Re: [MBZ] '87 300D head job update

2008-08-29 Thread Luther
I used a 6mm 1/4hex drive bit and a u-joint. Luther OK Don wrote: It's more the principle of the matter - that the enginelooks complete now, after being apart all summer. If you're referring to the lower manifold to head bolts, I solved that one years ago on the SDL - use a 1/4 socket set,

Re: [MBZ] '87 300D head job update

2008-08-29 Thread Loren Faeth
My HF compression tester had a fitting for OM 60x injector At 08:22 PM 8/27/2008, you wrote: Well, crap - I was planning to use my Harbor Freight compression tester in the injector holes - some of those glow plug holes are near to impossible to get that fitting into with the intake

Re: [MBZ] '87 300D head job update

2008-08-29 Thread Loren Faeth
For the 603 intake bolts, I bought a smap-on long 6mm all en socket balldriver. Allows the allen to go in the bolt at an angle. Works great! I have not broken the ball off yet. At 09:15 AM 8/28/2008, you wrote: OK Don wrote: (We JUST got the intake manifold back on - it almost hurts my son

Re: [MBZ] '87 300D head job update

2008-08-28 Thread John Robbins
OK Don wrote: (We JUST got the intake manifold back on - it almost hurts my son to think about taking it off again.) If you make the right tool it is a walk in the park. On my 2.5T I couldn't remove the manifold at all without it. When I replaced the delivery valves a month or so ago, I

Re: [MBZ] '87 300D head job update

2008-08-28 Thread Mitch Haley
John Robbins wrote: If you want pics of the tool I made let me know, and I'll post them to the list. Tools are good. Let's see what you made. Seems like for glow plugs Marshall recommended the Snap-On socket with built in ball joint swivel. Mitch. ___

Re: [MBZ] '87 300D head job update

2008-08-28 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
yea, post them John Robbins wrote: OK Don wrote: (We JUST got the intake manifold back on - it almost hurts my son to think about taking it off again.) If you make the right tool it is a walk in the park. On my 2.5T I couldn't remove the manifold at all without it. When I replaced the

Re: [MBZ] '87 300D head job update

2008-08-28 Thread OK Don
It's more the principle of the matter - that the enginelooks complete now, after being apart all summer. If you're referring to the lower manifold to head bolts, I solved that one years ago on the SDL - use a 1/4 socket set, cut a 6mm Allen wrench to get a piece to make a bit that fits in the 6mm

Re: [MBZ] '87 300D head job update

2008-08-28 Thread Jim Cathey
If you're referring to the lower manifold to head bolts, I solved that one years ago on the SDL - use a 1/4 socket set That was the secret to getting the carbs out of my Merc 850. That little socket and skinny shaft just slipped right in there. I outfitted the boat toolkit with 1/4 sockets in

Re: [MBZ] '87 300D head job update

2008-08-27 Thread Luther
A matched set of 617 cost my dad $250. I can get a quote or give you the number if you like. Luther Kaleb C. Striplin wrote: Luther has a bosch guy who rebuilds pumps good, I assume he does injectors also. Which reminds me, I spent all that money rebuilding the IP on my 2.5 turbo and

Re: [MBZ] '87 300D head job update

2008-08-27 Thread Tom Hargrave
To: Mercedes Discussion List Subject: Re: [MBZ] '87 300D head job update A matched set of 617 cost my dad $250. I can get a quote or give you the number if you like. Luther Kaleb C. Striplin wrote: Luther has a bosch guy who rebuilds pumps good, I assume he does injectors also. Which reminds me, I

Re: [MBZ] '87 300D head job update

2008-08-27 Thread OK Don
Well, crap - I was planning to use my Harbor Freight compression tester in the injector holes - some of those glow plug holes are near to impossible to get that fitting into with the intake manifold on. On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:53 PM, Kaleb C. Striplin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just know my

Re: [MBZ] '87 300D head job update

2008-08-27 Thread OK Don
Yes - I'd like a quote to test, and repair if neccesary, 6 injectors for 603.95 engine On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A matched set of 617 cost my dad $250. I can get a quote or give you the number if you like. Luther -- OK Don, KD5NRO Norman, OK There

Re: [MBZ] '87 300D head job update

2008-08-27 Thread Luther
http://www.arkansasfuelinjection.com/ Ask for Scott. As for shipping, you can save shipping at least one way Luther OK Don wrote: Yes - I'd like a quote to test, and repair if neccesary, 6 injectors for 603.95 engine On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [MBZ] '87 300D head job update

2008-08-27 Thread Luther
Dad says to ship them to us and we'll bring them back next week... Luther wrote: http://www.arkansasfuelinjection.com/ Ask for Scott. As for shipping, you can save shipping at least one way Luther OK Don wrote: Yes - I'd like a quote to test, and repair if neccesary, 6 injectors

Re: [MBZ] '87 300D head job update

2008-08-27 Thread Jim Cathey
Well, crap - I was planning to use my Harbor Freight compression tester in the injector holes - some of those glow plug holes are near to impossible to get that fitting into with the intake manifold on. The kit's full of fittings, you saying there isn't one for those injectors? (The intake

Re: [MBZ] '87 300D head job update

2008-08-27 Thread OK Don
I need to get a spare injector for these engines - too many unanswered questions here. (We JUST got the intake manifold back on - it almost hurts my son to think about taking it off again.) The kit's full of fittings, you saying there isn't one for those injectors? (The intake manifold doesn't

