On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Jussi Peltola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The other option I believe would be using PF to round robin the packets
on
both destinations using route-to rules. Would this work?
Why wouldn't it?
Not that I can think of, I guess that is why I am emailing the list
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 01:03:37PM -0500, William Boshuck wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 12:59:29PM -0500, William Boshuck wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 05:39:46PM +0100, Christophe Rioux wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 04:31:57PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just try to install
Hi
I just try to install OpenBSD 4.4 on a serveur (HP DL120
G5) to test the
functionality of the raid (seens it works again .).
I configure the first disk without any issue, and then try following
commands:
disklabel wd0 disklabel.wd1
fdisk -i wd1
disklabel -R -r wd1
Hello Damian/Claer/misc,
Thanks for your feedback,
Just a bit more background...
Here is some of my reasoning for wanting to do trap handling and
duplications
There are several advantages to having the devices send only one trap to
a central system.
1) Less configuration on the devices (and
On 2008-11-05, Mikel Lindsaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The other option I believe would be using PF to round robin the packets on
both destinations using route-to rules. Would this work?
it should, but you might need to make the rules stateless (no state).
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 10:37:27AM +0100, Michael wrote:
Hi,
I've got trouble adding a IPv6 route to the routing table. Looked at the
man pages and searched the web but that didn't help.
I've got a setup like this
[ISP A]---
|---[router]
[ISP B]---
[ISP A] and [ISP B]
Michael wrote:
Hi,
I've got trouble adding a IPv6 route to the routing table. Looked at the
man pages and searched the web but that didn't help.
I've got a setup like this
[ISP A]---
|---[router]
[ISP B]---
[ISP A] and [ISP B] are ALIX boxes and [router] is another box I
Hi,
Claudio Jeker schrieb:
The man page does not mention that you can use CIDR notation for IPv6.
Use -prefixlen instead that will work:
route add -inet6 2a01:198:xxx:: -repfixlen 48 2a01:198:yyy::3
Thanks, that worked. :-)
# route add -inet6 2a01:198:xxx:: -prefixlen 48 2a01:198:yyy::3
add
On 2008-11-05, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I been updating packages from 4.3 to 4.4 but my box rebooted due to a
power outage and now I'm getting the following error while updating
packages:
Warning: couldn't read packing-list from installed package jasper-1.900.1
File
Hi,
I've got trouble adding a IPv6 route to the routing table. Looked at the
man pages and searched the web but that didn't help.
I've got a setup like this
[ISP A]---
|---[router]
[ISP B]---
[ISP A] and [ISP B] are ALIX boxes and [router] is another box I where
want to add the
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 10:45:58AM +0100, Christophe Rioux wrote:
Hi
I follow my mail from september were I tried to install the soft raid on
OpenBSD 4.3. As we saw, this couldn't work.
Do not mix up softraid with RaidFrame.
You use RaidFrame (raidctl below).
softraid use bioctl.
They are
I redone the procedure with the new released version, and
it seems to be
better:
Extraction of dmesg:
softraid0 at root
root on wd0a swap on wd0b dump on wd0b
raid0: Component /dev/wd0d being configured at row: 0 col: 0
Row: 0 Column: 0 Num Rows: 1 Num Columns: 2
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:26:02PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello again,
After a long time since my initial post, I managed to test the
machine which stopped three times in a week because of this uvm_fault.
At first I thought it was the RAM. The RAM checked out fine after a
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 09:57:31AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 01:03:37PM -0500, William Boshuck wrote:
Sorry, this does seem ok in 4.3. (An example in
the FAQ uses a relative path, and that's what I've
always done.)
It only seems ok in 4.3 *if you ignore the
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 12:22:03PM +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote:
Here is what Stuart requested.
I hope the attachment goes through!
00f0:
0100: 6382 5363 3401 0035 c.Sc4..5
And that might be the problem.
Simen Stavdal wrote:
:1) Less configuration on the devices (and also less load, though not a
:big problem anymore). This is not really a problem for small
:installations, but once you have 500+ devices to configure, it is easy
:to do the maths.
You should always have systems in
Hi Damian/misc,
I appreciate your input -I really do.
Please see my comments below.
Cheers,
Simon.
On Wed Nov 5 14:46 , Damian Gerow sent:
Simen Stavdal wrote:
: 1) Less configuration on the devices (and also less load, though
not a
: big problem anymore). This is not really a problem
Hi misc,
With inteldrm enabled, my 3D Desktop works.
