man vertibrae (5)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 August 2005 01:25 AM
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: back and neck pain
>
>
> A friend told me about you- i have a' spondie'-l4-l5, that
> surgey helped a
> little, and 10 mos. lat
> AFAIK, and I've been known to be wrong, those other OSes have rate
> converters in the drivers, but OBSD leaves this to userland.
I think you are right.
http://cvs.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-wrapper?full=yes&numbers=4249
Regards
Edd
Adam wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 15:01:12 +1000 Graeme Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I think I was talking about the disk buffer, not the shared buffer.
You said it "uses the os disk buffer" and doesn't maintain its own.
its own disk buffer
Everything that reads data from the fil
No, unfortunately I didn't read the CAVEATS section.
I've read bug report (link sent by Edd Barrett) and I think there
should be an option to enable resampling in sound driver. Not all
aplications are capable of stream resampling.
Jernej
On 8/19/05, Jacob Meuser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I do believe that your assertion will become true in the future.
Right. Because we know from experience that software and hardware
is getting more reliable, less buggy and more secure over time.
//art
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 17:08:36 +1000 Graeme Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
This is very much off topic, but you seem to be misunderstanding me.
> The shared buffer is used by all the postmaster processes as a shared
> memory pool for selects/inserts/updates on the table space. The disk
> buffer
Hi,
I have two internet connections and would like to load balance outgoing
trafic between the two interfaces.
Using rules from the PF FAQ does not work for me (trafic is always
routed to the first interface).
The connections are both from the same provider, have a different
public IP address, b
Adam wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 17:08:36 +1000 Graeme Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
This is very much off topic, but you seem to be misunderstanding me.
The shared buffer is used by all the postmaster processes as a shared
memory pool for selects/inserts/updates on the table space. The d
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 14:38:02 -0400
Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:11:08 +0200 Ulrich Kahl
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have tried to configure an intel PRO/100 S nic (intel 82550) to
> > use 10baseT (works) and half-duplex (don't work).
> >
> > I
Hi.
I set up a firewall with openbsd and pf. i activated ftp-proxy in
inetd.conf as follows:
127.0.0.1:8021 stream tcp nowait root/usr/libexec/ftp-proxy
ftp-proxy
my pf-rules regarding the ftp-proxy are looking like this:
rdr pass on sis0 inet proto tcp from any to any port = ft
Why do not use 1 interface with 2 IP's and 1 nat rule with address pool for
balancing?
somthing like this:
nat on $ext_if inet from any to any -> {$ext_ip_1 $ext_ip_2} round-robin
- ?? ? -
??: "Remy Chibois" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
??:
?: ?, 19 ?? 2005 11:54
?
* Marc Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-19 12:29]:
> when i try to ftp everything is working fine. but when i try to connect
> to a host, which is running proftpd with TLS activated, ftp-proxy cuts
> off when TLS begins to work
ftp-proxy does not support TLS.
moreover, when you think about i
Have you run --makedat ?
2005/8/19, Blake Darche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/local/bin/ipcheck.py", line 5025, in ?
> _main(sys.argv)
> File "/usr/local/bin/ipcheck.py", line 4386, in _main
> (fileip, filehosts) = datfile.read()
> File "/usr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> A friend told me about you- i have a' spondie'-l4-l5, that
> surgey helped a
> little, and 10 mos. later my car fell off the jacks, breaking
> my back-burst
> fracture of t-12, and aggrivating the 'spondie'. I have a lot
> of pain and
> percocets have helped, ca
On 19/08/05, Jernej Vodopivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, unfortunately I didn't read the CAVEATS section.
>
> I've read bug report (link sent by Edd Barrett) and I think there
> should be an option to enable resampling in sound driver. Not all
> aplications are capable of stream resampling.
Hello OpenBSD fans,
I have problems with eap(4) driver. I have two CT5880
cards of different manufacturers placed in different computers. The
problem arises only with one sound
card.
The computer with this card, works fine:
eap0 at pci0 dev 10 function 0 "Ensoniq CT5880" rev 0x02: irq 5
ac97: co
Ok, first off sorry if this is old ground or posted to the wrong list.
I've come across something a bit odd and I'd like someone who actually
knows what he's doing, not me to shed some light on what's going on.
I'm trying to connect a Windows XP Sp2 (yes I know) box to a Win2k
Server using PPT
I'm trying to connect a Windows XP Sp2 (yes I know) box to a Win2k
Server using PPTP across two firewalls. i.e.
