Am 11.04.2006 um 13:19 schrieb Henning Brauer:
this is not a freebsd ist.
Yes, I know. But as I read the mail from Gustava I thought this may
be a general carp issue and not a freebsd specific one. This is why I
wrote to the list.
they are, for their specific addresses. They do not matc
Hi to all.
I am interested to developing a little
assembly language programs.
I rode the article written by Thomas Sommers
( http://user.nj.net/~tms/hello.html )
I followed author's instructions but at the end of compilation
as -o .o .s
ld -o .o
what I have is
#./
#ksh: Operation not pe
chmod +x ?
On 4/12/06, Alessandro Coppelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi to all.
> I am interested to developing a little
> assembly language programs.
>
> I rode the article written by Thomas Sommers
> ( http://user.nj.net/~tms/hello.html )
> I followed author's instructions but at the end o
On 12/04/06, Alessandro Coppelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi to all.
> I am interested to developing a little
> assembly language programs.
>
> I rode the article written by Thomas Sommers
> ( http://user.nj.net/~tms/hello.html )
> I followed author's instructions but at the end of compilation
On 4/12/06, Alessandro Coppelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi to all.
> I am interested to developing a little
> assembly language programs.
>
> I rode the article written by Thomas Sommers
> ( http://user.nj.net/~tms/hello.html )
> I followed author's instructions but at the end of compilation
>
Alessandro Coppelli wrote:
Hi to all.
I am interested to developing a little
assembly language programs.
I rode the article written by Thomas Sommers
( http://user.nj.net/~tms/hello.html )
I followed author's instructions but at the end of compilation
as -o .o .s
ld -o .o
what I have is
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 05:45:30PM +1000, Ash Williams wrote:
> > what I have is
> >
> > #./
> > #ksh: Operation not permitted
> >
> >
> > Someone knows what is happenig ?
>
> I've not done any ASM on OpenBSD although i have a bit of experience
> with FreeBSD. Have you looked at the syscalls
On 4/10/06, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2006/04/10 15:48, Siju George wrote:
> > D-Link DFE-570TX Quad port
>
>Incidentally D-Link are in the doghouse at the moment for selling
>consumer routers configured to query a number of stratum-1 NTP
>timeservers intended for
> --- Urspr|ngliche Nachricht ---
> Von: David Terrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: Ash Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Kopie: misc@openbsd.org
> Betreff: Re: Assembly Language Programs
> Datum: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 03:14:33 -0500
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 05:45:30PM +1000, Ash Williams wrote:
> > > wha
"Intel 915GM/GMS Video" rev 0x03 at pci0 dev 2 function 1 not configured
Hello,
I have the same card and same dmesg line. I have Xorg working on my
Compal laptop using "vesa" driver at 1024x768. Not too good but works ;-)
If you need my xorg config file please let me know.
Ramiro.
Hello. I have 2 atheros cm9's in a box and the only channels I can set
are 36,40 and 44.
How can I "unlock" all the channels the card supports? I'm interested
in channels 100-140.
Man ath didn't say anything about it.
forgot dmesg just in case
OpenBSD 3.9-current (GENERIC) #672: Mon Apr 3 16:15:29 MDT 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Intel Pentium II ("GenuineIntel" 686-class, 512KB L2 cache) 401 MHz
cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE3
Gustavo A. Baratto wrote:
[.. snip ..]
FW2 hostname.carpX (3.8)
---
fw2# cat /etc/hostname.carp0
inet 1.2.3.2 255.255.255.0 1.2.3.255 vhid 1 pass foo carpdev em0 advskew 127
inet alias 1.2.3.6 255.255.255.0 1.2.3.255 vhid 1 pass foo carpdev em0
advskew 127
inet alias 1.2
Hi,
I have an OpenVPN server interconnecting 5 networks with data center using
permanent PtP links - each network has about 30 PCs. Also there is about 30
road-warrior OpenVPN clients. Average traffic on each PtP link is 1-2Mbit/s.
