com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>
> ___
> Mikrotik mailing list
> Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
> ___
> Mikrotik mailing list
> Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20081022/c865fe7f/attachment.html
I never thought about using two wds links on the same dish.
I wonder how much you would gain in this configuration over dual nstreme?
As the nstreme requires quite a bit of horsepower once you start pushing a lot
of traffic through the link.
-Keith-
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Ne
With OSPF you can use equal cost, and it will quasi load balance. For the
extra boost you mention, you can put an additional cost to force each side
to upload on a certain link. This would allow you to force it to something
similar to the full duplex nature of Nstreme Dual, but keep the redundanc
In their application it can be done in either one or two board applications.
I use nstreme dual for extra bandwidth. As was warned before it lacks
redundancy - in fact it is like Raid 0, striping. I like it for the
little boost but despise it's problem magnetism. If either one of 4
cards have a
Two separate boards. Right now we have an x86 Mikrotik router on both ends,
one of the links is using RB532's and the other is actually a Redline. This
is a 24 mile link and we are needing more capacity. At the moment with the
limited tower space we're going to be installing some dual polarity
f
All on one board, or using two separate boards?
Kevin Neal wrote:
We've been using equal cost OSPF routes, there's no redundancy with Nstreme
Dual.
-Kevin Neal
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Randy Cosby
Sent: Wednesday, October 22,
We've been using equal cost OSPF routes, there's no redundancy with Nstreme
Dual.
-Kevin Neal
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Randy Cosby
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 4:29 PM
To: MikroTik@mail.butchevans.com
Subject: [Mikrotik] nstr
Anyone using this successfully in 5.x frequencies? What boards, cards,
antennas, etc?
--
Randy Cosby
Vice President
InfoWest, Inc
office: 435-773-6071
__
Mikrotik mailing list
Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
___
Mikrotik mailing list
Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
-- next part --
An HTML a
;>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ___
>> Mikrotik mailing list
>> Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>>
>>
>
> ___
> Mikrotik mailing list
> Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20081022/f4f827d7/attachment.html
The big difference for me is I have never heard of Tranzeo removing
threads from forums or changing wiki pages when there is a problem. It
seem to me that Damien and staff roll their sleeves up and take care of
the problem.
On the other hand I know of a couple of threads that have vanished an
We go with whomever solves the problem fastest and with the least
hassle. That's the company to go with in our book.
Robert
D. Ryan Spott wrote:
I mentioned that. While it might not be correct when it comes to karma,
it is correct when you have a board and shareholders to contend with.
_I_
StarOS's refusal to work with MT in the 5 an 10mhz channel sizes is what
caused me to drop StarOS. If I see one of my suppliers playing the
proprietary game in an area that has been non-proprietary i.e. ubiquiti
works with all... I will drop them. Proprietary hurts my business in
the long
I mentioned that. While it might not be correct when it comes to karma,
it is correct when you have a board and shareholders to contend with.
_I_ have a fiduciary responsibility to my investors and my customers but
(and I think Tranzeo did this):
"If we do the right thing all the time, the nu
Throwing in my 2 cents:
Someone mentioned something about one of the parties having a fiduciary
duty to not help a competitor. That attitude, which I hope is not
prevailing in this and future instances, will only end up hurting both
parties.
An eye for eye only ends up making the whole wor
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Josh Luthman wrote:
That letter makes me sick. I still stand by Tranzeo on this issue
as I believe they did the right thing.
The truth of the matter is that it doesn't matter who, exactly, was
at fault. It is clear from some of my customers that the problem is
not just
y line issues...
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>
>> -- next part --
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> http://www.butchev
s.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20081022/006c181f/attachment.html
___
Mikrotik mailing list
Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
they've solved their
supply line issues...
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20081022/006c181f/attachment.html
p://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuiper_belt>.)
> >> Even I said it was not an issue and "hey they just disconnect a few
> >> times a day.. who cares!" (whoops! talk to my P** off customers!)
> >> Even Marlon the strange wizard from the far side of the mountain
om
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20081022/766e98de/attachment.html
___
Mikrotik mailing list
Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
http:
-
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
>
> WISPA Wireless List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20081022/d4781105/attachment.html
ntelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20081022/766e98de/attachment.html
___
Mikrotik m
rmail/mikrotik/attachments/20081022/766e98de/attachment.html
24 matches
Mail list logo
