From Linux man page for ls
NAME
ls - list directory contents
SYNOPSIS
ls [OPTION]... [FILE]...
pay special attention to synopsis section. I can't see here that your
format of scripts is allowed.
so use what's standard and expected behaviour. It doesn't mean that if
some system is
Hello,
I've updated my two pf firewalls today from 4.8 to 4.9 (worked fine,
nice). But it looks there is a problem with net-snmp and the
traffic reported (IF-MIB). This is not correct anymore (like 30
Mbits/s instead more than 150 Mbits/s). I've checked the interfaces
indexes in the snmp tables
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 03:48:59AM +0200, Benny Lofgren wrote:
On 2011-06-22 03.03, vadi...@gmail.com wrote:
Please continue to use Linux.
That's ugly, useless and dangerous.
Oops, looks like that was a holy war type of question. Sorry I did
not want to start that.
If you want
Why don't you use aliases ?
in your .zshrc:
alias ls=ls -lh
alias l=ls -lh
Le 22/06/2011 05:50, vadi...@gmail.com a C)crit :
On 6/21/11, Johan Beisserj...@caustic.org wrote:
I use Bash and OpenBSD's ksh. In both CTRL-a gets me back to the beginning
of the line.
I use zsh in vi mode. So
I understood the idea, but please keep in mind that I'm just a regular
user, not OS developer. I just pick features I find useful no matter
how wrong they look. That was a stop or go kind of question because
I do not want to spend a lot of time reading manual and experimenting
with stuff just to
Why don't you use aliases ?
It's not about 'ls' only: I've just used it as an example. I noticed
that after running a command with one set of options sometimes I want
to add another option(s). For some reason this is important for me to
the extent that I have not become a FreeBSD user when I had
On 2011-06-22 09.24, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 03:48:59AM +0200, Benny Lofgren wrote:
On 2011-06-22 03.03, vadi...@gmail.com wrote:
Please continue to use Linux.
That's ugly, useless and dangerous.
Oops, looks like that was a holy war type of question. Sorry I did
not want
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:20:22PM -0400, vadi...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry I really did not want to start any flame. I just thought that
getting answer from the mailing list would be faster than spending my
time studying source code of the new system.
What you should do is relearn the proper
Seconded, or alternatively can you add another interface (physical
or vlan) to place the server on?
It might be possible to do bridging and nat on the same interface
(possibly using bridge rules and PF tags) but at best you're setting
yourself up for a complicated and fragile ruleset.
On
On 2011-06-21, gdrm g...@opensrv.org wrote:
Hello misc,
I'm trying to configure OpenBSD4.9 with Sendmail as a mail server and so far,
so good, I have a configuration with static IP, masked and with ssl support,
but I can not figure out how to implement sasl, someonehas a link where to
find
tl;dr: In my opinion, these anti Linux rants do harm to OpenBSD by
condemning everything Linux does instead of allowing us to pick out just
the good parts.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:22:02AM +0200, Benny Lofgren wrote:
On 2011-06-22 09.24, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 03:48:59AM
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:49:22 +0200
Tobias Ulmer tobi...@tmux.org wrote:
tl;dr: In my opinion, these anti Linux rants do harm to OpenBSD by
condemning everything Linux does instead of allowing us to pick out
just the good parts.
Hmm. Even if there would be no antilinux rants it is just
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 09:24:35AM +0200, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
This rose tinted OpenBSD is the greatest shit really gets on my
nerves. It's all fun to bash others, but from time to time you have to
look at their stuff and figure out which parts they did right and you
could improve.
Yeah sure.
Hi there,
At first, I would like to apologize for the possibility that this e-mail
message might fatigue you, but I just want to be sure.