Logical layout
[Win XP] IP/1723 GRE(47) > [Firewall 1] - Internet
[Firewall 2]--> [Win2k PPTP endpoint]
Now for my first test Firewall 1 was a Linux 2.6.10 (ubunt
I forgot to mention that these are ADSL connections. The two modems are
physically attached to the firewall, on two separate NICs.
> Why do not use 1 interface with 2 IP's and 1 nat rule with address
> pool for balancing?
>
> somthing like this:
> nat on $ext_if inet from any to any -> {$ext_ip_
Sorry folks being stupid!
change:
nat on xl1 proto {tcp udp icmp} from 10.190.0.0/16 to any -> 11.11.0.1
to
nat on xl1 proto {tcp udp icmp gre} from 10.190.0.0/16 to any -> 11.11.0.1
of FW1 and
nat on ste0 proto {tcp udp icmp} from 12.12.0.2 to any -> 11.11.0.10
to
nat on ste0 proto {tcp u
Dave Wickberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just recently installed OpenBSD 3.7 (Release) on a Celeron 466 w/
> 256MB of RAM.
>
> I created a boot floppy and from there the install went flawlessly.
> However, after booting the systems for first time I am getting a
> kernel page fault error as soon as I t
Percussive Maintenance :-)
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Welty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 August 2005 01:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: back and neck pain
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > A friend told me about you- i have a' spondie'-
Hi all,
I'd like to know what are the necessary steps to run GNU/Linux binaries
under
OpenBSD, or where I could get a good paper about it. I also wanted to know
if
anyone here have successfully run OpenOffice using binary emulation under
OpenBSD.
Thanks.
--
Joco Salvatti
Undergraduating in Comp
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Siju George wrote:
> then you wont be able to preserve the permissions exactly.
>
If you do it as a tarball on that vfat filesystem, no problem.
--
Signing off,
Joseph C. Bender
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Does the government fear us? Or do we fear the government? When
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:21:00 -0300
Joco Salvatti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to know what are the necessary steps to run GNU/Linux binaries
> under
> OpenBSD, or where I could get a good paper about it.
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq9.html#Interact
and
http://www.openbsd.or
On 19/08/05, Joco Salvatti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to know what are the necessary steps to run GNU/Linux binaries
> under
> OpenBSD, or where I could get a good paper about it. I also wanted to know
> if
> anyone here have successfully run OpenOffice using binary emulatio
From: Joco Salvatti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I'd like to know what are the necessary steps to run
> GNU/Linux binaries
> under
> OpenBSD, or where I could get a good paper about it.
Manual pages are always a good place to start:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=compat_linux&sekt
> If you do it as a tarball on that vfat filesystem, no problem.
The disk will be in active use on the solaris workstation. A tarball
is not practical.
Regards
Edd
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:35:25 -0400 (EDT)
"Joseph C. Bender" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Siju George wrote:
>
> > then you wont be able to preserve the permissions exactly.
> >
> If you do it as a tarball on that vfat filesystem, no problem.
But how does Solaris handle
On Thursday 18 August 2005 06:57 pm, Edd Barrett wrote:
>
> See this is why I asked here, I know that FFS is close friends with
> UFS, but I wasnt sure. So you reckon I can use native solaris FS and
> mount in OBSD?
>
"close friends" <> compatible. Sun's current UFS was originally based on
Berke
Does TCF count as a valid reason to call out sick from work?
On Friday 19 August 2005 09:43 am, Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu wrote:
> Percussive Maintenance :-)
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Richard Welty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 19 August 2005 01:46 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PR
Is it possible to apply filtering rules to replies to translated
packets? It appears that replies to translated packets are allowed
through, without question. I have an OpenBSD router, from which I
forward a range of ephemeral ports to various LAN computers, and would
like to prevent RST segm
On 19/08/05, Timothy Donahue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "close friends" <> compatible. Sun's current UFS was originally based on
> Berkeley's FFS, but has been modified quite a bit in the last 20+ years.
>
Good job i checked!
> Rsync over ssh would work if you have a net connection between the
On 8/18/05, Edd Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I shall be transporting a hard disk between two sites for backup
> purposes. The backup shall be on a RAID-1 mirror in an openbsd server.
> The disk will primarily be used in a sun workstation running solaris.
