design
Its website
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2012-April/240174.html
-
Thanks!
Tony
are on me!
Tony
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.orgwrote:
I'm about to write an article on OpenBSD's brilliant design, mainly to
make
things clearer to myself as well as my coworkers - all of whom have been
using FreeBSD for the past 15 years. All of whom
I've since been advised that a show of appreciation is better expressed
through donations. And they're coming - you have my word.
Tony
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Tony ableton...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Theo,
This was not meant as a troll, sorry if it came off like that.
It was more
MSNBC works now. I'm in London so this means I can see the MSNBC site.
Thank you.
Summary: I want to turn my main system into a semi-automatic follower
of -current and I think this strategy may useful to the project. Is
this something that is already being done?
My rationale here is that it's a good thing for OpenBSD users who have
the technical skills to follow development as
Jan Stary wrote:
There is a difference between an empty table and a nonexistent table,
and there is a difference between a table not existing at load time
and table being deleted.
Exactly what difference in behavior is expected?
This seems too much like NULL pointer exceptions in Java,
where the
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:49 PM, mxb m...@alumni.chalmers.se wrote:
On Apr 3, 2012, at 4:31 PM, Tony Sarendal wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Jonathan Gray j...@jsg.id.au wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 03:09:37PM +0200, Tony Sarendal wrote:
When testing new boxes with Intel E3
When testing new boxes with Intel E3-1270 cpu I don't see AES on the cpu's
in dmesg.
Does this mean that the aes-ni stuff isn't used on these ? I was a bit
curious to see if it had any effect on ipsec performance.
Regards Tony
test3.pio# dmesg
OpenBSD 5.1-current (GENERIC.MP) #258: Mon Apr 2 12
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Jonathan Gray j...@jsg.id.au wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 03:09:37PM +0200, Tony Sarendal wrote:
When testing new boxes with Intel E3-1270 cpu I don't see AES on the
cpu's
in dmesg.
Does this mean that the aes-ni stuff isn't used on these ? I was a bit
attached.
Regards Tony
John Tate wrote:
Don't enter a logical debate with me. I am not interested.
Kinda says it all, don't your think?
Something about gladly making fools suffer as opposed to gladly suffering
fools.
Actually they are a lot kinder and gentler than I would be.
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of John
Tate
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 1:28 AM
To:
Vitali wrote:
I had some big movie files, development directories and so on which I
...
Vital information missing: File system on the USB drive
Guessing:
The USB Drive is FAT32 which has a size limit of 2G on individual files
Out of curiosity, WHY should any make install in ports actually DO anything?
Seems like the object of ports is to make packages and packages are installed
by pkg_add.
If you want to be something, say a packager, it helps if you have at least a
slight clue what it is all about.
-Original
You might try reading your own message.
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of John
Tate
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 9:19 AM
To: Fubar
Cc: Richard Toohey; misc
Subject: Re: Burning DVDs
I have dvd+rw tools and cdrecord still gives
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.comwrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 04:37:49PM +0200, Tony Sarendal wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Josh Hoppes josh.hop...@gmail.com
wrote:
Why are you using set nexthop self and then trying to change
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Patrick Lamaiziere
patf...@davenulle.orgwrote:
Le Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:19:15 +0200,
Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org a icrit :
Hi,
current1# cat /etc/bgpd.conf
AS 65001
network 10.0.1.0/24
current1# bgpctl show rib nei 172.29.1.52 out
flags
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Andre Keller a...@list.ak.cx wrote:
Hi
Am 31.08.2011 10:23, schrieb Tony Sarendal:
Sender says next hop = 172.29.1.100, receiver says .51.
show rib out in this case shows incorrect nexthop.
Well thats kind of the point of having set nexthop self
a bug in bgpctl/bgpd (or where ever it may be).
Dont you want to be able to trust the information bgpctl gives you ?
Regards Tony
frantisek holop wrote:
but for me it's really time to move on.
Bye.
AS 65001
network 10.0.2.0/24
neighbor 172.29.1.51 {
remote-as 65001
set nexthop self
local-address 172.29.1.52
descr current1
}
allow to any
allow from any
Tested on -current, see the same on 4.9.
Regards Tony
into now.
Regards Tony
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.orgwrote:
On 2011-07-08, Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org wrote:
If you're running isakmpd from 4.8 or 4.9 with IKE you want to pull
up src/sbin/isakmpd/dh.c to r1.14 otherwise you will certainly
see problems from time
Joel Carnat wrote
well, compared to my previous box, running NetBSD/xen, the same services
and showing about 0.3-0.6 of load ; I thought a load of 1.21 was quite much.
