Dieselhead wrote:
> Except I'd argue that both are aware that there are people who don't know
> where the next meal will come from, but only want to use them for their own
> political advantage.
That seems to be the gig.
Imagine you are there - you don't know where the next meal will come
from. A
I don't think Marie had distain for people, remember she didn't say
"let them eat cake" she in fact said brioche which is a kind of
sweet bread quite different than cake.
She wasn't disdainful she was out of touch, she'd never been hungry
and never had to work. She had no clue there were peopl
27;m not entirely sure it was her fault as much as the advisors that pretty much
ran her world...
-Curt
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 10:19:12 -0600
From: Dieselhead <126die...@gmail.com>
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] 85 people own half the worlds wealth and 99% of the
old
rk. She had no clue there were people who didn't have enough to eat.
I'm not entirely sure it was her fault as much as the advisors that pretty much
ran her world...
-Curt
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 10:19:12 -0600
From: Dieselhead <126die...@gmail.com>
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Su
There seems to be a population size at which the "law of diminishing
returns" slowly reduces the efficiency and viability of a population as
the population exceeds a certain size.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diminishing_returns
Populations that exceed that size due to uncontrolled immigration
Grant wrote:
> Part of the problem presently is that we the people
> have gone soft and allowed the people we voted in to represent our interest
> to operate without being held responsible.
Partially true.
Don't forget to factor in the realty of the dumbing down of 312M
people, of which, probably
With all respect for your opinion, I still believe we need to "vote them
off the island" to take a reality show phrase.
We have a potential candidate pool of some 312,000,000 citizens to choose
from, why mess around. Part of the problem presently is that we the people
have gone soft and allowed t
With all respect for your opinion, I still believe we need to "vote them
off the island" to take a reality show phrase.
We have a potential candidate pool of some 312,000,000 citizens to choose
from, why mess around. Part of the problem presently is that we the people
have gone soft and allowed th
On Jan 28, 2014 11:03 PM, "Dieselhead" <126die...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Last 10 elections I've voted in I wished most strongly for a choice at
the
>> ballot that said "NONE OF THE ABOVE" .. if "none of the above" got the
most
>> votes, they could never run for or hold public office again in their
Last 10 elections I've voted in I wished most strongly for a choice at the
ballot that said "NONE OF THE ABOVE" .. if "none of the above" got the most
votes, they could never run for or hold public office again in their
lifetimes..
Wouldn't that be good?
Hear HEAR!
Sign me up!
Many times I wr
t
Subject: Re: [MBZ] 85 people own half the worlds wealth and 99% of the
old citizens
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Last 10 elections I've voted in I wished most strongly for a choice at the
ballot that said "NONE OF THE ABOVE" .. if "n
Grant wrote:
> Wouldn't that be good?
That ballot initiative has my yes vote.
But it ain't gonna happen.
mao
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okie
Last 10 elections I've voted in I wished most strongly for a choice at the
ballot that said "NONE OF THE ABOVE" .. if "none of the above" got the most
votes, they could never run for or hold public office again in their
lifetimes..
Wouldn't that be good?
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Mountain
Grant wrote:
> Individual choice, or states choice, who owns the individual, that
> individuals life and work effort? It is a question debated in each
> generation, isn't it? Why?
Why? - because we all want more, not less.
Shall we start the less-for-me political party?
Does anyone want to join?
<'ll add another line in the suggested chapter since we don't like war
and bloodshed.
How about no health care for people older than 65. The challenge is
to live to age 65 in such a way that you have no health issues. Lose
the boomers, more jobs for the unemployed youth that have education
de
Latest polling suggests you are losing the grey vote
Hendrik
who still has a fair way to to until 65
On 28/01/14 13:26, Mountain Man wrote:
H&F wrote:
Hmmnh, sounds familiar.
Obviously you'll need wars for all these heroes to shed blood in, perhaps
set them on the non citizens?
Perhaps for
16 matches
Mail list logo
