Re: [Mimedefang] mimedefang fails to start upon reboot

2009-11-10 Thread jef moskot
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009, jef moskot wrote: The problem leaves this evidence in /var/log/maillog Nov 7 23:45:30 phantom mimedefang-multiplexor[936]: Starting slave 1 (pid 1238) (1 running): Bringing slaves up to minSlaves (2) Nov 7 23:45:30 phantom mimedefang-multiplexor[936]: Slave 1 stderr: Out

Re: [Mimedefang] mimedefang fails to start upon reboot

2009-11-10 Thread Paul Murphy
Jef, > Nov 7 23:45:30 phantom mimedefang-multiplexor[936]: Starting slave 1 (pid > 1238) (1 running): Bringing slaves up to minSlaves (2) > Nov 7 23:45:30 phantom mimedefang-multiplexor[936]: Slave 1 stderr: Out of > memory during request for 4088 bytes, total sbrk() is 9553920 bytes! > Nov

[Mimedefang] Email in Korean language becomes clutterd and unreadable when received.

2009-11-10 Thread Aniruddha Barua
Hi, One Korean buyer was visiting a Garments factory in Chittagong, BANGLADESH. He sent an email in Korean Language to his office in Seoul using our SMTP server running MIMEDefang 2.67 + sendmail + clamav. The email successfully reaches the destination mailbox but when the recipient opens the me

[Mimedefang] mimedefang+postfix on debian lenny

2009-11-10 Thread ADNET Ghislain
hi, I have a silly question. As i try to install mimedefang and postfix on debian it seems debian want to install sendmail and remove postfix as soon as i say the 'mimedefang' word. Is there any way to make this work or are we doomed to sendmail on debian ? The following NEW packages will

Re: [Mimedefang] mimedefang+postfix on debian lenny

2009-11-10 Thread ADNET Ghislain
ok i think i got it working by: - installing mimedefang - stopping sendmail - purging sendmail - installing postfix again strange, resintalling postfix does not remove sendmail completly.. anyway it seems to work that way -- Cordialement, Ghislain smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptog

[Mimedefang] new install

2009-11-10 Thread dhottinger
Ive installed mimedefang sucessfully. Its installed on a redhat dist. I copied the redhat init script to /etc/init.d and tried to get it to start. I get an error message that says: Starting mimedefang-multiplexor: ERROR: You must not run mimedefang-multiplexor as root. Use the -U option t

Re: [Mimedefang] mimedefang+postfix on debian lenny

2009-11-10 Thread David F. Skoll
ADNET Ghislain wrote: > strange, resintalling postfix does not remove sendmail completly.. > anyway it seems to work that way Please file a bug with the Debian mimedefang maintainer. Installing MIMEDefang should never force the removal of Postfix. Regards, David. __

Re: [Mimedefang] Email in Korean language becomes clutterd and unreadable when received.

2009-11-10 Thread Andrzej Adam Filip
Aniruddha Barua wrote: > One Korean buyer was visiting a Garments factory in Chittagong, > BANGLADESH. He sent an email in Korean Language to his office in Seoul > using our SMTP server running MIMEDefang 2.67 + sendmail + clamav. The > email successfully > reaches the destination mailbox but when

Re: [Mimedefang] mimedefang+postfix on debian lenny

2009-11-10 Thread Andrzej Adam Filip
"David F. Skoll" wrote: > ADNET Ghislain wrote: > >> strange, resintalling postfix does not remove sendmail completly.. >> anyway it seems to work that way > > Please file a bug with the Debian mimedefang maintainer. Installing > MIMEDefang should never force the removal of Postfix. Accordin

Re: [Mimedefang] mimedefang+postfix on debian lenny

2009-11-10 Thread David F. Skoll
Andrzej Adam Filip wrote: > According to Debian site mimedefang package for stable (lenny) sendmail > at "recommends" list: > http://packages.debian.org/lenny/mimedefang I think that's a bug. It should be "suggests", because AFAIK apt-get now pulls in "recommends" packages unless you tell it o