Different systems will agree on the spelling of the word load.
That is about as much agreement as you can expect.
Does the
Joel Carnat wrote:
But one thing that didn't convinced me is that, if I shutdown apmd and
configure hw.setperf=100, the load drops down to 0.30-0.20.
I don't get how A high load is just that: high. It means you have a lot
of processes that sometimes run. can show load variation depending on
CPU
someone listened to you.
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvsm=130176586700354w=2
Next step:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html
2011/3/30 Tony Berth tonybe...@googlemail.com
Thank you for that clarification
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Janne Johansson icepic...@gmail.comwrote
currently not but this machine will be a DB server (Postgresql + Mysql) and
it was aksed if we could go beyond the 8G.
In any case, for now, if I can address 8G physical memory is fine.
Thanks for your feedback
Tony
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Ted Unangst ted.unan...@gmail.com wrote
I can't??? So the limit of 4G physical memory still exists? And why was this
statement made from 4.4 release?
Thanks
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Janne Johansson icepic...@gmail.comwrote:
2011/3/30 Tony Berth tonybe...@googlemail.com
currently not but this machine will be a DB server
it, let's say, to 16GB?
Thanks
Tony
Methinks this project is somehow about good code, not good moods.
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf
Of Mihai Popescu
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 9:19 AM
To: misc
Subject: Re: is SHA256 file used or not ?
Hi Henning,
It
Marcos Laufer wrote
Is this a prank message?
starting my very own
Obviously I take security seriously,
and therefore will be using OpenBSD exclusively.
One thing is bothering me though.
I hope you friendly folks would help me.
---to quote a rabbit He don't know me do he?
Benny LC6fgren wrote:
Oh come on, surely you can't fail to realize that there are actually
benefits to having all your data on one place, always? Especially if
you
have an environment where you might need to access it from several
different platforms.
Not only in terms of user
Is there a way to redistribute routes from BGP to OSPF using bgpd and ospfd
?
I have a network where the core concists of openbsd devices using bgpd to
distribute
routing information. At present we need to use static routing if we connect
devices that
do not support BGP.
Regards Tony
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Insan Praja SW insan.pr...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Tony,
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 18:44:46 +0700, Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org
wrote:
Is there a way to redistribute routes from BGP to OSPF using bgpd and ospfd
?
on bgpd.conf you might want to do this:
match
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.dewrote:
* Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org [2010-10-23 14:29]:
rtlabel label
Add the prefix with the specified label to the kernel
routing
table.
Is this an error in the page or me
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.orgwrote:
On 2010-10-23, Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org wrote:
rtlabel label
Add the prefix with the specified label to the kernel
routing
table.
I think this should be:
Add the prefix
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.dewrote:
* Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org [2010-10-23 19:03]:
How does OpenBSD handle the same prefix being in both bgpd and ospfd ?
in general? OSPF routes have priority over BGP routes. that's
implemented kernel routing
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.dewrote:
* Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org [2010-10-23 19:03]:
How does OpenBSD handle the same prefix being in both bgpd and ospfd ?
in general
Frank Bax wrote:
Marco Peereboom wrote:
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 01:08:25AM +, JC Choisy wrote:
That being out of the way, you got me wondering what good is
any integrity check which failure is OK.
It is only meant to help uptight people having some sort of false
sense
of
Personally, I liked the article.
Small change in perspective changes an ordeal into an adventure.
Jacob Meuser wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 04:28:57PM +0300, Mihai Popescu B.S. wrote:
Hello,
My post was not intended as a direct hit for the article. I told my
opinion to misc@ because
frantisek holop wrote:
my whining, is a comparison of experiences with others,
questions if someone can reproduce a particular problem
i am having, whether it is considered a problem at all,
and so on. a practice i thought about as the first step
of bug reporting and as such a perfectly
frantisek holop wrote:
the borderline between the useful and useless error checking
is sometimes a bit fuzzy i think.
Not THAT fuzzy.
Foreign file systems NEVER get prime attention.
When you do stupid things the results are rather predictable
and you compound your error by trying to blame
frantisek holop wrote:
to know the road ahead, ask those coming back.
You mean the ones who like it so much they travel it twice?
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Somewhat embarrassingly, OpenBSD has never had a working Firewire
implementation.