Steps:
1. Enabling 3D Acceleration:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/$ glxinfo | grep -i direct
direct rendering: Yes
2. Download the 3Ddesktop
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=59688
3. Compilation
tar xzf 3ddesktop-0.2.9.tar.gz
cd
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 11:32:36AM +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote:
Deraj Puma wrote:
This same thing happened to me last night between me and my ISP. I
deleted /var/db/dhclient.leases.if and rebooted which worked.
No cigar.
Of course, I have no /var/db/dhclient.leases, but I did move
dhcpd.leases
Simen Stavdal wrote, sometime around 05/11/08 14:14:
Hi Damian/misc,
I appreciate your input -I really do.
Please see my comments below.
I am not trying to escape the fact that one needs systems in place to
manage large installations, I am merely looking for what *I* think
would be a
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 12:30:58PM +0100, Christophe Rioux wrote:
I redone the procedure with the new released version, and
it seems to be
better:
Extraction of dmesg:
softraid0 at root
root on wd0a swap on wd0b dump on wd0b
raid0: Component /dev/wd0d being configured
Simen Stavdal wrote:
: I am not trying to escape the fact that one needs systems in place
: to manage large installations, I am merely looking for what *I*
: think would be a better way to deploy resources.
I'm just going to drop this part of the thread.
: As a service
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 11:32:36AM +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote:
This is the dmesg, and it clearly shows a compatibility problem; under
the default as well as under verbose states:
Nov 5 11:07:07 solN /sbin/dhcpagent[319]: [ID 566172 daemon.warning]
recv_pkt: bad option overload
Nov 5
Hi
I follow my mail from september were I tried to install the soft raid on
OpenBSD 4.3. As we saw, this couldn't work.
I redone the procedure with the new released version, and it seems to be
better:
Extraction of dmesg:
softraid0 at root
root on wd0a swap on wd0b dump on wd0b
raid0:
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 8:10 AM, William Boshuck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, thanks, and sorry if I seem to have suggested
otherwise. The man page says that if I use a
relative path then newfs will do the right thing
(use the corresponding raw device), and that's
the form of the command in
Hi Damian,
Nothing like a fiery discussion :)
On Wed Nov 5 15:39 , Damian Gerow sent:
Simen Stavdal wrote:
: I am not trying to escape the fact that one needs systems in place
: to manage large installations, I am merely looking for what *I*
: think would be a better way to deploy
Hi
I try to reconfigure httpd on OpenBSD 4.4 to do reverse proxy as I did for
years following this documentation : http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article
http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=articlesid=20040118105719
sid=20040118105719
I can't get it done.
The only relevant message is in
Hi Russell,
Thanks for your answer.
Sending traps to multicast addresses seems like a good idea, except it
would be up to the receiver to decide whether to use the trap or not
(taking away the possibility to filter which hosts gets copied the traps
(multicast traps to predefined destinations)).
Simen Stavdal wrote, sometime around 05/11/08 15:25:
Hi Russell,
Thanks for your answer.
Sending traps to multicast addresses seems like a good idea, except it
would be up to the receiver to decide whether to use the trap or not
(taking away the possibility to filter which hosts gets copied
Simen Stavdal wrote:
: Worth submitting a feature request?
: --- I looks like this would be the best solution ---
Sounds like you have your desired solution. So long as the OBSD developers
accept your request as valid.
: --- The subject of my posting is Duplicating incoming
Note that you can still create a setup that does not
raid the root disk, just all others. And then use
the /altroot backup for the root disk, preferably
/altroot on wd1a. Raided root disk might be regarded
as a doubtful feature anyway since the kernel will
be loaded from wd0 anyway, and if
Hello again,
Ok, I think we are getting closer to a resolution.
I like the loopback solution (never thought of that), it should work for
udp at least since it is connection-less, and it would work for my
scenario and netflow alike.
Then you could add multiple loopbacks to subscribe to different
Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
This (untested) diff might help. Unfortunately I have no Solaris to
test against and I'm off to work now. Test reports welcome, or better
fixes.
You lack the Solaris, and my firewall lacks the sources and stuff, so I
can't compile there. But if the dhcpd is a
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008-11-05, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I been updating packages from 4.3 to 4.4 but my box rebooted due to a
power outage and now I'm getting the following error while updating
packages:
Warning: couldn't read packing-list from installed package jasper-1.900.1
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 09:40:02AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008-11-05, Mikel Lindsaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The other option I believe would be using PF to round robin the packets on
both destinations using route-to rules. Would this work?
it should, but you might need to
On 2008-11-05, Christophe Rioux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that you can still create a setup that does not
raid the root disk, just all others. And then use
the /altroot backup for the root disk, preferably
/altroot on wd1a. Raided root disk might be regarded
as a doubtful feature anyway
Hi misc@:
I tried :
$ swapctl -d /dev/wd0b
swapctl: /dev/wd0b: Unknown error: -682811376
$ swapctl -l
Device 512-blocks UsedAvail Capacity Priority
swap_device 294518400 29451840 0%0
why 24GB of swap?
