Sorry - never mind. I cracked open my case after I got home to verify,
and I'm using a v4. v5 must be really new then, because I bought this
just a few weeks ago.
Kian
Kian Mohageri wrote:
Maybe someone on the mailing list can provide me with an answer to:
1. Can v5 af the card be used
For those of you who are waiting on me to finish testing for OpenBSD
3.9 on the Nokia IP330 firewalls, it appears that the dirty hack that
worked on 3.8 works on 3.9 as well. The main deterrent is that
OpenBSD can't locate a serial port to use as its console, thus giving
the dreaded 'entry point
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 1, 2006, at 1:35 AM, Bob Beck wrote:
We are pleased to announce the official release of OpenBSD 3.9.
Got my CDs last week, upgraded a few systems by disc; no problems
(expected behavior).
And
# pkg_add -ui -F update -F updatedepends
Some minor things I noticed, the following is still at 3.8
http://www.openbsd.org/pkg-stable.html
http://www.openbsd.org/errata38.html
should link to a http://www.openbsd.org/pkg-stable38.html, rather than
the above.
As an example in pkg-stable.html the package clamav-0.88.1.tgz only
exists for
On 5/1/06, Jonathan Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try 3.9, the Intel specific interrupt quirks now match on your
chipset unlike 3.8.
I have tried varoius snapshot-versions of 3.9 (latest OpenBSD
3.9-current (GENERIC) #720: Thu Apr 27 21:45:15 MDT 2006) and are
downloading the official 3.9
Hi all,
I'm looking at the set optimization policies for PF, and while it's clear that
there are varying levels of aggression towards expiring state entries, I can't
find exact numbers of what those levels represent.
I assume they're based on a time and/or traffic metric ??
My current policy is
Hi , my name is takesima , a japanese .
i succeed in access avi file in remote PC with nfs mount in openvpn tunnel .
the chart is next .
gentoo(192.168.1.88)--intra net--(192.168.1.50)openbsd=internet===
==openbsd(192.168.72.50)--intra net--(192.168.72.66)gentoo
(192.168.72.66)gentoo is
On 5/1/06, Mats [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 03:36:27AM -0300, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
Hrraaayyy!!
Man, I've preordered my CDs about 2 weeks ago, and they haven't
arrived yet... (bought from www.temporeal.com.br Brazil)
Seems like I'll use ftp instead :P Can't
On 4/30/06, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2006/04/30 06:34, S t i n g r a y wrote:
Now what i want to know , maybe is O T in this list
but what is the diffrence , i mean pf in openBSD is
refered to as a firewall for home or small offices ?
why is that , i mean what is the
Below is a comment about X-Windows security sent to me
by a person with a lot of experience in computer security:
===
Dave,
X-Windows has been known to be insecure for some time. That is to
say it can be hacked.
Now you could get the code and change the sockets that are used or
require
As pointed out on Slashdot somebody also provides Torrents wich may reduce
the load of the Servers.
The files can be found here:
http://openbsd.somedomain.net/
Kind regards,
Sebastian
And the whining continues
On May 1, 2006, at 9:57 AM, Dave Feustel wrote:
Below is a comment about X-Windows security sent to me
by a person with a lot of experience in computer security:
===
Dave,
X-Windows has been known to be insecure for some time. That is to
say it can be hacked.
Now you could get the
I use KDE with AntiAlias enabled, but disabled for font size from 7 to
17, and for specific application (e.g FireFox) preceding the application
name with env GDK_USE_XFT=0.
After I upgraded my i386 from 3.8 to 3.9 (my CDs arrived just one day
before the official date), none of the two methods
On 5/1/06, Jonathan Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
The snapshots are quite a bit past 3.9 now.
Yes i would imagine so.
Are you running the latest BIOS provided by the vendor?
Of course.
--
Regards
Henrik
On Sunday 30 April 2006 10:56 pm, Dave Feustel wrote:
This is a very well written article for new users of OpenBSD:
http://www.softwareinreview.com/cms/content/view/34/1/
One question I have: Is the description in the article of what's
required to install Java on OpenBSD correct?