As I understand it, only the malware writers are embarrassed.
You don't need a back door when the front door is missing.
Any time all of system memory is open to Read/Write access by
Nick Holland wrote:
On 07/12/10 03:11, czark...@gmail.com wrote:
...
This is not about Theo personally, it's about everyone in this
thread.
Peter did't pretend to get a custommer support, neither he said
someone is
obliged to answer his question. He simply wanted someone familiar
Eric S Pulley wrote:
... and I hate systems that hide that information from me, but
that's just me.
Nope. Not just you.
A system that hides stuff has to be an order of magnitude
more correct just to break even.
Hi,
dmesg keeps displaying following entry:
wd0i: device fault reading fsbn 4146624 of 4146624-4146655 (wd0 bn 85997799;
cn 5353 tn 29 sn 27), retrying
pciide1:0:0: recal drive fault
there are 2 IDE HDs connected. Should I derive that the HD is dead?
Thanks
-p0 001_kerberos.patch
as referred in:
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/4.7/common/001_kerberos.patch
Thanks
Tony
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Nick Holland
n...@holland-consulting.netwrote:
On 06/18/10 09:42, Tony Berth wrote:
when trying to patch a new i386 installation
!
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Nick Holland
n...@holland-consulting.netwrote:
Tony Berth wrote:
did the following:
after navigating to: http://openbsd.org/anoncvs.html#starting
applied:
# *cd /usr; cvs checkout -P -rOPENBSD_4_7 src*
...
now, as I suggested, go read FAQ5 and find out what
Ingo Schwarze wrote:
Hi Tony,
Tony Berth wrote on Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 08:11:31PM +0200:
but FAQ5 is about 'Building the System from Source' which I don't
want!
I just want to patch an existing system!
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq10.html#Patches
Note that this one doesn't talk
).
1 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to
kerberosV/src/lib/krb5/crypto.c.rej
done
-
Thanks
Tony
patrick keshishian wrote:
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Jacob Meuser jake...@sdf.lonestar.org
wrote:
I'm still curious how anything left in /usr/obj can be anything
but a possible problem after updating system binaries and sources
to a new release. especially for people who are just
Jacob Meuser wrote:
...
On 5/06/2010, at 7:31 AM, Nick Holland wrote:
a patch to the upgrade guide would be wrong.
The problem is the patching process (a special case of the userland build
process) assumes a clean obj dir. This has nothing to do with upgrades. If
you try to rebuild the same
IF YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOUR ARE DOING, INSTALL A NEW SNAPSHOT
Theo de Raadt wrote:
Miod, Dale, Kurt, Kettenis and I am quite often the first people to
deal with bumping systems forward over bumps. Some bumps are so
difficult that after they are done the rest of us jump over them using
Jacob Meuser wrote:
On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 01:49:46AM -0400, Tony Abernethy wrote:
Jacob Meuser wrote:
...
On 5/06/2010, at 7:31 AM, Nick Holland wrote:
a patch to the upgrade guide would be wrong.
The problem is the patching process (a special case of the userland build
process) assumes
Jacob Meuser wrote:
On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 05:13:19AM -0400, Tony Abernethy wrote:
All I need to break any automated system you devise is to have
some programs that I compile myself and use the system directories
to hold the sources etc.
then you are on your own, not someone who is just
Jacob Meuser wrote:
we have users that say they follow the install and upgrade guides to the
letter and they get fucked.
there is a problem.
they don't even know /usr/obj exists.
What they say. What they did. Two different things.
There's lots of things they do not know about.
I fail to
Might be better to read and comprehend ``man patch'' before assuming
limitations on the scope of patch's reach.
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf
Of Uwe Dippel
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 11:23 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject:
Uwe Dippel wrote:
drill it down to some 70 files being of the previous
version.
It might be tiring, but what evidence do you want?
The error message(s) you are suppressing (or maybe didn't see)
About the only way you can get some files but not all files
from a tarball is some fatal error in
Why?
(There, I said it.)
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of
irix
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 7:38 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: traffic management
Hello Misc,
But at least you can say why?
no kidding. As we've told
to thousands of our friends AZ
Tourist Friends...
http://www.facebook.com/aztouristnews
Warm Regards,
Tony Venuti
Publisher AZ Tourist News
520-622-7008
Stas Miasnikou wrote:
Marco Peereboom wrote:
Wouldn't it be adorable if people learned to program FSMs instead of
java in those fancy universities?
