no ocamlopt in openbsd?

2008-12-03 Thread Vivek Ayer
Hey guys, I'm trying to compile the texvc in the mediawiki package so I can render LaTeX on the fly, but it needs the ocaml set of binaries including ocamlc and ocamlopt. The OpenBSD 4.3 package for ocaml doesn't have the ocamlopt binary meaning I can't compile texvc. Is there any hope? Should I t

Re: mutt and ffs stat performance when starting mutt

2008-12-03 Thread jared r r spiegel
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 03:38:07PM +0800, David Schulz wrote: > maildir_header_cache_verify means : Check for Maildir unaware programs > other than Mutt-ng having modified maildir files when the header cache > is in use. This incurs one stat(2) per message every time the folder is > opened. >

Re: OpenBSD

2008-12-03 Thread Marco Peereboom
You are having some interrupt issues. Try GENERIC.MP. If that does not work give -current a try (upgrade to a snapshot; takes less than 5 minutes on this box). On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 07:56:55PM -0800, rizzo0917 wrote: > I knew that !! :) > > dmesg: > OpenBSD 4.4 (GENERIC) #1021: Tue Aug 12 17:

Re: OpenBSD

2008-12-03 Thread rizzo0917
I knew that !! :) dmesg: OpenBSD 4.4 (GENERIC) #1021: Tue Aug 12 17:16:55 MDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC cpu0: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 3000+ ("AuthenticAMD" 686-class, 512KB L2 cache) 2.18 GHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,

Re: OpenBSD

2008-12-03 Thread Marco Peereboom
Hi. Your report misses dmesg and xorg log. On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 06:23:16PM -0800, rizzo0917 wrote: > Hi I just installed openbsd on a computer just for a learning experience. I > managed to get most of it up and running, and currently posting from the > openbsd machine. However there are a few

Pedido de Agenda d2

2008-12-03 Thread Agenda DIARIO JURIDICO 2009
AGENDA DIARIO JURMDICO 2009 Para escolher o modelo e fazer pedido acesse o site www.novaagenda.com.br Se preferir envie email para [EMAIL PROTECTED] ou telefone para 21.2225-7560 / 21.2556-9879

OpenBSD

2008-12-03 Thread rizzo0917
Hi I just installed openbsd on a computer just for a learning experience. I managed to get most of it up and running, and currently posting from the openbsd machine. However there are a few hardware problems: 1. No usb ports work. They all power the devices on , but dmesg doesn't change. I tried a

Re: ar5424 hal codes ??

2008-12-03 Thread ropers
2008/12/3 romeofx romeofx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > # dmesg |grep ath0 > ath0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Atheros AR5424" rev 0x01: irq 10 > ath0: AR5424 14.2 phy 7.0 rf 0.0, WOR5_ETSIC, address xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx > > ar5424 of hal codes are open now? > http://svn.freebsd.org/base/projects/ath_hal/ > htt

Varjuk a Mikulast!

2008-12-03 Thread noreply
Kedves Rowiw FelhasznC!lC3! Oldalunk folyamatos fejlesztC)s alatt C!ll. A hC)ten a legrC6videbb C:t kijelzC)se funkciC3t vezettC A kapcsolati hC!lC3tokat hasznC!lva az algoritmus megkeresi, hogy mennyi lC)pC)sbC6l C)rhetC6 el egy kedves ismerC6sC6tC6k. KarC!csonyra C:jabb fejlesztC)skC)nt az

Re: dmesg Asus EEE Box 202

2008-12-03 Thread Anathae Townsend
Ted Unangst Sent Wednesday, December 03, 2008 3:46 PM > On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Anathae Townsend > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The Intel Atom 270 is a single physical core with a new type of > > hyperthreading. > > I notice that the dmesg reports it as two separate cpus (cpu0 cpu1). > I'

Re: dmesg Asus EEE Box 202

2008-12-03 Thread Daniel E. Hassler
Below is dmesg.boot from an Intel D945GCLF2 - MP kernel sees 4 CPU's ;) OpenBSD 4.4-stable (GENERIC.MP) #0: Mon Nov 24 20:06:06 PST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP RTC BIOS diagnostic error 80 cpu0: Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU 330 @ 1.60GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 1.60 G

Re: dmesg Asus EEE Box 202

2008-12-03 Thread Ted Unangst
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Anathae Townsend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Intel Atom 270 is a single physical core with a new type of > hyperthreading. > I notice that the dmesg reports it as two separate cpus (cpu0 cpu1). I'm > guessing > that this would mean that with dual core Atom 330 i

Re: dmesg Asus EEE Box 202

2008-12-03 Thread Anathae Townsend
I extracted the dmesg that was at the bottom of the op's email for reference. The Intel Atom 270 is a single physical core with a new type of hyperthreading. I notice that the dmesg reports it as two separate cpus (cpu0 cpu1). I'm guessing that this would mean that with dual core Atom 330 it bsd

ar5424 hal codes ??

