Re: Kernel Panic on 6th March i386 build

2009-03-09 Thread Daniel Ouellet
Stefan Sperling wrote: On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 06:29:22PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote: Claudio Jeker wrote: Fell free to disagree, that's fair. Sorry, I don't get it a non-developer tries to educate a developer about how kernel crashes should be reported? Sorry most of your standpoints are

Re: Kernel Panic on 6th March i386 build

2009-03-09 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi All, On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 18:01:50 +0700, FRLinux frli...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Daniel Ouellet dan...@presscom.net wrote: I was clearly out of place. Same to you Steph, I shouldn't have reacted so quickly to your email address and have wrongly concluded to an

Re: Kernel Panic on 6th March i386 build

2009-03-09 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Daniel and Misc@, On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 06:29:22 +0700, Daniel Ouellet dan...@presscom.net wrote: Claudio Jeker wrote: Fell free to disagree, that's fair. Sorry, I don't get it a non-developer tries to educate a developer about how kernel crashes should be reported? Sorry most of your

Re: Kernel Panic on 6th March i386 build

2009-03-08 Thread FRLinux
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Daniel Ouellet dan...@presscom.net wrote: I was clearly out of place. Same to you Steph, I shouldn't have reacted so quickly to your email address and have wrongly concluded to an other Linux quick miss place question, or reaction. What I've learned from this

Re: Kernel Panic on 6th March i386 build

2009-03-08 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 06:29:22PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote: Claudio Jeker wrote: Fell free to disagree, that's fair. Sorry, I don't get it a non-developer tries to educate a developer about how kernel crashes should be reported? Sorry most of your standpoints are just wrong. Sure people

Re: Kernel Panic on 6th March i386 build

2009-03-07 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Fri, 06 Mar 2009 20:58:08 -0500 Daniel Ouellet dan...@presscom.net wrote: Fell free to disagree, that's fair. Best, Daniel With all due respect Daniel, I disagree, and I think you've misread things a bit. The original poster, Insan Praja, stated he had a panic with both a GENERIC kernel,

Re: Kernel Panic on 6th March i386 build

2009-03-07 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 08:58:08PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote: Stefan Sperling wrote: And note that there have recently been changes in the way pf keeps track of icmp, so this may well be a valid report. Could sure be I give you that. However, still true that snapshot is the way to go and

Re: Kernel Panic on 6th March i386 build

2009-03-07 Thread FRLinux
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Robert rob...@openbsd.pap.st wrote: Wrong. Reporting problems with kernels built from unmodified source is fine. Appologies, I stant corrected. Steph

Re: Kernel Panic on 6th March i386 build

2009-03-07 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Claudio and Misc@, On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 14:35:30 +0700, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 08:58:08PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote: Stefan Sperling wrote: On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:07:00PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote: Insan Praja SW wrote: Hi, On Sat,

Re: Kernel Panic on 6th March i386 build

2009-03-07 Thread Daniel Ouellet
Claudio Jeker wrote: Fell free to disagree, that's fair. Sorry, I don't get it a non-developer tries to educate a developer about how kernel crashes should be reported? Sorry most of your standpoints are just wrong. Sure people are encuraged to run snapshot kernels but selfbuilt kernels are

Re: Kernel Panic on 6th March i386 build

2009-03-06 Thread FRLinux
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Insan Praja SW insan.pr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Misc@, on a i386 kernel recent build (6th march), I got panic. It says: Hello, As far as I know, home built kernel is not supported, you need to try out a snapshot instead and see if it works. Cheers, Steph

Re: Kernel Panic on 6th March i386 build

2009-03-06 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi, On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 03:17:57 +0700, FRLinux frli...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Insan Praja SW insan.pr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Misc@, on a i386 kernel recent build (6th march), I got panic. It says: Hello, As far as I know, home built kernel is not supported, you

Re: Kernel Panic on 6th March i386 build

2009-03-06 Thread Robert
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009 20:17:57 + FRLinux frli...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, As far as I know, home built kernel is not supported, you need to try out a snapshot instead and see if it works. Cheers, Steph Wrong. Reporting problems with kernels built from unmodified source is fine. -

Re: Kernel Panic on 6th March i386 build

2009-03-06 Thread Daniel Ouellet
Insan Praja SW wrote: Hi, On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 03:17:57 +0700, FRLinux frli...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Insan Praja SW insan.pr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Misc@, on a i386 kernel recent build (6th march), I got panic. It says: Hello, As far as I know, home built kernel

Re: Kernel Panic on 6th March i386 build

2009-03-06 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:07:00PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote: Insan Praja SW wrote: Hi, On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 03:17:57 +0700, FRLinux frli...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Insan Praja SW insan.pr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Misc@, on a i386 kernel recent build (6th march), I

Re: Kernel Panic on 6th March i386 build

2009-03-06 Thread Daniel Ouellet
Stefan Sperling wrote: On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:07:00PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote: Insan Praja SW wrote: Hi, On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 03:17:57 +0700, FRLinux frli...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Insan Praja SW insan.pr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Misc@, on a i386 kernel recent

Re: Kernel Panic on 6th March i386 build

2009-03-06 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 08:58:08PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote: Stefan Sperling wrote: On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:07:00PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote: Insan Praja SW wrote: Hi, On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 03:17:57 +0700, FRLinux frli...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Insan Praja