the BIMI spec. No one's required to follow the spec, but if
they don't, then they're not doing BIMI, and that's not the fault of the
spec.
-Tim
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 5:31 PM Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop
wrote:
> Dnia 11.01.2024 o godz. 17:02:01 Tim Starr via mailop pi
be faked,
too. But, again, that's an existing risk, which BIMI doesn't make any worse.
-Tim
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 2:35 PM Bastian Blank via mailop
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 01:45:19PM -0600, Tim Starr via mailop wrote:
> > To elaborate on Marcel's answer, so he doesn't have to w
To elaborate on Marcel's answer, so he doesn't have to waste time
explaining it all over again, the "different logo" won't be displayed by
the mailbox providers, because it's not the authenticated one.
-Tim
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 1:11 PM Marcel Becker via mailop
wrote:
> On Thu,
They can already rip people off, w/out BIMI. BIMI limits their ability to
do so in two ways:
1) It raises the cost, because BIMI setup costs more.
2) It makes it harder for scammers to impersonate trusted brands.
-Tim
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 12:58 PM Randolf Richardson, Postmaster via mailop
it serves
as a visible indicator of email that is both authenticated and passes
DMARC. If you also object to authentication and DMARC, then you're making
yourself even more of a minority advocate. I do not expect any such boycott
to get widespread adoption.
Tim Starr
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 11:34 A
Others have reported this, but I'm not seeing it, myself. It seems to be
intermittent. Some see it, some don't.
-Tim
On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 4:04 PM Omar Thameen via mailop
wrote:
> Is anyone else seeing data missing from Google Postmaster Tools?
> For all our hosted domains, ever
Go to the URL, open a ticket, be persistent, explain that you don't send
any spam.
-Tim
On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 8:41 AM Otto J. Makela via mailop
wrote:
> Can someone shed light on a Microsoft/Outlook block list? Our hobby server
> (on upcloud.com) seem to have been blocked for quite som
I see those, too. I assumed it was due to temporary DNS lookup failures.
-Tim
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 10:19 AM Gellner, Oliver via mailop <
mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we repeatedly receive DMARC reports from dmarcrep...@microsoft.com with
> allegedly failed DKIM
It's back up today for me.
Tim Starr
Senior Director, Deliverability
The Lifetime Value Company
On Sat, Mar 4, 2023 at 3:52 PM Emre Üst via mailop
wrote:
> Thank you Mark , so there is a global problem .
>
> On Sun, Mar 5, 2023 at 12:40 AM Mark Alley wrote:
>
>> I've see
:
https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/jammy-jellyfish-release-notes/24668
Best regards
Tim Düsterhus
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
that they just need to make their IT more plain
and simple with way less tracking, which would benefit security.
And this is before we get onto:
10 different marketing click tracking, pop up loading, lots of
javascript from 8 different domains/CDNs in a simple website.
Tim
this list, but I'm
not seeing any signs for that.
Best regards
Tim Düsterhus
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
On 4/19/22 16:57, Laura Atkins via mailop wrote:
We just did 2 tests, one with an email that violated half a dozen best
practices and one that has a SPFSoftfail (with no DKIM).
I believe you accidentally pasted the same test twice, the headers look
100% identical to me.
Best regards
Tim
the same problem. A new problem that
started sometime since 2022-02-09 20:39:38 UTC. (our users don't send
much email over night in UK time.
Tim Bray
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
https://bgp.he.net/AS63949#_prefixes6 They aren't
exactly short of address space. :) I'm sure linode could to go RIPE
and ask for more space too. (if Linode go past 52 billion customers,
give me a call)
--
Tim Bray
Huddersfield, GB
t...@koo
good success simply emailing the postmas...@rzone.de address
(rzone is their reverse zone for customer domains, the email was
rejected by smtpin.rzone.de) a few days ago. Within an hour I had a
helpful response from one of their postmasters.
Best regards
Tim Düsterhus
Hi,
I've used different hostnames (and therefore different certificates) on
the same IP for years on one service.
And different IPs with different IPs on another service.
And same IP, same hostname (same certificate) on another.
Makes no difference. Do what suits you.
Tim
On 15/10/2021
/query/ip/2607:f8b0:4864:20::82d
confirms 'has been detected 1 times in the last month. It has been
removed 1 times.'
Any thoughts?
--
Tim Bray
Huddersfield, GB
t...@kooky.org
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo
On 19/07/2021 10:16, Thomas Walter via mailop wrote:
On 19.07.21 10:56, Tim Bray via mailop wrote:
I do this. For a corporate email system is makes a lot of sense. I
shouldn't be receiving email externally with a From: domain which is
local.
As long as your users don't have an external
or valid DKIM.
Tim
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
My main motivation for getting the blocking right is to avoid having
1000s of connections from scanners, and so real mail not getting through.