2008-12-03 Thread romeofx romeofx
# dmesg |grep ath0 ath0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Atheros AR5424" rev 0x01: irq 10 ath0: AR5424 14.2 phy 7.0 rf 0.0, WOR5_ETSIC, address xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx ar5424 of hal codes are open now? http://svn.freebsd.org/base/projects/ath_hal/ http://madwifi-project.org/wiki/news/20081129/sam-leffler-relea

Re: bash for root?

2008-12-03 Thread Jesse Zbikowski
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jesse Zbikowski wrote: >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toor > > Did you actually READ that article? say, maybe, end part under "Security > Considerations"? Yup. Did you read it as well, or did you just assume that because

Re: radeondrm issues

2008-12-03 Thread Mattieu Baptiste
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 12:55 AM, Dan Harnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:12:48AM +0100, Mattieu Baptiste wrote: > > > > You can imagine that if I had the oportunity to do something on the > console, > > I would have already done that. > > You'd be surprised. > > > The p

Re: bash for root?

2008-12-03 Thread Paul de Weerd
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:21:28PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote: > Martin Schrvder wrote: >> 2008/12/2 Christopher Linn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>>$ sudo su - >> >> Make that >> $ sudo -s >> >> Best >>Martin > > amazing how annoying two words can be. > By saying "make that", you are saying so

pcidump hexdump byte ordering

2008-12-03 Thread dermiste
Hi misc, I'm toying with SMM with the prospect to write a correct (read: not depending on some useless firmware magic) driver for battery threshold setting for thinkpads. Right now I need to flip the D_OPEN flag of the northbridge, but I'm unsure about the ordering of the bytes in the PCI subsyste

Re: bash for root?

2008-12-03 Thread Nick Holland
Martin Schrvder wrote: 2008/12/2 Christopher Linn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: $ sudo su - Make that $ sudo -s Best Martin amazing how annoying two words can be. By saying "make that", you are saying someone else was wrong, and this is correct. For many purposes, "sudo su -" and "sudo

Re: bash for root?

2008-12-03 Thread Nick Holland
Jesse Zbikowski wrote: Nick Holland wrote: the generally bad idea of duplicate user numbers I am not aware that this is considered a bad idea to have two usernames for the same UID. It is a pretty established practice to add a so-called "toor" username for exactly the reason of getting a nice

Re: Local mail relay

2008-12-03 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Thu, 20.11.2008 at 14:57:21 +0200, Yuriy A. Dmitrishin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > router sm-msp-queue[3879]: mAFNUix6020927: to=root, delay=4+12:59:18, > xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=19473085, relay=[127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, > stat=Deferred: Connection refused by [127.0.0.1] > > H

Re: extend snmp mibs?

2008-12-03 Thread Reyk Floeter
Hi, the tool is requesting the UCD-SNMP-MIB which is a non-standard extension of ucd/net-snmp. I'm not convinced to implement any of the non-standard UCD mibs. Most of the useful values can be exported by the standards-based HOST-RESOURCES-MIB and I already started on extending our implementatio

Re: extend snmp mibs?

2008-12-03 Thread Alexander Sabourenkov
Ricardo Augusto de Souza wrote: Hi, I am trying to configure snmpd in a openbsd 4.3 . It4s running and i am able to collect some info from openbsd. I am using zenoss ( www.zenoss.com ) to monitor all my enviroment. zenoss can only show IpInterface. At windows servers i had to install snmp info

Re: bash for root?

2008-12-03 Thread Juan Miscaro
2008/12/3 Diana Eichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Brian wrote: > >> --- On Tue, 12/2/08, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Install bash statically linked. That's all. >>> >>> Never make a mistake. That's all. >> >> Exactly. I don't get this thread. I mean, I could

Re: Another softraid question

2008-12-03 Thread Marco Peereboom
I created a migration option so it should work just fine. You might get an irritating message to announce that it is migrating but that is it. You do have to migrate all members for it to work (obviously). This is all handled magically for you; no user intervention required. On Wed, Dec 03, 2008

extend snmp mibs?

2008-12-03 Thread Ricardo Augusto de Souza
Hi, I am trying to configure snmpd in a openbsd 4.3 . It4s running and i am able to collect some info from openbsd. I am using zenoss ( www.zenoss.com ) to monitor all my enviroment. zenoss can only show IpInterface. At windows servers i had to install snmp informant to extend snmp mibs. zenos

Re: bash for root?

