Re: [mailop] Certified Senders Alliance

2019-10-04 Thread Neil Youngman via mailop
On 04/10/2019 12:34, Sebastian Kluth wrote: Hi Neil, hi all, „Eventually I was asked for permission to pass the email to the ESP as part of the investigation. Although I wasn't confident that any positive action would be taken, I expected that the emails would finally stop and that I would ge

Re: [mailop] Certified Senders Alliance

2019-10-04 Thread Sebastian Kluth via mailop
y via mailop Gesendet: Freitag, 4. Oktober 2019 11:20 An: Neil Youngman Cc: mailop@mailop.org Betreff: Re: [mailop] Certified Senders Alliance On Thu 03/Oct/2019 12:31:43 +0200 Neil Youngman via mailop wrote: > On 03/10/2019 10:07, Alessandro Vesely wrote: >> On Thu 03/Oct/2019 09:46

Re: [mailop] Certified Senders Alliance

2019-10-04 Thread Benjamin BILLON via mailop
> I browsed their site and found the price list[*] sooner than the FAQs[†]. > The very last section is For Mailbox Providers and Spam Filter Providers, but > doesn't actually tell how to verify if a sender is whitelisted. I wrote them > asking for more info. Interesting. The "Participants"

Re: [mailop] Certified Senders Alliance

2019-10-04 Thread Alessandro Vesely via mailop
On Thu 03/Oct/2019 12:31:43 +0200 Neil Youngman via mailop wrote: > On 03/10/2019 10:07, Alessandro Vesely wrote: >> On Thu 03/Oct/2019 09:46:35 +0200 Neil Youngman via mailop wrote: >>> >>> On 23rd March, I looked into their data protection details. The >>> contact was the same customer care emai

Re: [mailop] Certified Senders Alliance

2019-10-03 Thread Support 3Hound via mailop
- Benjamin -Original Message- From: mailop On Behalf Of Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. via mailop Sent: jeudi 3 octobre 2019 17:22 To: Mail Op Subject: Re: [mailop] Certified Senders Alliance The CSA has, to the best of my knowledge, never been about best practices, let alone about enforcing th

Re: [mailop] Certified Senders Alliance

2019-10-03 Thread Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. via mailop
> In article <3827efcb-337f-4456-9fb8-6eff4a5d9...@isipp.com> you write: >> The CSA has, to the best of my knowledge, never been about best practices > > You're mistaken. Their criteria are here: > > https://certified-senders.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/CSA_Admission_Criteria.pdf > > I've

Re: [mailop] Certified Senders Alliance

2019-10-03 Thread John Levine via mailop
In article <3827efcb-337f-4456-9fb8-6eff4a5d9...@isipp.com> you write: >The CSA has, to the best of my knowledge, never been about best practices You're mistaken. Their criteria are here: https://certified-senders.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/CSA_Admission_Criteria.pdf I've sent complaints wh

Re: [mailop] Certified Senders Alliance

2019-10-03 Thread Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. via mailop
> We were certified by ISIPP (as an ESP) many years ago, and I don't remember > going through an extensive check process for that. You did. :-) However it was all in the background, based on your responses to your application. > As we didn't see any improvement in the deliverability, we sto

Re: [mailop] Certified Senders Alliance

2019-10-03 Thread Benjamin BILLON via mailop
t least from my Europe-based experience. -- Benjamin -Original Message- From: mailop On Behalf Of Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. via mailop Sent: jeudi 3 octobre 2019 17:22 To: Mail Op Subject: Re: [mailop] Certified Senders Alliance The CSA has, to the best of my knowledge, never been about best pra

Re: [mailop] Certified Senders Alliance

2019-10-03 Thread Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. via mailop
The CSA has, to the best of my knowledge, never been about best practices, let alone about enforcing them. The only two organizations anywhere that are truly about certifying email senders because they are following best practices are (again, to the best of my knowledge), Return Path and us. A