--
Tim Bray
Huddersfield, GB
t...@kooky.org
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.or
the automatic fix of 8.8.8.8 and not
telling anybody and mail stopped for 50% of messages.
--
Tim Bray
Huddersfield, GB
t...@kooky.org
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
at Spamhaus rejects, timestamps
are UTC):
Just check which DNS servers you are using. And lot of the 8.8.8.8
and 9.9.9.9 of the world and similar don't work very well for RBLs
I usually install a local unbound.
Sorry if that is too obvious, but has caught me out before.
--
Tim Bray
correctly and the volume just wasn't large enough.
Best regards
Tim Düsterhus
Postmaster WoltLab GmbH
--
WoltLab GmbH
Nedlitzer Str. 27B
14469 Potsdam
Tel.: +49 331 96784338
duester...@woltlab.com
www.woltlab.com
Managing director:
Marcel Werk
AG Potsdam H
Hello Bastian,
On 6/2/21 2:17 PM, Bastian Blank via mailop wrote:
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 01:22:31PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus, WoltLab GmbH via
mailop wrote:
Mail is being sent with a 'MAIL FROM:'
with the 'From:' containing an email address of the customer's custom
domain.
We're DKIM signing
ld suspect that we reached this minimum volume, but of course
we can't be sure there.
Does anyone of you have practical experience with Google's feedback loop
mechanism and might be able to identify if we are doing anything wrong
or if it's just the low volume?
Best regards
Tim Düsterhus
Postmaster
years ago.
--
Tim Bray
Huddersfield, GB
t...@kooky.org
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
mailserver for problem domains and see
what happens?
Like fire up an exim?
Tim
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
delay when sending an email. Potentially detect if you are
sending loads of emails to the same domain and have some limit on
parallel connections.
Tim
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
hat this email would have been
rejected by T-Online.de with the new rules?
Best regards
Tim Düsterhus
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
the 5322.from, needlessly
breaking a valid DKIM signature from the original sender.
Am I understanding that correctly?
Best regards
Tim Düsterhus
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
On 16/12/2020 10:50, Thomas Walter via mailop wrote:
we switched over to rspamd quite a while ago and will not look back.
I switched on the back your suggestion. rspamd seems way better.
And switching on the dmarc module sends away the scammers.
--
Tim Bray
Huddersfield, GB
t...@kooky.org
/ - this one can test a zillion things on your
domain include DNSSEC, MTA-STS, DANE, DMARC. It incudes website stuff
in the tests. It is quite good fun getting a full set of greens.
--
Tim Bray
Huddersfield, GB
t...@kooky.org
___
mailop mailing
y will ask somebody
else to use their company card to buy something for them. These staff
too junior to have their own cards.
--
Tim Bray
Huddersfield, GB
t...@kooky.org
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
think any further DKIM checks will be done.
I'll DKIM check and then make the change before it drops into the mailbox.
--
Tim Bray
Huddersfield, GB
t...@kooky.org
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
DKIM signature? Is that possible? Is
that useful? Mailinglists do this ? Could somebody who understands
this a bit better please say what they think ?
--
Tim Bray
Huddersfield, GB
t...@kooky.org
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
thinking they were on a special
mission for the big boss. £1300 lost, some maybe recovered.
If I stripped the name, they would have seen mablecri...@gmail.com and
hopefully noticed sooner.
Thoughts or ideas?
--
Tim Bray
Huddersfield, GB
___
mailop
t per line, then but then line breaks are in
valid inside the json.
--
Tim Bray
Huddersfield, GB
t...@kooky.org
+44 7966479015
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
. Or opening another port just too much admin.
Tim
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
On 30/09/2020 09:59, Thomas Mechtersheimer via mailop wrote:
It does. Exim adds "s" to received_protocol for encrypted connections.
Check your exim log for the cipher that was used...
Oh, it is. My bad. I was just expecting to see the cipher in the header.
TLS1.3 - all goo
just haven't turned on yet. And
thanks for sorting this all out)
Received: from mx.mailop.org ([2a03:4000:37:599:d8ce:dff:fee1:81c2])
by herm.doylem.co.uk with esmtps (Exim 4.92 #3 (Debian))
id 1kNWO9-0005Hf-1Y
Tim
___
mailop mailing
iness
letters, order forms and websites"
Why t-mobile want to white list, I don't know. But you can be sure they
don't get random spam from random compromised home broadband or cloud
servers.
--
Tim Bray
Huddersfield, GB
t...@kooky.org
___
mail
.
--
Tim Bray
Huddersfield, GB
t...@kooky.org
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
in some other software which allows
people to easily steal sendgrid credentials.
