Well we really need to have an "easier" way for the users find the more
"conservative" version of 3.6.5 when 3.7.0 comes out. I do not think
anyone would call 3.7.0 the version a new user should try first over
3.6.5. SO we need a better and easier way for them to get to that
install instead
Hello Tim,
We are actually not going to do that (see my previous mail in a new
thread).
In fact we already did discuss this ten times in the past, and I really
would like to close this subject once and for all.
Thank you,
Charles.
Le dimanche 21 octobre 2012 à 10:02 -0400, webmaster-Kracked_P_
I think this thread has gone way beyond what the original posting was about.
Yes, there is a point about calling a version "conservative" since a few
people might see the name and think about their country's political
party with that name. But the point is we are beyond using words like
"mor
en it's bound to get capitalised at some point.
>> So, i think i would prefer using "Corporate" or something else.
>>
>>
>> Regards from
>> Tom :)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >____________
>> > From:
from
> Tom :)
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> > From: webmaster-Kracked_P_P
> >To: marketing@global.libreoffice.org
> >Sent: Friday, 19 October 2012, 12:39
> >Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Stable? Seriously?? Fw: [tdf
omething else.
Regards from
Tom :)
>
> From: webmaster-Kracked_P_P
>To: marketing@global.libreoffice.org
>Sent: Friday, 19 October 2012, 12:39
>Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Stable? Seriously?? Fw: [tdf-announce]
>The Document Foundation announces LibreOffice 3
e.
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Fri, 19/10/12, Carlo Strata wrote:
From: Carlo Strata
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Stable? Seriously?? Fw: [tdf-announce] The
Document Foundation announces LibreOffice 3.6.2
To: "marketing@global.libreoffice.org"
Cc: "charles.sch...@docume
shy about exploring and reporting issues. We might even find that people use
that as a route into triage.
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Fri, 19/10/12, Carlo Strata wrote:
From: Carlo Strata
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Stable? Seriously?? Fw: [tdf-announce] The
Document Found
Hi Everyone,
I think we are all in the right way. :-)
The only thing to do is let people (users) to know - from the start! -
that there are two versions.
In this way "someone with less computer skills" can directly choose
either the conservative branch or fall back to it (and not to OpenOffi
d that "you can't make omelettes without breaking eggs". LO
> makes huge improvements all the time and in many ways already surpasses MS
> Office in terms of quality of final documents produced and ease of producing
> them.
You cannot imagine how true your words are... Lib
ments produced and ease of producing
them.
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Thu, 4/10/12, Cor Nouws wrote:
From: Cor Nouws
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Stable? Seriously?? Fw: [tdf-announce] The
Document Foundation announces LibreOffice 3.6.2
To: "marketing@global.libreof
lobal.libreoffice.org
> CC: charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org
> Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Stable? Seriously?? Fw: [tdf-announce]
> The Document Foundation announces LibreOffice 3.6.2
>
> Hi,
>
> Tom Davies wrote (04-10-12 20:28)
> > Hi :) Seriously. What is the reason for h
Hi,
Tom Davies wrote (04-10-12 20:28)
Hi :) Seriously. What is the reason for having 2 branches?
[...]
Ah well, who am I to say that you can't understand it. Though the way
this thread was started, does not show much (will for) understanding,
IMHO. But OK, brief...
- In each LibreOffice s
ursday, 4 October 2012, 19:19
>Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Stable? Seriously?? Fw: [tdf-announce]
>The Document Foundation announces LibreOffice 3.6.2
>
>Let's look at this from the bright side:
>it's good to have a joker in a project.
>
>Cheers,
>Cor
&g
: Cor Nouws
>To: "marketing@global.libreoffice.org"
>Cc: "charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org"
>
>Sent: Thursday, 4 October 2012, 19:19
>Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Stable? Seriously?? Fw: [tdf-announce]
>The Document Foundation announces LibreOffice 3.
Let's look at this from the bright side:
it's good to have a joker in a project.