The server and end-points of permanent PtP links are currently run
On 2006/04/12 11:27, Marek Nixworx wrote:
> I've read about OpenBSD's ability to use hardware crypto acceleration card
> to transparently accelerate OpenSSL calls.
In general, don't bother with PCI cards, if you want accelerated
crypto use AES with one of the newer VIA CPUs with on-chip AES suppor
Thank you,
can you explain me please, why aren't PCI/miniPCI cards sufficient ? I'd
like to use same hardware and only add PCI card on server and end-points..
Thanx
Marek
2006/4/12, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 2006/04/12 11:27, Marek Nixworx wrote:
> > I've read about OpenBSD's a
Hi,
OpenBSD-current amd64 from around march, 20th.
Next to a reboot, OpenBGP had a problem validating NextHops :
Nexthop State
x.x.x.105 invalid vlan97 UP, Ethernet, no carrier, 100 MBit/s
I had about 30 addresses on different vlans in this case. This resulted in the
BGP
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>> We notice that the upcoming OpenBSD 3.9 still uses gcc 3.3.5.
>>
>> Is the gcc 3.3 branch still a supported product for the gcc people, and this
>> a
>> fix that "slipped through the cracks" in their usual maintenance process?
>
> I have no idea if the 3.3 branch is active
I have a postfix server on OpenBSD. The mail server work great.
I use the following configurations in "main.cf":
myhostname = home.wplink.net
mydomain = wplink.net
myorigin = $mydomain
mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain
I send an get e-mails without problems. My e-mail client is Mo
Hi,
> I have an OpenVPN server interconnecting 5 networks with data center using
> permanent PtP links - each network has about 30 PCs. Also there is about
> 30
> road-warrior OpenVPN clients. Average traffic on each PtP link is
> 1-2Mbit/s.
> The server and end-points of permanent PtP links are c
On 12/04/06, Sylvain Coutant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> - Shouldn't OpenBGP drop the session if the nexthop is not valid ?
Next hop and peer address does not have to be the same thing.
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't h
On 2006/04/12 11:57, Marek Nixworx wrote:
> can you explain me please, why aren't PCI/miniPCI cards sufficient ? I'd
> like to use same hardware and only add PCI card on server and end-points..
There's a lot more overhead involved with the PCI cards which are
serviced by interrupt-handlers (rather
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 12:18:07PM +0200, Sylvain Coutant wrote:
> Hi,
>
> OpenBSD-current amd64 from around march, 20th.
>
> Next to a reboot, OpenBGP had a problem validating NextHops :
>
> Nexthop State
> x.x.x.105 invalid vlan97 UP, Ethernet, no carrier, 100 MBit/s
>
> What was the state of the parent interface and what kind of interface is
> it?
Bge driver. It was up and running : BGP sessions were established through the
vlans reported as invalid by OpenBGP.
> ifconfig down should not crash the box. Panic message and trace would be
> interesting.
It was
On 12/04/06, Sylvain Coutant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What was the state of the parent interface and what kind of interface is
> > it?
>
> Bge driver. It was up and running : BGP sessions were established through
> the vlans reported as invalid by OpenBGP.
>
>
> > ifconfig down should not c
Using OpenBSD3.8 as a desktop on a laptop, default settings (nothing added
or changed) when I do:
halt -p
I get:
/etc/rc.shutdown in progress
/etc/rc.shutdown complete
Attempting to power down
apm0:APM set power state: unable to enter requested state (96)
apm0:APM set power state: unable to e
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 01:36:46PM +0200, Sylvain Coutant wrote:
> > What was the state of the parent interface and what kind of interface is
> > it?
>
> Bge driver. It was up and running : BGP sessions were established
> through the vlans reported as invalid by OpenBGP.
>
I bet Henning's diff w
On 12/04/06, tony sarendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/04/06, Sylvain Coutant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > What was the state of the parent interface and what kind of interface
> > is
> > > it?