Re: [MBZ] '87 300D head job update

2008-08-27 Thread OK Don
We'll call them and see what they say --- On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:06 PM, Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dad says to ship them to us and we'll bring them back next week... Luther wrote: http://www.arkansasfuelinjection.com/ Ask for Scott. As for shipping, you can save shipping at least

Re: [MBZ] '87 300D head job update

2008-08-26 Thread OK Don
I wonder how injectors from a 617 NA or 616 engine would run in the 603? I have a few of those that I could easily swap for a test --- I also remember that the heat shields/seals below the injectors were burnt and deformed in two of the cyl. when we disassembled the engine - probably another sign

Re: [MBZ] '87 300D head job update

2008-08-26 Thread John Robbins
OK Don wrote: I wonder how injectors from a 617 NA or 616 engine would run in the 603? I have a few of those that I could easily swap for a test --- They'll fit, but have different pop pressures and a different pintle design. They would work great for testing, but you'll get better

Re: [MBZ] '87 300D head job update

2008-08-26 Thread Peter Frederick
Could also be a sign of excessive oil ingestion. Which were they, do you remember? You should probably pull all six injectors and have an injection shop check them. A bad nozzle (squirts instead of spraying fog, for instance) will cause excessive knock, white smoke, and poor fuel economy.

Re: [MBZ] '87 300D head job update

2008-08-26 Thread OK Don
#1 is burnt - the center ring is about to fall off. #3 is heavily carboned - on both sides. #6 is pancaked - towards turning in-side out. The others all look good. #2 for certain is missing, 1 and 3 are to a lesser extent. The search for an new injector re-builder is on (my old one died a few

Re: [MBZ] '87 300D head job update

2008-08-26 Thread OK Don
The insides of the per-chambers all looked OK. The older injector swap would be only for diagnostic purposes, though I'm still not sure if they are significantly different how much they'll tell us. On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 8:21 AM, John Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK Don wrote: I wonder

Re: [MBZ] '87 300D head job update

2008-08-26 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
Luther has a bosch guy who rebuilds pumps good, I assume he does injectors also. Which reminds me, I spent all that money rebuilding the IP on my 2.5 turbo and now you have it. Great. OK Don wrote: #1 is burnt - the center ring is about to fall off. #3 is heavily carboned - on both sides.

Re: [MBZ] '87 300D head job update

2008-08-26 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
It wont work, the threads are different, they will not thread into the holes IIRC. OK Don wrote: The insides of the per-chambers all looked OK. The older injector swap would be only for diagnostic purposes, though I'm still not sure if they are significantly different how much they'll tell

Re: [MBZ] '87 300D head job update

2008-08-26 Thread OK Don
Why do you think I bought it? It gets great mileage also :-) The tires were coming apart - the ride/handling is great with the new Kuhmos. Which reminds me, I spent all that money rebuilding the IP on my 2.5 turbo and now you have it. Great. -- OK Don, KD5NRO Norman, OK There are three

Re: [MBZ] '87 300D head job update

2008-08-26 Thread OK Don
I think the injectors in the 602, post 1990, are shorter than the '87 603 injectors. Would they likely fit otherwise? On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Kaleb C. Striplin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It wont work, the threads are different, they will not thread into the holes IIRC. -- OK Don,

Re: [MBZ] '87 300D head job update

2008-08-26 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
I just know my compression tester fitting for 617 via injector hole will not work on 60x injectors, have to use glow plug hole. SO I assume the threads are different OK Don wrote: I think the injectors in the 602, post 1990, are shorter than the '87 603 injectors. Would they likely fit

Re: [MBZ] '87 300D head job update

2008-08-25 Thread Peter Frederick
Yes, but you won't mistake the lifter clank for anything else! Peter On Aug 24, 2008, at 10:14 PM, OK Don wrote: I figured a compression test was among the next steps. We've never had coolant pressure problems - still don't. Good catch - we'll swap #2 injector with another one and see if

Re: [MBZ] '87 300D head job update

2008-08-25 Thread OK Don
Don;t think it would stop smoking and sound good after it was hot. On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 10:43 PM, Kaleb C. Striplin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you sure its not the bottom end? -- OK Don, KD5NRO Norman, OK There are three kinds of lies: lies, damn lies, and statistics. -Benjamin Disraeli,

Re: [MBZ] '87 300D head job update

2008-08-25 Thread OK Don
Probably true --- On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Peter Frederick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, but you won't mistake the lifter clank for anything else! Peter On Aug 24, 2008, at 10:14 PM, OK Don wrote: I figured a compression test was among the next steps. We've never had coolant

Re: [MBZ] '87 300D head job update

2008-08-24 Thread Peter Frederick
Did you do a compression test? Low compression will give you white smoke at idle and cold, black under load. You should also have the injectors checked, a bad one will do the same thing. Quick and dirty check is to swap #2 with another one -- if the problem follows the injector, it's bad.

Re: [MBZ] '87 300D head job update

2008-08-24 Thread OK Don
I figured a compression test was among the next steps. We've never had coolant pressure problems - still don't. Good catch - we'll swap #2 injector with another one and see if the missing follows it. Would a sticky/faulty cam follower do the same thing? On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Peter

Re: [MBZ] '87 300D head job update

2008-08-24 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
you sure its not the bottom end? OK Don wrote: This is the car that my son bought from a friend of ours, who got it from Kaleb. It was idling rough, and blowing whitish smoke before it got up to temp. Among other things, we found low compression in cylinder 1. Pulled the head (a #17), saw the