Arrived yesterday to me in Brazil, Rio...
2014-10-30 22:01 GMT-02:00 Fish Kungfu jamescass...@gmail.com:
5.6 CD's arrived today in Greenville, South Carolina!
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Carlin Bingham c...@viennan.net wrote:
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, at 10:32 AM, Richard Toohey wrote:
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, at 10:32 AM, Richard Toohey wrote:
On 10/30/14 07:26, Zé Loff wrote:
Sighted on my mailbox today, in Lisbon, Portugal.
Arrived today in Tauranga, New Zealand.
Arrived today in the other half of New Zealand (Chistchurch).
--
Carlin
5.6 CD's arrived today in Greenville, South Carolina!
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Carlin Bingham c...@viennan.net wrote:
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, at 10:32 AM, Richard Toohey wrote:
On 10/30/14 07:26, Zé Loff wrote:
Sighted on my mailbox today, in Lisbon, Portugal.
Arrived today in
Hi Oliver,
On 10/28/14 14:23, Oliver Peter wrote:
If the difference between release and snapshot is too confusing for
you, you should probably just stay with release. If you need releases
on time you should order a CD set next time.
Of course I understand that there is a difference
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 04:54:26PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Hi Oliver,
On 10/28/14 14:23, Oliver Peter wrote:
If the difference between release and snapshot is too confusing for
you, you should probably just stay with release. If you need releases
on time you should order a CD set
Harald Dunkel wrote
Hopefully you agree that the file name snapshots/amd64/install56.iso
is misleading? Looking at the file name I had assumed/hoped there is some
kind of upgrade path from the install56.iso snapshot to the 5.6 release.
Who is being misled?
(from an outsider)
The overriding
Hopefully you agree that the file name snapshots/amd64/install56.iso
is misleading? Looking at the file name I had assumed/hoped there is some
kind of upgrade path from the install56.iso snapshot to the 5.6 release.
My mistake.
It is not misleading in any way.
Those two digits are looked at by
5.6 arrived today in syracuse, new york. right on time, just as usual. :)
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
Hopefully you agree that the file name snapshots/amd64/install56.iso
is misleading? Looking at the file name I had assumed/hoped there is some
Hopefully you agree that the file name snapshots/amd64/install56.iso
is misleading? Looking at the file name I had assumed/hoped there is some
kind of upgrade path from the install56.iso snapshot to the 5.6 release.
My mistake.
As I understand it, the releases do not necessarily correspond
On 10/29/14 18:04, ian kremlin wrote:
5.6 arrived today in syracuse, new york. right on time, just as usual. :)
It arrived yesterday in Schweinfurt, Germany. This time the seal was
not broken :-).
-peter
Sighted on my mailbox today, in Lisbon, Portugal.
As always, special thanks to all the developers for yet another
consistent and straight on schedule release.
fanboy
I'd just like to add that for the past year (at least) it has been
amazing to watch the project take some big (and some not so big
On 10/30/14 07:26, Zé Loff wrote:
Sighted on my mailbox today, in Lisbon, Portugal.
Arrived today in Tauranga, New Zealand.
On 10/27/14 20:19, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Major differences.
The snapshot code is -current. That includes commits from only a few
hours earlier. From time to time, it also contains changes which are
not yet commited.
If I got you correctly the current install56.iso from the
snapshots
On 10/28/14 20:52, Harald Dunkel wrote:
I would suggest to increase the version information in the
snapshot file names as soon as the release tag is attached and
the -stable branch is created. This could help to avoid a lot
of confusion.
You get your asbestos pants on, and I'll get myself
On 10/28/14 09:02, Richard Toohey wrote:
You get your asbestos pants on, and I'll get myself some popcorn.
I didn't mean any offense.
Thanx for the heads-up
Harri
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 08:52:24AM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
On 10/27/14 20:19, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Major differences.
The snapshot code is -current. That includes commits from only a few
hours earlier. From time to time, it also contains changes which are
not yet commited.
On 10/27/14 20:19, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Major differences.
The snapshot code is -current. That includes commits from only a few
hours earlier. From time to time, it also contains changes which are
not yet commited.
If I got you correctly the current install56.iso from the
snapshots
Theo de Raadt said:
Oh, you want us to call the snapshots 57, instead?
How will that enligthen people?
FWIW naming snapshots after release they lead to is more helpful then
naming them after previous release that does not include some of their
code.
--
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
As a release engineer, the numbering convention of the snapshots does seem
confusing to me at first. But if it works for the project, that's what's
important.
And as Theo brought up, numbering them 57 snapshots doesn't fix anything.
It just changes the confusion. Instead of you asking if the 56
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 08:13:51PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
On 10/27/14 19:44, Theo de Raadt wrote:
How is the current install56.iso in pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/amd64/ on
the mirrors related to the shipped 5.6 CDs?
From the ftp site:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 58741116 Oct 27
trondd said:
And as Theo brought up, numbering them 57 snapshots doesn't fix anything.
It just changes the confusion. Instead of you asking if the 56 snapshot
was close to the 56 release version, we'd have someone asking if the 57
snapshot they see is close to the 57 release that won't be cut
Hi folks,
How is the current install56.iso in pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/amd64/ on
the mirrors related to the shipped 5.6 CDs?
Regards
Harri
How is the current install56.iso in pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/amd64/ on
the mirrors related to the shipped 5.6 CDs?
From the ftp site:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 58741116 Oct 27 01:42 base56.tgz
That is around 11 hours ago. Probably a bit newer than what people
will find on their CDs.
On 10/27/14 19:44, Theo de Raadt wrote:
How is the current install56.iso in pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/amd64/ on
the mirrors related to the shipped 5.6 CDs?
From the ftp site:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 58741116 Oct 27 01:42 base56.tgz
That is around 11 hours ago. Probably a bit newer
On 10/27/14 19:44, Theo de Raadt wrote:
How is the current install56.iso in pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/amd64/ on
the mirrors related to the shipped 5.6 CDs?
From the ftp site:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 58741116 Oct 27 01:42 base56.tgz
That is around 11 hours ago. Probably a bit newer
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:21:15 +0100, Maurice McCarthy wrote:
OpenBSD 5.6 arrived Swansea UK today, 24 Oct 2014.
Arrived north of Chicago IL, USA on 27 Oct 2014
On new website looked at shipping address during order and realized a
couple things needed to be rearranged to make things look US
OpenBSD 5.6 arrived Swansea UK today, 24 Oct 2014.
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:21:15 +0100
Maurice McCarthy m...@mythic-beasts.com wrote:
OpenBSD 5.6 arrived Swansea UK today, 24 Oct 2014.
So does this mean I should download and install 5.6 to power my
OpenBSD/pf firewall/NAT/router?
SteveT
Steve Litt* http
sl...@troubleshooters.com (Steve Litt), 2014.10.24 (Fri) 17:41 (CEST):
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:21:15 +0100
Maurice McCarthy m...@mythic-beasts.com wrote:
OpenBSD 5.6 arrived Swansea UK today, 24 Oct 2014.
So does this mean I should download and install 5.6 to power my
OpenBSD/pf
sl...@troubleshooters.com (Steve Litt), 2014.10.24 (Fri) 17:41 (CEST):
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:21:15 +0100
Maurice McCarthy m...@mythic-beasts.com wrote:
OpenBSD 5.6 arrived Swansea UK today, 24 Oct 2014.
So does this mean I should download and install 5.6 to power my
OpenBSD/pf
30 matches
Mail list logo