(of course, none of this helps if you are looking at your inbox and
seeing more phishing)
--
Tim Bray
Huddersfield, GB
t...@kooky.org
+44 7966479015
___
mailop mailing list
ping,
and so firewall all ICMP, they need sending back to networking school)
--
Tim Bray
Huddersfield, GB
t...@kooky.org
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
something if we were.
Maybe we did nothing wrong and just tripped a rate limit, filter or
keyword or something.
Tim Bray
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
damage.
--
Tim Bray
Huddersfield, GB
t...@kooky.org
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
Hi,
Anybody else seeing increase phishing through sendgrid? They look
fairly convincing.
A few paypals, and a few amazons.
I thought sendgrid were ok? Has somebody leaked a big pile of
sendgrid usernames and passwords or something?
--
Tim Bray
Huddersfield, GB
t...@kooky.org
?
Tim
//
--
Tim Bray
Huddersfield, GB
t...@kooky.org
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
in the
List-Unsubscribe ??
List-Unsubscribe: <https://cloud-distribution.us20.l
--
Tim Bray
Huddersfield, GB
t...@kooky.org
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
. I guess depends whether mailchimp think they are governed by GDPR
or not.
--
Tim Bray
Huddersfield, GB
t...@kooky.org
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
, but it is
possible to have it working.
--
Tim Bray
Huddersfield, GB
t...@kooky.org
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
mailserver (I'd be suspicious of such a wide range of
space for sending mailservers)
--
Tim Bray
Huddersfield, GB
t...@kooky.org
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
don't want to
globally do a mass block.
(sorry mailchimp, you are like the best mailinglist people, so more
comes from you)
--
Tim Bray
Huddersfield, GB
t...@kooky.org
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin
On 02/02/2020 18:48, Matthias Leisi via mailop wrote:
From one particular IPv6 range, each and every DNS query was sent from
a unique IPv6 /128, and every /128 seen was used exactly once.
Um, I do this. To guard against cache poisoning attacks. Each
nameserver has a /64 to use for
On 27/01/2020 12:57, Lennert Van Alboom via mailop wrote:
Alternatives?
https://www.migadu.com/
Tim
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
I just got confirmation that it's a bug of theirs.
-Tim
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 10:25 AM John Rowan via mailop
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> When I checked our domains/subdomains today, I noticed that beginning
> today *all* of our IP reputations were bad. Previously they had been a m
ot hotmail or Microsoft here)
--srs
*From:* mailop on behalf of Tim Bray via
mailop
*Sent:* Tuesday, November 26, 2019 3:40 PM
*To:* mailop@mailop.org
*Subject:* [mailop] Blank emails to office 365
Hi,
Weird problem.
We hav
office365.
MX always *.protection.outlook.com.
Maybe the email is just a bit too plain for modern email system?
Any ideas?
Tim
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
Trying those, thanks! Already tried similar role accounts for their other
domains, but those bounced...
-Tim
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 5:50 PM Chris Woods <
christopherwoods+list-mai...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's an RBL-style block response but it may be due to an internal
> blackli
Each message has its own unique return-path address with that parent domain
and subdomain naming convention. They're redacting the localpart for
unknown reasons.
-Tim
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 7:45 PM Ángel via mailop wrote:
> On 2019-10-30 at 16:02 -0500, Tim Starr via mailop wrote:
>
ider,
but are there any better channels to reach them?
Tim Starr
Senior Director - Deliverability
Maropost.com
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
?
Tim
On 29/10/2019 19:42, Heiko Schlittermann via mailop wrote:
Hello Mailops,
from a vServer, I recently got, I'm not able to sucessfully receive
answers from spamhaus:
dig -4 @a.gns.spamhaus.org 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org
runs in a timeout. Tcpdump shows only the outgoing packages. Using
, and they are
in the UK.
https://ico.org.uk/make-a-complaint/nuisance-calls-and-messages/spam-emails/
I doubt the ICO will take formal action, but contact from the ICO might
focus the mind. There might just be other people complaining.
(or just block the senders domain)
Tim
to "investigate" to prolong the attack,
but I wouldn't give them much thought, after submitting the report and
dropping all future connections on your edge.
Tim
On 9/1/19 5:31 AM, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote:
https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-us/engage/cars
By the time yo
don't know why this is. But came around because I need to run the
older exim until I've solved another problem.
exim4-daemon-heavy 4.92-8+deb10u1 from Debian Buster works fine. TLS1.3
does work.
--
Tim Bray
Huddersfield, GB
t...@kooky.org
+44
Seems to be our turn to get a class C blocked by ATT for the first time in
years. Haven't made any progress via official channels yet. Anyone else
have a recommendation?
Tim Starr
Senior Director, Deliverability
Maropost Postmaster
___
mailop mailing
Hey Thiago,
abuse@ and postmaster@ for G-Suite domains are monitored by GSuite.
