On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 11:45:40AM -0700, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> > From: Gilles Chehade
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2018 1:20 PM
> >
> > That's bad but could easily be fixed if you want to help us
>
> So I dropped in the latest table-ldap from git, and it still failed
> authentications after an
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 09:37:07PM +0200, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 03:58:59PM +0300, Consus wrote:
> > On 14:31 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 02:20:50PM +0200, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > > > Could someone tell me if my ch
Hello,
Thanks for this patch! I'm setting up a similar configuration. I'll have
a test also.
Regards.
Christophe
Le 05/24/18 à 20:45, Paul B. Henson a écrit :
From: Gilles Chehade
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2018 1:20 PM
That's bad but could easily be fixed if you want to help us
So I dropp
Is this a laptop you're dealing with? Vendor firmwares tend to enforce a
whitelist of permitted cards for the internal mini-PCI(e) slot.
--
Patrick Harper
paia...@fastmail.com
On Wed, 23 May 2018, at 13:46, Chris Bennett wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 07:43:09AM +, Antal Ispanovity wr
Ah okay. In my different situation I did
mv /etc/ssl/cert /tmp
Then ran command again.
I will try -D next time instead.
V/r,
Bryan
> On May 25, 2018, at 5:51 PM, Scott Vanderbilt wrote:
>
>> On 5/25/2018 2:41 PM, Bryan Harris wrote:
>> Did you already have a cert for datagenic.com but whi
Am Freitag, Mai 25, 2018 22:22 CEST, Alexandre Ratchov schrieb:
> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 10:22:26AM +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> > Hi Alexandre,
> >
> > Am Freitag, Mai 25, 2018 08:41 CEST, Alexandre Ratchov
> > schrieb:
> >
> > > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 12:21:18AM +0200, Alexandre Rat
On 5/25/2018 2:41 PM, Bryan Harris wrote:
Did you already have a cert for datagenic.com but which didn’t include the new
name?
I think the -A argument only makes a new cert when old one doesn’t exist.
Otherwise tries to use found cert and failed because old cert doesn’t have new
name. At leas
Did you already have a cert for datagenic.com but which didn’t include the new
name?
I think the -A argument only makes a new cert when old one doesn’t exist.
Otherwise tries to use found cert and failed because old cert doesn’t have new
name. At least that’s my understanding.
Or maybe I misu
On 5/25/2018 2:20 PM, Fred wrote:
On 05/25/18 21:10, Scott Vanderbilt wrote:
I'm having difficulty creating a new SSL cert for a virtual host I'm
just standing up for the first time. I get the following error on
successive attempts:
urn:acme:error:unauthorized
Error creating new cert :: autho
I have run into a problem that seems similar to yours. I'm still
debugging it (or rather trying to find the time to do so), but I believe
the problem is that acme-client does not correctly handle the "pending"
status: it is handled as "valid". As a result, the challenge file is
removed before the a
On 05/25/18 21:10, Scott Vanderbilt wrote:
I'm having difficulty creating a new SSL cert for a virtual host I'm
just standing up for the first time. I get the following error on
successive attempts:
urn:acme:error:unauthorized
Error creating new cert :: authorizations for these names not found
Hi,
Ingo Schwarze wrote on Thu, May 24, 2018 at 09:15:29PM +0200:
> justina colmena wrote on Thu, May 24, 2018 at 05:54:45PM +:
>> On Wed, 23 May 2018 11:47:47 +0200 Marko Cupac wrote:
>>> I am sure OpenBSD will correct their errors in html/css code, if any,
>> Right now, https://man.openbsd
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 10:22:26AM +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> Am Freitag, Mai 25, 2018 08:41 CEST, Alexandre Ratchov
> schrieb:
>
> > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 12:21:18AM +0200, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> > >
> > > Maybe, but unlikely. If the device attaches, generally
I'm having difficulty creating a new SSL cert for a virtual host I'm
just standing up for the first time. I get the following error on
successive attempts:
urn:acme:error:unauthorized
Error creating new cert :: authorizations for these names not found or
expired: aeneas.datagenic.com
I've ve
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 03:58:59PM +0300, Consus wrote:
> On 14:31 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 02:20:50PM +0200, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > > Could someone tell me if my changes below are OK. :-)
> > >
> > > The part I'm not clear is I read in current.ht
Good afternoon,
I see that the Ubiquiti EdgeRouter 6P is supported under octeon port.
Just wondering if anyone on the list is running OpenBSD 6.3 or current
on the EdgeRouter 6P? I'm mainly interested in the performance of this
unit as a home firewall but also interested in using it for other S
Hi,
On OpenBSD 6.3/amd64, I'm using snmpd(8) to gather pf(4) statistics.
It seems that some stats are not coherent.
For example, on egress and vio0 interfaces.
Asking snmpd(8), I get :
OPENBSD-PF-MIB::pfIfDescr.3 = STRING: "egress"
OPENBSD-PF-MIB::pfIfDescr.12 = STRING: "vio0"
OPENBSD-PF-MIB::pf
Minor OTA
This morning, before my coffee, this email really messed with me.