2008-12-03 Thread Diana Eichert
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Brian wrote: --- On Tue, 12/2/08, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Install bash statically linked. That's all. Never make a mistake. That's all. Exactly. I don't get this thread. I mean, I could understand BASH as an option when openBSD was moving off of csh b

Can't associate a rt2790 (ral) wifi card to an access point

2008-12-03 Thread Louis Opter
Hello, I'm trying to configure a rt2790 wifi card under OpenBSD 4.4-release. The card is perfectly recognized by the ral driver as you can see in dmesg : http://www.kalessin.fr/stuff/eee901xp_16g_single_ssd.txt "ral0 at pci4 dev 0 function 0 "Ralink RT2790" rev 0x00: apic 2 int 19 (irq 11), add

Re: maxmaxusers in 4.4-stable

2008-12-03 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 02:09:12PM +0100, Sico Bruins wrote: > On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:42:42PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:36:49PM +0100, Sico Bruins wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:06:14PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, Dec 03, 200

Re: dmesg `Lenovo IdeaPad S10e'

2008-12-03 Thread Miod Vallat
> Note: I installed the wlan-firmware BWI(4) but the dmesg says: > > "Broadcom BCM4315" rev 0x01 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 not configured 4315 use a different radio than the other broadcom devices supported by bcm(4), and there is currently no support for it. Miod

Re: maxmaxusers in 4.4-stable

2008-12-03 Thread Sico Bruins
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:42:42PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: [mostly deleted for brevity] > You are confusing groups and login classes. Foot in mouth time, putting in "staff" with vipw has magically lifted the 100 process limit. Now back to a lower maxusers setting (below 100), maybe something

Re: dmesg `Lenovo IdeaPad S10e'

2008-12-03 Thread Christian Ruesch
Note: I installed the wlan-firmware BWI(4) but the dmesg says: "Broadcom BCM4315" rev 0x01 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 not configured -- Kind regards Christian Ruesch

Re: maxmaxusers in 4.4-stable

2008-12-03 Thread Sico Bruins
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:42:42PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:36:49PM +0100, Sico Bruins wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:06:14PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:57:32AM +0100, Sico Bruins wrote: >>> On one of my PCs I ran i

Re: OpenBSD and XenSource

2008-12-03 Thread Dongsheng Song
Yes, This happend for default rtl8139 nics, you can use e1000 nics instead rtl8139. 2008/12/3 Felipe Alfaro Solana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 4:45 AM, Dongsheng Song <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Yes, I running OpenBSD amd64 in Debian 5.0(lenny) kvm box for OpenBSD >> Translatio

dmesg `Lenovo IdeaPad S10e'

2008-12-03 Thread Christian Ruesch
OpenBSD 4.4-current (GENERIC) #1544: Tue Dec 2 17:45:52 MST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC cpu0: Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N270 @ 1.60GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 1.60 GHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,F

Re: maxmaxusers in 4.4-stable

2008-12-03 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:36:49PM +0100, Sico Bruins wrote: > On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:06:14PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:57:32AM +0100, Sico Bruins wrote: > > > >> On one of my PCs I ran into the process table full / cannot fork > >> trouble, so I decided to

Re: maxmaxusers in 4.4-stable

2008-12-03 Thread Sico Bruins
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:06:14PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:57:32AM +0100, Sico Bruins wrote: > >> On one of my PCs I ran into the process table full / cannot fork >> trouble, so I decided to make a single change in the GENERIC >> kernel config: I bumped up the max

Re: OpenBSD and XenSource

2008-12-03 Thread Felipe Alfaro Solana
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 4:45 AM, Dongsheng Song <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, I running OpenBSD amd64 in Debian 5.0(lenny) kvm box for OpenBSD > Translation > Status[1] at lease one month, it's fine! For me, OpenBSD 4.4 on KVM/HVM in 32-bit mode is painful: I keep getting a watchdog message fro

synproxy issue

2008-12-03 Thread Stephan A. Rickauer
I seem to either not understand or having the following synproxy issue: A client (172.16.2.60) behind a firewall (nat, 4.4) does a http connect to cds.sun.com (72.5.239.134), requesting the header only: $ lynx -dump -head http://cds.sun.com The matching pf rule is: pass in log quick inet proto

Re: maxmaxusers in 4.4-stable

2008-12-03 Thread Paul de Weerd
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:57:32AM +0100, Sico Bruins wrote: | On one of my PCs I ran into the process table full / cannot fork | trouble, so I decided to make a single change in the GENERIC | kernel config: I bumped up the maxusers setting to 128. Which of the two did you run into ? proces table