> >
> > Bge driver. It was up and running : BGP sessions were established
> > through
Hi misc!
> I don't see this error with openbsd-misc mailing list. Any idea that
> help me?
Your mailservers hostname ist not reverse resolveable. Means you get the
IP from the name, but no name from that ip.
Try yourself: dig -x 82.79.81.6
-Falk
On 12/04/06, Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 01:36:46PM +0200, Sylvain Coutant wrote:
> > > What was the state of the parent interface and what kind of interface
> is
> > > it?
> >
> > Bge driver. It was up and running : BGP sessions were established
> > through
* Sylvain Coutant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-12 12:21]:
> Hi,
>
> OpenBSD-current amd64 from around march, 20th.
>
> Next to a reboot, OpenBGP had a problem validating NextHops :
>
> Nexthop State
> x.x.x.105 invalid vlan97 UP, Ethernet, no carrier, 100 MBit/s
the reason
Hi misc,
I'm looking for an open-source software solution for a multi-user
password management. Ideally, it's a webapp running on OpenBSD,
allowing multiple user, each can only see a subpart of the password
database (ACL or things like that). I've found a lots of such project
on sf.net but only
* Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-12 14:21]:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 01:36:46PM +0200, Sylvain Coutant wrote:
> > > What was the state of the parent interface and what kind of interface is
> > > it?
> > Bge driver. It was up and running : BGP sessions were established
> > through the v
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 01:58:24PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
> On 12/04/06, Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 01:36:46PM +0200, Sylvain Coutant wrote:
> > > > What was the state of the parent interface and what kind of interface
> > is
> > > > it?
> > >
> >
End-points are running on ibase's network security appliance hardware:
http://www.ibasetechnology.net/EN/fwa7204.html
- the only way to put some hw accel to this is miniPCI - that's why I've
asked about it before..
The central server is some Fujitsu-Siemens server with free PCI slot
You mention
Funny, I also have this :
Apr 12 16:48:29 x bgpd[10601]: Lost child: session engine terminated; signal 11
Apr 12 16:48:29 x bgpd[31105]: fatal in RDE: rde_dispatch_imsg_session: pipe
closed
Apr 12 16:48:29 x bgpd[10601]: Lost child: route decision engine exited
Once every two or three weeks. Us
> Funny, I also have this :
>
> Apr 12 16:48:29 x bgpd[10601]: Lost child: session engine terminated;
> signal 11
> Apr 12 16:48:29 x bgpd[31105]: fatal in RDE: rde_dispatch_imsg_session:
> pipe closed
> Apr 12 16:48:29 x bgpd[10601]: Lost child: route decision engine exited
I forgot to see it b
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 12:56:42PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Using OpenBSD3.8 as a desktop on a laptop, default settings (nothing added
> or changed) when I do:
>
> halt -p
>
> I get:
>
> /etc/rc.shutdown in progress
> /etc/rc.shutdown complete
> Attempting to power down
> apm0:APM set
On 2006/04/12 15:30, Marek Nixworx wrote:
> End-points are running on ibase's network security appliance hardware:
> http://www.ibasetechnology.net/EN/fwa7204.html
More powerful than Geode-based boards then - you probably need to
try it for yourself on the hardware with your packet mix, then, and
Hi all,
I'd like to know why 'passwd' is located in /usr/bin, since this
command is very important for system maintenance purposes. Wouldn't it
be better 'passwd' being located in /bin? Because generally /usr has
its own partition, and then, when entering in single user mode for any
reason or even
* Sylvain Coutant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-12 15:58]:
> Funny, I also have this :
>
> Apr 12 16:48:29 x bgpd[10601]: Lost child: session engine terminated; signal
> 11
> Apr 12 16:48:29 x bgpd[31105]: fatal in RDE: rde_dispatch_imsg_session: pipe
> closed
> Apr 12 16:48:29 x bgpd[10601]: Los
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 01:03:58PM +0200, Piotrek Kapczuk wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a new server to deploy and I don't want to wait unlit official
> release. So I'd like to compile 3.9 stable from source and I've faced a
> problem.