As others have pointed out, use a t
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, J. Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:35:25 -0400 (EDT)
"Joseph C. Bender" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Siju George wrote:
then you wont be able to preserve the permissions exactly.
If you do it as a tarball on that vfat filesys
> As others have pointed out, use a tarball on a vfat filesystem. You might want
> to doublecheck the capabilities of the various tar utilties, and
> perhaps use gtar
> (GNU Tar) on both ends.
I dont have enough cash to buy another disk and I know there will not
be space on the disk to tar up. (I
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Rogier Krieger wrote:
On 8/15/05, Luiz Otavio Souza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why CARP not send packets with physical CARP interface address ?
(...)
Unless I'm badly mistaken, the reason CARP does not send the physical
interface's address in its packets is the same rea
On Friday 19 August 2005 12:00 pm, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > As others have pointed out, use a tarball on a vfat filesystem. You might
> > want to doublecheck the capabilities of the various tar utilties, and
> > perhaps use gtar
> > (GNU Tar) on both ends.
>
> I dont have enough cash to buy another d
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Adam wrote:
> Postgresql's shared buffer cache is used to cache data read from disk,
> so it is a disk cache maintained by on its own. I think postgresql
> stores and purges data in the shared buffer cache with an understanding
> of table/column access, so you should get more
> > See this is why I asked here, I know that FFS is close friends with
> > UFS, but I wasnt sure. So you reckon I can use native solaris FS and
> > mount in OBSD?
> >
>
> "close friends" <> compatible.
[snip][chop][whack]
You could 'fake' compatability by using NFS no?
--Bryan
Am Freitag, 19. August 2005 13:59 schrieben Sie:
> I agree .It seems the developers are not interested (fair enough, obsd
> wasnt designed for multimedia) . Read the reply.
>
> Yes some apps dont allow resampling. As I said mplayer is very good
> for this, but it cannot substitute xmms (which does
Hello,
I decide to upgrade a Dell Poweredge 2650 from one of those other BSD's to
Open today. Lo and behold, I've forgotten about the issues with Adaptec; it
seems there's a PERC based raid card in this little box.
Would falling back to 3.6 work for the time being? The host is fairly static
and i
then bridge this 2 NICs and
- ?? ? -
??: "Remy Chibois" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
??: "Yanko Karkalichev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
??:
?: ?, 19 ?? 2005 15:46
???: Re: PF load balancing
>I forgot to mention that these are ADSL connections. The two modems are
> ph
One more question.
Are the IP's of two NICs real or virtual?
>I forgot to mention that these are ADSL connections. The two modems are
> physically attached to the firewall, on two separate NICs.
>
>
>> Why do not use 1 interface with 2 IP's and 1 nat rule with address
>> pool for balanc
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 19:12:11 +1000 Graeme Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> It was a suggestion. And the shared buffer cache is still not a disk
> cache.
A bad suggestion, hence my correcting it. I really hate seeing
misinformation in list archives, people do use them. Yes, this is
fairly commo
3.6 will install on it. I believe the aac driver still exists but is
disabled by default. You could install 3.6, recompile the kernel with aac
support enabled then upgrade. I have multiple 2650s running OpenBSD and was
quite dissappointed in the Adaptec issue.
I understand why this was done, but i
obviously, some steps missing here. are you doing
AUDIO_INITINFO(&Inf);
AUDIO_GETINFO(&Inf);
Inf.foo = bar;
AUDIO_SETINFO(&Inf);
or just
AUDIO_INITINFO(&Inf);
Inf.foo = bar;
AUDIO_SETINFO(&Inf);
if you are doing the first, like audioctl does, try the second. does that
work properly?
I was
heya,
i'm trying to get PVM 3.4.5 to compile from source on a
3.6-release system and have run into some problems. when i
first attempted this, i got the following error:
...
cc -DIMA_BSD386 -I../../include -I../../tracer -I../../src
-DSOCKADHASLEN -DNOREXEC -DRSHCOMMAND=\"/usr/bin/rsh\"
-DHASSTD
Hi:
I plan to buy IBM XSeries Server,
But I can't see any IBM ServeRaid card (SCSI) in OpenBSD support list,
( http://www.openbsd.org/i386.html#hardware )
Seems FreeBSD can Support with ips(4)
( http://www.tw.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/hardware-i386.html#DISK )
If any one can give me some suggest
49 matches
Mail list logo