Re: [mailop] Certified Senders Alliance

2019-10-03 Thread Tim Bray via mailop
On 03/10/2019 08:46, Neil Youngman via mailop wrote: It is now October. The emails are still coming and there has been no further communication from CSA. I'd be tempted to complain to the information commissioner.   You are lucky because you actually know who is sending the stuff, and they ar

Re: [mailop] Certified Senders Alliance

2019-10-03 Thread Neil Youngman via mailop
On 03/10/2019 10:07, Alessandro Vesely wrote: On Thu 03/Oct/2019 09:46:35 +0200 Neil Youngman via mailop wrote: On 23rd March, I looked into their data protection details. The contact was the same customer care email that was failing to resolve the issue. Looking at the email headers, I saw

Re: [mailop] Certified Senders Alliance

2019-10-03 Thread Alessandro Vesely via mailop
On Thu 03/Oct/2019 09:46:35 +0200 Neil Youngman via mailop wrote: > > By the 16th of February it was clear that the unsubscribe was not > working, so I emailed their customer service team. They responded on > the 17th telling me that they would look int the problem and they had > removed me from

[mailop] Certified Senders Alliance

2019-10-03 Thread Neil Youngman via mailop
In January I decided to unsubscribe from the Thompson and Morgan mailing lists. Thompson and Morgan are a well known supplier of seeds and plants in the UK. I have bought from them twice in the last 2 or 3 years, but I felt that getting at least one email a day, sometimes more from a company I only

Re: [mailop] Certified Senders Alliance

2017-11-02 Thread Philip Paeps
On 2017-11-01 08:28:39 (-0500), Alexander Burch wrote: What is the general opinion of the Certified Senders Alliance? I receive quite a lot of spam with an `X-CSA-Complaints` header pointing at ... Does anyone find it impactful for delivery? They offered to let us join without any vetting, ju

Re: [mailop] Certified Senders Alliance

2017-11-02 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > What is the general opinion of the Certified Senders Alliance? I had one case with them in 2009, which ended *very* unpleasent. We had some spam case from one of their members, complaint by phone and a few minutes later one of our internal addresses got subscribed via some Tor relay to som

Re: [mailop] Certified Senders Alliance

2017-11-02 Thread Benoit Panizzon
Hi I made mixed experience with CSA. Their 'complaints' team does react quickly on complaints and also document the number of complaints they receive per CSA Member. But by 'reacting' they just acknowledge the complaints and document the complaint. Not much more happens to make the problem stop.

Re: [mailop] Certified Senders Alliance

2017-11-01 Thread David Hofstee
The rules they offer are "normal" for an ESP. I have complained personally, a couple of times (to the address they make you add in the headers). Did not get any response on that (repeatedly). Microsoft and Yahoo are partners of the CSA. Terry posted something on it but I can't remember what they d

Re: [mailop] Certified Senders Alliance

2017-11-01 Thread Steve Atkins
> On Nov 1, 2017, at 6:28 AM, Alexander Burch wrote: > > What is the general opinion of the Certified Senders Alliance? Does anyone > find it impactful for delivery? They offered to let us join without any > vetting, just sent us a bill for $___ without any questions. If there is no > vetting

Re: [mailop] Certified Senders Alliance

2017-11-01 Thread Laura Atkins
They’re useful / important if you’re mailing into certain EU-centric consumer email providers - .de being the big one. But if your market is primarily US or webmail providers it’s not a huge priority. laura > On Nov 1, 2017, at 6:28 AM, Alexander Burch wrote: > > What is the general opinion

Re: [mailop] Certified Senders Alliance

2017-11-01 Thread Bill Cole
On 1 Nov 2017, at 9:28 (-0400), Alexander Burch wrote: What is the general opinion of the Certified Senders Alliance? Never heard of them before today... They appear to be mostly oriented to the German and Deutschophone European markets. (Note that I've run mail systems for German entities'

[mailop] Certified Senders Alliance

2017-11-01 Thread Alexander Burch
What is the general opinion of the Certified Senders Alliance? Does anyone find it impactful for delivery? They offered to let us join without any vetting, just sent us a bill for $___ without any questions. If there is no vetting process I have a hard time seeing how it would validate any sender a