>
> I have a machine which runs 3.8-stable
> I've wiped ou
Because passwd is actually a big old command that uses
lots of shared libraries. - and may use other network
calls, such as yp or kerberos. commands in /bin are staticly
linked.
The short answer is if you want to do things like
vi or passwd in single user mode - mount /usr - it's
Hi,
The window of danger was booting a kernel from any time _after_ 2
weeks ago and running a fsck from any time _before_ 4 days ago. If
you have booted a new kernel, do not use the old fsck.
Do I infer correctly from the following paragraph
I have backed out the new superblock changes. The
On 12/04/06, Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 01:58:24PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
> > On 12/04/06, Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 01:36:46PM +0200, Sylvain Coutant wrote:
> > > > > What was the state of the parent
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 04:49:29PM +0200, Jonathan Thornburg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >The window of danger was booting a kernel from any time _after_ 2
> >weeks ago and running a fsck from any time _before_ 4 days ago. If
> >you have booted a new kernel, do not use the old fsck.
>
> Do I infer correctl
Hi,
I was trying to get wet with BGP, OpenBGPD, AS nos. etc so that I can
Implement them in my network. Going through the print out of RFC 1930.
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1930.html
I read
---
BGP (Border G
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 05:20:31PM +0400, Bruno Carnazzi wrote:
>Hi misc,
>
> I'm looking for an open-source software solution for a multi-user
> password management. Ideally, it's a webapp running on OpenBSD,
> allowing multiple user, each can only see a subpart of the password
> database (AC
Thanks Bob!
On 4/12/06, Bob Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Because passwd is actually a big old command that uses
> lots of shared libraries. - and may use other network
> calls, such as yp or kerberos. commands in /bin are staticly
> linked.
>
> The short answer is if you wa
On Wednesday 12 April 2006 23:04, Siju George wrote:
> 1) Will BGP get obsolete soon? if so in what time frame?
No, obsoleting BGP would require major changes to the internet infrastructure
that would probably be both timeconsuming and errorprone. The RFC you quoted
is dated 1996 and 10 years
Hi all,
I wrote a plugin for Openvpn that does authentication using the passwd
or the shadow files. I wrote it cause the only authentication plugin for
openvpn is the auth-pam, and i needed to do authentication using the
shadow suite. I then wrote a small C program that did this, a
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 08:34:53PM +0530, Siju George wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was trying to get wet with BGP, OpenBGPD, AS nos. etc so that I can
> Implement them in my network. Going through the print out of RFC 1930.
>
> http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1930.html
>
> I read
>
>
> 1) Will BGP get obsolete soon? if so in what time frame? ( Just
> wondering if Henning's, Claudio's and Esben's work on OpenBGPD will be
> of little value in the comming years)
>
> 2) Henning used say about Theo motivating hime to write OpenBGPD, so I
> wonder why Theo did not ask them to write
2006/4/12, Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 05:20:31PM +0400, Bruno Carnazzi wrote:
> >Hi misc,
> >
> > I'm looking for an open-source software solution for a multi-user
> > password management. Ideally, it's a webapp running on OpenBSD,
> > allowing multiple user
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 12:21:33 -0300, Giancarlo Razzolini proclaimed...
> I wrote a plugin for Openvpn that does authentication using the passwd
> or the shadow files. I wrote it cause the only authentication plugin for
> openvpn is the auth-pam, and i needed to do authentication using the
>
On 2006-04-12 20:34:53 +0530, Siju George wrote:
>[BGP-4]), and IDRP (The OSI Inter-Domain Routing Protocol, which the
^^^
Nobody uses OSI-networking standards :-)
Best
Martin
--
http://www.tm.oneiros.de
* Siju George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-12 17:24]:
> http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1930.html
>
> I read
>
> ---
> BGP (Border Gateway
>Protocol, the current de facto standard for inter-AS routing; see
>
On 12/04/06, Bob Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 1) Will BGP get obsolete soon? if so in what time frame? ( Just
> > wondering if Henning's, Claudio's and Esben's work on OpenBGPD will be
> > of little value in the comming years)
> >
> > 2) Henning used say about Theo motivating hime to write
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Should each user have access to his/her own passwords, and
> nothing else?