Seconded.
Do you seriously expect programmers to learn to program?
Lars Nooden wrote:
On Wed, 5 May 2010, Geoff wrote:
There's a paper from Berkeley showing how a threaded program can
never be fully debugged and should be presumed to be broken,
probably fatally broken.
Geoff, can you post the URL or any details that might help finding and
retrieving
Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
pe...@bsdly.net (Peter N. M. Hansteen) writes:
I would think that would be a fair question to ask the person who
told
you PF is garbage because it is multithreaded:
eh, because it is *not* multithreaded:
Now watch when application programmers use multithreaded
Andreas Gerdd wrote:
Hello.
I noticed some unreferenced files from MySQL in my daily output mail;
However, i don't have anything in /tmp or /var/tmp to check/fix the
problem with fsck.
Does this mean i lost some data from the database(s)?
How may i fix or remove the reported bad files?
is it possible to list the patches already applied in a v 4.6 installation?
Thanks
Tony
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 09:35:42PM +0800, Aaron Lewis wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm reading Operating System Concepts (7th Edition) , Written by
Abraham , Peter Greg.
In chapter 5.3 , it talks about a schedule
Aaron Lewis wrote:
Yeah , looping time depends the complexity of that loop , i've learned
that ,
We use a O(n) to present such complexity of a program.
Counterexample:
Simple solution to 9 body problem
Any much quicker solution to same problem.
Do you really have an O(n) solution to a sort?,
Donald Allen wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 4:16 AM, Artur Grabowski a...@blahonga.org
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Donald Allen
donaldcal...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the compliment, but I'm a *lot* older than nine.
Yet you still believe that it's ok for guests to tell
Donald Allen wrote:
So you believe civility and correctness are mutually exclusive?
Interesting.
Hardly, but if I am given a choice, I will take correctness.
You seem to be under the impression that either correctness is
irrelevant or that somehow civility implies correctness.
As for mutual
VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO wrote:
Logic works the same for everyone, since it's an abstract
field, but apparently you did not study it.
It weems that you did not learn it.
Marco Peereboom wrote:
See I told you logic wouldn't work for you.
snip
Since _my_ definition of freedom for software is different, I
reach different conclusions.
Right. It didn't.
VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO wrote:
Please do not take my mesages out of context. Removing sentences, and
twisting what I said can be very convenient to put me in the wrong
whithout factual evidence.
I do not please.
Since no message can be completely within context, that implies
that your are
Zachary Uram wrote:
Your attitude proves my point. I was not trolling. Grow up!
Another of the type of statement guaranteed to be false.
Zachary Uram wrote:
You get lost. You seem to think the project exists as an end unto
itself. Develop the most wonderful kernel and userspace in the world
but if no one uses it what is the point? Since your attitude to new
users is get lost that reflects very poorly on yourself and
I am POSITIVE you are a troll.
-Original Message-
From: Zachary Uram [mailto:net...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 7:58 PM
To: Tony Abernethy
Cc: Bret S. Lambert; misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: OpenBSD culture?
As does yours. Try being positive instead
Zachary Uram wrote:
Sorry a lot of people got upset by my message. I will try to learn
OpenBSD on my own since that is the way to do it here.
That is the way to learn most anything that actually matters.
I don't think that people were so much upset as they prefer
to gladly make fools
: BACKUP - MASTER
Apr 9 16:24:30 fw-pri /bsd: carp2: state transition: BACKUP - MASTER
hopefully you can help me.
Regards,
Tom
net.inet.carp.preempt Allow virtual hosts to preempt each other.
Set it to 0 and give it a try.
/Tony
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Mark Kettenis
mark.kette...@xs4all.nlwrote:
It's worth trying to disable ichiic(4).
Cheers, giving it a go on a few of them.
Over a week running with i386 4.6 and -current
Is there a way to see where the cpu time is spent when it isn't in userland
?
I took one of our affected systems and killed everything on it as well as
disabling pf.
bmr1.brh# ps aux
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME COMMAND
root 1 0.0 0.0 324 296 ??
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nlwrote:
It's worth trying to disable ichiic(4).
Cheers, giving it a go on a few of them.
/Tony
20 of these boxes running open and freebsd, so far all of the
openbsd boxes
display this behaviour using amd64, i386, sp and mp, 4.6 and various 4.7
snapshots.
I only see this on these specific supermicros. This happens on the devices
that don't
move any traffic as well.