The
David Terrell wrote:
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 07:17:34AM -0700, Dag Richards wrote:
And the whining continues
What are you talking about? I see 'em on the mirrors.
Well I guess I am talking abou the 404 I get by going here
http://www.openbsd.org/3.9_packages/
But oh yeah ya dope,
On Monday 01 May 2006 10:48, Kurt Miller wrote:
On Sunday 30 April 2006 10:56 pm, Dave Feustel wrote:
This is a very well written article for new users of OpenBSD:
http://www.softwareinreview.com/cms/content/view/34/1/
One question I have: Is the description in the article of what's
Can queues be used to queue overall bandwidth? We have a project where we
will be sharing an Internet connection with another company, we will have an
IP and they will have an IP each company providing their own firewall. I
understand that queuing is able to queue based on protocol, etc on the
ALTQ Should do the trick:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/queueing.html
On 5/1/06, Chris Bullock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can queues be used to queue overall bandwidth? We have a project where we
will be sharing an Internet connection with another company, we will have an
IP and they will have
Hi.
I haven't recieved a single test report, but I still get
letters about asking for an update. How's that?
This tarball also includes mysqli, fastcgi and hardened php support:
http://gi.unideb.hu/~robert/php.tar.gz
On (28/04/06 01:59), Robert Nagy wrote:
Hi.
Finally after fighting with
On May 1, 2006, at 1:02 PM, Chris Bullock wrote:
Can queues be used to queue overall bandwidth? We have a project
where we
will be sharing an Internet connection with another company, we
will have an
IP and they will have an IP each company providing their own
firewall. I
understand that
I forgot to mention in my previous e-mail, that if you were to
implement the scenerio outlined in your e-mail, then the other company
would have to 'trust' that you're setting up your firewall to not
exceed your 100k of bandwidth.
Just setup a single queue that caps at 100k.
On 5/1/06, Chris
As I saw the website providing torrents for 3.9 I just thought about
somethign for packages.
Isn`t it be possible to switch to torrents to install packages?
In fact there many mirrors and if they all would maybe use torrent the
synergy-effect would be great.
With the trackerless-torrents the
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well I4m interested in YOUR ubersystem to reduce the load...
Are you a solution in search of a problem, right now?
DS
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 3:47 PM
To: Marco Peereboom
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: using torrents for packages?
Well I4m interested in YOUR ubersystem to reduce the load...
Buy the CDs, no load on the
Hello!
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 09:49:46PM +0200, Karel Gardas wrote:
My question is: what's really needed to do to make GCC with threads
enabled working? I think this will be needed anyway seeing recent SMP and
Rthreads work appearing in OpenBSD releases.
I'm not sure. What does that mean?
Some mirros simply miss some install-Sets and I don4t mean the x* stuff.
Some mirros didn`t updated yet (well I guess they`ll do it later).
Some mirrors have parts of the Source and some have the Source but not the
ports.tar.gz.
And mostly no mirror has packages.
May be I am missing something,
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 03:58:57PM -0400, Wade, Daniel wrote:
Buy the CDs, no load on the ftp servers at all.
As soon as you figure out how to get 3G of packages for i386 alone
onto a CD...
--
David Terrell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
((meatspace)) http://meat.net/
On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 13:02 -0400, Chris Bullock wrote:
Can queues be used to queue overall bandwidth? We have a project where we
will be sharing an Internet connection with another company, we will have an
IP and they will have an IP each company providing their own firewall. I
understand
May be I am missing something, but I thought the project have/had plenty
of mirrors to go around. Yeap today and for the next few days may be to
busy as everyone is getting to them to get their files instead of may be
buying CD's, but other then that, I really thought that capacity, even
for
On Mon, 01 May 2006 16:08:11 -0400 Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And I am not talking about Torrents, as I prefer getting my data from a
trusted source thank you.
As irrelivant as this discussion is, why do people make comments like
this? What makes downloading through http or ftp
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 09:46:51PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Well I4m interested in YOUR ubersystem to reduce the load...
