Bruce Preudhomme wrote:
Yes, you are both right! There is a lot I don't know about mini-disks and
haven't take the time to learn. I did assume that the data on mini-disks was
virtually uncompressed so that is why I mistakenly thought their capacity to
be the same as CDs. I should have thought it
Bruce Preudhomme wrote:
Yes, you are both right! There is a lot I don't know about mini-disks and
haven't take the time to learn. I did assume that the data on mini-disks was
virtually uncompressed so that is why I mistakenly thought their capacity to
be the same as CDs. I should have thought it
I still have some 60 minutes discs
"David W. Tamkin" wrote:
>
> Bruce wrote,
>
> | I am happy with 74 minute mini-disks but am curious as to what if anything
> | out there is going on to dramatically increase playing time (hence the
> | reason behind asking questions 1 and 5 earlier). I am fa
nd software together!~
http://www.pcpursuits.com/
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of David W. Tamkin
> Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2000 1:52 PM
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: MD: "jumping to" eighty-mi
Larry wrote,
| David, the problem is that Bruce is thinking in megs and computer files not
| PCM.
Or that he's thinking in PCM and not in ATRAC. In a later post he implied
that he thought an MD stored 650 Mb of uncompressed audio (ergo his calcu-
lation that one MD could hold ten hours of 128-
"David W. Tamkin" wrote:
How do you figure that? 128-kbps MP3's take almost a meg per minute,
David, the problem is that Bruce is thinking in megs and computer files not
PCM. If the MD could store MP3 files and then further compress them through
ATRAC he would get the length of music that he t
Bruce explained,
| ... my CD-R doesn't handle 80 minute CD-Rs ...
That's unusual AFAIK. Are you sure it's your CDR hardware and not just your
burning software? In either case, nothing comparable applies to MD units:
they all handle 80-minute discs.
| If and when there is a mini-disk player t
http://www.pcpursuits.com/
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of David W. Tamkin
> Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2000 9:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: MD: "jumping to" eighty-minute discs
>
>
Bruce wrote,
| I am happy with 74 minute mini-disks but am curious as to what if anything
| out there is going on to dramatically increase playing time (hence the
| reason behind asking questions 1 and 5 earlier). I am familiar with the 80
| minute mini-disks but not overly excited about jumping