On Jan 28, 2014 11:03 PM, Dieselhead 126die...@gmail.com wrote:
Last 10 elections I've voted in I wished most strongly for a choice at
the
ballot that said NONE OF THE ABOVE .. if none of the above got the
most
votes, they could never run for or hold public office again in their
lifetimes..
With all respect for your opinion, I still believe we need to vote them
off the island to take a reality show phrase.
We have a potential candidate pool of some 312,000,000 citizens to choose
from, why mess around. Part of the problem presently is that we the people
have gone soft and allowed the
With all respect for your opinion, I still believe we need to vote them
off the island to take a reality show phrase.
We have a potential candidate pool of some 312,000,000 citizens to choose
from, why mess around. Part of the problem presently is that we the people
have gone soft and allowed
Grant wrote:
Part of the problem presently is that we the people
have gone soft and allowed the people we voted in to represent our interest
to operate without being held responsible.
Partially true.
Don't forget to factor in the realty of the dumbing down of 312M
people, of which, probably
There seems to be a population size at which the law of diminishing
returns slowly reduces the efficiency and viability of a population as
the population exceeds a certain size.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diminishing_returns
Populations that exceed that size due to uncontrolled immigration
I don't think Marie had distain for people, remember she didn't say let them
eat cake she in fact said brioche which is a kind of sweet bread quite
different than cake.
She wasn't disdainful she was out of touch, she'd never been hungry and never
had to work. She had no clue there were people
cake was the burnt crumbs that stick to the pan after baking bread,
usually tossed out or to the pigs, or serfs or peasants or whatever the
freenchies called them.
--R
On 1/29/14 6:24 PM, Curt Raymond wrote:
I don't think Marie had distain for people, remember she didn't say let them eat
I don't think Marie had distain for people, remember she didn't say
let them eat cake she in fact said brioche which is a kind of
sweet bread quite different than cake.
She wasn't disdainful she was out of touch, she'd never been hungry
and never had to work. She had no clue there were people
Dieselhead wrote:
Except I'd argue that both are aware that there are people who don't know
where the next meal will come from, but only want to use them for their own
political advantage.
That seems to be the gig.
Imagine you are there - you don't know where the next meal will come
from. Are
'll add another line in the suggested chapter since we don't like war
and bloodshed.
How about no health care for people older than 65. The challenge is
to live to age 65 in such a way that you have no health issues. Lose
the boomers, more jobs for the unemployed youth that have education
debt,
Grant wrote:
Individual choice, or states choice, who owns the individual, that
individuals life and work effort? It is a question debated in each
generation, isn't it? Why?
Why? - because we all want more, not less.
Shall we start the less-for-me political party?
Does anyone want to join?
Last 10 elections I've voted in I wished most strongly for a choice at the
ballot that said NONE OF THE ABOVE .. if none of the above got the most
votes, they could never run for or hold public office again in their
lifetimes..
Wouldn't that be good?
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Mountain
Grant wrote:
Wouldn't that be good?
That ballot initiative has my yes vote.
But it ain't gonna happen.
mao
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
I've been espousing the idea for awhile. I have 2 steps though.
If a plurality of people vote for none of the above we just run the election
again but none of the previous candidates can run again since they obviously
were unwanted.
If 3/4 of people vote none of the above we run the election
Last 10 elections I've voted in I wished most strongly for a choice at the
ballot that said NONE OF THE ABOVE .. if none of the above got the most
votes, they could never run for or hold public office again in their
lifetimes..
Wouldn't that be good?
Hear HEAR!
Sign me up!
Many times I write
Latest polling suggests you are losing the grey vote
Hendrik
who still has a fair way to to until 65
On 28/01/14 13:26, Mountain Man wrote:
HF wrote:
Hmmnh, sounds familiar.
Obviously you'll need wars for all these heroes to shed blood in, perhaps
set them on the non citizens?
Perhaps for
16 matches
Mail list logo