I selected a mirror that's local and up to date and set PKG_PATH to use
it.
If the packages aren't there I'll select another mirror -or- I'll roll my
own.
There
On 4/30/06, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2006/04/30 06:34, S t i n g r a y wrote:
Now what i want to know , maybe is O T in this list
but what is the diffrence , i mean pf in openBSD is
refered to as a firewall for home or small offices ?
why is that , i mean what is the
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 02:14:43PM -0700, Michael Scheliga wrote:
The torrent idea has been beaten to death during previous
releases.
If people are so hot for torrents, then why hasn't someone made one? I
don't recall every hearing that a mirror would be delisted if they
offered torrents. So
Hi All,
Over the last couple of months we have learned that many dual core AMD
Athlon64 X2 and AMD Opteron systems using nVidia's nForce4 chipset
come with a broken MP BIOS implementation. As a result, they will not
work with the bsd.mp kernel. For some of these systems, a BIOS update
is
no sorry, not yet
I don't have any USB floppy drives!
Darrin Chandler wrote:
Have you tried booting any other way such as floppy? Just fishing...
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 12:22:41AM +0200, Vincent Immler wrote:
no sorry, not yet
I don't have any USB floppy drives!
Darrin Chandler wrote:
Have you tried booting any other way such as floppy? Just fishing...
I have had some issues with CDROMs. Sometimes I get read errors, then
retries,
On 5/1/06, Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If people are so hot for torrents, then why hasn't someone made one? I
don't recall every hearing that a mirror would be delisted if they
offered torrents. So one of you out there wanting torrents set up a
mirror and get torrents going.
don't
Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If people are so hot for torrents, then why hasn't someone made one?
But Andrew Fresh has.
http://openbsd.somedomain.net/
--
Christian naddy Weisgerber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 03:39:02PM -0700, Ted Unangst wrote:
don't worry, they're coming. i wasn't sure which packages people
would want, so i started one seed for each combination. any minute
now and i'll be done uploading all
Sylvain Coutant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, your 2 plus the 5 from your other customers plus the
$max-prefix
The 5 is the $max_prefix. We have just only one BGP customer. Total is 7. I
should never have announced more than 7 routes in any case.
Is there any reason why you don't
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 10:42:32PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If people are so hot for torrents, then why hasn't someone made one?
But Andrew Fresh has.
http://openbsd.somedomain.net/
Oh, yeah. Right you are. Then why are we having this
David Terrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 02:54:06PM +0200, Martin Reindl wrote:
Any ideas? Simply bad hardware? This was working fine with 3.8 and
even a 3.9 snapshot from two months ago before the CDs arrived monday
and I did the upgrade.
Give the dc(4)
Thanks for your help, but I already tried that possibility.
I had to disable the following devices:
pciide*
uhub*
brgphy*
bge*
wdc*
isa0
then the last lines are:
isa at mainbus0 not configured
biomask netmask ttymask
rd0: fixed, 3800blocks
root on rd0a
rootdev=0x1100
On 5/1/06, Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 03:39:02PM -0700, Ted Unangst wrote:
don't worry, they're coming. i wasn't sure which packages people
would want, so i started one seed for each combination. any minute
now and i'll be done uploading all
On 5/1/06, Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 10:42:32PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If people are so hot for torrents, then why hasn't someone made one?
But Andrew Fresh has.
http://openbsd.somedomain.net/
Oh,
* Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060501 18:27]:
On 5/1/06, Greg Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Isn`t it be possible to switch to torrents to install packages?
Are you talking about a torrent for each package? No thanks.
Are you
On 5/1/06, Greg Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/1/06, Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 10:42:32PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If people are so hot for torrents, then why hasn't someone made one?
But
On 5/1/06, Samurai Chef [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/1/06, Greg Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/1/06, Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 10:42:32PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If people are so hot
Greg Thomas.. you may need some glasses
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=114648851725516w=2
Hint: Take a look at the date and the time...
Btw: I talked about synergy-effects wich would be provide an advantage for
all Servers. If you don`t know what synergy is and if that`s the
I was wondering about installing OpenBSD on a very old laptop (no cdrom) via
serial line. I am aware it would take literally ages.