> $ uname -a
> OpenBSD ultron.hulten.org 6.3 GENERIC.MP#45 amd64
One of my machines is named ultron as well...
Ken
Hello, some more information,
On 25 May 14:15 Marco van Hulten wrote:
> I have a Dell Latitude E7470 with the latest OpenBSD snapshot.
>
> [...]
I also updated the software packages to the snapshot (pkg_add -u);
problem persists.
> Applications crash. For instance for Claws Mail:
>
> Se
Hello, responding to my own post,
On 25 May 13:50 Marco van Hulten wrote:
> I have a Dell Latitude E7470 with the latest OpenBSD snapshot. It
> boots fine when not connected to a docking station. When I connect it
> to a DELL E-Port II (Model No: PR03X) docking station, it crashes with
> the fol
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 09:27:21AM -0400, Amelia A Lewis wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2018 16:15:00 +0300, Consus wrote:
> > On 15:14 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 03:58:59PM +0300, Consus wrote:
> >>> On 14:31 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
> you need an
On Fri, 25 May 2018 16:15:00 +0300, Consus wrote:
> On 15:14 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 03:58:59PM +0300, Consus wrote:
>>> On 14:31 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade wrote:
you need an additonal rule such as:
match auth from any sender for any appl
On 15:20 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> no matter the keywords, there's no way 100% people would be satisfied :)
>
> be happy, first iteration was "match [...] => foobar", now 'action'
> does not look so bad hu ?
Guess so :D
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 04:15:00PM +0300, Consus wrote:
> On 15:14 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 03:58:59PM +0300, Consus wrote:
> > > On 14:31 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > > > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 02:20:50PM +0200, Walter Alejandro Iglesias
> > > > wrot
On 15:14 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 03:58:59PM +0300, Consus wrote:
> > On 14:31 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 02:20:50PM +0200, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > > > Could someone tell me if my changes below are OK. :-)
> > > >
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 03:58:59PM +0300, Consus wrote:
> On 14:31 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 02:20:50PM +0200, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > > Could someone tell me if my changes below are OK. :-)
> > >
> > > The part I'm not clear is I read in current.ht
On 14:31 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 02:20:50PM +0200, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > Could someone tell me if my changes below are OK. :-)
> >
> > The part I'm not clear is I read in current.html remote authenticated
> > users need a explicit rule. Do I need
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 02:20:50PM +0200, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> Could someone tell me if my changes below are OK. :-)
>
> The part I'm not clear is I read in current.html remote authenticated
> users need a explicit rule. Do I need to add some "match auth" rule?
>
yes.
before, "fr
Could someone tell me if my changes below are OK. :-)
The part I'm not clear is I read in current.html remote authenticated
users need a explicit rule. Do I need to add some "match auth" rule?
# /etc/mail/smptd.conf
egress_int="em0"
server="server.roquesor.com"
table aliases file:/etc/mail/
Hello—
I have a Dell Latitude E7470 with the latest OpenBSD snapshot.
$ uname -a
OpenBSD ultron.hulten.org 6.3 GENERIC.MP#45 amd64
dmesg is attached.
Applications crash. For instance for Claws Mail:
Segmentation fault (core dumped) claws-mail
For Firefox there might be mor
Hello—
I have a Dell Latitude E7470 with the latest OpenBSD snapshot. It
boots fine when not connected to a docking station. When I connect it
to a DELL E-Port II (Model No: PR03X) docking station, it crashes with
the following kernel error:
error: [drm:pid8048:i915_gem_init_hw] *ERROR* Failed
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 07:51:15AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> That is at least detected by package tools and more easily fixed :)
The package tools err on the side of caution because we've been burnt
too many times.
There is often whining about it from other developers because sometimes
it
And regarding earlier statements:
Indeed, printers should have good drivers.
Best Regards,
Fair Pay In Cyberspace
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DnvPGTvI8hw
I know Bluetooth support was pulled, but I was wondering if there was any new
information about it being rekindled in some fashion. My primary interest is the
bluetooth audio side.
If there is or isn't I would be interested in helping to make it happen. Not
sure I am the best person to code it, b
rdomain is interessting, wasn´t aware of that.
thanks for this input Claudio.
On 24 May 2018 at 19:58, trondd wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2018 1:28 pm, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 09:22:32AM -0400, trondd wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 23, 2018 4:35 am, Thomas Huber wrote:
> >> > Hi a
Hi Alexandre,
Am Freitag, Mai 25, 2018 08:41 CEST, Alexandre Ratchov schrieb:
> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 12:21:18AM +0200, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> >
> > Maybe, but unlikely. If the device attaches, generally it works. Show
> > what's received on midi2 when you type on the keyboard or do any ot
On 2018-05-24, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> Base system snapshots (including xenocara) and packages are not build
> at the same time. Package builds use the latest snapshot, but since
> building packages takes a day or so (depending on the arcitecture and
> build machines available) and distribution
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 04:38:17PM -0400, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 14:18, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
> > In effect, instead of having:
> > accept from any for local deliver to mbox
> >
> > You will have:
> > action "my_action" mbox
> > match from any for local action "my_act
38 matches
Mail list logo