I would like to know if my machine automatically reboots at a kernel
panic (if it's not failing too much because of malfunctioning hardware,
etc.,
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, ter Voorde Informatiesystemen wrote:
In /etc/sysctl.conf I see the following commented line:
#ddb.panic=0
and nothing else about ddb.panic is present there. With other words,
I guess: 'ddb.panic=0' is the default boot time setting and does not
have to be set
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:12:30 +0200
ter Voorde Informatiesystemen i...@tv-is.nl wrote:
Hi there,
At first, I would like to apologize for the possibility that this
e-mail message might fatigue you, but I just want to be sure.
I would like to know if my machine automatically reboots at a
Sir Coppa,
That's why I apologized... Forgetting the possibility of reading out the
value of ddb.panic. Kind of stupid for a person (me) doing 'sysctl
hw.sensors' 10 times a week. But that's off topic.
It is set now and returns 0. That machine will me moved 30 kilometers
away and must stay
Hello everybody,
I updated my openbsd firewalls (two carp-ed fw) last month (May 24th) to
4.9 release. I don't know if this is related, but i have a significant
numbers of watchdog timeout errors in logs (the master becomes slave
when the error appears).
Before the update, i've just seen
Le Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:23:01 +0200,
Patrick Lamaiziere patf...@davenulle.org a C)crit :
Hello,
I've updated my two pf firewalls today from 4.8 to 4.9 (worked fine,
nice). But it looks there is a problem with net-snmp and the
traffic reported (IF-MIB). This is not correct anymore (like 30
I am sorry, this confused me, and i didn't quite understand.
Just to be clear:
ddb.panic=0 will boot instead of dropping you into a ddb?
Or is it ddb.panic=1 the option that will make the system boot?
Regards,
David Coppa wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, ter Voorde Informatiesystemen wrote:
tl;dr
linux still sucks
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 01:49:22PM +0200, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
tl;dr: In my opinion, these anti Linux rants do harm to OpenBSD by
condemning everything Linux does instead of allowing us to pick out just
the good parts.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:22:02AM +0200, Benny
Hi folks,
i have installed openbsd 4.9 and i am trying to compile ucspi-tcp-0.88
with a ssl patch, but the compilation process fails due to not finding
a program called nroff.
Previous version of OpenBSD seems to have installed nroff. Does
anybody knows why it was removed?
How could i install
On 2011-06-22, Gregory Edigarov g...@bestnet.kharkov.ua wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:49:22 +0200
Tobias Ulmer tobi...@tmux.org wrote:
tl;dr: In my opinion, these anti Linux rants do harm to OpenBSD by
condemning everything Linux does instead of allowing us to pick out
just the good parts.
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:45:49 -0300
Marcos Laufer mar...@ipversion4.com wrote:
ddb.panic=0 will boot instead of dropping you into a ddb?
greg@greg:~$ banner YES
# # ### #
# # # # #
# # # #
###
## #
## # #
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:09:17 + (UTC)
Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
On 2011-06-22, Gregory Edigarov g...@bestnet.kharkov.ua wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:49:22 +0200
Tobias Ulmer tobi...@tmux.org wrote:
tl;dr: In my opinion, these anti Linux rants do harm to OpenBSD by
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:45:49AM -0300, Marcos Laufer wrote:
I am sorry, this confused me, and i didn't quite understand.
Just to be clear:
ddb.panic=0 will boot instead of dropping you into a ddb?
Or is it ddb.panic=1 the option that will make the system boot?
Please... are we not a
pkg_add groff
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Friedrich Locke
friedrich.lo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
i have installed openbsd 4.9 and i am trying to compile ucspi-tcp-0.88
with a ssl patch, but the compilation process fails due to not finding
a program called nroff.
Previous version
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:52:17 -0300
Friedrich Locke wrote:
Previous version of OpenBSD seems to have installed nroff. Does
anybody knows why it was removed?
How could i install it?
I think it wasn't needed for the man pages anymore. It is in ports,
groff, I think. A search for nroff on the
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 18:11:36 +0300
Gregory Edigarov wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:45:49 -0300
Marcos Laufer mar...@ipversion4.com wrote:
ddb.panic=0 will boot instead of dropping you into a ddb?
greg@greg:~$ banner YES
# # ### #
# # # # #
# # # #
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Tobias Ulmer tobi...@tmux.org wrote:
tl;dr: In my opinion, these anti Linux rants do harm to OpenBSD by
condemning everything Linux does instead of allowing us to pick out just
the good parts.