> > Which user can change which password(s)?
>
> The security model can be something like 'john belongs to pay_group,
> so he can read and maybe write (if group administrator) passwords of
> pa
On 2006/04/12 19:40, Bruno Carnazzi wrote:
> The security model can be something like 'john belongs to pay_group,
> so he can read and maybe write (if group administrator) passwords of
> pay_group'.
ldap could do this. login_ldap is in ports, you might need to write
some easy-to-use CGI scripts fo
On 2006/04/12 20:34, Siju George wrote:
> I was trying to get wet with BGP, OpenBGPD, AS nos. etc so that I can
> Implement them in my network. Going through the print out of RFC 1930.
The RFCs aren't especially helpful for learning this stuff, unless
you're writing an implementation (and even the
It sounds like you want to be using OpenLDAP (http://
www.openldap.org/). Instead of using groups for delegation, use OUs.
It's probably not going to be a small project, though.
On Apr 12, 2006, at 8:40 AM, Bruno Carnazzi wrote:
2006/4/12, Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wed, Apr
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Should each user have access to his/her own passwords, and
> > nothing else?
> > > Which user can change which password(s)?
> >
> > The security model can be something like 'john belongs to pay_group,
> > so he can read and maybe write (if group administrator) pas
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 12:04:12PM -0300, Jo?o Salvatti wrote:
> On 4/12/06, Bob Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > having said that I never run passwd to recover a root
> > password, I just use ed on /etc/master.passwd, paste in a copy
> > of a blowfish password I know and run pwd_mkdb
>
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 10:48:38AM -0500, Eric Pancer wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 12:21:33 -0300, Giancarlo Razzolini proclaimed...
>
> > I wrote a plugin for Openvpn that does authentication using the passwd
> > or the shadow files. I wrote it cause the only authentication plugin for
> > o
Eric Pancer wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 12:21:33 -0300, Giancarlo Razzolini proclaimed...
>
>> I wrote a plugin for Openvpn that does authentication using the passwd
>> or the shadow files. I wrote it cause the only authentication plugin for
>> openvpn is the auth-pam, and i needed to do au
Yes, you can do an "Upgrade".
Select only packages you want to upgrade (or missed ones).
On Wednesday 12 April 2006 05:11, Andrew Ng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> understand that there are options to select xbase, game etcs during
> OpenBSD installation. Can I install these options, (particularly X)
> post-in
> To fix this problem, I need to add some lines to named DNS server?
_IF_ you were the owner of the subnet your mailserver lies in you _SHOULD_
be able to add the proper reverse entrys, BUT i'd suggest asking your ISP,
which is propably the one responsible for the PTR-Record.
-Falk
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 05:54:38PM +0200, Martin Schrvder wrote:
| On 2006-04-12 20:34:53 +0530, Siju George wrote:
| >[BGP-4]), and IDRP (The OSI Inter-Domain Routing Protocol, which the
| ^^^
| Nobody uses OSI-networking standards :-)
IS-IS is quite commonly used
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 14:07:53 -0300, Giancarlo Razzolini proclaimed...
> Did you read my mail at all? The plugin authenticate itself from
> master.passwd on OpenBSD and from shadow on linux distributions. I
> mentioned PAM, case the only plugin that existed for authentication in
> openvpn uses PA
Eric Pancer wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 14:07:53 -0300, Giancarlo Razzolini proclaimed...