You need to create Google Groups. But considering this was over 8 hours
ago I'm sure you've already figured it out
Check out the article here: https://support.google.com/a/answer/33389?hl=en
Cheers
Tim
On 3/22/19
Webroot's forms for de-listing phishing URLs is broken. I've just emailed
the usual role accounts there, but is there any better direct contact there
I can reach?
Tim Starr
Sr. Director - Deliverability
Maropost.com
___
mailop mailing list
mailop
ing CNAMEd to
one, then one client sending a campaign with a blacklisted domain in it,
getting all the domains with the same CNAME value flagged.
Tim Starr
Senior Director, Deliverability
Maropost.com
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop
We've noticed a couple of domains listed by Day Old Bread (
http://support-intelligence.com/dob/) today, one ours, one not ours, both
of which are much more than 5 days old. Is that blacklist broken?
Tim Starr
Maropost.com
___
mailop mailing list
mailop
Hey Mailop,
I have made contact. (Once again mailing-lists to the rescue)
Cheers!
On 20/11/2018 16:27, Tim C wrote:
Hey Mailop,
I was hoping someone from bigpond could contact me offlist regarding
multiple customers domains that are getting flagged as spam.
I have a few examples over
as spam.
I've tried emailing postmaster@ but have not had any success.
Cheers,
Tim
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
in last few years.
DNSSEC the same :)
Tim
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
stuff for years. But the reports that come back suggest a
lot of our customers doing dodgy mailforwarding.
(there is no easy answer)
Tim
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
It is always good to think about data protection and privacy. How can
you be better? What is really necessary.
Tim
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
Salesforce Marketing Cloud, for zillow.com.
-Tim Starr
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 2:26 PM, Steve Atkins <st...@blighty.com> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 2, 2018, at 12:22 PM, Jaren Angerbauer <jarenangerba...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Looking
requests. There are plenty of more accurate ways to block anyone deserving
it amongst our client base, which we do actually police, so I don't see
what benefit there is to listing this domain...
Tim Starr
Sr. Director, Deliverability
Maropost.com
___
mailop
We've been having the same experience for months now. Not always, but way
too often.
-Tim
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 4:29 AM, Edgaras | SENDER <edga...@sender.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2 days ago one of our IPs started getting an AS3150 block when sending to
> Hotmail/Outlook.
>
My apologies if I've asked this before and forgotten the answer, but is
there a good way to contact Libero.it about one of my ESP clients getting
blocked?
Tim Starr
Sr. Directory, Deliverability
Maropost.com
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
o.
We just drop them in the firewall for a bit. We've dropped about 300
IPv4 addresses in the last 6 hours.
Tim
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
Good theory, but my data is the opposite - lower spam rates from 7/1
through 8/15, with higher spam rates after, presumably from better delivery.
-Tim
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Brian Curry <bcu...@merkleinc.com> wrote:
> Here is my take on the positive surge for various send
I've now seen this for two of my clients here at Maropost, per eDataSource
panel data. Gmail inbox delivery went way up for both right around the same
time, in mid-August, for no apparent reason. Opens, clicks, and complaints
went up at the same time, too.
-Tim
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 11:17 AM
at similar evaluations, but in either case we started blocking campaigns
from being sent if they had blacklisted domains in them. Helped a lot.
Tim Starr
Sr. Director, Deliverability, Maropost
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Laura Atkins <la...@wordtothewise.com>
wrote:
>
> On Aug 2, 2
Then what does "unmanaged" mean in this context?
-Tim
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 1:28 AM, Dave Warren <da...@hireahit.com> wrote:
> As far as #2, because users of said servers often want to send email.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017, at 12:05, Tim Starr wrote:
>
> A
An overall admirable response, keep up the good work. Just 2 questions:
1) Why not put TLDR at top?
2) Why allow email to be sent at all from "unmanaged servers"?
-Tim
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Hetzner Blacklist <blackl...@hetzner.de>
wrote:
> I just got back fr
I have a client getting spoofed with a payload domain hosted by OVH. I
found their abuse-reporting webform, but are there any better contacts for
reporting this to them?
Tim Starr
Senior Director, Deliverability
Maropost.com
___
mailop mailing list
I have a client getting blocked by fastwebnet.it with this code:
Error code is simply: 554 Message refused
We're already trying abuse@/postmaster@ for both fastwebnet.it and
fastweb.it. Does anyone know of any better way to contact them about this?
-Tim
Anyone got a working contact for Cablevision (optonline.net)? Their
blinqu...@cv.net role account used to work, but bounces now. Already trying
abuse@/postmaster@, but haven't had much luck w/ them before.
Deferrals we're getting are:
We suddenly stopped getting complaints from our JMRP feed on 12/29. Is it
just us, or others, too? What's the best way to get this fixed?
Tim Starr
Sr. Director - Deliverability
Maropost.com
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