Regards Tony
bmr0.mlt
I'd be looking at the state of your mbufs as well. man netstat
Thanks Aaron,
these systems are currently running with load very low. From one of the
boxes with
the problem:
bmr1.mlt# uptime
11:33AM up 13 days, 1:04, 1 user, load averages: 0.15, 0.17, 0.11
bmr1.mlt# netstat -m
102 mbufs in
Dan Naumov wrote:
... I can only suggest therapy, it works
for millions of people.
That explains the state of Information Technology.
I'll take the code, snide remarks and all. Thanks.
Good morning misc,
I upgraded two devices from i386-4.6 to i386-snapshot-feb28.
After the upgrade snapshot boxes are unable to communicate with the 4.6
devices
when going through ipsec. snapshot-snapshot works fine.
Everything looks ok except that nothing shows up on enc0 when doing
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.orgwrote:
On 2010-03-01, Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org wrote:
Good morning misc,
I upgraded two devices from i386-4.6 to i386-snapshot-feb28.
After the upgrade snapshot boxes are unable to communicate with the 4.6
Noah McNallie wrote:
please read latest post
Doesn't get any lazier than that.
rhubbell wrote:
Another sensitive type. Guess there are always a few on every list.
As distinguished from insensitive twerps like yourself.
Sorry for top-posting, but please: Disk sectors start with 1 (unless you are
reformatting the entire track and something like Write Record zero still
exists)
On DOS-FORMATTED disks, the initial sector is at cylinder 0, head 0, sector 1,
and contains within the bootstrap loader what DOS and Windows
Nice Daemon wrote:
[nothing of interest]
[nothing but bad gas]
about 23 times worse than CO2.
Amazing how the nicknames are what one should be as opposed to what one is.
There are a few exceptions, but not this idiot who cannot tell the
difference between a cup holder and a disk drive.
Nice Daemon wrote:
No, I'm certainly not stupid.
Invariably the mark of someone who IS stupid.
Longer version.
If I am not stupid then I can say something intelligent to make the point.
If the only thing I can come up with it to say I am not stupid, then that
implies at least a total lack of
:55 AM
To: t...@servacorp.com.
Cc: Claudio Jeker; misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Bind ntpd on certain interface?
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Tony Aberenthy
t...@servacorp.com wrote:
Nice Daemon wrote:
No, I'm certainly not stupid.
Invariably the mark of someone who IS stupid
@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Bind ntpd on certain interface?
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Tony Aberenthy
t...@servacorp.com wrote:
Nice Daemon wrote:
No, I'm certainly not stupid.
Invariably the mark of someone who IS stupid.
Longer version.
If I am not stupid then I can say something
I'm very sorry do disappoint you, but I'd have found it (on
my own). But it's nice of you to underestimate other people,
as it fits in your role model. I don't mind.
Then why didn't you? (find it on your own)
The developers seem to have a rather precise idea of their own
Competence and the
I've managed by myself so far
That's the wierdest idea of by myself I've ever seen.
Go back to your cup holder.
Nick Bender wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:08 PM, PJaf.gour...@videotron.ca wrote:
Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
Once you've cleared that hurdle, It would help a lot with
more details
about the hardware, what image file you are using and where it came
from (ie is it the i386 one, the
Anathae Townsend wrote:
I am currently trying to open up a few ports on my firewall
to allow an
internal
windows home server to provide services to the outside world.
My OpenBSD version is OpenBSD 4.5-current (GENERIC) #6: Sat
May 16 21:50:41
MDT 2009
I am trying to use the simple
Sergey Yudin wrote:
Please can someone tell why disk geometry changed after install
in installation time on empty sd0:
Disk: sd0 geometry: 78753/2/911 [143638992 Sectors]
I don't know what that is, or where it came from,
but I don't think any 80386-type pc-BIOS could handle that
Eric d'Alibut
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Kenneth R
Westerbackkwesterb...@rogers.com wrote:
Try floppyB or bsd.rd or cdrom. You are probably missing the driver
for your scsi card. Kinda hard to tell since you have provided no
information.
I am booting with teh same floppy I
Jan Stary wrote:
This is 4.5 trying to create a FAT partition
on an external (USB) 80G disk.
snip
Also, why does disklabel say '16 partitions'?
Thanks
Jan
fdisk plays with DOS (windows) partitions. There are 4 of them.
disklabel plays with OpenBSD partitions.
101 - 200 of 672 matches
Mail list logo