>
>> Did you read my mail at all? The plugin authenticate itself from
>> master.passwd on OpenBSD and from shadow on linux distributions. I
>> mentioned PAM, case the only plugin that existed for authentica
On 04/12/06 17:59, Henning Brauer wrote:
yes, BGP will be obsolete soon, together with IP. All heil OSI
protocols!
Yep!
With ATM ("high speed" ISDN) instead of Ethernet of course.
Ideals come true, wonderful world!
Please keep turd polishing, better a polished operating cheap turd
than hi
Unless I am reading something wrong, isn't this:
If you had started from a 3.9-beta, you might have got lucky. But
jumping from 3.8 to 3.9 is NOT an easy process, and is completely
unsupported.
and this:
1) Start with 3.8, and upgrade to 3.9 later (actually, pretty easy).
totally cont
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Geof Crowl wrote:
> Unless I am reading something wrong, isn't this:
>
> >
> > If you had started from a 3.9-beta, you might have got lucky. But
> > jumping from 3.8 to 3.9 is NOT an easy process, and is completely
> > unsupported.
> >
>
> and this:
>
> >
> > 1) Start w
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 12:34:55PM -0400, Geof Crowl wrote:
| Unless I am reading something wrong, isn't this:
|
| >
| >If you had started from a 3.9-beta, you might have got lucky. But
| >jumping from 3.8 to 3.9 is NOT an easy process, and is completely
| >unsupported.
| >
|
| and this:
|
| >
| >
On 4/12/06, Geof Crowl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unless I am reading something wrong, isn't this:
>
> >
> > If you had started from a 3.9-beta, you might have got lucky. But
> > jumping from 3.8 to 3.9 is NOT an easy process, and is completely
> > unsupported.
[building 3.9 source on 3.8]
> a
I am having problems getting ospfd to work with 802.1q vlans. I have 2
existing ospfd servers that are working correctly with physical interfaces in
each network they are trying to take part in. I recently built new box that
I'm trying to use vlans as it only has 2 interfaces and I want it to
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 12:34:55PM -0400, Geof Crowl wrote:
> >If you had started from a 3.9-beta, you might have got lucky. But
> >jumping from 3.8 to 3.9 is NOT an easy process, and is completely
> >unsupported.
> >
>
> and this:
>
> >
> >1) Start with 3.8, and upgrade to 3.9 later (actually,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> cat .inputrc
"\e[3~": delete-char
"\e[1~": beginning-of-line
"\e[4~": end-of-line
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> uptime
2:18PM up 527 days, 9:49, 3 users, load averages: 0.85, 0.97, 0.99
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>
Heh... just thought I would throw out the uptime. It's my longest
uptime (f
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, imEnsion wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> cat .inputrc
> "\e[3~": delete-char
> "\e[1~": beginning-of-line
> "\e[4~": end-of-line
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> uptime
> 2:18PM up 527 days, 9:49, 3 users, load averages: 0.85, 0.97, 0.99
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>
>
>
> Heh... just thoug
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 03:15:50PM -0400, Tim Donahue wrote:
> I am having problems getting ospfd to work with 802.1q vlans. I have 2
> existing ospfd servers that are working correctly with physical interfaces in
> each network they are trying to take part in. I recently built new box that
>
On Wednesday 12 April 2006 15:38, Jason Ackley wrote:
> Tim Donahue wrote:
> > recv_dd_description: invalid MTU 1500 sent by neighbor ID 10.4.64.3,
> > expected 1496
>
> This is your problem. Your physical interface driver
> doesn't understand frames that are 'slightly' larger
> than 1500 (ba
Tim Donahue wrote:
recv_dd_description: invalid MTU 1500 sent by neighbor ID 10.4.64.3, expected
1496
This is your problem. Your physical interface driver
doesn't understand frames that are 'slightly' larger
than 1500 (baby giant). Frames are increased by
4 bytes when they have 802.1q tag
hahahaha I think I just got owned.
That is so awesome. I needed the laugh, thank you.
