las <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I have an Aiwa AM-F70
>
> You are correct I used the wrong model number. And I used to be a hard ass for
> details, correcting every one who said Sony MZ-R1 instead of M-Z1. I guess I'm
> getting mellow in my old age.
Um, that
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Stuart Howlette wrote:
>
> I myself see three effects that this NetMD is going to cause.
>
> 1) Current users of MiniDisc will praise the speed of transfer.
Agreed. This is pretty much what I've been waiting for, and why I
didn't buy one of the new mdlp units to replace my
Stuart Howlette wrote,
| 2) New users will buy these as (from what I can see) the media is cheaper,
| unless they need new types of discs, but then it'll be a different format
| altogether
The announcement said that tracks written under NetMD will be playable in
older equipment, so we won't nee
> What we people need to do is not campaign for more files, but campaign
> for less compression
I agree totally. Bitwise reduction, not to say compression, was what made me
hesitate for several years before adopting the MD technology, and I know
many people for whom this is still a real obstacle
I myself see three effects that this NetMD is going to cause.
1) Current users of MiniDisc will praise the speed of transfer.
2) New users will buy these as (from what I can see) the media is cheaper,
unless they need new types of discs, but then it'll be a different format
altogether
3) Both
yes it will be compatible w/ ATRAC3
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 09:09:39PM -0400, las wrote:
> the 900 with a ATRAC3 (allowing LP) is not as great as the difference between
> the 900 and the new gear assuming that it will also be able to record in the
> "standard" ATRAC3 MDLP mode.
>
--
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001 20:35:55 -0500 (CDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have an Aiwa AM-F70 that read and rewrote a TOC that my MDS-JE520
trashed
> (that was the one and only thing that every has gone wrong with my 520),
res-
> cuing the disc, which has had no more problems to this day (not ev
Larry wrote,
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| > I have an Aiwa AM-F70
|
| You are correct I used the wrong model number.
That wasn't intended as a correction, and I'm sorry if it sounded that way.
When you called yours an F70 you were clear enough, and more often than not
I don't use the full len
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have an Aiwa AM-F70
You are correct I used the wrong model number. And I used to be a hard ass for
details, correcting every one who said Sony MZ-R1 instead of M-Z1. I guess I'm
getting mellow in my old age.
Lawrence
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> When I wrote, in light of the news about NetMD,
>
> T> Maybe I should pack up my new R900 and return it to save money for a NetMD
> T> machine. [But I can't return it now, so I g]uess I'll just have to enjoy
> T> the R900 until NetMD hardware becomes available.
>
> La
When I wrote, in light of the news about NetMD,
T> Maybe I should pack up my new R900 and return it to save money for a NetMD
T> machine. [But I can't return it now, so I g]uess I'll just have to enjoy
T> the R900 until NetMD hardware becomes available.
Larry answered,
S> Dave,
and we're off
"David W. Tamkin" wrote:
> Maybe I should pack up my new R900 and return it to save money for a NetMD
> machine.
>
> Oh no, can't: I sent in the coupon for the arm-band case just yesterday and
> can't return a whole package now. Guess I'll just have to enjoy the R900
> until NetMD hardware beco
12 matches
Mail list logo