Re: maxmaxusers in 4.4-stable

2008-12-03 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:57:32AM +0100, Sico Bruins wrote: > On one of my PCs I ran into the process table full / cannot fork > trouble, so I decided to make a single change in the GENERIC > kernel config: I bumped up the maxusers setting to 128. > > Config warned me that "config: warning: maxu

maxmaxusers in 4.4-stable

2008-12-03 Thread Sico Bruins
On one of my PCs I ran into the process table full / cannot fork trouble, so I decided to make a single change in the GENERIC kernel config: I bumped up the maxusers setting to 128. Config warned me that "config: warning: maxusers (128) > 100". I grepped around in /usr/src/usr.sbin/config and fou

Re: I/O redirection

2008-12-03 Thread Heinrich Rebehn
On Dec 3, 2008, at 10:49 AM, Tom Van Looy wrote: No, check the ksh man page. Or, you could use the /usr/bin/time command to just avoid the ksh builtin. /usr/bin/time java helloWorld >time.report 2>&1 Which works as expected. Or use $ (time java helloWorld) >time.report 2>&1 -Heinrich

Re: I/O redirection

2008-12-03 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 09:49:21AM +, Tom Van Looy wrote: > >No, check the ksh man page. > > Or, you could use the /usr/bin/time command to just avoid the ksh builtin. > /usr/bin/time java helloWorld >time.report 2>&1 > Which works as expected. That depends very much on your expectations.

Another softraid question

2008-12-03 Thread Manuel Ravasio
Back to my 3 disks PC... Suppose I decide to move the two disks containing the RAID0 volume to a different OpenBSD-4.4 PC. Suppose also I put another disk in said PC, so that the two disks are labeled wd1 and wd2 again. Or suppose I need to reinstall OpenBSD. Would the filesystem on RAID0 volume

Re: I/O redirection

2008-12-03 Thread Tom Van Looy
>No, check the ksh man page. Or, you could use the /usr/bin/time command to just avoid the ksh builtin. /usr/bin/time java helloWorld >time.report 2>&1 Which works as expected.

Re: usb hsdpa modem not working

2008-12-03 Thread Schöberle Dániel
Hi! I'm having the same problem, no reply from the ucom0 or ucom 1. Did you have any luck getting it to work? (same HW btw) Regs, Daniel. > -Original Message- > From: bdz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 12:44 PM > To: misc@openbsd.org > Subject: usb hsdpa m

Re: I/O redirection

2008-12-03 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 02:40:59PM +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote: > Hello, > > I'm not aware if this has been brought up here before, didn't know how > to search for this particular question through the archives, so > writing to the list. > Pardon me if I'm repeating. > > I'm under OpenBSD 4.2 run

Re: bash for root?

2008-12-03 Thread Artur Grabowski
Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > more than 13 years [...] > If you write shell scripts that depend on being run by a specific > shell, you are supposed to use the #! thing. Yes, you are great. You've never made any mistake in more than 13 years. Us mere mortals prefer to avoid the risk of ma

I/O redirection

2008-12-03 Thread Mayuresh Kathe
Hello, I'm not aware if this has been brought up here before, didn't know how to search for this particular question through the archives, so writing to the list. Pardon me if I'm repeating. I'm under OpenBSD 4.2 running ksh (PD KSH v5.2.14 99/07/13.2) as my shell. I tried to do the following; t

Re: bash for root?

2008-12-03 Thread Martin Schröder
2008/12/2 Christopher Linn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >$ sudo su - Make that $ sudo -s Best Martin

�dv

2008-12-03 Thread H�rlevel
Szia Par napja kirdezted hogy nem e tudok egy js letvltős oldalt. Is in most talaltam egyet. Tele van jobbnal jobb filmekkel, is olcss! 1 db sms elk|ldise utan 500 kb/sec-el tvltvttem napokig a legzjabb premier filmeket is mesiket. Szerintem neked is be fog valni: http://href.hu/x/7k7e __

Re: Failure to NAT

2008-12-03 Thread Dieter
> The hard drive on my firewall machine died overnight, so I rebuilt > it with a new hard drive this morning. I grabbed the most recent > OpenBSD CD I had > Any ideas on where I might be going wrong, and what I can do to fix it? You should be restoring from backups. Then you'd have a known worki

Re: bash for root?

2008-12-03 Thread Dieter
> if you continue to do stuff like that, then eventually you will > have such problems. > p.s. 13+ years experience system management with NeXT, SunOS{4.x,5.x}, > MacOS, OpenBSD (2.2 to present), Linux, OSF1/Tru64. Gee, I've been using bash as root's shell for more than 13 years on NetBSD,