Cheers,
Cor
Tom Davies wrote (04-10-12 20:12)
Hi :)
Ok, so what is the reason for having 2 branches being developed at the same
time. Try to explain it again and i will try to listen.
Regards from
Tom :)
--
-
t: Thursday, 4 October 2012, 18:25
>Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Stable? Seriously?? Fw: [tdf-announce]
>The Document Foundation announces LibreOffice 3.6.2
>
>
>Charles.
>Le 4 oct. 2012 19:16, "Tom Davies" a écrit :
>
>> Hi :)
>> When the
>
> >
> > From: webmaster-Kracked_P_P
> >To: marketing@global.libreoffice.org
> >Sent: Thursday, 4 October 2012, 14:41
> >Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Stable? Seriously?? Fw:
> [tdf-announce] The Document Foundation announces Li
rg
>Sent: Thursday, 4 October 2012, 14:41
>Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Stable? Seriously?? Fw: [tdf-announce]
>The Document Foundation announces LibreOffice 3.6.2
>
>
>The key would be to ask yourself which version would you give your local
>government office, or la
ttitude in most
corporate environments i've ever been in.
Regards from
Tom :)
>
> From: Cor Nouws
>To: Marketing LibreOffice
>Sent: Thursday, 4 October 2012, 15:39
>Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Stable? Seriously?? Fw: [tdf-
Hi all,
Carlo Strata wrote (04-10-12 16:10)
But how you layout the download page with:
[...]
It's not new that we find ourselves in an interesting, challenging
situation with the character of the work, product and the release
schedule etc.
Now and then people come up with suggestions to impr
le? Seriously?? Fw:
[tdf-announce] The Document Foundation announces LibreOffice 3.6.2
Tom,
The points you are making are repeated at each release. I cannot really
help if you refuse to understand how we work or how software development
works. But as we are on the marketing list we need to work on
x27;t realise that public announcements and press releases
have nothing to do with marketing.
Apols and regards from
Tom :)
____
From: Charles-H. Schulz
To: "marketing@global.libreoffice.org"
Sent: Thursday, 4 October 2012, 13:30
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Stable? Seriously?? Fw:
[
Sent: Thursday, 4 October 2012, 13:54
> Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Stable? Seriously?? Fw:
> [tdf-announce] The Document Foundation announces LibreOffice
> 3.6.2
>
>
> Public announcements are obviously marketing. Some
Sent: Thursday, 4 October 2012, 13:54
>Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Stable? Seriously?? Fw: [tdf-announce]
>The Document Foundation announces LibreOffice 3.6.2
>
>Public announcements are obviously marketing. Someone repeatedly
>complaining that software comes with bugs
ober 2012, 13:30
> >Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Stable? Seriously?? Fw:
> [tdf-announce] The Document Foundation announces LibreOffice 3.6.2
> >
> >Tom,
> >
> >The points you are making are repeated at each release. I cannot really
> >help if you refuse
sday, 4 October 2012, 13:30
>Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Stable? Seriously?? Fw: [tdf-announce]
>The Document Foundation announces LibreOffice 3.6.2
>
>Tom,
>
>The points you are making are repeated at each release. I cannot really
>help if you refuse to understand how
Tom,
The points you are making are repeated at each release. I cannot really
help if you refuse to understand how we work or how software development
works. But as we are on the marketing list we need to work on marketing and
not lose our time with recurring rants that are not related to marketing
Hi Tom,
You certainly have a point here ;)
+1
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
> Hi :)
> Again. The only advantage listed for the new release in the newest branch
> of LO is that it's "more stable". What is it more stable than? Is it more
> stable than the 3.5.6?
>
> Puttin
Hi :)
Again. The only advantage listed for the new release in the newest branch of
LO is that it's "more stable". What is it more stable than? Is it more stable
than the 3.5.6?
Putting anything mentioning bug-fixes and possible regressions just makes
people wonder what new bugs and new reg
30 matches
Mail list logo