Don't worry, the ranters and the pickers aren't the same people.
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:52:17 +0200, Friedrich Locke wrote:
i have installed openbsd 4.9 and i am trying to compile ucspi-tcp-0.88
with a ssl patch, but the compilation process fails due to not finding
a program called nroff.
Previous version of OpenBSD seems to have installed nroff. Does
When I first switched to OpenBSD, I thought this would be a huge
problem, but I got used to it in a week or two.
Like someone else said, I just use CTRL-A to go back to the start of the
line.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 4:39 PM, vadi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm considering migrating my desktop
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Tobias Ulmer tobi...@tmux.org wrote:
The getopt(3) function is inconsistent amongst operating systems and
could use some polish in my opinion. Maybe there are technical reasons
why this feature can't be implemented, but this discussion has certainly
On Tue, June 21, 2011 5:39 pm, vadi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm considering migrating my desktop from Linux to OpenBSD but the
main feature that
kept me away from *BSD world for over a decade since I've first tried
FreeBSD was the
one that options must only be specified after command before
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, vadi...@gmail.com wrote:
Why don't you use aliases ?
It's not about 'ls' only: I've just used it as an example. I noticed
that after running a command with one set of options sometimes I want
to add another option(s). For some reason this is important for me to
the extent
Linus didn't do his homework properly. That, combined with the fact that
Linux became such a huge success is both a blessing and a curse to us
in the unix community; on the one hand Linux provides us with plenty of
young blood in a new generation of hackers... while on the other hand
they
On 22 June 2011 21:22, Bryan Irvine sparcta...@gmail.com wrote:
For what it's worth ls, is part of GNU.
I yanked this right from ls.c
/* Written by Richard Stallman and David MacKenzie. */
**ducks**
Huh?
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/bin/ls/ls.c?rev=1.37;content-type=t
On 2011-06-22 13.49, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
OpenBSD specifically and old BSD in general is not true to Unix. From
ksh to billions of options to find and other tools to the entire
networking framework (bolted on with additional syscalls, pseudo devices
etc), nothing of that is Unix (or even
You are completely right.
I was only wondering if I do not set the variable explicitly, the
default value would be 0 or 1.
Kind regards,
Frank
On 06/22/11 17:12, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:45:49AM -0300, Marcos Laufer wrote:
I am sorry, this confused me, and i didn't
Folks,
I could add another physical interface for the internal end of the bridge, but
not for the external end. Would this work?
--Paul
On Jun 22, 2011, at 6:56 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Seconded, or alternatively can you add another interface (physical
or vlan) to place the server on?
On Wednesday, June 22, 2011, ropers rop...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 June 2011 21:22, Bryan Irvine sparcta...@gmail.com wrote:
For what it's worth ls, is part of GNU.
I yanked this right from ls.c
/* Written by Richard Stallman and David MacKenzie. */
**ducks**
Huh?
Quarantine Digest for misc@openbsd.org
Click here to access your spam quarantine.
The spam quarantine contains emails that are being held from your email
account.
Quarantined emails can be released to your inbox or deleted using the
spam quarantine link.
172871
[IMAGE]
Pms Capacitacisn Efectiva de Mixico le presenta este programa:
Convencisn Nacional Secretarmas Ejecutivas y Asistentes 2011
22-23 de Julio, Playa del Carmen
Exclusivas conferencias presentadas por 3 Expertos Expositores
Empresa Registrada ante la STPS Reg. COLG640205CP30005
Hi guys,
I am in the midst of configuring the OpenBSD 4.9 PF using ip balancing and
active-passive solution.
Every interface was configured successfully but I hit the problem when I am
going to add IP Alias/NAT IP on carp interface.
1)For active-passive scenario:
Let say I am going to
44 matches
Mail list logo