Re: [Mimedefang] mimedefang+postfix on debian lenny

2009-11-10 Thread Richard Laager
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 13:00 -0500, David F. Skoll wrote: > ADNET Ghislain wrote: > > > strange, resintalling postfix does not remove sendmail completly.. > > anyway it seems to work that way > > Please file a bug with the Debian mimedefang maintainer. Installing > MIMEDefang should never for

Re: [Mimedefang] mimedefang+postfix on debian lenny

2009-11-10 Thread David F. Skoll
Richard Laager wrote: > The "mimedefang" package [1] in Debian, regardless of which version of > Debian you're running, doesn't depend on "sendmail", it only recommends > it. Thus, you should be able to have it installed without sendmail. Except, AFAIK, Debian is moving towards automatically inst

Re: [Mimedefang] mimedefang+postfix on debian lenny

2009-11-10 Thread Richard Laager
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 13:35 -0500, David F. Skoll wrote: > I think that's a bug. It should be "suggests", because AFAIK apt-get > now pulls in "recommends" packages unless you tell it otherwise. As an aside, I was never a fan of this change, as it seems to lead to exactly this. > There are at le

Re: [Mimedefang] mimedefang+postfix on debian lenny

2009-11-10 Thread David F. Skoll
Richard Laager wrote: > What's the other use? I mentioned it in another post: You might want a standalone scanner that communicates with your MTAs via TCP. I don't really like that arrangement, but I'm pretty sure there are real-life MIMEDefang deployments that work that way. Regards, David. _

Re: [Mimedefang] mimedefang+postfix on debian lenny

2009-11-10 Thread Leonard Mills
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009, David F. Skoll wrote: > Richard Laager wrote: > > > What's the other use? > > I mentioned it in another post: You might want a standalone scanner > that communicates with your MTAs via TCP. I don't really like that > arrangement, but I'm pretty sure there are real-life MIME

Re: [Mimedefang] mimedefang+postfix on debian lenny

2009-11-10 Thread ADNET Ghislain
David F. Skoll a écrit : ADNET Ghislain wrote: strange, resintalling postfix does not remove sendmail completly.. anyway it seems to work that way Please file a bug with the Debian mimedefang maintainer. Installing MIMEDefang should never force the removal of Postfix. i will

Re: [Mimedefang] mimedefang+postfix on debian lenny

2009-11-10 Thread Andrzej Adam Filip
ADNET Ghislain wrote: > David F. Skoll a écrit : >> ADNET Ghislain wrote: >> >> >>> strange, resintalling postfix does not remove sendmail completly.. >>> anyway it seems to work that way >>> >> >> Please file a bug with the Debian mimedefang maintainer. Installing >> MIMEDefang shoul

Re: [Mimedefang] mimedefang+postfix on debian lenny

2009-11-10 Thread Richard Laager
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 22:30 +0100, ADNET Ghislain wrote: > i will try to contact him. I run also in another issue. Postfix runs as > the user posfix and i do not found any way to configure mimedefang to > have a socket that let the postfix user to communicate with it. Is > there any parameters

Re: [Mimedefang] new install

2009-11-10 Thread Aniruddha Barua
You also need to copy the file "redhat/mimedefang-sysconfig" from mimedefang source directory to "/etc/sysconfig/mimedefang" file. Then restart mimedefang service. --Aniruddha Barua. - Original Message From: "dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us" To: "mimedefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com

[Mimedefang] quota alert

2009-11-10 Thread Cliff Hayes
Hello, I programmed mimedefang to send a reject to the sender if user's mailbox is full. I'd also like to send a one-line email to the receiver notifying him/her that messages are being rejected due to full box. That way the user knows why they are suddenly not receiving email and can fix the iss

[Mimedefang] FW: quota alert

2009-11-10 Thread Cliff Hayes
ok, I tried that ... bad idea. Then I tried this in filter_end ... and it ignored the "replace_entire_message" and simply delivered the message as-is: action_notify_sender("The mailbox for $userName is full. Subject: $afoMsgSubject \n"); $entity = "From: Support\nSubject: Your mailbox

[Mimedefang] FW: quota alert

2009-11-10 Thread Cliff Hayes
Got it! Works like a charm! I missed the bit about using Mime::Tools to build the entity. For anyone who wants to build a quota system and notify both the sender and receiver, it's easy... just get a size from the entity and compare it against a hard-coded limit. Then you reject if it's too big