On 4/12/06, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, imEnsion wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> cat .inputrc
> > "\e[3~": delete-char
> > "\e[1~": beginning-of-line
> > "\e[4~": end-o
On 04/12/06 21:08, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
Hi,
This fixes a gcc code generation bug, demonstrated using -march=i686
-O2, but I suspect it can occur in other circumstances as well.
Yep, any architecture with and without -march=i686
The interesting thing is that the gcc people classified this as
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, chefren wrote:
> On 04/12/06 21:08, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This fixes a gcc code generation bug, demonstrated using -march=i686
> > -O2, but I suspect it can occur in other circumstances as well.
>
> Yep, any architecture with and without -march=i686
>
> > Th
I was trying to set default auth-type and auth-md and ran into some
trouble. Doing some debugging, I tried just uncommenting part of the
example ospfd.conf and have found it doesn't work. Here is what I did:
ospfd.conf.orig is the v1.2 available here:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/et
A follow up on this that might be of interest.
Also a request for information as to what people might know on cases, or
anything that would very strongly justify my position to want this stop.
After many weeks requesting to justify this where I never got any answer
to it and keep asking about
> Hi to all.
> I am interested to developing a little
> assembly language programs.
>
> I rode the article written by Thomas Sommers
> ( http://user.nj.net/~tms/hello.html )
> I followed author's instructions but at the end of compilation
>
> as -o .o .s
> ld -o .o
>
> what I have is
>
>
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 09:22:49AM +0200, Alessandro Coppelli wrote:
> Hi to all.
> I am interested to developing a little
> assembly language programs.
>
> I rode the article written by Thomas Sommers
> ( http://user.nj.net/~tms/hello.html )
> I followed author's instructions but at the end of co
On Wednesday 12 April 2006 23:21, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> I wrote a plugin for Openvpn that does authentication using the passwd
> or the shadow files
What would be even cooler is a bsd-auth plugin.
Lars Hansson
Ted Unangst wrote:
On 4/12/06, Geof Crowl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Unless I am reading something wrong, isn't this:
If you had started from a 3.9-beta, you might have got lucky. But
jumping from 3.8 to 3.9 is NOT an easy process, and is completely
unsupported.
[building 3.9 source on 3.8]
Lars Hansson wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 April 2006 23:21, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
>> I wrote a plugin for Openvpn that does authentication using the passwd
>> or the shadow files
>
> What would be even cooler is a bsd-auth plugin.
>
>
> Lars Hansson
>
>
>From the man of the OpenBSD getp
I will be moving some servers and switches in the near future. The
computer equipment is all rack-mountable so it's 1U and 2U. I was
wondering if anyone could recommend storage containers for this type
of computer equipment. Let me know if you have any ideas. Thanks.
Phusion
Phusion wrote:
I will be moving some servers and switches in the near future. The
computer equipment is all rack-mountable so it's 1U and 2U. I was
wondering if anyone could recommend storage containers for this type
of computer equipment. Let me know if you have any ideas. Thanks.
You can bu
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 12:12, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2006/04/12 20:34, Siju George wrote:
> > I was trying to get wet with BGP, OpenBGPD, AS nos. etc so that I can
> > Implement them in my network. Going through the print out of RFC 1930.
>
> The RFCs aren't especially helpful for learning th
Phusion wrote:
I will be moving some servers and switches in the near future. The
computer equipment is all rack-mountable so it's 1U and 2U. I was
wondering if anyone could recommend storage containers for this type
of computer equipment. Let me know if you have any ideas. Thanks.
At work, we
Since this from a two month old snapshot, I don't know if this even
worth reporting...
console is /[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL PROTECTED],1/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL
PROTECTED],3f8
Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved
At 05.15 13/04/2006, Curtis H. Wilbar Jr. wrote:
(..)
If you ever get into OSPF... he has a similar paper on OSPF, I think
it was called a 'Design Guide'... but I don't recall off hand.
Hope they help,
-- Curt
May it be this one?
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/104/1.html
friscom
99 matches
Mail list logo
