very Well expressed ...
On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 07:48 -0500, Carson Chittom wrote:
> Daniel Villarreal writes:
>
> > I have to reconsider if I will ever buy another set of [Theo's] software, or
> > continue to use it.
>
> Quit whining. Seriously, you're making us Americans look bad.
>
> I like
Is it just me, or is there a certain irony between the statement:
> And less chest thumping "we are the greatest rah rah rah" idjits would be good
> too
and this auto-sig:
> Sent from my iPhone
did anyone else here the *thump* *thump* *thump*?
Or is that just a left-over ringing in my ears from
On 27 August 2011 06:09, Rob Payne wrote:
> Chris, feel free to get out of the US. We do not need any apologists
> here. The free world would not be so without us.
Discouraging expression of ideas that don't toe the Party line sounds
rather like one of the USA's old enemies...
One can certainl
process- It is a
committee and not a democracy.
--- On Fri, 8/26/11, Theo de Raadt wrote:
From: Theo de Raadt
Subject: Re: CDDL vs GPL and maybe some implications for BSD?
To: "Amit Kulkarni"
Cc: "Nick Holland" , misc@openbsd.org
Date: Friday, August 26, 2011, 2:57 AM
And less chest thumping "we are the greatest rah rah rah" idjits would be good
too
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 26, 2011, at 6:54 PM, ropers wrote:
> On 26 August 2011 22:09, Rob Payne wrote:
>> Chris, feel free to get out of the US. We do not need any apologists
>> here.
>
> Apologists, eh?
>
On 26 August 2011 22:09, Rob Payne wrote:
> Chris, feel free to get out of the US. We do not need any apologists
> here.
Apologists, eh?
You keep using that word... ;-P
That said, I completely agree. The last thing the US in its current
state needs is apologists.
Chris, feel free to get out of the US. We do not need any apologists
here. The free world would not be so without us. Theo can adopt any
policy he wishes in his British Commonwealth. No one gives a rat's
ass. If his product is useful, I'll buy it. OpenBSD continues in spite
of Theo's 'leaders
On 8/26/2011 6:01 AM, Chris Bennett wrote:
I have to support Theo on this. I am also an American.
Have you noticed OpenBSD's policy on crypto work?
No Americans due to fucked up US laws, not even if they live outside of US.
Have you noticed a while back that Theo was looking for Hackathon sites
What you mean snow ? Europe is more than Sweden and Norway!
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Carson Chittom wrote:
> Daniel Villarreal writes:
>
>> I have to reconsider if I will ever buy another set of [Theo's] software,
or
>> continue to use it.
>
> Quit whining. Seriously, you're making us A
I have to support Theo on this. I am also an American.
Have you noticed OpenBSD's policy on crypto work?
No Americans due to fucked up US laws, not even if they live outside of US.
Have you noticed a while back that Theo was looking for Hackathon sites and
said no US sites?
Have you noticed worl
Daniel Villarreal writes:
> I have to reconsider if I will ever buy another set of [Theo's] software, or
> continue to use it.
Quit whining. Seriously, you're making us Americans look bad.
I like being an American, and specifically one from the southeast US.
There is exactly zero chance that I
Theo, I call you on it. I'm American. I have an American perspective. I
basically earn minimum wage in Canada, but I take pride in my work because
my Dad taught me to. Dad was in the USN. I am trying to teach my son what my
Dad taught me.
I have to reconsider if I will ever buy another set of your
> I don't think Free and Net learnt anything from the old Unix lawsuit,
> the whole unpleasantness of it.
Their group is largely American; and when not in location they are so
in perspective. Why would they have learned anything?
Shall I keep it short? They are simplistic retards, not because t
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Theo de Raadt
wrote:
>> yeah, you gotta wonder about that.
>> No, really, you don't.
>> Those that tell you it is about "Freedom" are mostly full of shit.
>> It's about "it didn't cost me anything" to most of them.
>
> We've got an entire operating system which is
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Steve Shockley
wrote:
> On 8/23/2011 11:17 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>>
>> Who are these "ZFS and dtrace" people? Are they HFT programmers? B I
>> really don't know. B Do they help the project? B I can assure you that
>> they do not.
>
> Perhaps they want to use dtr
On 8/23/2011 11:17 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Who are these "ZFS and dtrace" people? Are they HFT programmers? I
really don't know. Do they help the project? I can assure you that
they do not.
Perhaps they want to use dtrace to find out where their ZFS data went...
> yeah, you gotta wonder about that.
> No, really, you don't.
> Those that tell you it is about "Freedom" are mostly full of shit.
> It's about "it didn't cost me anything" to most of them.
We've got an entire operating system which is completely free as a
base; besides that, a shrinking set of GP
On 08/23/11 12:17, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
...
> OpenBSD is really clear about its policy, but do you think that it's
> really possible to port stuff this way and made it available as
> module without need for change of license or worrying about shark
> suits?
"porting" stuff isn't the issue, usually
martian67 [martia...@gmail.com] wrote:
>
> It is extremely clear, no non-ISC licensed/similarly licensed
> software will be imported into base. Peroid.
I don't know about that. Quite a bit of GPL software is now being incorporated
into the base tree. In fact, Theo is almost finished importing
On 8/23/2011 10:17 AM, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
Hi all,
as some of you maybe know there's new player on OS market called
http://smartos.org . What's starting to be interesting is their "port"
of KVM to Solaris code base which is used as a kernel module.
Bryan Cantrill didn't talk much about licenses
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 06:17:53PM +0200, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> as some of you maybe know there's new player on OS market called
> http://smartos.org . What's starting to be interesting is their "port"
> of KVM to Solaris code base which is used as a kernel module.
>
> Bryan Cantrill
Hi all,
as some of you maybe know there's new player on OS market called
http://smartos.org . What's starting to be interesting is their "port"
of KVM to Solaris code base which is used as a kernel module.
Bryan Cantrill didn't talk much about licenses in his paper
http://www.linux-kvm.org/wiki/i
22 matches
Mail list logo