I am guessing slip would be the way to go, I have never used it before. Does
anyone have anything they can point me at with a reasonable introduction,
such as certain
On Monday 01 May 2006 17:29, Henrik Borgh wrote:
I suscpect that the situation is pretty much the same on every laptop,
equpped with a Insyde MobilePRO BIOS,
Or it could just be Acer since I dont get any errors on my generic laptop with
Insyde MobilePRO 4.00:
OpenBSD 3.9-current (GENERIC)
On Sunday 30 April 2006 18:38, Lasse Bach wrote:
Wtf is that? How can that be a secret?
It probably isnt but i bet that's the standard reply you'll always get from
first-level support.
1. Can v5 af the card be used with the ral driver?
I have no idea. I know the ural works with the listed
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 05:31, bofh wrote:
I must say though, a well designed gui can be a great help in managing a
set of firewalls, or a firewall with complex rules. I like pf for the
cleanliness of syntax and simplicity of doing things, but the guy who ran
the checkpoint firewalls for 50+
No.
Stable or Release build that I downloaded boot disks for
today (waiting for my CD's).
Completely blank machine.
Formatted hard drive with low-level SATA utility.
Bob Beck wrote:
* Ed V. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-01 12:34]:
Install from bare metal.
Install completed without errors.
On 5/1/06, Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 05:31, bofh wrote:
I must say though, a well designed gui can be a great help in managing a
[...]
not believe him. Now that I'm managing a small bunch of checkpoint
boxes
with a few hundred rules, and some vpns,
On 5/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Greg Thomas.. you may need some glasses
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=114648851725516w=2
Hint: Take a look at the date and the time...
Btw: I talked about synergy-effects wich would be provide an advantage for
all
Adam wrote:
On Mon, 01 May 2006 16:08:11 -0400 Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And I am not talking about Torrents, as I prefer getting my data from a
trusted source thank you.
As irrelivant as this discussion is, why do people make comments like
this? What makes downloading through
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 03:57:42AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Btw: I talked about synergy-effects wich would be provide an advantage for
all Servers. If you don`t know what synergy is and if that`s the reason
why you can`t stop bitching you may wanna visit the school again
This
On Monday 01 May 2006 22:15, John Kintaro Tate wrote:
I was wondering about installing OpenBSD on a very old laptop (no cdrom)
via serial line. I am aware it would take literally ages.
I am guessing slip would be the way to go, I have never used it before.
Does anyone have anything they can
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 12:15:09PM +1000, John Kintaro Tate wrote:
I was wondering about installing OpenBSD on a very old laptop (no cdrom) via
serial line. I am aware it would take literally ages.
I am guessing slip would be the way to go, I have never used it before. Does
anyone have
STeve Andre' wrote:
On Monday 01 May 2006 22:15, John Kintaro Tate wrote:
I was wondering about installing OpenBSD on a very old laptop (no cdrom)
via serial line. I am aware it would take literally ages.
I am guessing slip would be the way to go, I have never used it before.
Does anyone
I am reading through the tree(3), and I need some clarification. If I want to
correctly remove an element from a red black tree that I have found and free
it's memory allocation, this code should work, right?
find.i = 400;
n = RB_FIND(inttree, head, find);
if (n != NULL) {
n =
On 5/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greg Thomas.. you may need some glasses
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=114648851725516w=2
Hint: Take a look at the date and the time...
http://www.bsdforums.org/forums/archive/index.php/t-31242.html
What's your point
On 2-May-06, at 12:21 AM, jared r r spiegel wrote:
a couple of things spring to mind:
A) python would have to be in base then. the license seems to my
amateur eyes as a BSD license with a tamed-down djb clause #3.
perhaps the license excludes it from consideration in base.
Hello...
Some people seem to think that installing a compiler inherently makes
their system less secure... despite never being able to cite any actual
reasons why.
Personally, I really dont see how a compiler is going to lessen
security, particuarly when they are used to patch the system, But I
67 matches
Mail list logo