It was a partitioning error (i didnt know that b: is
hi,
i've been running 4.4 release since the cd's arrived, and have
experienced 3 freezes/crashes since then. first time was when i
was enabling wpa2psk on the ral0 interface, second time when simply
running a vnc session, and the third directly after te reboot following
the second freeze.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 5:45 AM, andrew fresh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 09:40:02AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008-11-05, Mikel Lindsaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The other option I believe would be using PF to round robin the packets
on
both destinations
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 07:05:56PM +0100, Louis V. Lambrecht wrote:
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008-11-05, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I been updating packages from 4.3 to 4.4 but my box rebooted due to a
power outage and now I'm getting the following error while updating
packages:
Hi, for some reason my OpenBSD 4.4 firewall is been able to negotiate
dhcp request although there are no rules that allow this operation.
If I issue a 'dhclient vr0' I get the following:
$sudo dhclient vr0
DHCPREQUEST on vr0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67
DHCPACK from 190.18.xx.yy
bound to
On 2008-11-05, Limaunion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, for some reason my OpenBSD 4.4 firewall is been able to negotiate
dhcp request although there are no rules that allow this operation.
dhcp uses BPF (like tcpdump does), this is below PF and is not
restricted by PF.
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 09:47:55PM -0200, Limaunion wrote:
Hi, for some reason my OpenBSD 4.4 firewall [has] been able to [send
a] dhcp request although there are no [pf] rules that allow this
operation.
Because dhclient uses a low-level interface, accessible only to root,
that gets around PF.
Send to: misc@, not me ;-)
Happens to me all the time.
Marc Espie wrote:
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 07:05:56PM +0100, Louis V. Lambrecht wrote:
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008-11-05, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I been updating packages from 4.3 to 4.4 but my box rebooted
Are you certain that /var/www/proxy/ is writeable by the server?
i.e. what is the owner/group of the directory and what are the permissions?
Pc Nicolas wrote:
Hi
I try to reconfigure httpd on OpenBSD 4.4 to do reverse proxy as I did for
years following this documentation :
In the ftp list for openbsd, the master fan-out is ftp.openbsd.org and a
request to use a secondary mirror.
ftp.ca.openbsd.org is listed as a secondary mirror in Edmonton.
However, the motd at ftp.ca.openbsd.org says that
OpenBSD ftp services are not really provided at this site.
awesome dude, thanks for sharing. will do it later on my thinkpad x61
which has intel chip as well. actually, one of the reasons i bought it
was openbsd 'better' support of the intel chip vs the nvidia or else stuff.
Joco Salvatti wrote:
Hi misc,
With inteldrm enabled, my 3D Desktop works.
Cadastro com dados completos para o Brasil todo.
Empresas e Pessoas Fmsicas.
Separados por estados.
Base de Banda Larga, Celular, Fmsico, Jurmdico e outros.
Entre em contato e tire suas dzvidas.
=
Telefone: 0XX+51+3741.4617
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2008-11-06, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008-11-05, Limaunion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, for some reason my OpenBSD 4.4 firewall is been able to negotiate
dhcp request although there are no rules that allow this operation.
dhcp uses BPF (like tcpdump does), this is below PF and is not
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Marc Espie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 07:05:56PM +0100, Louis V. Lambrecht wrote:
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008-11-05, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I been updating packages from 4.3 to 4.4 but my box rebooted due to a
power outage and
I've followed the SSL instructions in the FAQ,
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq10.html#HTTPS, but I get the following error in
Firefox (other browsers don't work either)
SSL received a record that exceeded the maximum permissible length.
(Error code: ssl_error_rx_record_too_long)
PF allows
yes, its awesome this time !
James R. Campbell wrote:
Thanks for all of your hard work! I really enjoyed the song in this release
also.
--James
Congrats, Mr. de Raadt
2008/10/31 Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nov 1, 2008.
We are pleased to announce the official release of OpenBSD 4.4.
This is our 24th release on CD-ROM (and 25th via FTP). We remain
proud of
53 matches
Mail list logo
