===
= NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please =
= be more selective when quoting text =
===
On Wed, 22 Mar 2000 09:39:58 +0100 Ralph Smeets
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Sony's gotta figure something out, in fact, I know they will.
>
> MD is only one of a few products that are backward compatable. A few that
> come to mind are"
>
> casette tapes - any compact casette player will play a compact casette
> unless it's digital or a dif
> I think it's a good idea, and I would be interested in seeing an MD
> Data2 (650MB) based audio MD portable. I think it would be great for
> MDs to hold 4 times as much audio (~5h20m of 292kbps ATRAC, or ~21h
> of
> 66kbps ATRAC3). However, there are a few issues that complicate
> Sony's
> de
===
= NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please =
= be more selective when quoting text =
===
Dear Magic,
Thanks for your prompt and knowled
From: Dr. Wailun Kwok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: MD-List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2000 12:50 PM
Subject: MD: MD's future
>
> Dear all,
>
> I have read a lot of messages regarding MD, MP3,..., etc. I have also read
> some long discussion about MD's future not too long ago. I have
>Personally i
>think that if they wanted to really push it, the next time they
know they
>are going to have an album release, they should only release it on
MD for
>the first 6 or so months, that would definately push a lot of
people into
>the MD scene that
Simon Barnes wrote:
> Probably someone high up in the
> company dreamed up the idea of "End Search". Would they sell more units if
> they changed it ? NO. Would someone loose face if they did ? YES.
>
> I wonder what it must be like for a person working at Sony to see the
> company getting slagg
> James Jarvie wrote:
>
> Now we all seem to agree on two
> additional points (other than wanting the format to
> survive and prosper), those being: 1) Sony is an
> arrogant and short-sighted company and 2) Sony's
> marketing leaves much to be desired.
>
I demur on (1). I don't know if Sony i
From: Eric Woudenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2000 8:30 PM
Subject: MD: MD's Future
> Anyway, why not address the problem constructively: what changes does
> Sony need to make?
As if we didn't already know the answer to that one
GET RID OF T
===
= NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please =
= be more selective when quoting text =
===
If they do or do not read this mailing list, i
10 matches
Mail list logo
